From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Paris Subject: Re: [Bug #13845] inotify regression, missing events Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:15:02 -0400 Message-ID: <1248812102.15671.0.camel@localhost> References: <3zAHs5O6maO.A.ATB.-GObKB@chimera> <1248683738.22308.0.camel@quest> <200907280052.44653.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200907280052.44653.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Scott James Remnant , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 00:52 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday 27 July 2009, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:28 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > of recent regressions. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > > (either way). > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13845 > > > Subject : inotify regression, missing events > > > Submitter : Scott James Remnant > > > Date : 2009-07-11 16:02 (16 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124732816314881&w=4 > > > Handled-By : Eric Paris > > > > > This patch hasn't found its way into Linus' tree yet, so it's definitely > > still an issue and should be listed. > > Thanks for the update Looks like it was pulled into Linus's tree last night if you would like to test and verify. -Eric