kernel-testers.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17: early crash on x86-64
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:06:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807180106.08328.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080718012842.690b8346.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thursday, 17 of July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since next-20080716:
> 
> Temporarily dropped tree: ttydev (it gets too many patch failures).
> 
> Changed trees: the security-testing tree was moved later in the merge in
> anticipation of majo merge problems that have been delayed.
> 	The vfs tree changed branch names.
> 
> Most of the differences were conflicts moving from tree to tree as some
> of the trees are now merged into Linus' tree.  Most have been inflicted
> on the driver-core and usb trees.  I have not notified these separately.
> 
> Because of the moving of conflicts around it is difficult to tell when
> they are going away (though I assume some are).
> 
> The driver-core tree gained two build fixes from the scsi tree (since
> that went into Linus' tree).
> 
> The usb tree gained a conflict from the firmware tree (ditto).
> 
> The x86 tree gained an expected conflict against the stackprotector and a
> build failure that required a revert of a commit.
> 
> The pci tree needed another build fix patch.
> 
> The ide tree had more conflicts with its parts that have been merged into
> Linus' tree.
> 
> The acpi had various merge problems - maybe because I am pulling a
> different tree than what was merged into Linus' tree.
> 
> The galak tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
> 
> The ubifs tree also had merge problems because a different version was
> sent to Linus.
> 
> I have also applied the following patches for known problems:
> 
> 	sparc64: sysdev API change fallout
> 
> This tree fails to build for ARCH=sparc (i.e. 32bit) with a 64bit gcc
> v3.4.5 - it tries to use the 64bit header files.  This may be an artifact
> of one of my merge fixups, but I don't actually think so.

This one crashes all of my x86-64 test boxes early during boot.

The Linus' tree is not affected.

Failing configs:
http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/debug/next/20080717/HPC_nx6325-config
http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/debug/next/20080717/M3A32-MVP-config

It's not very likely that I'll be able to bisect this issue before OLS, so most
probably I won't be testing linux-next in the next several days.

Thanks,
Rafael

       reply	other threads:[~2008-07-17 23:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20080718012842.690b8346.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2008-07-17 23:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-07-18 13:52   ` linux-next: Tree for July 17: early crash on x86-64 Alexander Beregalov
2008-07-19  3:52     ` Al Viro
     [not found]       ` <20080719035231.GU28946-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-19 18:42         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-19 19:54           ` James Morris
     [not found]             ` <Xine.LNX.4.64.0807200553380.22632-RC8Ws/H8zzudju81dFSl6rpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-20  9:42               ` BUG at security/selinux/avc.c:883 (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17: early crash on x86-64) Thomas Meyer
2008-07-20 12:15                 ` Al Viro
2008-07-28 17:32                   ` Stephen Smalley
     [not found]                     ` <1217266358.20373.54.camel-/ugcdrsPCSfIm9DtXLC9OUVfdvkotuLY+aIohriVLy8@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-28 21:38                       ` James Morris
     [not found]                         ` <Xine.LNX.4.64.0807290736440.30242-RC8Ws/H8zzudju81dFSl6rpzq4S04n8Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-29  0:33                           ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200807180106.08328.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).