From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [Bug #11438] Upcoming oops in lockdep Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:01:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20080831210115.4fdff99f@infradead.org> References: <1220132205.8426.40.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1220132205.8426.40.camel@twins> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:36:45 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 21:50 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11438 > > Subject : Upcoming oops in lockdep > > Submitter : Arjan van de Ven > > Date : 2008-08-23 20:49 (8 days old) > > References : > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121952463613140&w=4 > > http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=mark_lock > > Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra > > as far as I'm concerned this has nothing to do with lockdep > > yeah the pattern increasing looks like a fedora special; eg the fedora utrace patches seem to be utter bust. As long as we keep utrace out of mainline we're fine ;-)