From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc4-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080827.154343.18918939.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080827230828.4285022b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org Cc: alan-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org, petero2-zq6IREYz3ykAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org, alan-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, bunk-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, protasnb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:38:16 -0700 (PDT) > Btw, why is unlocked_ioctl returning "long"? Does anybody depend on that > too? That's another difference between the "unlocked" and the traditional > version.. The return values want to be "long" sign extended all the way back down to syscall dispatch, I think this is just an effort to add some consistency here so that the int --> long extension eventually can be eliminated once unlocked_ioctl is the only case left.