From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Anholt Subject: Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:05:25 -0800 Message-ID: <1234911925.9844.89.camel@gaiman> References: <20090215134347.GB21670@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZYRDkFtZKrrDGwk61+4W" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090215134347.GB21670-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: To: Matthew Garrett Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Len Brown , Nico Schottelius --=-ZYRDkFtZKrrDGwk61+4W Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 13:43 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >=20 > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me kno= w > > (either way). >=20 > I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed? I haven't done anything in the area of brightness control. --=20 Eric Anholt eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org eric.anholt-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org --=-ZYRDkFtZKrrDGwk61+4W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmbQrUACgkQHUdvYGzw6vfToQCgke6csFpyf3QtChdAfNXpqrAb RYEAni5ioUMT2PYh1zeKZHth7xCHpcVf =JTxd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZYRDkFtZKrrDGwk61+4W--