From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2) Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:52:37 -0700 Message-ID: <1246906357.11545.49.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090703000829.735976000@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090703000829.735976000-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Dave Jones Cc: "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "cpufreq-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dave Young , Pekka Enberg , Mathieu Desnoyers , Thomas Renninger On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:08 -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there have been > multiple reports of lockdep issues in cpufreq. Patch series takes care of > these problems. > > This is the next attempt following the one here, which was not a complete fix. > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0906.3/01073.html > > I am currently running some stress tests to make sure there are no issues with > these patches. But, wanted to send them out for review/comments/testing > before I head out for the long weekend. > > If this patchset seems sane, the first patch in the patchset should also get > into 30.stable. > Just an update. I ran some stress test on few of my test machines over the long weekend and havent seen any issues with this patchset. Thanks, Venki