From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:24:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20080912152443.c4e59f42.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: James Morris Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 08:14:10 +1000 (EST) James Morris wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > Submitter : Andrew Morton > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > this seen with? > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64.