From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian McMenamin Subject: Re: [Bug #13069] regression in 2.6.29-git3 on SH/Dreamcast Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 11:38:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1242556715.4568.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1240594638.4777.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <84144f020905170112l789e9ec0p2bf6bb71879579e1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <84144f020905170112l789e9ec0p2bf6bb71879579e1@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Pekka Enberg Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Manuel Lauss On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 11:12 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >> of recent regressions. > >> > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > >> (either way). > >> > >> > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13069 > >> Subject : regression in 2.6.29-git3 on SH/Dreamcast > >> Submitter : Adrian McMenamin > >> Date : 2009-03-29 19:04 (19 days old) > >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123835353115372&w=4 > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Adrian McMenamin > wrote: > > At this point it *looks* as though it was simply a question of > > insufficient memory to boot, but I think it needs further testing. > > Nobody else seems to have picked it up though. > > Yeah, it looks like there's not enough memory to boot. It could well > be that the kernel memory footprint got bigger but I don't think the > bisected commit is at fault here. Perhaps we should just close the > bug? I think that is probably the best course of action for now, yes.