Re: [regression?] usb: new errors during device detection

[Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>]

On Sunday 03 August 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 10:11:21PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > +usb 3-1: new low speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
> >  ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 5
> >  ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00, driver 10 Dec
> > 2004 usb usb5: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> >  hub 5-0:1.0: USB hub found
> > -usb 3-1: new low speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
> > +usb 3-1: device not accepting address 2, error -71
> > +hub 3-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 1
>
> what is this device attached to this port ?

Eh, that info is already trivially available from my original mail:
 uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3
[...]
 input: USB Compliant Keyboard as /class/input/input0
 input: USB HID v1.10 Keyboard [USB Compliant Keyboard] on usb-0000:00:1d.2-1
 input: USB Compliant Keyboard as /class/input/input1
 input: USB HID v1.10 Device [USB Compliant Keyboard] on usb-0000:00:1d.2-1

> Do you have the device attached before turning on the machine ?

Yes, obviously the keyboard is attached during boot (and has been connected
to the same USB port basically since I first installed the machine...).

> Does it happen if you boot without that device attached and attach
> it afterwards ?

No idea. I could try this I guess if it will really provide useful info.
Somehow I doubt that in this case.

> Can you please enable CONFIG_USB_DEBUG and resend dmesg output ?

Will include that in my reply to Alan's mail.

Cheers,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html