From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [Bug #39342] [3.0.0-rc6-git7] possible recursive locking atcache_alloc_refill Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:54:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1314003262.24275.2.camel@twins> References: <201108150736.FFC69227.MQSJVFHFFOOOtL@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Tetsuo Handa , rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, florian-sVu6HhrpSfRAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 08:46 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Tetsuo Handa > wrote: > > Pekka Enberg wrote: > >> Tetsuio, did Peter's commit 30765b9 ("slab, lockdep: Annotate the locks > >> before using them") and commit 83835b3 ("slab, lockdep: Annotate slab -> > >> rcu -> debug_object -> slab") in Linus' git fix this for you? > > > > Yes. Applying these two commits fixes this problem. > > > > Thank you. > > The commits weren't tagged for -stable, I'm afraid. Peter? I must have forgotten people were actually triggering this on 3.0. Feel free to tell gregkh to include those two patches in his next 3.0-stable lineup.