From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:38:30 +1100 Message-ID: <1235032710.8805.37.camel@pasglop> References: <878wognj00.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> <200902142342.59186.rjw@sisk.pl> <87hc2u26m5.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> <1234775410.26036.122.camel@pasglop> <87d4di1wwr.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> <87r61uzv95.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87r61uzv95.fsf-D7l3p2TGOOdLdt5/z87VRY6ehsQQaF5K@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Paul Collins Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 21:27 +1300, Paul Collins wrote: > > Just for laughs I slapped together the following, which seems to do > the > > job, although not especially tidily. > > And it doesn't even do the job. Judging by this new trace, submitting > input events from the via-pmu resume function is still too early. > What's up Thomas ? We can't call gettimeofday() from a sysdev suspend/resume ? That's a little bit too harsh no ? Cheers, Ben.