From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:01:57 +0400 Message-ID: <20080922060157.GA7663@localhost> References: <7lIhZC4hCxE.A.zJH.p0q1IB@albercik> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ByxPVhll6b4VGNvS3zYiXzCj9E7zSytkU50Pa1DPKUc=; b=SV5PmLmiEyr42HOG01BHQILx3kycTisDiVKUo4R62eWvz16CvdvPnt7RZFUakVVISd 8X0aQN8WqiX3/mvYlOHyT1OTIA1xwKt9yvnxHvTGVSoateMNoHlbrVAuRzMEeyD9ON/0 YHerl3GBnTQ4OhgPHb69cTzKgLDnUWWvvzH0g= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7lIhZC4hCxE.A.zJH.p0q1IB@albercik> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Ingo Molnar , Joshua Hoblitt , Thomas Gleixner [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 08:54:19PM +0200] | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report | of recent regressions. | | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions | from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know | (either way). | | | Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 | Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? | Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt | Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (11 days old) | References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 | Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner | Cyrill Gorcunov | Ingo Molnar | | There are really multiple issues touched in report. nmi_watchdog hangs, rtc device creation, NULL deref... I've asked Joshua for more information. Since he must to use netdev tree for a while maybe we could wait 'till next merge window will be closed and check if nmi_watchdog does work. So the work in progress. - Cyrill -