From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:19:57 +1000 Message-ID: <1244071197.27194.39.camel@pasglop> References: <4to6E2myxvG.A.muC.aIbIKB@chimera> <200906032210.54854.rjw@sisk.pl> <1244067926.27194.35.camel@pasglop> <200906040100.35254.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200906040100.35254.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Johannes Berg , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Jan Scholz On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 01:00 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > I'll try to tackle the trackpad problem. > > Perhaps the VIA-PMU interrupt shouldn't be disabled in > suspend_device_irqs()? Possibly, but then we did use to have all interrupts disabled at some stage before going to suspend_late anyway no ? So it shouldn't make a big difference. The VIA interrupt must not be HW masked in the PIC on some machines because it's the wakeup source, so we may have to force re-enable it since it can be lazy-disabled, but those aren't the machines with the trackpad problem so I think I'll need to have a closer look at what's going on and get my head around it. Haven't had a chance yet, hopefully today or tomorrow. Ben.