From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [Bug #14621] specjbb2005 and aim7 regression with 2.6.32-rc kernels Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:05:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1263193528.6444.21.camel@marge.simson.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Gautham R Shenoy , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "Zhang, Yanmin" On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14621 > Subject : specjbb2005 and aim7 regression with 2.6.32-rc kernels > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin > Date : 2009-11-06 7:38 (66 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125749310413174&w=4 FWIW, I couldn't reproduce the aim7 regression with my one little disk, the opposite in fact, attributable to cfq low_latency switch. (don't have specjbb2005, can't try to reproduce that one) -Mike