From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:46:32 +1100 Message-ID: <1235335592.8805.214.camel@pasglop> References: <878wognj00.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> <200902142342.59186.rjw@sisk.pl> <87hc2u26m5.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> <1234775410.26036.122.camel@pasglop> <87d4di1wwr.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> <87r61uzv95.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> <1235032710.8805.37.camel@pasglop> <1235080303.8805.50.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Paul Collins , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Ingo Molnar On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 20:31 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > We had problems in the past where we just returned frozen time and the > calling code got surprised when the time jumped 5 hours ahead just a > few microseconds later. > > What I find more fishy is the fact that the lid switch needs to be a > sysdev. It's a simple input event, which causes the user space code to > trigger the suspend sequence when the lid is shut. > Well, the PMU is a sysdev for lots of good reasons.. then it -also- happens to provide us with the lid switch event. I'm a bit surprised by the explanation about the code that is surprised to see the time jump. IE. Code -will- see the time jump anyway. IE. I don't see how making gtod blow instead of returning a frozen time will make any difference whatsoever for code who get the time some time before suspend and then some time after resume and see a 5 hours gap... Cheers, Ben.