* 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26
@ 2008-09-21 18:52 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:52 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (43 more replies)
0 siblings, 44 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.26, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.26, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2008-09-21 169 45 36
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11611
Subject : Commit 2344abbcbdb82140050e8be29d3d55e4f6fe860b breaks resume on nx6325
Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date : 2008-09-20 23:24 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122195277606974&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11610
Subject : Problem with kernel commit 664d080c41463570b95717b5ad86e79dc1be0877
Submitter : Michal 'vorner' Vaner <vorner@ucw.cz>
Date : 2008-09-21 17:35 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=122201853409501&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11609
Subject : oops in find_get_page
Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-20 14:53 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122192251101892&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608
Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11607
Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 =C2=A0Bug in tty_chars_in_buffer
Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-15 2:26 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122144565514490&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11590
Subject : Nokia 5310 Xpress usb-storage not mounting
Submitter : David Almaroad <dalmaroad@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-18 21:35 (4 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569
Subject : Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced
Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (20 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568
Subject : spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27
Submitter : Andy Wettstein <ajw1980@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-14 20:00 (8 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11551
Subject : Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6
Submitter : Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net>
Date : 2008-09-10 18:07 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107007407994&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11548
Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373!
Submitter : Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-09-08 14:26 (14 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122088566310440&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516
Subject : severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27= -rc5
Submitter : Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-07 13:59 (15 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (17 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506
Subject : oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5)
Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-04 19:14 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055573123449&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504
Subject : reiserfs =C2=A0BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11501
Subject : Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw
Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date : 2008-09-04 18:34 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055342419068&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476
Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4
Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465
Subject : Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Date : 2008-08-30 18:52 (23 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122012238925775&w=4
Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11459
Subject : kernel crash after wifi connection established
Submitter : Alexey Kuznetsov <ak@axet.ru>
Date : 2008-08-30 03:08 (23 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407
Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (32 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (32 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382
Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM
Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com>
Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (45 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4
Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380
Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (33 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11357
Subject : Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick
Submitter : uwe <kender@freenet.de>
Date : 2008-08-16 14:17 (37 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340
Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (40 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11335
Subject : 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-08-12 4:18 (41 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121851477201960&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/16/274
Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (42 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272
Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (48 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271
Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (48 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98
Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (46 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230
Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs
Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224
Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine.
Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (52 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
Subject : Screen stays black after resume
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (53 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215
Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (53 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
Subject : libata badness
Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (53 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4
Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (53 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11555
Subject : rmmod ide-cd_mod: tried to init an initialized =C2=A0object, something is s= eriously wrong.
Submitter : Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Date : 2008-07-16 2:22 (68 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=122061839713526&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095622602315&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11552
Subject : Disabling IRQ #23
Submitter : Justin Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-09 19:08 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098735230906&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107367715361&w=4
Handled-By : David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122187222705195&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550
Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4
Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098498125536&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549
Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup
Submitter : <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>
Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (20 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4
Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098180019264&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507
Subject : usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2008-08-26 21:03 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121977815018224&w=2
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg09735.html
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505
Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4
http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442
Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git
Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (28 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4
Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11439
Subject : [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings
Submitter : Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael@numericable.fr>
Date : 2008-08-26 9:37 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121974353815440&w=4
Handled-By : Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121976424221858&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237
Subject : corrupt PMD after resume
Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date : 2008-08-02 9:51 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121767073424952&w=4
Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122001615314700&w=2
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.26,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread* [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11210] libata badness Rafael J. Wysocki ` (42 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dhaval Giani, Miao Xie, Peter Zijlstra, Zhang, Yanmin This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207 Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Dhaval Giani <dhaval-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Miao Xie <miaox-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11210] libata badness 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:52 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Rafael J. Wysocki ` (41 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Kumar Gala This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Subject : libata badness Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4 Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:52 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11210] libata badness Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume Rafael J. Wysocki ` (40 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Peter Zijlstra, Zdenek Kabelac This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-30 22:25 ` Pavel Machek 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Rafael J. Wysocki ` (39 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Nico Schottelius This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Subject : Screen stays black after resume Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-30 22:25 ` Pavel Machek 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Pavel Machek @ 2008-09-30 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Nico Schottelius On Sun 2008-09-21 20:54:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 > Subject : Screen stays black after resume > Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (53 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 This is actually three problems in one :-(. If you try to suspend with minimum config, will resume still take 30 seconds? Is the problem still there in 2.6.27-rc7? Is there chance to bisect it? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine Rafael J. Wysocki ` (38 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Josh Boyer This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (51 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine. 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD after resume Rafael J. Wysocki ` (37 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Jones This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224 Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (52 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD after resume 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Rafael J. Wysocki ` (36 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Jenkins, Hugh Dickins, Ingo Molnar, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, Jeremy Fitzhardinge This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Subject : corrupt PMD after resume Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins-cCz0Lq7MMjm9FHfhHBbuYA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-02 9:51 (51 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121767073424952&w=4 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122001615314700&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD after resume Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (35 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jean-Luc Coulon This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (46 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (7 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki ` (34 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jaswinder Singh This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (48 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (8 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 23:49 ` Randy Dunlap 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (33 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Hugh Dickins, Randy Dunlap This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11335 Subject : 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-12 4:18 (41 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121851477201960&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/16/274 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 23:49 ` Randy Dunlap 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2008-09-21 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Hugh Dickins Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > Let's drop it & I'll report if it happens again. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11335 > Subject : 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-08-12 4:18 (41 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121851477201960&w=4 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/16/274 > Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> -- ~Randy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (9 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (32 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Francois Romieu, Jaswinder Singh This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (48 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (10 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Rafael J. Wysocki ` (31 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christoph Lameter This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (42 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (11 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (30 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, uwe This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11357 Subject : Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Submitter : uwe <kender-KuiJ5kEpwI6ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-16 14:17 (37 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (12 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Rafael J. Wysocki ` (29 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380 Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (13 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Rafael J. Wysocki ` (28 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (40 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (14 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Rafael J. Wysocki ` (27 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, James Bottomley, Miller, Mike (OS Dev), rdunlap This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4 Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (15 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 23:51 ` David Miller 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki ` (26 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christopher Li, David Vrabel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4 Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 23:51 ` David Miller [not found] ` <20080921.165159.67476441.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-21 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0 Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:54:13 +0200 (CEST) > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 > Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM > Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (45 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4 > Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Fixed by: commit 78566fecbb12a7616ae9a88b2ffbc8062c4a89e3 Author: Christopher Li <chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date: Fri Sep 5 14:04:05 2008 -0700 e1000: prevent corruption of EEPROM/NVM Andrey reports e1000 corruption, and that a patch in vmware's ESX fixed it. The EEPROM corruption is triggered by concurrent access of the EEPROM read/write. Putting a lock around it solve the problem. [akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK to avoid confusing lockdep] Signed-off-by: Christopher Li <chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Reported-by: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar-JGs/UdohzUI@public.gmane.org> Cc: Zach Amsden <zach-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Cc: Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Cc: PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Cc: John Ronciak <john.ronciak-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080921.165159.67476441.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080921.165159.67476441.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-22 6:59 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <21d7e9970809212359y6876c405ub57dca3e9ee737e4-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-22 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:51 AM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> > Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:54:13 +0200 (CEST) > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 >> Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM >> Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org> >> Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (45 days old) >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4 >> Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > Fixed by: > > commit 78566fecbb12a7616ae9a88b2ffbc8062c4a89e3 > Author: Christopher Li <chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > Date: Fri Sep 5 14:04:05 2008 -0700 > > e1000: prevent corruption of EEPROM/NVM > > Andrey reports e1000 corruption, and that a patch in vmware's ESX fixed > it. > > The EEPROM corruption is triggered by concurrent access of the EEPROM > read/write. Putting a lock around it solve the problem. > Just noticed I replied to davem and not to everyone.. so I did some further hunting. Okay so e1000e seems to have a problem in this area, that this *DOESN'T* fix. I've reconstructed my boot timeline from message logs Sep 3rd, I booted rawhide kernel 2.6.27-0.290.rc5.fc10.i686 I suspended/resume a few times in between with no issues. Sep 8th I booted my own 2.6.27-rc5 kernel based from ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 This got a corrupted e1000e checksum and every kernel since has. Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <21d7e9970809212359y6876c405ub57dca3e9ee737e4-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809212359y6876c405ub57dca3e9ee737e4-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-22 7:01 ` David Miller 2008-09-22 22:15 ` Jiri Kosina 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-22 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:59:51 +1000 > I've reconstructed my boot timeline from message logs > > Sep 3rd, I booted rawhide kernel 2.6.27-0.290.rc5.fc10.i686 What upstream SHA1 is this based upon? > I suspended/resume a few times in between with no issues. > > Sep 8th I booted my own 2.6.27-rc5 kernel based from > ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 > > This got a corrupted e1000e checksum and every kernel since has. Ok. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809212359y6876c405ub57dca3e9ee737e4-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-22 7:01 ` David Miller @ 2008-09-22 22:15 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809230010460.27884-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-22 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie Cc: David Miller, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: > Sep 8th I booted my own 2.6.27-rc5 kernel based from > ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 > This got a corrupted e1000e checksum and every kernel since has. Have you restored the EEPROM contents after it got corrupted for the first time? Once the EEPROM contents get corrupted, the card will then be broken forever even on kernel that gets this fixed one day. This is pretty serious bug in fact, as it renders hardware of poor users unusable, and just patching kernel is then not enough to put things back to shape. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809230010460.27884-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809230010460.27884-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-22 22:28 ` David Miller [not found] ` <20080922.152815.22060684.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-22 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ Cc: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:15:08 +0200 (CEST) > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > Sep 8th I booted my own 2.6.27-rc5 kernel based from > > ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 > > This got a corrupted e1000e checksum and every kernel since has. > > Have you restored the EEPROM contents after it got corrupted for the first > time? > > Once the EEPROM contents get corrupted, the card will then be broken > forever even on kernel that gets this fixed one day. > > This is pretty serious bug in fact, as it renders hardware of poor users > unusable, and just patching kernel is then not enough to put things back > to shape. The top priority is to root cause this, so that we can stop the problem from happening as fast as possible, and I'm still waiting for the SHA1 ID that was used for the last kernel Dave booted before the problem occurred which is pretty damn critical for making forward progress here. It could even be some PCI or x86 layer change that caused the corruption, we don't even know yet. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080922.152815.22060684.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080922.152815.22060684.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-23 1:26 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <21d7e9970809221826i76081719pdd749237580fc68e-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-23 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 8:28 AM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:15:08 +0200 (CEST) > >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> > Sep 8th I booted my own 2.6.27-rc5 kernel based from >> > ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 >> > This got a corrupted e1000e checksum and every kernel since has. >> >> Have you restored the EEPROM contents after it got corrupted for the first >> time? >> >> Once the EEPROM contents get corrupted, the card will then be broken >> forever even on kernel that gets this fixed one day. >> >> This is pretty serious bug in fact, as it renders hardware of poor users >> unusable, and just patching kernel is then not enough to put things back >> to shape. > > The top priority is to root cause this, so that we can stop the > problem from happening as fast as possible, and I'm still waiting for > the SHA1 ID that was used for the last kernel Dave booted before the > problem occurred which is pretty damn critical for making forward > progress here. It was exactly 2.6.27-rc5 + Fedora at the time but we rarely touch these areas, most of the extra code is in other places, and since people are seeing it on !Fedora also I would assume it wasn't these. I think people have seen it on earlier kernels maybe but not sure. really Intel needs to get a fix of some sort out so we can repair the hw so we can root cause the probem. Dave. > > It could even be some PCI or x86 layer change that caused the corruption, > we don't even know yet. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <21d7e9970809221826i76081719pdd749237580fc68e-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809221826i76081719pdd749237580fc68e-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-23 1:59 ` David Miller [not found] ` <20080922.185902.80812984.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-23 1:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Cc: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:26:52 +1000 > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 8:28 AM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:15:08 +0200 (CEST) > > > >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> > >> > Sep 8th I booted my own 2.6.27-rc5 kernel based from > >> > ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 > >> > This got a corrupted e1000e checksum and every kernel since has. ... > It was exactly 2.6.27-rc5 + Fedora at the time but we rarely touch > these areas, most of the extra code is in other places, and since > people are seeing it on !Fedora > also I would assume it wasn't these. > > I think people have seen it on earlier kernels maybe but not sure. So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. Included in there is the HPET revert and other similarly themed changes. commit b4609472116bb806a95e98d04767189406c74c70 Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date: Fri Aug 29 14:38:03 2008 -0700 Revert "x86: fix HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25, check hpet against BAR, v3" This reverts commit a2bd7274b47124d2fc4dfdb8c0591f545ba749dd. Some power management related changes stand out slightly: commit 9d3593574702ae1899e23a1535da1ac71f928042 Author: John Kacur <jkacur-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date: Tue Sep 2 14:36:13 2008 -0700 pm_qos_requirement might sleep and commit 74c4633da7994eddcfcd2762a448c6889cc2b5bd Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Date: Tue Sep 2 14:36:11 2008 -0700 rtc-cmos: wake again from S5 The rest of the changes in that range look completely benign. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080922.185902.80812984.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080922.185902.80812984.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-23 14:29 ` Jiri Kosina 2008-09-23 16:38 ` Renato S. Yamane [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809231229460.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-23 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M Cc: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 > ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were > definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. David, was this also your case, or did the EEPROM got garbled out of a sudden? [1] https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-23 14:29 ` Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-23 16:38 ` Renato S. Yamane [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809231229460.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Renato S. Yamane @ 2008-09-23 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: David Miller, david.vrabel, airlied, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, chrisl, auke-jan.h.kok, jesse.brandeburg, john.ronciak, bruce.w.allan, arjan, torvalds Jiri Kosina wrote: > Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled > into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. > > David, was this also your case, or did the EEPROM got garbled out of a > sudden? > [1] https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 And... <http://lwn.net/Articles/299787> <http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459202> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/263555> Best regards, Renato ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809231229460.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809231229460.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-23 21:03 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <21d7e9970809231403wf766660u39908aca70548ca7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-23 21:05 ` David Miller 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-23 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: David Miller, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > >> So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 >> ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were >> definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. > > Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled > into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. > > David, was this also your case, or did the EEPROM got garbled out of a > sudden? I have no evidence in my logs of a graphics panic, but I do do a lot of graphics devel, so it might be a possiblity but I'd hate to handwave it away at that. Dave. > > [1] https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 > > -- > Jiri Kosina > SUSE Labs > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <21d7e9970809231403wf766660u39908aca70548ca7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809231403wf766660u39908aca70548ca7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-23 22:05 ` David Miller 2008-09-24 6:02 ` David Newall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-23 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Cc: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:03:53 +1000 > I have no evidence in my logs of a graphics panic, but I do do a lot > of graphics devel, > so it might be a possiblity but I'd hate to handwave it away at that. Let's not handwave, but rather try to figure out if that is part of the pattern. Right now we don't have any real leads, so data acquisition is really important at this phase. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-23 22:05 ` David Miller @ 2008-09-24 6:02 ` David Newall 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: David Newall @ 2008-09-24 6:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: airlied, jkosina, david.vrabel, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, chrisl David Miller wrote: > Right now we don't have any real leads, so data acquisition is really > important at this phase. Isn't this reliably reproducible? Assuming yes, Intel are such swell guys that you might ask them to ship a few dozen cards to you to break until you've tracked down the problem. I mean, it's a lot easier to find this sorts of fault when you can see it first hand than trying to guess from third parties' reports, isn't it? For some reasonable value of "you", that so. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809231229460.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-23 21:03 ` Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-23 21:05 ` David Miller [not found] ` <20080923.140519.268233735.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-23 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ Cc: david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:29:16 +0200 (CEST) > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > > > So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 > > ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were > > definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. > > Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled > into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. My current suspicion in all of this is either the GEM kernel patches or recent X server. However, the eeprom/nvram programming sequence seems non-trivial on the e1000e. You have to execute a set of precise register writes and register polls to successfully write things out to the nvram. This makes something like a random scribble out to MMIO space less likely to cause this problem. Is there some linear mapping of the nvram that could be written to on these cards? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080923.140519.268233735.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080923.140519.268233735.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-23 21:09 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <21d7e9970809231409r3fdd640h53a72a808266d220-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-23 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:05 AM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:29:16 +0200 (CEST) > >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: >> >> > So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 >> > ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were >> > definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. >> >> Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled >> into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. > > My current suspicion in all of this is either the GEM kernel patches > or recent X server. > I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. Dave. > However, the eeprom/nvram programming sequence seems non-trivial on > the e1000e. You have to execute a set of precise register writes > and register polls to successfully write things out to the nvram. > > This makes something like a random scribble out to MMIO space less > likely to cause this problem. > > Is there some linear mapping of the nvram that could be written to > on these cards? > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <21d7e9970809231409r3fdd640h53a72a808266d220-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809231409r3fdd640h53a72a808266d220-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-23 22:07 ` David Miller [not found] ` <20080923.150722.141587696.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 12:24 ` Jiri Kosina 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-23 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Cc: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:09:09 +1000 > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:05 AM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:29:16 +0200 (CEST) > > > >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > >> > >> > So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 > >> > ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were > >> > definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. > >> > >> Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled > >> into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. > > > > My current suspicion in all of this is either the GEM kernel patches > > or recent X server. > > > > I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. Good data point, can someone confirm this? Also, what X server version is the effected OpenSUSE shipping? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080923.150722.141587696.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080923.150722.141587696.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-23 22:12 ` Jeff Kirsher [not found] ` <9929d2390809231512w160d221axa2923a6b293a041-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jeff Kirsher @ 2008-09-23 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:07 PM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: > From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:09:09 +1000 > >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:05 AM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> >> > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:29:16 +0200 (CEST) >> > >> >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: >> >> >> >> > So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 >> >> > ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were >> >> > definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. >> >> >> >> Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled >> >> into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. >> > >> > My current suspicion in all of this is either the GEM kernel patches >> > or recent X server. >> > >> >> I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. > > Good data point, can someone confirm this? Also, what X server version > is the effected OpenSUSE shipping? > -- OpenSuSE 11 ships x server version 7.3. -- Cheers, Jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <9929d2390809231512w160d221axa2923a6b293a041-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <9929d2390809231512w160d221axa2923a6b293a041-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-23 22:19 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809240014390.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-23 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Kirsher Cc: David Miller, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > >> I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. > > Good data point, can someone confirm this? Also, what X server version > > is the effected OpenSUSE shipping? > OpenSuSE 11 ships x server version 7.3. Opensuse 11 is fine. The problem can be reproduced [not only] on opensuse 11.1 beta1, which has xorg-x11-7.4-1.6.x86_64.rpm -- Jiri Kosina ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809240014390.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809240014390.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-24 4:12 ` David Miller [not found] ` <20080923.211215.193696086.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-24 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:19:00 +0200 (CEST) > On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > >> I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. > > > Good data point, can someone confirm this? Also, what X server version > > > is the effected OpenSUSE shipping? > > OpenSuSE 11 ships x server version 7.3. > > Opensuse 11 is fine. > > The problem can be reproduced [not only] on opensuse 11.1 beta1, which has > > xorg-x11-7.4-1.6.x86_64.rpm I did some snooping around, and while doing so I noticed that the PCI mmap code for x86 doesn't do one bit of range checking on the size, or any other aspect of the request, wrt. the MMIO regions actually mapped in the BARs of the PCI device. Yikes! It just does a reserve_memtype() on the address range, and says "ok". So if, for example, the X server tries to mmap() more than an MMIO bar actually maps, the kernel lets the user do this. It would be very interesting to add the appropriate checks to pci_mmap_page_range() in arch/x86/pci/i386.c, anyone who wants to do this can use the code in arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c: __pci_mmap_make_offset() as a guide, and see what happens. If the MMIO space regions of the video cards sit right before the E1000E ones on the effected systems, that would pretty much convince me that this is the kind of problem we are having here. This also reminds me that there was that whole set of issues that had to get worked out wrt. write-caching of mappings on x86. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080923.211215.193696086.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080923.211215.193696086.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-24 5:45 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <21d7e9970809232245x6a91c6e2l552ff039d07e2017-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-24 23:15 ` Jiri Kosina 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-24 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:12 PM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:19:00 +0200 (CEST) > >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jeff Kirsher wrote: >> >> > >> I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. >> > > Good data point, can someone confirm this? Also, what X server version >> > > is the effected OpenSUSE shipping? >> > OpenSuSE 11 ships x server version 7.3. >> >> Opensuse 11 is fine. >> >> The problem can be reproduced [not only] on opensuse 11.1 beta1, which has >> >> xorg-x11-7.4-1.6.x86_64.rpm > > I did some snooping around, and while doing so I noticed that the PCI > mmap code for x86 doesn't do one bit of range checking on the size, or > any other aspect of the request, wrt. the MMIO regions actually mapped > in the BARs of the PCI device. > > Yikes! > > It just does a reserve_memtype() on the address range, and says "ok". > > So if, for example, the X server tries to mmap() more than an MMIO bar > actually maps, the kernel lets the user do this. > > It would be very interesting to add the appropriate checks to > pci_mmap_page_range() in arch/x86/pci/i386.c, anyone who wants to do > this can use the code in arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c: > __pci_mmap_make_offset() as a guide, and see what happens. > > If the MMIO space regions of the video cards sit right before the > E1000E ones on the effected systems, that would pretty much > convince me that this is the kind of problem we are having here. > > This also reminds me that there was that whole set of issues that > had to get worked out wrt. write-caching of mappings on x86. > I'm still dubious about this, wouldn't we see other wierdass side effects if X was trashing the BARs on other devices? I think tglx is on the right path, same problem as e1000, code is stupid, it can reenter the nvram read/write code from irq context, and pwn itself. Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <21d7e9970809232245x6a91c6e2l552ff039d07e2017-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809232245x6a91c6e2l552ff039d07e2017-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-24 7:36 ` David Miller 2008-09-24 8:59 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <20080924.003638.71148740.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-24 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Cc: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:45:46 +1000 > I'm still dubious about this, wouldn't we see other wierdass side > effects if X was trashing the BARs on other devices? Sure. My theory is that it's a recent xorg change causing this, so I've been going through GIT history for xserver, libpciaccess, and the intel driver for the past year looking for clues. If there is usually a gap after the video device, there would just be no response from the PCI bus, and the way that's handled is chipset specific. At least a while back, most x86 systems would silently ignore writes and return all 1's in such a case, but they may be generating bus error events these days. I simply don't know. > I think tglx is on the right path, same problem as e1000, code is > stupid, it can reenter the nvram read/write code from irq > context, and pwn itself. The e1000e side here is reproducable way too easily for it to be the same case, as far as I see it. The e1000 driver has probably had this problem for years and we've only recently had some concrete cases of it triggering. Also, what utility are you running on your system that is even accessing the NVRAM on the e1000e card? Knowing that might help us understand why this problem has appeared now. Maybe there is some diagnostic or monitoring tool that is now becoming prevalent in these distributions where it triggers. This problem started happening seemingly "all of a sudden", even to people who have been keeping sort-of recent with their kernels, such as yourself. Yet we can't get any sense yet what range of kernel versions are in use when the problem triggers. I'm about to leave for a week or so in Paris for the netfilter workshop, so I hope that someone other than myself will do some data mining like I have instead of (merely) tossing theories around and finger pointing. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-24 7:36 ` David Miller @ 2008-09-24 8:59 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <21d7e9970809240159u6db747eex51892061846b2251-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> [not found] ` <20080924.003638.71148740.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-24 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: jkosina, jeffrey.t.kirsher, david.vrabel, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, chrisl On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:36 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:45:46 +1000 > >> I'm still dubious about this, wouldn't we see other wierdass side >> effects if X was trashing the BARs on other devices? > > Sure. My theory is that it's a recent xorg change causing this, > so I've been going through GIT history for xserver, libpciaccess, > and the intel driver for the past year looking for clues. > > If there is usually a gap after the video device, there would just > be no response from the PCI bus, and the way that's handled is > chipset specific. At least a while back, most x86 systems would > silently ignore writes and return all 1's in such a case, but > they may be generating bus error events these days. I simply don't > know. The only thing I can think off then is either the pciaccess conversion of the intel Xorg driver, or maybe something going wrong since PAT support was added. > >> I think tglx is on the right path, same problem as e1000, code is >> stupid, it can reenter the nvram read/write code from irq >> context, and pwn itself. > > The e1000e side here is reproducable way too easily for it to be the > same case, as far as I see it. > > The e1000 driver has probably had this problem for years and we've > only recently had some concrete cases of it triggering. > > Also, what utility are you running on your system that is even > accessing the NVRAM on the e1000e card? Knowing that might help > us understand why this problem has appeared now. Maybe there is > some diagnostic or monitoring tool that is now becoming prevalent > in these distributions where it triggers. The driver seems quite happy to access the NVRAM, I think Thomas has some backtraces that show it clearly doing silly reentrant things... > > This problem started happening seemingly "all of a sudden", even to > people who have been keeping sort-of recent with their kernels, such > as yourself. > > Yet we can't get any sense yet what range of kernel versions are in > use when the problem triggers. I've seen it reported at least at 2.6.27-rc1 and maybe even one of Fedora's -rc0 kernels. Dave. > > I'm about to leave for a week or so in Paris for the netfilter > workshop, so I hope that someone other than myself will do some data > mining like I have instead of (merely) tossing theories around and > finger pointing. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <21d7e9970809240159u6db747eex51892061846b2251-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809240159u6db747eex51892061846b2251-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-24 9:01 ` David Miller [not found] ` <20080924.020116.193720569.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-24 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Cc: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:59:34 +1000 > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:36 PM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: > The driver seems quite happy to access the NVRAM, I think Thomas has > some backtraces that show > it clearly doing silly reentrant things... I don't dispute that the locking is dodgy and likely needs to be fixed like e1000. I'm asking what userland tool or kernel event is triggering the nvram access. It shouldn't even touch the thing after probing and initializing the card. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080924.020116.193720569.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080924.020116.193720569.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-24 9:16 ` Dave Airlie 2008-09-24 16:33 ` Jiri Kosina 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-24 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:01 PM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: > From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:59:34 +1000 > >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:36 PM, David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> The driver seems quite happy to access the NVRAM, I think Thomas has >> some backtraces that show >> it clearly doing silly reentrant things... > > I don't dispute that the locking is dodgy and likely needs to be fixed > like e1000. > > I'm asking what userland tool or kernel event is triggering the nvram > access. > > It shouldn't even touch the thing after probing and initializing > the card. Hopefully tglx can supply some traces, I think getting an interrupt during device startup can possibly access the nvram http://www.tglx.de/~tglx/wtf2.txt seems to suggest bad things could happen. Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-24 9:16 ` Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-24 16:33 ` Jiri Kosina 2008-09-24 20:07 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809241829500.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-24 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie Cc: David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher, david.vrabel, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, chrisl On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: > Hopefully tglx can supply some traces, I think getting an interrupt > during device startup can possibly access the nvram > http://www.tglx.de/~tglx/wtf2.txt > seems to suggest bad things could happen. Actually another user has just reported [1] that his e1000e card got screwed up exactly at the point when the installer was probing the X configuration. So this really seems a lot like some lethal interaction between intel graphics and the network card. Dave (Airlie, too many Daves on CC here really), do you by any chance see any recent change in kernel intel graphic parts of DRM be causing this breakage? [1] https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480#c69 -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-24 16:33 ` Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-24 20:07 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809241829500.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-24 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher, david.vrabel, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, chrisl On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> Hopefully tglx can supply some traces, I think getting an interrupt >> during device startup can possibly access the nvram >> http://www.tglx.de/~tglx/wtf2.txt >> seems to suggest bad things could happen. > > Actually another user has just reported [1] that his e1000e card got > screwed up exactly at the point when the installer was probing the X > configuration. So this really seems a lot like some lethal interaction > between intel graphics and the network card. > > Dave (Airlie, too many Daves on CC here really), do you by any chance see > any recent change in kernel intel graphic parts of DRM be causing this > breakage? > Okay some from the kernel if this isn't in 2.6.26, the drm has introduced no patches I can even remotely claim might affect this. So its either userspace or PAT related. Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809241829500.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809241829500.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-24 16:37 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809241836180.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-24 22:54 ` Parag Warudkar 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-24 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie Cc: David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote: > Dave (Airlie, too many Daves on CC here really), do you by any chance > see any recent change in kernel intel graphic parts of DRM be causing > this breakage? BTW, why is the PAT fix implented in commit 242e3df80 needed only for radeons? -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809241836180.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809241836180.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-24 18:10 ` Jiri Kosina 2008-09-24 20:18 ` Dave Airlie 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-24 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie Cc: David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > Dave (Airlie, too many Daves on CC here really), do you by any chance > > see any recent change in kernel intel graphic parts of DRM be causing > > this breakage? > BTW, why is the PAT fix implented in commit 242e3df80 needed only for > radeons? Further important observation -- as far as I can see, all affected machines by this bug whatsoever (and the number of reportes is increasing) were using i915 DRM. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809241836180.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-24 18:10 ` Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-24 20:18 ` Dave Airlie 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-24 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote: > >> Dave (Airlie, too many Daves on CC here really), do you by any chance >> see any recent change in kernel intel graphic parts of DRM be causing >> this breakage? > > BTW, why is the PAT fix implented in commit 242e3df80 needed only for > radeons? > Good question, mainly because only radeons showed the illegal mapping crash, which was mapping via sysfs _wc files and then doing a UC mapping in the kernel over the same address space would fail. However this was VRAM related and these things don't have VRAM. Dave. > -- > Jiri Kosina > SUSE Labs > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809241829500.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-24 16:37 ` Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-24 22:54 ` Parag Warudkar 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Parag Warudkar @ 2008-09-24 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Dave Airlie, David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > Actually another user has just reported [1] that his e1000e card got > screwed up exactly at the point when the installer was probing the X > configuration. So this really seems a lot like some lethal interaction > between intel graphics and the network card. > Another data point in the support of this theory - I've been running all various 2.6.27-rc releases (including rc7) on my HP machine which has an embedded 82566 and Radeon x1650 graphics - and so far I have not seen any problems. Parag ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080924.003638.71148740.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080924.003638.71148740.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-24 16:27 ` Jonathan Corbet 2008-09-24 20:47 ` Theodore Tso [not found] ` <20080924102730.31ee305a-vw3g6Xz/EtPk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-24 19:10 ` Kyle McMartin 1 sibling, 2 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2008-09-24 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:36:38 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote: > I'm about to leave for a week or so in Paris for the netfilter > workshop, so I hope that someone other than myself will do some data > mining like I have instead of (merely) tossing theories around and > finger pointing. A data point, just in case it helps... I've not had time to update my desktop system, so this all-Intel, ICH9, e1000e-based box has been stuck at 2.6.27-rc3. It has rawhide as of shortly after the floodgates reopened (but with my own kernel); that means X server 1.5.0 and i810 2.4.2-3. It's happy as a clam. I'm not sure how often this problem bites, but it hasn't gotten me. jon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-24 16:27 ` Jonathan Corbet @ 2008-09-24 20:47 ` Theodore Tso [not found] ` <20080924102730.31ee305a-vw3g6Xz/EtPk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Theodore Tso @ 2008-09-24 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: David Miller, airlied, jkosina, jeffrey.t.kirsher, david.vrabel, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, chrisl On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:27:30AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:36:38 -0700 (PDT) > David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > > > I'm about to leave for a week or so in Paris for the netfilter > > workshop, so I hope that someone other than myself will do some data > > mining like I have instead of (merely) tossing theories around and > > finger pointing. > > A data point, just in case it helps... I've not had time to update my > desktop system, so this all-Intel, ICH9, e1000e-based box has been stuck > at 2.6.27-rc3. It has rawhide as of shortly after the floodgates > reopened (but with my own kernel); that means X server 1.5.0 and i810 > 2.4.2-3. I'm running a 2.6.26-rc6 kernel on a X61s laptop, which is an all-Intel ICH8, using the e1000e driver, and I haven't been been bitten with the problem either. I'm using an Ubuntu Hardy userspace, which means I'm using an 1.4.0.90 X Server with an i915 drm version 1.6.0 20060119, and my e1000 EEPROM hasn't been blasted to oblivion yet! Personally, I don't plan on upgrading to a newer userspace until we figure out what the heck is going on. :-) - Ted ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080924102730.31ee305a-vw3g6Xz/EtPk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080924102730.31ee305a-vw3g6Xz/EtPk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-24 16:56 ` Jiri Kosina 2008-09-25 19:01 ` Jiri Kosina 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-24 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: David Miller, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > A data point, just in case it helps... I've not had time to update my > desktop system, so this all-Intel, ICH9, e1000e-based box has been stuck > at 2.6.27-rc3. It has rawhide as of shortly after the floodgates > reopened (but with my own kernel); that means X server 1.5.0 and i810 > 2.4.2-3. > It's happy as a clam. I'm not sure how often this problem bites, but it > hasn't gotten me. Thanks for the information. Seems like it quite often triggers during the very first probing of graphics card during the initial X startup. Karsten is currently writing a tool that will safely restore the EEPROM contents to the card. When this gets done, testing will get much easier and hopefully we'll be able to isolate whether it is e1000e driver (I currently don't think so), DRM kernel code, or xorg 7.4 causing this. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080924102730.31ee305a-vw3g6Xz/EtPk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-24 16:56 ` Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 19:01 ` Jiri Kosina 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: David Miller, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > A data point, just in case it helps... I've not had time to update my > desktop system, so this all-Intel, ICH9, e1000e-based box has been stuck > at 2.6.27-rc3. It has rawhide as of shortly after the floodgates > reopened (but with my own kernel); that means X server 1.5.0 and i810 > 2.4.2-3. If any of you guys has Lenovo thinkpad (T60p ideally) with 8086:104b revision 3 card, could you please send me the respective "ethtool -e" dump? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080924.003638.71148740.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-24 16:27 ` Jonathan Corbet @ 2008-09-24 19:10 ` Kyle McMartin [not found] ` <20080924191022.GC2591-EK4dZfYtfFRW/gs8oUvUg/d9D2ou9A/h@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Kyle McMartin @ 2008-09-24 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:36:38AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > The e1000e side here is reproducable way too easily for it to be the > same case, as far as I see it. > I've been working on a patch to detect (using a timer and checking at up/down) whether or not the flash has been corrupted, and, if it is rewrite it with the saved good copy (which obviously only helps if it's the same boot.) Unfortunately, I don't have enough time to finish it before I go away for the weekend, so I'll toss it over the wall and see if it sticks to anything. At a glance, one would need to add support for rewriting adapter->hw.flash from ethtool if someone reprograms the good firmware back, and writing the good flash back on down/remove if it detects a change. Bear in mind, super quick hack, and I haven't even run-tested it yet. If nobody decides to run with it, I'll probably give it another poke late tonight. Definitely-not-signed-off-by-or-tested-by: Kyle At the very least, if someone pokes in a hexdump of the firmware, at least we might be able to see some of the method to the madness of the corruption pattern. diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h b/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h index ac4e506..08cce8c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct e1000_adapter { struct timer_list watchdog_timer; struct timer_list phy_info_timer; struct timer_list blink_timer; + struct timer_list flash_timer; struct work_struct reset_task; struct work_struct watchdog_task; diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h b/drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h index 74f263a..ca3f645 100644 --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h @@ -863,6 +863,11 @@ struct e1000_hw { u8 __iomem *hw_addr; u8 __iomem *flash_address; + int flash_len; + + u8 *flash; + u8 *flash_backup; + spinlock_t flashlock; struct e1000_mac_info mac; struct e1000_fc_info fc; diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c index d266510..13f05f8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c @@ -2535,6 +2535,7 @@ void e1000e_down(struct e1000_adapter *adapter) del_timer_sync(&adapter->watchdog_timer); del_timer_sync(&adapter->phy_info_timer); + del_timer_sync(&adapter->flash_timer); netdev->tx_queue_len = adapter->tx_queue_len; netif_carrier_off(netdev); @@ -2922,6 +2923,33 @@ static void e1000_update_phy_info(unsigned long data) e1000_get_phy_info(&adapter->hw); } +static inline int e1000_test_flash(struct e1000_adapter *adapter) +{ + int ret = 0; + + if (adapter->hw.flash && adapter->hw.flash_backup) { + spin_lock(&adapter->hw.flashlock); + memcpy(adapter->hw.flash_backup, adapter->hw.flash_address, + adapter->hw.flash_len); + ret = memcmp(adapter->hw.flash, adapter->hw.flash_backup, + adapter->hw.flash_len); + spin_unlock(&adapter->hw.flashlock); + if (ret) { + /* dump_eeprom(adapter); */ + printk(KERN_ERR "AWOOOGA AWOOOGA flash changed\n"); + } + } + + return ret; +} + +static void e1000_flash_test(unsigned long data) +{ + struct e1000_adapter *adapter = (struct e1000_adapter *) data; + e1000_test_flash(adapter); + mod_timer(&adapter->flash_timer, jiffies+(20*HZ)); +} + /** * e1000e_update_stats - Update the board statistics counters * @adapter: board private structure @@ -4439,6 +4467,22 @@ static int __devinit e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, adapter->hw.flash_address = ioremap(flash_start, flash_len); if (!adapter->hw.flash_address) goto err_flashmap; + + adapter->hw.flash_len = (int)flash_len; + /* stash away a copy of the flash, and allocate + space for a second copy... */ + if (!adapter->hw.flash) { + u8 *flash = kmalloc(flash_len, GFP_KERNEL); + u8 *flash_backup = kmalloc(flash_len, GFP_KERNEL); + if (flash && flash_backup) { + memcpy(flash, adapter->hw.flash_address, + adapter->hw.flash_len); + adapter->hw.flash = flash; + adapter->hw.flash_backup = flash_backup; + spin_lock_init(&adapter->hw.flashlock); + } + } + } /* construct the net_device struct */ @@ -4570,6 +4614,10 @@ static int __devinit e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, adapter->phy_info_timer.function = &e1000_update_phy_info; adapter->phy_info_timer.data = (unsigned long) adapter; + init_timer(&adapter->flash_timer); + adapter->flash_timer.function = &e1000_flash_test; + adapter->flash_timer.data = (unsigned long) adapter; + INIT_WORK(&adapter->reset_task, e1000_reset_task); INIT_WORK(&adapter->watchdog_task, e1000_watchdog_task); @@ -4641,6 +4689,9 @@ static int __devinit e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, e1000_print_device_info(adapter); + /* every twenty seconds, test the flash */ + mod_timer(&adapter->flash_timer, jiffies+(HZ*20)); + return 0; err_register: @@ -4690,6 +4741,7 @@ static void __devexit e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) set_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state); del_timer_sync(&adapter->watchdog_timer); del_timer_sync(&adapter->phy_info_timer); + del_timer_sync(&adapter->flash_timer); flush_scheduled_work(); ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080924191022.GC2591-EK4dZfYtfFRW/gs8oUvUg/d9D2ou9A/h@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080924191022.GC2591-EK4dZfYtfFRW/gs8oUvUg/d9D2ou9A/h@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-24 19:22 ` Jesse Brandeburg 2008-09-24 19:52 ` David Miller 2008-09-24 22:37 ` Jiri Kosina 2 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jesse Brandeburg @ 2008-09-24 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyle McMartin Cc: David Miller, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Brandeburg, Jesse [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 430 bytes --] On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Kyle McMartin <kyle-pfcGkIkfWfAsA/PxXw9srA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > At the very least, if someone pokes in a hexdump of the firmware, at > least we might be able to see some of the method to the madness of the > corruption pattern. Thanks Kyle! attached is a patch to dump the eeprom to dmesg (first 64 bytes) at boot for e1000e, which kind of goes along with your AWOOGA part of your patch. [-- Attachment #2: e1000e-dump-eeprom-to-dmesg.txt --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2605 bytes --] e1000e: dump eeprom to dmesg for ich8/9 From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> dumping the eeprom for now seems like a bit of a verbose hack, but might be useful when we want to restore it. if syslogd (or something like) isn't running it won't be kept however. Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> --- drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c index 89ca272..48072fa 100644 --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c @@ -4338,6 +4338,52 @@ static void e1000_eeprom_checks(struct e1000_adapter *adapter) } /** + * e1000e_dump_eeprom - write the eeprom to kernel log + * @adapter: our adapter struct + * + * Dump the eeprom for users having checksum issues + **/ +static void e1000e_dump_eeprom(struct e1000_adapter *adapter) +{ + struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev; + struct ethtool_eeprom eeprom; + const struct ethtool_ops *ops = netdev->ethtool_ops; + u8 *data; + int i; + u16 csum_old, csum_new = 0; + + eeprom.len = ops->get_eeprom_len(netdev); + eeprom.offset = 0; + + data = kzalloc(eeprom.len, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!data) { + printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to allocate memory to dump EEPROM" + " data\n"); + return; + } + + ops->get_eeprom(netdev, &eeprom, data); + + csum_old = (data[NVM_CHECKSUM_REG * 2]) + + (data[NVM_CHECKSUM_REG * 2 + 1] << 8); + for (i = 0; i < NVM_CHECKSUM_REG * 2; i += 2) + csum_new += data[i] + (data[i + 1] << 8); + csum_new = NVM_SUM - csum_new; + + printk(KERN_ERR "/*********************/\n"); + printk(KERN_ERR "Current EEPROM Checksum : 0x%04x\n", csum_old); + printk(KERN_ERR "Calculated : 0x%04x\n", csum_new); + + printk(KERN_ERR "Offset Values\n"); + printk(KERN_ERR "======== ======\n"); + print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1, data, 128, 0); + + printk(KERN_ERR "/*********************/\n"); + + kfree(data); +} + +/** * e1000_probe - Device Initialization Routine * @pdev: PCI device information struct * @ent: entry in e1000_pci_tbl @@ -4541,6 +4587,11 @@ static int __devinit e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, e1000_eeprom_checks(adapter); + /* debug code ... dump the first 128 bytes of the eeprom for + * ich parts that might get a corruption */ + if (adapter->flags & FLAG_IS_ICH) + e1000e_dump_eeprom(adapter); + /* copy the MAC address out of the NVM */ if (e1000e_read_mac_addr(&adapter->hw)) e_err("NVM Read Error while reading MAC address\n"); ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080924191022.GC2591-EK4dZfYtfFRW/gs8oUvUg/d9D2ou9A/h@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-24 19:22 ` Jesse Brandeburg @ 2008-09-24 19:52 ` David Miller 2008-09-24 22:37 ` Jiri Kosina 2 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-24 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kyle-pfcGkIkfWfAsA/PxXw9srA Cc: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA From: Kyle McMartin <kyle-pfcGkIkfWfAsA/PxXw9srA@public.gmane.org> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:10:22 -0400 > I've been working on a patch to detect (using a timer and checking at > up/down) whether or not the flash has been corrupted, and, if it is > rewrite it with the saved good copy (which obviously only helps if > it's the same boot.) Looks interesting, I hope someone runs with it :-) If the flash is seen as corrupt, we should print the current process that is running at the time, and perhaps a pt_regs dump, as these might provide the most important clues to diagnosing this. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080924191022.GC2591-EK4dZfYtfFRW/gs8oUvUg/d9D2ou9A/h@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-24 19:22 ` Jesse Brandeburg 2008-09-24 19:52 ` David Miller @ 2008-09-24 22:37 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250036090.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 2 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-24 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyle McMartin Cc: David Miller, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Kyle McMartin wrote: > I've been working on a patch to detect (using a timer and checking at > up/down) whether or not the flash has been corrupted, and, if it is > rewrite it with the saved good copy (which obviously only helps if > it's the same boot.) Thanks, looks interesting e1000e hack that might possibly be of some help. BUT! please have a look at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/24/133 Looks like this device got a lot of 0xff written somewhere in its config space, right? But it isn't Intel card at all. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250036090.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250036090.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 18:39 ` H. Peter Anvin 2008-09-25 20:45 ` Kok, Auke 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2008-09-25 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Kyle McMartin, David Miller, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Kyle McMartin wrote: > >> I've been working on a patch to detect (using a timer and checking at >> up/down) whether or not the flash has been corrupted, and, if it is >> rewrite it with the saved good copy (which obviously only helps if >> it's the same boot.) > > Thanks, looks interesting e1000e hack that might possibly be of some help. > > BUT! please have a look at > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/24/133 > > Looks like this device got a lot of 0xff written somewhere in its config > space, right? But it isn't Intel card at all. > That looks like the device disappeared completely. -hpa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250036090.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 18:39 ` H. Peter Anvin @ 2008-09-25 20:45 ` Kok, Auke 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Kok, Auke @ 2008-09-25 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Kyle McMartin, David Miller, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Kyle McMartin wrote: > >> I've been working on a patch to detect (using a timer and checking at >> up/down) whether or not the flash has been corrupted, and, if it is >> rewrite it with the saved good copy (which obviously only helps if >> it's the same boot.) > > Thanks, looks interesting e1000e hack that might possibly be of some help. > > BUT! please have a look at > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/24/133 > > Looks like this device got a lot of 0xff written somewhere in its config > space, right? But it isn't Intel card at all. I asked that person and he said reverting to an older kernel made it work again, also there is a fix out as romieu pointed out as well, so this seems to be a different bug for now. Auke ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <20080923.211215.193696086.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-24 5:45 ` Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-24 23:15 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250110070.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 0:26 ` Jesse Barnes 1 sibling, 2 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-24 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > I did some snooping around, and while doing so I noticed that the PCI > mmap code for x86 doesn't do one bit of range checking on the size, or > any other aspect of the request, wrt. the MMIO regions actually mapped > in the BARs of the PCI device. Ugh, indeed. Added Ingo and Jesse to CC. > Yikes! > > It just does a reserve_memtype() on the address range, and says "ok". > > So if, for example, the X server tries to mmap() more than an MMIO bar > actually maps, the kernel lets the user do this. > > It would be very interesting to add the appropriate checks to > pci_mmap_page_range() in arch/x86/pci/i386.c, anyone who wants to do > this can use the code in arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c: > __pci_mmap_make_offset() as a guide, and see what happens. Absolutely. Or we can even do some dirty hackery in userspace, like LD_PRELOADing X server and checking mmaps() that are close to MMIO regions of affected devices. > If the MMIO space regions of the video cards sit right before the > E1000E ones on the effected systems, that would pretty much > convince me that this is the kind of problem we are having here. Unfortunately, looking at the lspci outputs that are in https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 it seems to me that the MMIO regions are quite far away from each other. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250110070.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250110070.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 0:22 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <21d7e9970809241722w7c3bb6a5w1af5801b7380169d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-25 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > >> I did some snooping around, and while doing so I noticed that the PCI >> mmap code for x86 doesn't do one bit of range checking on the size, or >> any other aspect of the request, wrt. the MMIO regions actually mapped >> in the BARs of the PCI device. > > Ugh, indeed. Added Ingo and Jesse to CC. > >> Yikes! >> >> It just does a reserve_memtype() on the address range, and says "ok". >> >> So if, for example, the X server tries to mmap() more than an MMIO bar >> actually maps, the kernel lets the user do this. >> >> It would be very interesting to add the appropriate checks to >> pci_mmap_page_range() in arch/x86/pci/i386.c, anyone who wants to do >> this can use the code in arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c: >> __pci_mmap_make_offset() as a guide, and see what happens. > > Absolutely. Or we can even do some dirty hackery in userspace, like > LD_PRELOADing X server and checking mmaps() that are close to MMIO regions > of affected devices. > >> If the MMIO space regions of the video cards sit right before the >> E1000E ones on the effected systems, that would pretty much >> convince me that this is the kind of problem we are having here. > > Unfortunately, looking at the lspci outputs that are in > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 it seems to me that the > MMIO regions are quite far away from each other. > Yup on my laptop these were far away and I wondered what could mangle things that badly. Well I'm out of the race, my attempts to re-write my eeprom using an eeprom from an equivalent laptop have totally failed and my BIOS won't boot anymore - so my laptop is == a brick. Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <21d7e9970809241722w7c3bb6a5w1af5801b7380169d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809241722w7c3bb6a5w1af5801b7380169d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 1:27 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250310190.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 4:25 ` Jesse Brandeburg 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie, Jeff Garzik, David Miller, Andrew Morton Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: > Well I'm out of the race, my attempts to re-write my eeprom using an > eeprom from an equivalent laptop have totally failed and my BIOS won't > boot anymore - so my laptop is == a brick. Uh oh. Shouldn't we put something like the patch below in Linus' tree unless we get this sorted out? Otherwise more and more people who use -rc kernels will run into this, and will get their hardware [hopefully temporarily, but not all users are able to re-flash their network card EEPROMs, right] bricked. I know that it is quite aggressive and is going to disable wired networking on a lot of systems that have been functioning properly, therefore RFC ... From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] E1000E: temporarily disable e1000e driver E1000E: temporarily disable e1000e driver There is a serious bug somewhere, that renders e1000e network cards unusable on certain hardware configurations by rewriting EEPROM with 0xff all over. Debugging this is not trivial, because: - it is not yet even clear whether the bug is caused by userspace (new version of xorg drivers, bad interaction with PAT, ...) or some bug in kernel code; it's even not yet certain at which exact combination of software versions and hardware configuration this started to trigger - you have only one attempt to test potential fix. If the fix doesn't work, the eeprom of the card is hosed and therefore fixing this has potential to take some time. The tool that will safely restore the previous contents of EEPROM is currently being written, but even this is not trivial (Dave Airlie has turned his notebook into brick while trying to restore the EEPROM contents). Let's therefore mark this driver as broken (though it is very well possible that this particular driver is not at fault at all) until this gets resolved, so that users of -rc kernels don't get their network cards totally unusable. References (information about sw/hw configurations of affected systems might be found in the bugzillas): http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/8/123 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/22/23 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459202 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/263555 https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=44147 Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> --- diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig index 4a11296..2d7a7f2 100644 --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig @@ -1938,7 +1938,7 @@ config E1000_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT config E1000E tristate "Intel(R) PRO/1000 PCI-Express Gigabit Ethernet support" - depends on PCI && (!SPARC32 || BROKEN) + depends on PCI && BROKEN ---help--- This driver supports the PCI-Express Intel(R) PRO/1000 gigabit ethernet family of adapters. For PCI or PCI-X e1000 adapters, ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250310190.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250310190.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 2:01 ` Frans Pop [not found] ` <200809250401.54818.elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 2:28 ` Jeff Garzik 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Frans Pop @ 2008-09-25 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jeff-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w > Uh oh. Shouldn't we put something like the patch below in Linus' tree > unless we get this sorted out? Otherwise more and more people who > use -rc kernels will run into this, and will get their hardware > [hopefully temporarily, but not all users are able to re-flash their > network card EEPROMs, right] bricked. Something else to worry about is bisections. People seeing an unrelated issue with .27 after release may well be asked to do a bisection and could then run into the issue even if it is fixed before the release. Guess we'll need to wait and see what the root cause is to know if that's a real concern or not. > - it is not yet even clear whether the bug is caused by userspace (new > version of xorg drivers, bad interaction with PAT, ...) or some bug in > kernel code; it's even not yet certain at which exact combination of > software versions and hardware configuration this started to trigger Extra datapoint. As far as I've seen this problem has not yet been reported by any people running Debian. This could point to X.Org as Debian currently has 7.3 while I think the reports so far have been with 7.4. I have been running .27-rc kernels myself on a HP 2510p laptop running Debian/lenny which does have the "bad" NIC (ICH9), but it's still working for me. I do have some vague resume from suspend problems, but for now I'm assuming those are unrelated. I have been running the kernels both with and without PAT enabled. Cheers, FJP ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200809250401.54818.elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <200809250401.54818.elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 17:24 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809251921340.18801-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 19:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa 0 siblings, 2 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frans Pop Cc: Jiri Kosina, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, Andrew Morton, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > Extra datapoint. As far as I've seen this problem has not yet been > reported by any people running Debian. This could point to X.Org as > Debian currently has 7.3 while I think the reports so far have been with > 7.4. Yes, I think that xorg/xorg i915 driver/libdrm/GEM/whatever are the biggest suspect currently, according to the data that has been gathered so far. Still, what confuses me a little bit -- the EEPROM of the card is set to all 0xff, once the corruption happens. Isn't that a quite a coincidence, that bytes representing "nothing" in this context are used? If being set to 0 (it's so easy to call memset(0) on a bogus pointer, there are usually lots of them in the code) or to random garbage, it would seem to be much more understandable, than 0xff. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809251921340.18801-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809251921340.18801-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 18:46 ` H. Peter Anvin 2008-09-25 18:56 ` Jesse Barnes 2008-09-25 20:06 ` David Miller 2 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2008-09-25 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Frans Pop, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, Andrew Morton, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Jiri Kosina wrote: > > Yes, I think that xorg/xorg i915 driver/libdrm/GEM/whatever are the > biggest suspect currently, according to the data that has been gathered so > far. > > Still, what confuses me a little bit -- the EEPROM of the card is set to > all 0xff, once the corruption happens. Isn't that a quite a coincidence, > that bytes representing "nothing" in this context are used? > Typical card EEPROMs are serial - either I2C or SPI. I believe the Intel cards use SPI EEPROMs, but I'm not sure. [Disclaimer: I don't actually know SPI all that well; I know I2C better. However, I'm pretty sure the following argument does apply to both.] Consider a corruption which turns a read command into a write command -- often just a single bit difference. Now, the EEPROM will expect data in to write, but nothing will be driving the data line, so it will typically be a 1. As the host tries to read, it will therefore fill the EEPROM with all ones. -hpa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809251921340.18801-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 18:46 ` H. Peter Anvin @ 2008-09-25 18:56 ` Jesse Barnes [not found] ` <200809251156.10648.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 20:06 ` David Miller 2 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2008-09-25 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Frans Pop, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, Andrew Morton, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w On Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:24 am Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > > Extra datapoint. As far as I've seen this problem has not yet been > > reported by any people running Debian. This could point to X.Org as > > Debian currently has 7.3 while I think the reports so far have been with > > 7.4. > > Yes, I think that xorg/xorg i915 driver/libdrm/GEM/whatever are the > biggest suspect currently, according to the data that has been gathered so > far. We have confirmation that this isn't GEM related; according to the Novell bug at https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 people have hit the problem with kernels w/o GEM. That doesn't rule out i915 (though I don't think any changes have gone in since 2.6.26 that would have caused this) or xf86-video-intel. It's possible that X is getting confused about BAR mappings somehow, resulting in a clobbered e1000e NVRAM, but why would the kernel version matter in that case? The only thing that comes to mind would be PAT... Recent versions of the X drivers (using recent libpciaccess code) will try to map the resourceN_wc file in sysfs. It's possible that the map size we end up using is wrong, leading to the situation Dave described earlier where we map too much MMIO space. > Still, what confuses me a little bit -- the EEPROM of the card is set to > all 0xff, once the corruption happens. Isn't that a quite a coincidence, > that bytes representing "nothing" in this context are used? Presumably one has to write all ones to the EEPROM BAR of the e1000 device to see that pattern? Or is there some way of configuring the EEPROM such that it'll fail to respond to read cycles resulting in all ones for every read back (i.e. target abort)? Jesse ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200809251156.10648.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <200809251156.10648.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 20:22 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809252218470.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Frans Pop, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Yes, I think that xorg/xorg i915 driver/libdrm/GEM/whatever are the > > biggest suspect currently, according to the data that has been > > gathered so far. > We have confirmation that this isn't GEM related; according to the > Novell bug at https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 people > have hit the problem with kernels w/o GEM. But the xorg intel driver shipped with xorg 7.4 already has support for GEM, right? So there could still be some bug in the GEM-aware driver running on non-GEM kernel, can't it? > That doesn't rule out i915 (though I don't think any changes have gone > in since 2.6.26 that would have caused this) or xf86-video-intel. It's > possible that X is getting confused about BAR mappings somehow, > resulting in a clobbered e1000e NVRAM, but why would the kernel version > matter in that case? The only thing that comes to mind would be PAT... Yes, booting with 'nopat' is on my list to try immediately after we are able to recover the corrupted EEPROM. > Recent versions of the X drivers (using recent libpciaccess code) will > try to map the resourceN_wc file in sysfs. It's possible that the map > size we end up using is wrong, leading to the situation Dave described > earlier where we map too much MMIO space. This we could catch easily even with strace, right? -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809252218470.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809252218470.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 19:36 ` Jesse Barnes [not found] ` <200809251236.12287.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2008-09-25 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Frans Pop, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w On Thursday, September 25, 2008 1:22 pm Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > Yes, I think that xorg/xorg i915 driver/libdrm/GEM/whatever are the > > > biggest suspect currently, according to the data that has been > > > gathered so far. > > > > We have confirmation that this isn't GEM related; according to the > > Novell bug at https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 people > > have hit the problem with kernels w/o GEM. > > But the xorg intel driver shipped with xorg 7.4 already has support for > GEM, right? So there could still be some bug in the GEM-aware driver > running on non-GEM kernel, can't it? X.Org 7.4 came with xf86-video-intel 2.4.2 right? That doesn't have any GEM bits in it either. However, the "Factory" log at #425480 *does* indicate that a GEM aware 2D driver was loaded (the "[drm:i915_getparam] *ERROR* Unknown parameter 5" message indicates as much), but the kernel was definitely not GEM aware otherwise the call would have succeeded. So that rules out GEM proper, but it could still be a bug in one of the non-GEM paths in the experimental xf86-video-intel bits the various distros seem to be picking up. > > That doesn't rule out i915 (though I don't think any changes have gone > > in since 2.6.26 that would have caused this) or xf86-video-intel. It's > > possible that X is getting confused about BAR mappings somehow, > > resulting in a clobbered e1000e NVRAM, but why would the kernel version > > matter in that case? The only thing that comes to mind would be PAT... > > Yes, booting with 'nopat' is on my list to try immediately after we are > able to recover the corrupted EEPROM. > > > Recent versions of the X drivers (using recent libpciaccess code) will > > try to map the resourceN_wc file in sysfs. It's possible that the map > > size we end up using is wrong, leading to the situation Dave described > > earlier where we map too much MMIO space. > > This we could catch easily even with strace, right? Yep, that one's easy to catch. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200809251236.12287.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <200809251236.12287.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 20:35 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809252234400.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Frans Pop, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > However, the "Factory" log at #425480 *does* indicate that a GEM aware > 2D driver was loaded (the "[drm:i915_getparam] *ERROR* Unknown parameter > 5" message indicates as much), but the kernel was definitely not GEM > aware otherwise the call would have succeeded. So that rules out GEM > proper, but it could still be a bug in one of the non-GEM paths in the > experimental xf86-video-intel bits the various distros seem to be > picking up. That was exactly the point I was trying to make, that these error paths will probably also need auditing, once we rule out the possibility of NVRAM being overwritten from kernelspace. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809252234400.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809252234400.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 21:06 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <21d7e9970809251406gb2bdacbuf9ff1bde3d118cdb-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 22:57 ` H. Peter Anvin 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-25 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Jesse Barnes, Frans Pop, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> However, the "Factory" log at #425480 *does* indicate that a GEM aware >> 2D driver was loaded (the "[drm:i915_getparam] *ERROR* Unknown parameter >> 5" message indicates as much), but the kernel was definitely not GEM >> aware otherwise the call would have succeeded. So that rules out GEM >> proper, but it could still be a bug in one of the non-GEM paths in the >> experimental xf86-video-intel bits the various distros seem to be >> picking up. > > That was exactly the point I was trying to make, that these error paths > will probably also need auditing, once we rule out the possibility of > NVRAM being overwritten from kernelspace. > Well the non-GEM paths are really the old codepaths we used in the older drivers.. So unless we do something really dumb... I'd target three areas PAT, pciaccess and e1000e itself. Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <21d7e9970809251406gb2bdacbuf9ff1bde3d118cdb-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809251406gb2bdacbuf9ff1bde3d118cdb-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 21:42 ` Jesse Brandeburg [not found] ` <4807377b0809251442x67e4e9eia706b70ae1c177ca-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jesse Brandeburg @ 2008-09-25 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie Cc: Jiri Kosina, Jesse Barnes, Frans Pop, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > I'd target three areas PAT, pciaccess and e1000e itself. ubuntu has CONFIG_X86_PAT disabled for at least i386 arch, maybe that is relevant. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4807377b0809251442x67e4e9eia706b70ae1c177ca-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <4807377b0809251442x67e4e9eia706b70ae1c177ca-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 21:45 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <21d7e9970809251445s216efcc3kaba639d5e29c51aa-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-25 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Brandeburg Cc: Jiri Kosina, Jesse Barnes, Frans Pop, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> I'd target three areas PAT, pciaccess and e1000e itself. > > ubuntu has CONFIG_X86_PAT disabled for at least i386 arch, maybe that > is relevant. > It rules out PAT I suppose, they have seen the issue as well. Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <21d7e9970809251445s216efcc3kaba639d5e29c51aa-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809251445s216efcc3kaba639d5e29c51aa-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 22:45 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809260042380.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie Cc: Jesse Brandeburg, Jesse Barnes, Frans Pop, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> I'd target three areas PAT, pciaccess and e1000e itself. > > ubuntu has CONFIG_X86_PAT disabled for at least i386 arch, maybe that > > is relevant. > It rules out PAT I suppose, they have seen the issue as well. I wasn't able to rule out PAT from the suse bugreports POV, as we have PAT enabled both for 32bit and 64bit x86. If Ubuntu has it disabled also for 64bit x86 (where do these guys have .config files to check?), I think we can definitely rule out PAT, as there has been at least one report from Ubuntu user on this very issue. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809260042380.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809260042380.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-26 7:06 ` Alexey Rempel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Alexey Rempel @ 2008-09-26 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Dave Airlie, Jesse Brandeburg, Jesse Barnes, Frans Pop, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 865 bytes --] On Fr, 2008-09-26 at 00:45 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > >> I'd target three areas PAT, pciaccess and e1000e itself. > > > ubuntu has CONFIG_X86_PAT disabled for at least i386 arch, maybe that > > > is relevant. > > It rules out PAT I suppose, they have seen the issue as well. > > I wasn't able to rule out PAT from the suse bugreports POV, as we have PAT > enabled both for 32bit and 64bit x86. > > If Ubuntu has it disabled also for 64bit x86 (where do these guys have > .config files to check?), I think we can definitely rule out PAT, as there > has been at least one report from Ubuntu user on this very issue. > I'm testing ubuntu intrepid also "afected system" but not affected card and use e1000e driver. (i945g+ich7) as i can see ubuntu at least now do not use pat on 32bit system. config is attached. [-- Attachment #2: config-2.6.27-4-generic --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 95910 bytes --] # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.27-4-generic # Wed Sep 24 01:23:33 2008 # # CONFIG_64BIT is not set CONFIG_X86_32=y # CONFIG_X86_64 is not set CONFIG_X86=y CONFIG_ARCH_DEFCONFIG="arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig" # CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK is not set CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE=y CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST=y CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_FAST_CMPXCHG_LOCAL=y CONFIG_MMU=y CONFIG_ZONE_DMA=y CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP=y CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG=y CONFIG_GENERIC_HWEIGHT=y CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO=y CONFIG_ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC=y # CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK is not set CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y # CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U32 is not set # CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U64 is not set CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_IDLE_WAIT=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY=y # CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL is not set CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX=y CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CACHE_LINE_SIZE=y CONFIG_HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA=y # CONFIG_HAVE_CPUMASK_OF_CPU_MAP is not set CONFIG_ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE=y CONFIG_ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE=y # CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32 is not set CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP=y # CONFIG_AUDIT_ARCH is not set CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT=y CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING=y CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS=y CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE=y CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ=y CONFIG_X86_SMP=y CONFIG_X86_32_SMP=y CONFIG_X86_HT=y CONFIG_X86_BIOS_REBOOT=y CONFIG_X86_TRAMPOLINE=y CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR=y CONFIG_DEFCONFIG_LIST="/lib/modules/$UNAME_RELEASE/.config" # # General setup # CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL=y CONFIG_INIT_ENV_ARG_LIMIT=32 CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="" # CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is not set CONFIG_VERSION_SIGNATURE="Ubuntu 2.6.27-4.6-generic" CONFIG_SWAP=y CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y CONFIG_SYSVIPC_SYSCTL=y CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE=y CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT=y CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3=y CONFIG_TASKSTATS=y # CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT is not set CONFIG_TASK_XACCT=y CONFIG_TASK_IO_ACCOUNTING=y CONFIG_AUDIT=y CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL=y CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE=y # CONFIG_IKCONFIG is not set CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT=17 CONFIG_CGROUPS=y # CONFIG_CGROUP_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_CGROUP_NS=y # CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE is not set CONFIG_CPUSETS=y CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK=y CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=y CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y # CONFIG_USER_SCHED is not set CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED=y CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT=y CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS=y CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=y CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y CONFIG_PROC_PID_CPUSET=y CONFIG_RELAY=y CONFIG_NAMESPACES=y CONFIG_UTS_NS=y CONFIG_IPC_NS=y # CONFIG_USER_NS is not set # CONFIG_PID_NS is not set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE="" # CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is not set CONFIG_SYSCTL=y # CONFIG_EMBEDDED is not set CONFIG_UID16=y CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL=y CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y # CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS is not set CONFIG_HOTPLUG=y CONFIG_PRINTK=y CONFIG_BUG=y CONFIG_ELF_CORE=y CONFIG_PCSPKR_PLATFORM=y # CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is not set CONFIG_BASE_FULL=y CONFIG_FUTEX=y CONFIG_ANON_INODES=y CONFIG_EPOLL=y CONFIG_SIGNALFD=y CONFIG_TIMERFD=y CONFIG_EVENTFD=y CONFIG_SHMEM=y CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS=y CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y # CONFIG_SLAB is not set CONFIG_SLUB=y # CONFIG_SLOB is not set CONFIG_PROFILING=y CONFIG_MARKERS=y CONFIG_OPROFILE=m CONFIG_HAVE_OPROFILE=y CONFIG_KPROBES=y CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=y CONFIG_KRETPROBES=y CONFIG_HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT=y CONFIG_HAVE_KPROBES=y CONFIG_HAVE_KRETPROBES=y # CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK is not set # CONFIG_HAVE_DMA_ATTRS is not set CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS=y # CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not set CONFIG_PROC_PAGE_MONITOR=y CONFIG_HAVE_GENERIC_DMA_COHERENT=y CONFIG_SLABINFO=y CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=y # CONFIG_TINY_SHMEM is not set CONFIG_BASE_SMALL=0 CONFIG_MODULES=y # CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_LOAD is not set CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y # CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD is not set CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y CONFIG_MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL=y CONFIG_KMOD=y CONFIG_STOP_MACHINE=y CONFIG_BLOCK=y CONFIG_LBD=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE=y CONFIG_LSF=y # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG is not set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY=y # # IO Schedulers # CONFIG_IOSCHED_NOOP=y CONFIG_IOSCHED_AS=y CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE=y CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ=y # CONFIG_DEFAULT_AS is not set # CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEADLINE is not set CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ=y # CONFIG_DEFAULT_NOOP is not set CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="cfq" CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y # # Processor type and features # CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y CONFIG_NO_HZ=y CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BUILD=y CONFIG_SMP=y CONFIG_X86_FIND_SMP_CONFIG=y CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE=y CONFIG_X86_PC=y # CONFIG_X86_ELAN is not set # CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER is not set # CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH is not set # CONFIG_X86_VSMP is not set # CONFIG_X86_RDC321X is not set CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER=y CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST=y CONFIG_XEN_SAVE_RESTORE=y CONFIG_VMI=y CONFIG_KVM_CLOCK=y CONFIG_KVM_GUEST=y # CONFIG_LGUEST_GUEST is not set CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y CONFIG_PARAVIRT_CLOCK=y # CONFIG_PARAVIRT_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_MEMTEST is not set # CONFIG_M386 is not set # CONFIG_M486 is not set CONFIG_M586=y # CONFIG_M586TSC is not set # CONFIG_M586MMX is not set # CONFIG_M686 is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMII is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMM is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 is not set # CONFIG_MK6 is not set # CONFIG_MK7 is not set # CONFIG_MK8 is not set # CONFIG_MCRUSOE is not set # CONFIG_MEFFICEON is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6 is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIP2 is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D is not set # CONFIG_MGEODEGX1 is not set # CONFIG_MGEODE_LX is not set # CONFIG_MCYRIXIII is not set # CONFIG_MVIAC3_2 is not set # CONFIG_MVIAC7 is not set # CONFIG_MPSC is not set # CONFIG_MCORE2 is not set # CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU is not set CONFIG_X86_GENERIC=y CONFIG_X86_CPU=y CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=7 CONFIG_X86_XADD=y CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE=y CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG=y CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y CONFIG_X86_ALIGNMENT_16=y CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY=y CONFIG_X86_MINIMUM_CPU_FAMILY=4 CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y CONFIG_DMI=y # CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER is not set CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64 CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y # CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y # CONFIG_X86_MCE is not set CONFIG_VM86=y # CONFIG_TOSHIBA is not set CONFIG_I8K=m CONFIG_X86_REBOOTFIXUPS=y CONFIG_MICROCODE=m CONFIG_MICROCODE_OLD_INTERFACE=y CONFIG_X86_MSR=m CONFIG_X86_CPUID=m # CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xC0000000 CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y CONFIG_ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE=y CONFIG_ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE=y CONFIG_ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y CONFIG_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL=y # CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL is not set # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is not set CONFIG_FLATMEM=y CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP=y CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_STATIC=y # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE is not set CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED=y CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS=4 # CONFIG_RESOURCES_64BIT is not set CONFIG_ZONE_DMA_FLAG=1 CONFIG_BOUNCE=y CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS=y CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER=y CONFIG_HIGHPTE=y # CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION is not set CONFIG_MTRR=y CONFIG_MTRR_SANITIZER=y CONFIG_MTRR_SANITIZER_ENABLE_DEFAULT=0 CONFIG_MTRR_SANITIZER_SPARE_REG_NR_DEFAULT=1 # CONFIG_X86_PAT is not set CONFIG_EFI=y # CONFIG_IRQBALANCE is not set CONFIG_SECCOMP=y # CONFIG_HZ_100 is not set CONFIG_HZ_250=y # CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set # CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set CONFIG_HZ=250 CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK=y CONFIG_KEXEC=y CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP=y CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x100000 CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN=0x100000 CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y # CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO is not set CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y # # Power management options # CONFIG_PM=y CONFIG_PM_DEBUG=y # CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE is not set CONFIG_CAN_PM_TRACE=y CONFIG_PM_TRACE=y CONFIG_PM_TRACE_RTC=y CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP=y CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=y CONFIG_SUSPEND=y CONFIG_PM_TEST_SUSPEND=y CONFIG_SUSPEND_FREEZER=y CONFIG_PM_DISABLE_CONSOLE=y CONFIG_HIBERNATION=y CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION="" CONFIG_ACPI=y CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=y CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY=m CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=m CONFIG_ACPI_BAY=m CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=y CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m CONFIG_ACPI_WMI=m # CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS is not set # CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA is not set CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE="" # CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT is not set CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD=y CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=2000 # CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT=m CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER=y CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER=m CONFIG_ACPI_SBS=m CONFIG_X86_APM_BOOT=y CONFIG_APM=m # CONFIG_APM_IGNORE_USER_SUSPEND is not set # CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE is not set # CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE is not set # CONFIG_APM_DISPLAY_BLANK is not set # CONFIG_APM_ALLOW_INTS is not set # CONFIG_APM_REAL_MODE_POWER_OFF is not set # # CPU Frequency scaling # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=m # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=m CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_POWERSAVE is not set # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_USERSPACE is not set # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND is not set # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE is not set CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=m CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=m CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=m CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=m # # CPUFreq processor drivers # CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=m CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K6=m CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K7=m CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K7_ACPI=y CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8=m CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI=y CONFIG_X86_GX_SUSPMOD=m CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO=m CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_TABLE=y CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_ICH=m CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_SMI=m CONFIG_X86_P4_CLOCKMOD=m CONFIG_X86_CPUFREQ_NFORCE2=m CONFIG_X86_LONGRUN=m CONFIG_X86_LONGHAUL=m # CONFIG_X86_E_POWERSAVER is not set # # shared options # # CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_PROC_INTF is not set CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_LIB=m CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_RELAXED_CAP_CHECK=y CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_GOV_LADDER=y CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_GOV_MENU=y # # Bus options (PCI etc.) # CONFIG_PCI=y # CONFIG_PCI_GOBIOS is not set # CONFIG_PCI_GOMMCONFIG is not set # CONFIG_PCI_GODIRECT is not set # CONFIG_PCI_GOOLPC is not set CONFIG_PCI_GOANY=y CONFIG_PCI_BIOS=y CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT=y CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG=y CONFIG_PCI_OLPC=y CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS=y CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS=y CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE=m CONFIG_PCIEAER=y # CONFIG_PCIEASPM is not set CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSI=y CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y CONFIG_PCI_LEGACY=y # CONFIG_PCI_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_HT_IRQ=y CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API=y CONFIG_ISA=y CONFIG_EISA=y CONFIG_EISA_VLB_PRIMING=y CONFIG_EISA_PCI_EISA=y CONFIG_EISA_VIRTUAL_ROOT=y CONFIG_EISA_NAMES=y CONFIG_MCA=y CONFIG_MCA_LEGACY=y # CONFIG_MCA_PROC_FS is not set CONFIG_SCx200=m CONFIG_SCx200HR_TIMER=m CONFIG_OLPC=y CONFIG_K8_NB=y CONFIG_PCCARD=m # CONFIG_PCMCIA_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_PCMCIA=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_LOAD_CIS=y CONFIG_PCMCIA_IOCTL=y CONFIG_CARDBUS=y # # PC-card bridges # CONFIG_YENTA=m CONFIG_YENTA_O2=y CONFIG_YENTA_RICOH=y CONFIG_YENTA_TI=y CONFIG_YENTA_ENE_TUNE=y CONFIG_YENTA_TOSHIBA=y CONFIG_PD6729=m CONFIG_I82092=m CONFIG_I82365=m CONFIG_TCIC=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_PROBE=y CONFIG_PCCARD_NONSTATIC=m CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI=m CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_FAKE=m CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_COMPAQ=m CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_COMPAQ_NVRAM=y CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_IBM=m CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI=m CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI_IBM=m CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_CPCI=y CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_CPCI_ZT5550=m CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_CPCI_GENERIC=m CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_SHPC=m # # Executable file formats / Emulations # CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT=m CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC=m CONFIG_NET=y # # Networking options # CONFIG_PACKET=m CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP=y CONFIG_UNIX=y CONFIG_XFRM=y CONFIG_XFRM_USER=m # CONFIG_XFRM_SUB_POLICY is not set # CONFIG_XFRM_MIGRATE is not set # CONFIG_XFRM_STATISTICS is not set CONFIG_XFRM_IPCOMP=m CONFIG_NET_KEY=m # CONFIG_NET_KEY_MIGRATE is not set CONFIG_INET=y CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y CONFIG_ASK_IP_FIB_HASH=y # CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE is not set CONFIG_IP_FIB_HASH=y CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE=y # CONFIG_IP_PNP is not set CONFIG_NET_IPIP=m CONFIG_NET_IPGRE=m CONFIG_NET_IPGRE_BROADCAST=y CONFIG_IP_MROUTE=y CONFIG_IP_PIMSM_V1=y CONFIG_IP_PIMSM_V2=y # CONFIG_ARPD is not set CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES=y CONFIG_INET_AH=m CONFIG_INET_ESP=m CONFIG_INET_IPCOMP=m CONFIG_INET_XFRM_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_INET_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT=m CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_BEET=m CONFIG_INET_LRO=m CONFIG_INET_DIAG=y CONFIG_INET_TCP_DIAG=y CONFIG_TCP_CONG_ADVANCED=y CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BIC=m CONFIG_TCP_CONG_CUBIC=m CONFIG_TCP_CONG_WESTWOOD=m CONFIG_TCP_CONG_HTCP=m CONFIG_TCP_CONG_HSTCP=m CONFIG_TCP_CONG_HYBLA=m CONFIG_TCP_CONG_VEGAS=m CONFIG_TCP_CONG_SCALABLE=m CONFIG_TCP_CONG_LP=m CONFIG_TCP_CONG_VENO=m CONFIG_TCP_CONG_YEAH=m CONFIG_TCP_CONG_ILLINOIS=m # CONFIG_DEFAULT_BIC is not set # CONFIG_DEFAULT_CUBIC is not set # CONFIG_DEFAULT_HTCP is not set # CONFIG_DEFAULT_VEGAS is not set # CONFIG_DEFAULT_WESTWOOD is not set CONFIG_DEFAULT_RENO=y CONFIG_DEFAULT_TCP_CONG="reno" CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG=y CONFIG_IP_VS=m # CONFIG_IP_VS_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_IP_VS_TAB_BITS=12 # # IPVS transport protocol load balancing support # CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_TCP=y CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_UDP=y CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_ESP=y CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_AH=y # # IPVS scheduler # CONFIG_IP_VS_RR=m CONFIG_IP_VS_WRR=m CONFIG_IP_VS_LC=m CONFIG_IP_VS_WLC=m CONFIG_IP_VS_LBLC=m CONFIG_IP_VS_LBLCR=m CONFIG_IP_VS_DH=m CONFIG_IP_VS_SH=m CONFIG_IP_VS_SED=m CONFIG_IP_VS_NQ=m # # IPVS application helper # CONFIG_IP_VS_FTP=m CONFIG_IPV6=m CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY=y # CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF is not set # CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD is not set CONFIG_INET6_AH=m CONFIG_INET6_ESP=m CONFIG_INET6_IPCOMP=m # CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6 is not set CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_INET6_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT=m CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_BEET=m CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_ROUTEOPTIMIZATION=m CONFIG_IPV6_SIT=m CONFIG_IPV6_NDISC_NODETYPE=y CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL=m CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y # CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES is not set # CONFIG_IPV6_MROUTE is not set CONFIG_NETLABEL=y CONFIG_NETWORK_SECMARK=y CONFIG_NETFILTER=y # CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_NETFILTER_ADVANCED=y CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=y # # Core Netfilter Configuration # CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_QUEUE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_LOG=m CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m CONFIG_NF_CT_ACCT=y CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK=y CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SECMARK=y CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_EVENTS=y # CONFIG_NF_CT_PROTO_DCCP is not set CONFIG_NF_CT_PROTO_GRE=m CONFIG_NF_CT_PROTO_SCTP=m CONFIG_NF_CT_PROTO_UDPLITE=m CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_AMANDA=m CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_FTP=m CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_H323=m CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IRC=m CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_NETBIOS_NS=m CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PPTP=m # CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SANE is not set CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SIP=m CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_TFTP=m CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XTABLES=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CLASSIFY=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CONNMARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_DSCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_MARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_NFQUEUE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_NFLOG=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_NOTRACK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_RATEEST=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TRACE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_SECMARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CONNSECMARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TCPMSS=m # CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TCPOPTSTRIP is not set CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_COMMENT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNBYTES=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNLIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNMARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNTRACK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DCCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DSCP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ESP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HELPER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPRANGE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LIMIT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MAC=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OWNER=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_POLICY=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MULTIPORT=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_PHYSDEV=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_PKTTYPE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_QUOTA=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_RATEEST=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_REALM=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_SCTP=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_STATE=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_STATISTIC=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_STRING=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_TCPMSS=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_TIME=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_U32=m CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HASHLIMIT=m # # IP: Netfilter Configuration # CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4=m CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROC_COMPAT=y CONFIG_IP_NF_QUEUE=m CONFIG_IP_NF_IPTABLES=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_RECENT=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_ECN=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_AH=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_TTL=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_ADDRTYPE=m CONFIG_IP_NF_FILTER=m CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REJECT=m CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_LOG=m CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_ULOG=m CONFIG_NF_NAT=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_NEEDED=y CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_MASQUERADE=m CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REDIRECT=m CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_NETMAP=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_SNMP_BASIC=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_PROTO_GRE=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_PROTO_UDPLITE=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_PROTO_SCTP=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_FTP=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_IRC=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_TFTP=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_AMANDA=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_PPTP=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_H323=m CONFIG_NF_NAT_SIP=m CONFIG_IP_NF_MANGLE=m CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_ECN=m CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_TTL=m CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_CLUSTERIP=m CONFIG_IP_NF_RAW=m CONFIG_IP_NF_SECURITY=m CONFIG_IP_NF_ARPTABLES=m CONFIG_IP_NF_ARPFILTER=m CONFIG_IP_NF_ARP_MANGLE=m # # IPv6: Netfilter Configuration # CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV6=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_QUEUE=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_IPTABLES=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_RT=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_OPTS=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_FRAG=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_HL=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_IPV6HEADER=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_AH=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_MH=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_EUI64=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_FILTER=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_LOG=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_REJECT=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_MANGLE=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_HL=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_RAW=m CONFIG_IP6_NF_SECURITY=m # # DECnet: Netfilter Configuration # CONFIG_DECNET_NF_GRABULATOR=m # # Bridge: Netfilter Configuration # CONFIG_BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_BROUTE=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_T_FILTER=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_T_NAT=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_802_3=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_AMONG=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_ARP=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_IP=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_IP6=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_LIMIT=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_MARK=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_PKTTYPE=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_STP=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_VLAN=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_ARPREPLY=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_DNAT=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_MARK_T=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_REDIRECT=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_SNAT=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_LOG=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_ULOG=m CONFIG_BRIDGE_EBT_NFLOG=m CONFIG_IP_DCCP=m CONFIG_INET_DCCP_DIAG=m CONFIG_IP_DCCP_ACKVEC=y # # DCCP CCIDs Configuration (EXPERIMENTAL) # CONFIG_IP_DCCP_CCID2=m # CONFIG_IP_DCCP_CCID2_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_IP_DCCP_CCID3=m # CONFIG_IP_DCCP_CCID3_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_IP_DCCP_CCID3_RTO=100 CONFIG_IP_DCCP_TFRC_LIB=m # # DCCP Kernel Hacking # # CONFIG_IP_DCCP_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_NET_DCCPPROBE=m CONFIG_IP_SCTP=m # CONFIG_SCTP_DBG_MSG is not set # CONFIG_SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT is not set # CONFIG_SCTP_HMAC_NONE is not set # CONFIG_SCTP_HMAC_SHA1 is not set CONFIG_SCTP_HMAC_MD5=y CONFIG_TIPC=m # CONFIG_TIPC_ADVANCED is not set # CONFIG_TIPC_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_ATM=y CONFIG_ATM_CLIP=y # CONFIG_ATM_CLIP_NO_ICMP is not set CONFIG_ATM_LANE=m CONFIG_ATM_MPOA=m CONFIG_ATM_BR2684=m # CONFIG_ATM_BR2684_IPFILTER is not set CONFIG_STP=m CONFIG_GARP=m CONFIG_BRIDGE=m CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q=m CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q_GVRP=y CONFIG_DECNET=m # CONFIG_DECNET_ROUTER is not set CONFIG_LLC=y CONFIG_LLC2=m CONFIG_IPX=m # CONFIG_IPX_INTERN is not set CONFIG_ATALK=m CONFIG_DEV_APPLETALK=m CONFIG_LTPC=m # CONFIG_COPS is not set CONFIG_IPDDP=m CONFIG_IPDDP_ENCAP=y CONFIG_IPDDP_DECAP=y CONFIG_X25=m CONFIG_LAPB=m CONFIG_ECONET=m CONFIG_ECONET_AUNUDP=y CONFIG_ECONET_NATIVE=y CONFIG_WAN_ROUTER=m CONFIG_NET_SCHED=y # # Queueing/Scheduling # CONFIG_NET_SCH_CBQ=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_HTB=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_HFSC=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_ATM=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_PRIO=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_RED=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_SFQ=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_TEQL=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_TBF=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_GRED=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_DSMARK=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_NETEM=m CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS=m # # Classification # CONFIG_NET_CLS=y CONFIG_NET_CLS_BASIC=m CONFIG_NET_CLS_TCINDEX=m CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE4=m CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE=y CONFIG_NET_CLS_FW=m CONFIG_NET_CLS_U32=m # CONFIG_CLS_U32_PERF is not set CONFIG_CLS_U32_MARK=y CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP=m CONFIG_NET_CLS_RSVP6=m # CONFIG_NET_CLS_FLOW is not set CONFIG_NET_EMATCH=y CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_STACK=32 CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_CMP=m CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_NBYTE=m CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_U32=m CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_META=m CONFIG_NET_EMATCH_TEXT=m CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT=y CONFIG_NET_ACT_POLICE=m CONFIG_NET_ACT_GACT=m CONFIG_GACT_PROB=y CONFIG_NET_ACT_MIRRED=m CONFIG_NET_ACT_IPT=m CONFIG_NET_ACT_NAT=m CONFIG_NET_ACT_PEDIT=m CONFIG_NET_ACT_SIMP=m # CONFIG_NET_CLS_IND is not set CONFIG_NET_SCH_FIFO=y # # Network testing # CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN=m CONFIG_NET_TCPPROBE=m CONFIG_HAMRADIO=y # # Packet Radio protocols # CONFIG_AX25=m CONFIG_AX25_DAMA_SLAVE=y CONFIG_NETROM=m CONFIG_ROSE=m # # AX.25 network device drivers # CONFIG_MKISS=m CONFIG_6PACK=m CONFIG_BPQETHER=m CONFIG_SCC=m # CONFIG_SCC_DELAY is not set # CONFIG_SCC_TRXECHO is not set CONFIG_BAYCOM_SER_FDX=m CONFIG_BAYCOM_SER_HDX=m CONFIG_BAYCOM_PAR=m CONFIG_BAYCOM_EPP=m CONFIG_YAM=m # CONFIG_CAN is not set CONFIG_IRDA=m # # IrDA protocols # CONFIG_IRLAN=m CONFIG_IRNET=m CONFIG_IRCOMM=m CONFIG_IRDA_ULTRA=y # # IrDA options # CONFIG_IRDA_CACHE_LAST_LSAP=y CONFIG_IRDA_FAST_RR=y CONFIG_IRDA_DEBUG=y # # Infrared-port device drivers # # # SIR device drivers # CONFIG_IRTTY_SIR=m # # Dongle support # CONFIG_DONGLE=y CONFIG_ESI_DONGLE=m CONFIG_ACTISYS_DONGLE=m CONFIG_TEKRAM_DONGLE=m # CONFIG_TOIM3232_DONGLE is not set CONFIG_LITELINK_DONGLE=m CONFIG_MA600_DONGLE=m CONFIG_GIRBIL_DONGLE=m CONFIG_MCP2120_DONGLE=m CONFIG_OLD_BELKIN_DONGLE=m CONFIG_ACT200L_DONGLE=m CONFIG_KINGSUN_DONGLE=m CONFIG_KSDAZZLE_DONGLE=m CONFIG_KS959_DONGLE=m # # FIR device drivers # CONFIG_USB_IRDA=m CONFIG_SIGMATEL_FIR=m CONFIG_NSC_FIR=m CONFIG_WINBOND_FIR=m CONFIG_TOSHIBA_FIR=m CONFIG_SMC_IRCC_FIR=m CONFIG_ALI_FIR=m CONFIG_VLSI_FIR=m CONFIG_VIA_FIR=m CONFIG_MCS_FIR=m CONFIG_BT=m CONFIG_BT_L2CAP=m CONFIG_BT_SCO=m CONFIG_BT_RFCOMM=m CONFIG_BT_RFCOMM_TTY=y CONFIG_BT_BNEP=m CONFIG_BT_BNEP_MC_FILTER=y CONFIG_BT_BNEP_PROTO_FILTER=y CONFIG_BT_CMTP=m CONFIG_BT_HIDP=m # # Bluetooth device drivers # CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB=m CONFIG_BT_HCIBTSDIO=m CONFIG_BT_HCIUART=m CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_H4=y CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_BCSP=y CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_LL=y CONFIG_BT_HCIBCM203X=m CONFIG_BT_HCIBPA10X=m CONFIG_BT_HCIBFUSB=m CONFIG_BT_HCIDTL1=m CONFIG_BT_HCIBT3C=m CONFIG_BT_HCIBLUECARD=m CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUART=m CONFIG_BT_HCIVHCI=m CONFIG_AF_RXRPC=m # CONFIG_AF_RXRPC_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_RXKAD=m CONFIG_FIB_RULES=y # # Wireless # CONFIG_CFG80211=m CONFIG_NL80211=y CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT=y CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT_SYSFS=y CONFIG_MAC80211=m # # Rate control algorithm selection # CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_PID=y CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT_PID=y CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT="pid" CONFIG_MAC80211_MESH=y CONFIG_MAC80211_LEDS=y CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUGFS=y # CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUG_MENU is not set CONFIG_IEEE80211=m # CONFIG_IEEE80211_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_WEP=m CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_CCMP=m CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_TKIP=m CONFIG_RFKILL=m CONFIG_RFKILL_INPUT=m CONFIG_RFKILL_LEDS=y CONFIG_NET_9P=m CONFIG_NET_9P_VIRTIO=m # CONFIG_NET_9P_DEBUG is not set # # Device Drivers # # # Generic Driver Options # CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH="/sbin/hotplug" # CONFIG_STANDALONE is not set CONFIG_PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD=y CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y # CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL is not set CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE="" # CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_DEVRES is not set # CONFIG_SYS_HYPERVISOR is not set CONFIG_CONNECTOR=m CONFIG_MTD=m # CONFIG_MTD_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_MTD_CONCAT=m CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS=y CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS=m CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_DIRECTORY_BLOCK=-1 # CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_UNALLOCATED is not set # CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS_READONLY is not set CONFIG_MTD_AR7_PARTS=m # # User Modules And Translation Layers # CONFIG_MTD_CHAR=m CONFIG_MTD_BLKDEVS=m CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK=m CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK_RO=m CONFIG_FTL=m CONFIG_NFTL=m CONFIG_NFTL_RW=y CONFIG_INFTL=m CONFIG_RFD_FTL=m CONFIG_SSFDC=m CONFIG_MTD_OOPS=m # # RAM/ROM/Flash chip drivers # CONFIG_MTD_CFI=m CONFIG_MTD_JEDECPROBE=m CONFIG_MTD_GEN_PROBE=m # CONFIG_MTD_CFI_ADV_OPTIONS is not set CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_1=y CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_2=y CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_4=y # CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_8 is not set # CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_16 is not set # CONFIG_MTD_MAP_BANK_WIDTH_32 is not set CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I1=y CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I2=y # CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I4 is not set # CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I8 is not set CONFIG_MTD_CFI_INTELEXT=m CONFIG_MTD_CFI_AMDSTD=m CONFIG_MTD_CFI_STAA=m CONFIG_MTD_CFI_UTIL=m CONFIG_MTD_RAM=m CONFIG_MTD_ROM=m CONFIG_MTD_ABSENT=m # # Mapping drivers for chip access # CONFIG_MTD_COMPLEX_MAPPINGS=y CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP=m CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_START=0x8000000 CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_LEN=0x4000000 CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_BANKWIDTH=2 CONFIG_MTD_SC520CDP=m CONFIG_MTD_NETSC520=m CONFIG_MTD_TS5500=m CONFIG_MTD_SBC_GXX=m CONFIG_MTD_SCx200_DOCFLASH=m CONFIG_MTD_AMD76XROM=m CONFIG_MTD_ICHXROM=m CONFIG_MTD_ESB2ROM=m CONFIG_MTD_CK804XROM=m CONFIG_MTD_SCB2_FLASH=m CONFIG_MTD_NETtel=m CONFIG_MTD_DILNETPC=m CONFIG_MTD_DILNETPC_BOOTSIZE=0x80000 CONFIG_MTD_L440GX=m CONFIG_MTD_PCI=m CONFIG_MTD_INTEL_VR_NOR=m CONFIG_MTD_PLATRAM=m # # Self-contained MTD device drivers # CONFIG_MTD_PMC551=m # CONFIG_MTD_PMC551_BUGFIX is not set # CONFIG_MTD_PMC551_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_MTD_DATAFLASH=m CONFIG_MTD_M25P80=m CONFIG_M25PXX_USE_FAST_READ=y CONFIG_MTD_SLRAM=m CONFIG_MTD_PHRAM=m CONFIG_MTD_MTDRAM=m CONFIG_MTDRAM_TOTAL_SIZE=4096 CONFIG_MTDRAM_ERASE_SIZE=128 CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK2MTD=m # # Disk-On-Chip Device Drivers # CONFIG_MTD_DOC2000=m CONFIG_MTD_DOC2001=m CONFIG_MTD_DOC2001PLUS=m CONFIG_MTD_DOCPROBE=m CONFIG_MTD_DOCECC=m # CONFIG_MTD_DOCPROBE_ADVANCED is not set CONFIG_MTD_DOCPROBE_ADDRESS=0 CONFIG_MTD_NAND=m # CONFIG_MTD_NAND_VERIFY_WRITE is not set # CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SMC is not set # CONFIG_MTD_NAND_MUSEUM_IDS is not set CONFIG_MTD_NAND_IDS=m CONFIG_MTD_NAND_DISKONCHIP=m # CONFIG_MTD_NAND_DISKONCHIP_PROBE_ADVANCED is not set CONFIG_MTD_NAND_DISKONCHIP_PROBE_ADDRESS=0 # CONFIG_MTD_NAND_DISKONCHIP_BBTWRITE is not set CONFIG_MTD_NAND_CAFE=m CONFIG_MTD_NAND_CS553X=m CONFIG_MTD_NAND_NANDSIM=m CONFIG_MTD_NAND_PLATFORM=m CONFIG_MTD_ALAUDA=m CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND=m CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_VERIFY_WRITE=y # CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_OTP is not set CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_2X_PROGRAM=y CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND_SIM=m # # UBI - Unsorted block images # CONFIG_MTD_UBI=m CONFIG_MTD_UBI_WL_THRESHOLD=4096 CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE=1 CONFIG_MTD_UBI_GLUEBI=y # # UBI debugging options # # CONFIG_MTD_UBI_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_PARPORT=m CONFIG_PARPORT_PC=m CONFIG_PARPORT_SERIAL=m CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_FIFO=y # CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_SUPERIO is not set CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_PCMCIA=m # CONFIG_PARPORT_GSC is not set CONFIG_PARPORT_AX88796=m CONFIG_PARPORT_1284=y CONFIG_PARPORT_NOT_PC=y CONFIG_PNP=y # CONFIG_PNP_DEBUG is not set # # Protocols # CONFIG_ISAPNP=y CONFIG_PNPBIOS=y CONFIG_PNPBIOS_PROC_FS=y CONFIG_PNPACPI=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_FD=m # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_XD is not set CONFIG_PARIDE=m # # Parallel IDE high-level drivers # CONFIG_PARIDE_PD=m CONFIG_PARIDE_PCD=m CONFIG_PARIDE_PF=m CONFIG_PARIDE_PT=m CONFIG_PARIDE_PG=m # # Parallel IDE protocol modules # CONFIG_PARIDE_ATEN=m CONFIG_PARIDE_BPCK=m CONFIG_PARIDE_BPCK6=m CONFIG_PARIDE_COMM=m CONFIG_PARIDE_DSTR=m CONFIG_PARIDE_FIT2=m CONFIG_PARIDE_FIT3=m CONFIG_PARIDE_EPAT=m # CONFIG_PARIDE_EPATC8 is not set CONFIG_PARIDE_EPIA=m CONFIG_PARIDE_FRIQ=m CONFIG_PARIDE_FRPW=m CONFIG_PARIDE_KBIC=m CONFIG_PARIDE_KTTI=m CONFIG_PARIDE_ON20=m CONFIG_PARIDE_ON26=m CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_DA=m CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_CISS_DA=m CONFIG_CISS_SCSI_TAPE=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DAC960=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UMEM=m # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_COW_COMMON is not set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CRYPTOLOOP=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NBD=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SX8=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_COUNT=16 CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE=65536 # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_XIP is not set CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD=m CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD_BUFFERS=8 # CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD_WCACHE is not set CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH=m CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK=m # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HD is not set CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES=y CONFIG_IBM_ASM=m CONFIG_PHANTOM=m CONFIG_EEPROM_93CX6=m CONFIG_SGI_IOC4=m CONFIG_TIFM_CORE=m CONFIG_TIFM_7XX1=m CONFIG_ACER_WMI=m CONFIG_ASUS_LAPTOP=m CONFIG_FUJITSU_LAPTOP=m # CONFIG_FUJITSU_LAPTOP_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_TC1100_WMI=m CONFIG_HP_WMI=m CONFIG_MSI_LAPTOP=m CONFIG_COMPAL_LAPTOP=m CONFIG_SONY_LAPTOP=m CONFIG_SONYPI_COMPAT=y CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI=m # CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI_BAY=y CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI_VIDEO=y CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI_HOTKEY_POLL=y CONFIG_INTEL_MENLOW=m CONFIG_EEEPC_LAPTOP=m CONFIG_ENCLOSURE_SERVICES=m CONFIG_HP_ILO=m CONFIG_HAVE_IDE=y # CONFIG_IDE is not set # # SCSI device support # CONFIG_RAID_ATTRS=m CONFIG_SCSI=m CONFIG_SCSI_DMA=y CONFIG_SCSI_TGT=m CONFIG_SCSI_NETLINK=y CONFIG_SCSI_PROC_FS=y # # SCSI support type (disk, tape, CD-ROM) # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD=m CONFIG_CHR_DEV_ST=m CONFIG_CHR_DEV_OSST=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR=m # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR_VENDOR is not set CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG=m CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SCH=m CONFIG_SCSI_ENCLOSURE=m # # Some SCSI devices (e.g. CD jukebox) support multiple LUNs # CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN=y CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS=y CONFIG_SCSI_LOGGING=y CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m # # SCSI Transports # CONFIG_SCSI_SPI_ATTRS=m CONFIG_SCSI_FC_ATTRS=m CONFIG_SCSI_FC_TGT_ATTRS=y CONFIG_SCSI_ISCSI_ATTRS=m CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATTRS=m CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_LIBSAS=m CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATA=y CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_HOST_SMP=y # CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_LIBSAS_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_SCSI_SRP_ATTRS=m CONFIG_SCSI_SRP_TGT_ATTRS=y CONFIG_SCSI_LOWLEVEL=y CONFIG_ISCSI_TCP=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_3W_XXXX_RAID=m CONFIG_SCSI_3W_9XXX=m CONFIG_SCSI_7000FASST=m CONFIG_SCSI_ACARD=m CONFIG_SCSI_AHA152X=m CONFIG_SCSI_AHA1542=m CONFIG_SCSI_AHA1740=m CONFIG_SCSI_AACRAID=m CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX=m CONFIG_AIC7XXX_CMDS_PER_DEVICE=8 CONFIG_AIC7XXX_RESET_DELAY_MS=15000 CONFIG_AIC7XXX_DEBUG_ENABLE=y CONFIG_AIC7XXX_DEBUG_MASK=0 CONFIG_AIC7XXX_REG_PRETTY_PRINT=y # CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX_OLD is not set CONFIG_SCSI_AIC79XX=m CONFIG_AIC79XX_CMDS_PER_DEVICE=32 CONFIG_AIC79XX_RESET_DELAY_MS=15000 CONFIG_AIC79XX_DEBUG_ENABLE=y CONFIG_AIC79XX_DEBUG_MASK=0 CONFIG_AIC79XX_REG_PRETTY_PRINT=y CONFIG_SCSI_AIC94XX=m # CONFIG_AIC94XX_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_SCSI_DPT_I2O=m CONFIG_SCSI_ADVANSYS=m CONFIG_SCSI_IN2000=m CONFIG_SCSI_ARCMSR=m CONFIG_SCSI_ARCMSR_AER=y CONFIG_MEGARAID_NEWGEN=y CONFIG_MEGARAID_MM=m CONFIG_MEGARAID_MAILBOX=m CONFIG_MEGARAID_LEGACY=m CONFIG_MEGARAID_SAS=m CONFIG_SCSI_HPTIOP=m CONFIG_SCSI_BUSLOGIC=m # CONFIG_SCSI_FLASHPOINT is not set CONFIG_SCSI_DMX3191D=m CONFIG_SCSI_DTC3280=m CONFIG_SCSI_EATA=m CONFIG_SCSI_EATA_TAGGED_QUEUE=y CONFIG_SCSI_EATA_LINKED_COMMANDS=y CONFIG_SCSI_EATA_MAX_TAGS=16 CONFIG_SCSI_FUTURE_DOMAIN=m CONFIG_SCSI_FD_MCS=m CONFIG_SCSI_GDTH=m CONFIG_SCSI_GENERIC_NCR5380=m CONFIG_SCSI_GENERIC_NCR5380_MMIO=m CONFIG_SCSI_GENERIC_NCR53C400=y CONFIG_SCSI_IBMMCA=m CONFIG_IBMMCA_SCSI_ORDER_STANDARD=y # CONFIG_IBMMCA_SCSI_DEV_RESET is not set CONFIG_SCSI_IPS=m CONFIG_SCSI_INITIO=m CONFIG_SCSI_INIA100=m CONFIG_SCSI_PPA=m CONFIG_SCSI_IMM=m # CONFIG_SCSI_IZIP_EPP16 is not set # CONFIG_SCSI_IZIP_SLOW_CTR is not set # CONFIG_SCSI_MVSAS is not set CONFIG_SCSI_NCR53C406A=m CONFIG_SCSI_NCR_D700=m CONFIG_SCSI_STEX=m CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_2=m CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_DMA_ADDRESSING_MODE=1 CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_DEFAULT_TAGS=16 CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_MAX_TAGS=64 CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_MMIO=y CONFIG_SCSI_IPR=m # CONFIG_SCSI_IPR_TRACE is not set # CONFIG_SCSI_IPR_DUMP is not set CONFIG_SCSI_NCR_Q720=m CONFIG_SCSI_NCR53C8XX_DEFAULT_TAGS=8 CONFIG_SCSI_NCR53C8XX_MAX_TAGS=4 CONFIG_SCSI_NCR53C8XX_SYNC=5 CONFIG_SCSI_PAS16=m CONFIG_SCSI_QLOGIC_FAS=m CONFIG_SCSI_QLOGIC_1280=m CONFIG_SCSI_QLA_FC=m CONFIG_SCSI_QLA_ISCSI=m CONFIG_SCSI_LPFC=m CONFIG_SCSI_SIM710=m CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C416=m CONFIG_SCSI_DC395x=m CONFIG_SCSI_DC390T=m CONFIG_SCSI_T128=m CONFIG_SCSI_U14_34F=m CONFIG_SCSI_U14_34F_TAGGED_QUEUE=y CONFIG_SCSI_U14_34F_LINKED_COMMANDS=y CONFIG_SCSI_U14_34F_MAX_TAGS=8 CONFIG_SCSI_ULTRASTOR=m CONFIG_SCSI_NSP32=m CONFIG_SCSI_DEBUG=m CONFIG_SCSI_SRP=m CONFIG_SCSI_LOWLEVEL_PCMCIA=y CONFIG_PCMCIA_AHA152X=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_FDOMAIN=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_NINJA_SCSI=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_QLOGIC=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_SYM53C500=m CONFIG_SCSI_DH=m CONFIG_SCSI_DH_RDAC=m CONFIG_SCSI_DH_HP_SW=m CONFIG_SCSI_DH_EMC=m CONFIG_SCSI_DH_ALUA=m CONFIG_ATA=m # CONFIG_ATA_NONSTANDARD is not set CONFIG_ATA_ACPI=y CONFIG_SATA_PMP=y CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=m CONFIG_SATA_SIL24=m CONFIG_ATA_SFF=y CONFIG_SATA_SVW=m CONFIG_ATA_PIIX=m CONFIG_SATA_MV=m CONFIG_SATA_NV=m CONFIG_PDC_ADMA=m CONFIG_SATA_QSTOR=m CONFIG_SATA_PROMISE=m CONFIG_SATA_SX4=m CONFIG_SATA_SIL=m CONFIG_SATA_SIS=m CONFIG_SATA_ULI=m CONFIG_SATA_VIA=m CONFIG_SATA_VITESSE=m CONFIG_SATA_INIC162X=m CONFIG_PATA_ACPI=m CONFIG_PATA_ALI=m CONFIG_PATA_AMD=m CONFIG_PATA_ARTOP=m CONFIG_PATA_ATIIXP=m # CONFIG_PATA_CMD640_PCI is not set CONFIG_PATA_CMD64X=m CONFIG_PATA_CS5520=m CONFIG_PATA_CS5530=m CONFIG_PATA_CS5535=m CONFIG_PATA_CS5536=m # CONFIG_PATA_CYPRESS is not set CONFIG_PATA_EFAR=m CONFIG_ATA_GENERIC=m CONFIG_PATA_HPT366=m CONFIG_PATA_HPT37X=m # CONFIG_PATA_HPT3X2N is not set CONFIG_PATA_HPT3X3=m # CONFIG_PATA_HPT3X3_DMA is not set # CONFIG_PATA_ISAPNP is not set CONFIG_PATA_IT821X=m CONFIG_PATA_IT8213=m CONFIG_PATA_JMICRON=m CONFIG_PATA_LEGACY=m CONFIG_PATA_TRIFLEX=m CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL=m CONFIG_PATA_MPIIX=m CONFIG_PATA_OLDPIIX=m CONFIG_PATA_NETCELL=m CONFIG_PATA_NINJA32=m CONFIG_PATA_NS87410=m CONFIG_PATA_NS87415=m # CONFIG_PATA_OPTI is not set # CONFIG_PATA_OPTIDMA is not set CONFIG_PATA_PCMCIA=m CONFIG_PATA_PDC_OLD=m CONFIG_PATA_QDI=m # CONFIG_PATA_RADISYS is not set CONFIG_PATA_RZ1000=m # CONFIG_PATA_SC1200 is not set CONFIG_PATA_SERVERWORKS=m CONFIG_PATA_PDC2027X=m CONFIG_PATA_SIL680=m CONFIG_PATA_SIS=m CONFIG_PATA_VIA=m CONFIG_PATA_WINBOND=m CONFIG_PATA_WINBOND_VLB=m CONFIG_PATA_SCH=m CONFIG_MD=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD=m CONFIG_MD_LINEAR=m CONFIG_MD_RAID0=m CONFIG_MD_RAID1=m CONFIG_MD_RAID10=m CONFIG_MD_RAID456=m CONFIG_MD_RAID5_RESHAPE=y CONFIG_MD_MULTIPATH=m CONFIG_MD_FAULTY=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM=m # CONFIG_DM_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_DM_CRYPT=m CONFIG_DM_SNAPSHOT=m CONFIG_DM_MIRROR=m CONFIG_DM_ZERO=m CONFIG_DM_MULTIPATH=m # CONFIG_DM_DELAY is not set CONFIG_DM_UEVENT=y CONFIG_FUSION=y CONFIG_FUSION_SPI=m CONFIG_FUSION_FC=m CONFIG_FUSION_SAS=m CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE=128 CONFIG_FUSION_CTL=m CONFIG_FUSION_LAN=m CONFIG_FUSION_LOGGING=y # # IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support # # # Enable only one of the two stacks, unless you know what you are doing # # CONFIG_FIREWIRE is not set CONFIG_IEEE1394=m CONFIG_IEEE1394_OHCI1394=m CONFIG_IEEE1394_PCILYNX=m CONFIG_IEEE1394_SBP2=m # CONFIG_IEEE1394_SBP2_PHYS_DMA is not set CONFIG_IEEE1394_ETH1394_ROM_ENTRY=y CONFIG_IEEE1394_ETH1394=m CONFIG_IEEE1394_RAWIO=m CONFIG_IEEE1394_VIDEO1394=m CONFIG_IEEE1394_DV1394=m # CONFIG_IEEE1394_VERBOSEDEBUG is not set CONFIG_I2O=m CONFIG_I2O_LCT_NOTIFY_ON_CHANGES=y CONFIG_I2O_EXT_ADAPTEC=y CONFIG_I2O_CONFIG=m CONFIG_I2O_CONFIG_OLD_IOCTL=y CONFIG_I2O_BUS=m CONFIG_I2O_BLOCK=m CONFIG_I2O_SCSI=m CONFIG_I2O_PROC=m CONFIG_MACINTOSH_DRIVERS=y CONFIG_MAC_EMUMOUSEBTN=y CONFIG_NETDEVICES=y CONFIG_IFB=m CONFIG_DUMMY=m CONFIG_BONDING=m CONFIG_MACVLAN=m CONFIG_EQUALIZER=m CONFIG_TUN=m CONFIG_VETH=m CONFIG_NET_SB1000=m CONFIG_ARCNET=m CONFIG_ARCNET_1201=m CONFIG_ARCNET_1051=m CONFIG_ARCNET_RAW=m CONFIG_ARCNET_CAP=m CONFIG_ARCNET_COM90xx=m CONFIG_ARCNET_COM90xxIO=m CONFIG_ARCNET_RIM_I=m CONFIG_ARCNET_COM20020=m CONFIG_ARCNET_COM20020_ISA=m CONFIG_ARCNET_COM20020_PCI=m CONFIG_PHYLIB=m # # MII PHY device drivers # CONFIG_MARVELL_PHY=m CONFIG_DAVICOM_PHY=m CONFIG_QSEMI_PHY=m CONFIG_LXT_PHY=m CONFIG_CICADA_PHY=m CONFIG_VITESSE_PHY=m CONFIG_SMSC_PHY=m CONFIG_BROADCOM_PHY=m CONFIG_ICPLUS_PHY=m # CONFIG_REALTEK_PHY is not set CONFIG_MDIO_BITBANG=m CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET=y CONFIG_MII=m CONFIG_HAPPYMEAL=m CONFIG_SUNGEM=m CONFIG_CASSINI=m CONFIG_NET_VENDOR_3COM=y CONFIG_EL1=m CONFIG_EL2=m CONFIG_ELPLUS=m CONFIG_EL16=m CONFIG_EL3=m CONFIG_3C515=m CONFIG_ELMC=m CONFIG_ELMC_II=m CONFIG_VORTEX=m CONFIG_TYPHOON=m CONFIG_LANCE=m CONFIG_NET_VENDOR_SMC=y CONFIG_WD80x3=m CONFIG_ULTRAMCA=m CONFIG_ULTRA=m CONFIG_ULTRA32=m CONFIG_SMC9194=m # CONFIG_ENC28J60 is not set CONFIG_NET_VENDOR_RACAL=y CONFIG_NI52=m CONFIG_NI65=m CONFIG_NET_TULIP=y CONFIG_DE2104X=m CONFIG_TULIP=m # CONFIG_TULIP_MWI is not set # CONFIG_TULIP_MMIO is not set # CONFIG_TULIP_NAPI is not set CONFIG_DE4X5=m CONFIG_WINBOND_840=m CONFIG_DM9102=m CONFIG_ULI526X=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_XIRCOM=m CONFIG_AT1700=m CONFIG_DEPCA=m CONFIG_HP100=m CONFIG_NET_ISA=y CONFIG_E2100=m CONFIG_EWRK3=m CONFIG_EEXPRESS=m CONFIG_EEXPRESS_PRO=m CONFIG_HPLAN_PLUS=m CONFIG_HPLAN=m CONFIG_LP486E=m CONFIG_ETH16I=m CONFIG_NE2000=m CONFIG_ZNET=m CONFIG_SEEQ8005=m CONFIG_NE2_MCA=m CONFIG_IBMLANA=m # CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_ZMII is not set # CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_RGMII is not set # CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_TAH is not set # CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_EMAC4 is not set CONFIG_NET_PCI=y CONFIG_PCNET32=m CONFIG_AMD8111_ETH=m CONFIG_ADAPTEC_STARFIRE=m CONFIG_AC3200=m CONFIG_APRICOT=m CONFIG_B44=m CONFIG_B44_PCI_AUTOSELECT=y CONFIG_B44_PCICORE_AUTOSELECT=y CONFIG_B44_PCI=y CONFIG_FORCEDETH=m # CONFIG_FORCEDETH_NAPI is not set CONFIG_CS89x0=m CONFIG_EEPRO100=m CONFIG_E100=m CONFIG_LNE390=m CONFIG_FEALNX=m CONFIG_NATSEMI=m CONFIG_NE2K_PCI=m CONFIG_NE3210=m CONFIG_ES3210=m CONFIG_8139CP=m CONFIG_8139TOO=m CONFIG_8139TOO_PIO=y # CONFIG_8139TOO_TUNE_TWISTER is not set CONFIG_8139TOO_8129=y # CONFIG_8139_OLD_RX_RESET is not set # CONFIG_R6040 is not set CONFIG_SIS900=m CONFIG_EPIC100=m CONFIG_SUNDANCE=m # CONFIG_SUNDANCE_MMIO is not set CONFIG_TLAN=m CONFIG_VIA_RHINE=m CONFIG_VIA_RHINE_MMIO=y CONFIG_SC92031=m CONFIG_NET_POCKET=y CONFIG_ATP=m CONFIG_DE600=m CONFIG_DE620=m CONFIG_NETDEV_1000=y CONFIG_ACENIC=m # CONFIG_ACENIC_OMIT_TIGON_I is not set # CONFIG_DL2K is not set CONFIG_E1000=m # CONFIG_E1000_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT is not set # CONFIG_E1000E is not set CONFIG_IP1000=m CONFIG_IGB=m # CONFIG_IGB_LRO is not set CONFIG_NS83820=m CONFIG_HAMACHI=m CONFIG_YELLOWFIN=m CONFIG_R8169=m CONFIG_R8169_VLAN=y CONFIG_SIS190=m CONFIG_SKGE=m # CONFIG_SKGE_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_SKY2=m # CONFIG_SKY2_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_VIA_VELOCITY=m CONFIG_TIGON3=m CONFIG_BNX2=m CONFIG_QLA3XXX=m CONFIG_ATL1=m CONFIG_ATL1E=m CONFIG_NETDEV_10000=y CONFIG_CHELSIO_T1=m CONFIG_CHELSIO_T1_1G=y CONFIG_CHELSIO_T3=m CONFIG_IXGBE=m CONFIG_IXGB=m CONFIG_S2IO=m CONFIG_MYRI10GE=m CONFIG_NETXEN_NIC=m CONFIG_NIU=m CONFIG_MLX4_CORE=m CONFIG_MLX4_DEBUG=y CONFIG_TEHUTI=m CONFIG_BNX2X=m CONFIG_SFC=m CONFIG_TR=y CONFIG_IBMTR=m CONFIG_IBMOL=m CONFIG_IBMLS=m CONFIG_3C359=m CONFIG_TMS380TR=m CONFIG_TMSPCI=m CONFIG_SKISA=m CONFIG_PROTEON=m CONFIG_ABYSS=m CONFIG_MADGEMC=m CONFIG_SMCTR=m # # Wireless LAN # CONFIG_WLAN_PRE80211=y CONFIG_STRIP=m CONFIG_ARLAN=m CONFIG_WAVELAN=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_WAVELAN=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_NETWAVE=m CONFIG_WLAN_80211=y CONFIG_PCMCIA_RAYCS=m CONFIG_IPW2100=m CONFIG_IPW2100_MONITOR=y # CONFIG_IPW2100_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_IPW2200=m CONFIG_IPW2200_MONITOR=y CONFIG_IPW2200_RADIOTAP=y CONFIG_IPW2200_PROMISCUOUS=y CONFIG_IPW2200_QOS=y # CONFIG_IPW2200_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_LIBERTAS=m CONFIG_LIBERTAS_USB=m CONFIG_LIBERTAS_CS=m CONFIG_LIBERTAS_SDIO=m # CONFIG_LIBERTAS_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_AIRO=m CONFIG_HERMES=m CONFIG_PLX_HERMES=m CONFIG_TMD_HERMES=m CONFIG_NORTEL_HERMES=m CONFIG_PCI_HERMES=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_HERMES=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_SPECTRUM=m CONFIG_ATMEL=m CONFIG_PCI_ATMEL=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_ATMEL=m CONFIG_AIRO_CS=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_WL3501=m CONFIG_PRISM54=m CONFIG_USB_ZD1201=m CONFIG_USB_NET_RNDIS_WLAN=m CONFIG_RTL8180=m CONFIG_RTL8187=m CONFIG_ADM8211=m # CONFIG_MAC80211_HWSIM is not set CONFIG_P54_COMMON=m CONFIG_P54_USB=m CONFIG_P54_PCI=m CONFIG_ATH5K=m # CONFIG_ATH5K_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_ATH9K=m CONFIG_IWLWIFI=m CONFIG_IWLCORE=m CONFIG_IWLWIFI_LEDS=y CONFIG_IWLWIFI_RFKILL=y # CONFIG_IWLWIFI_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_IWLAGN=m CONFIG_IWLAGN_SPECTRUM_MEASUREMENT=y CONFIG_IWLAGN_LEDS=y CONFIG_IWL4965=y CONFIG_IWL5000=y CONFIG_IWL3945=m CONFIG_IWL3945_RFKILL=y CONFIG_IWL3945_SPECTRUM_MEASUREMENT=y CONFIG_IWL3945_LEDS=y # CONFIG_IWL3945_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_HOSTAP=m CONFIG_HOSTAP_FIRMWARE=y CONFIG_HOSTAP_FIRMWARE_NVRAM=y CONFIG_HOSTAP_PLX=m CONFIG_HOSTAP_PCI=m CONFIG_HOSTAP_CS=m CONFIG_B43=m CONFIG_B43_PCI_AUTOSELECT=y CONFIG_B43_PCICORE_AUTOSELECT=y # CONFIG_B43_PCMCIA is not set CONFIG_B43_LEDS=y CONFIG_B43_RFKILL=y # CONFIG_B43_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_B43LEGACY=m CONFIG_B43LEGACY_PCI_AUTOSELECT=y CONFIG_B43LEGACY_PCICORE_AUTOSELECT=y CONFIG_B43LEGACY_LEDS=y CONFIG_B43LEGACY_RFKILL=y CONFIG_B43LEGACY_DEBUG=y CONFIG_B43LEGACY_DMA=y CONFIG_B43LEGACY_PIO=y CONFIG_B43LEGACY_DMA_AND_PIO_MODE=y # CONFIG_B43LEGACY_DMA_MODE is not set # CONFIG_B43LEGACY_PIO_MODE is not set CONFIG_ZD1211RW=m # CONFIG_ZD1211RW_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_RT2X00=m CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB=m CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB_PCI=m CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB_USB=m CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB_FIRMWARE=y CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB_RFKILL=y CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB_LEDS=y CONFIG_RT2400PCI=m CONFIG_RT2400PCI_RFKILL=y CONFIG_RT2400PCI_LEDS=y CONFIG_RT2500PCI=m CONFIG_RT2500PCI_RFKILL=y CONFIG_RT2500PCI_LEDS=y CONFIG_RT61PCI=m CONFIG_RT61PCI_RFKILL=y CONFIG_RT61PCI_LEDS=y CONFIG_RT2500USB=m CONFIG_RT2500USB_LEDS=y CONFIG_RT73USB=m CONFIG_RT73USB_LEDS=y # CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB_DEBUGFS is not set # CONFIG_RT2X00_DEBUG is not set # # USB Network Adapters # CONFIG_USB_CATC=m CONFIG_USB_KAWETH=m CONFIG_USB_PEGASUS=m CONFIG_USB_RTL8150=m CONFIG_USB_USBNET=m CONFIG_USB_NET_AX8817X=m CONFIG_USB_NET_CDCETHER=m CONFIG_USB_NET_DM9601=m CONFIG_USB_NET_GL620A=m CONFIG_USB_NET_NET1080=m CONFIG_USB_NET_PLUSB=m CONFIG_USB_NET_MCS7830=m CONFIG_USB_NET_RNDIS_HOST=m CONFIG_USB_NET_CDC_SUBSET=m CONFIG_USB_ALI_M5632=y CONFIG_USB_AN2720=y CONFIG_USB_BELKIN=y CONFIG_USB_ARMLINUX=y CONFIG_USB_EPSON2888=y CONFIG_USB_KC2190=y CONFIG_USB_NET_ZAURUS=m CONFIG_USB_HSO=m CONFIG_NET_PCMCIA=y CONFIG_PCMCIA_3C589=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_3C574=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_FMVJ18X=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_PCNET=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_NMCLAN=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_SMC91C92=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_XIRC2PS=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_AXNET=m CONFIG_ARCNET_COM20020_CS=m CONFIG_PCMCIA_IBMTR=m CONFIG_WAN=y CONFIG_HOSTESS_SV11=m CONFIG_COSA=m CONFIG_LANMEDIA=m CONFIG_SEALEVEL_4021=m CONFIG_HDLC=m CONFIG_HDLC_RAW=m CONFIG_HDLC_RAW_ETH=m CONFIG_HDLC_CISCO=m CONFIG_HDLC_FR=m CONFIG_HDLC_PPP=m CONFIG_HDLC_X25=m CONFIG_PCI200SYN=m CONFIG_WANXL=m CONFIG_PC300=m # CONFIG_PC300_MLPPP is not set # # Cyclades-PC300 MLPPP support is disabled. # # # Refer to the file README.mlppp, provided by PC300 package. # # CONFIG_PC300TOO is not set CONFIG_N2=m CONFIG_C101=m CONFIG_FARSYNC=m CONFIG_DSCC4=m CONFIG_DSCC4_PCISYNC=y CONFIG_DSCC4_PCI_RST=y CONFIG_DLCI=m CONFIG_DLCI_MAX=8 CONFIG_SDLA=m CONFIG_WAN_ROUTER_DRIVERS=m CONFIG_CYCLADES_SYNC=m CONFIG_CYCLOMX_X25=y CONFIG_LAPBETHER=m CONFIG_X25_ASY=m CONFIG_SBNI=m # CONFIG_SBNI_MULTILINE is not set CONFIG_ATM_DRIVERS=y # CONFIG_ATM_DUMMY is not set CONFIG_ATM_TCP=m CONFIG_ATM_LANAI=m CONFIG_ATM_ENI=m # CONFIG_ATM_ENI_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_ATM_ENI_TUNE_BURST is not set CONFIG_ATM_FIRESTREAM=m CONFIG_ATM_ZATM=m # CONFIG_ATM_ZATM_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_ATM_NICSTAR=m # CONFIG_ATM_NICSTAR_USE_SUNI is not set # CONFIG_ATM_NICSTAR_USE_IDT77105 is not set CONFIG_ATM_IDT77252=m # CONFIG_ATM_IDT77252_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_ATM_IDT77252_RCV_ALL is not set CONFIG_ATM_IDT77252_USE_SUNI=y CONFIG_ATM_AMBASSADOR=m # CONFIG_ATM_AMBASSADOR_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_ATM_HORIZON=m # CONFIG_ATM_HORIZON_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_ATM_IA=m # CONFIG_ATM_IA_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_ATM_FORE200E=m # CONFIG_ATM_FORE200E_USE_TASKLET is not set CONFIG_ATM_FORE200E_TX_RETRY=16 CONFIG_ATM_FORE200E_DEBUG=0 CONFIG_ATM_HE=m CONFIG_ATM_HE_USE_SUNI=y CONFIG_FDDI=y CONFIG_DEFXX=m # CONFIG_DEFXX_MMIO is not set CONFIG_SKFP=m CONFIG_HIPPI=y CONFIG_ROADRUNNER=m # CONFIG_ROADRUNNER_LARGE_RINGS is not set CONFIG_PLIP=m CONFIG_PPP=m CONFIG_PPP_MULTILINK=y CONFIG_PPP_FILTER=y CONFIG_PPP_ASYNC=m CONFIG_PPP_SYNC_TTY=m CONFIG_PPP_DEFLATE=m CONFIG_PPP_BSDCOMP=m CONFIG_PPP_MPPE=m CONFIG_PPPOE=m CONFIG_PPPOATM=m CONFIG_PPPOL2TP=m CONFIG_SLIP=m CONFIG_SLIP_COMPRESSED=y CONFIG_SLHC=m CONFIG_SLIP_SMART=y CONFIG_SLIP_MODE_SLIP6=y CONFIG_NET_FC=y CONFIG_NETCONSOLE=m CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC=y CONFIG_NETPOLL=y # CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP is not set CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET=m CONFIG_ISDN=y CONFIG_MISDN=m CONFIG_MISDN_DSP=m CONFIG_MISDN_L1OIP=m # # mISDN hardware drivers # CONFIG_MISDN_HFCPCI=m CONFIG_MISDN_HFCMULTI=m CONFIG_ISDN_I4L=m CONFIG_ISDN_PPP=y CONFIG_ISDN_PPP_VJ=y CONFIG_ISDN_MPP=y CONFIG_IPPP_FILTER=y CONFIG_ISDN_PPP_BSDCOMP=m CONFIG_ISDN_AUDIO=y CONFIG_ISDN_TTY_FAX=y CONFIG_ISDN_X25=y # # ISDN feature submodules # CONFIG_ISDN_DIVERSION=m # # ISDN4Linux hardware drivers # # # Passive cards # CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_HISAX=m # # D-channel protocol features # CONFIG_HISAX_EURO=y CONFIG_DE_AOC=y # CONFIG_HISAX_NO_SENDCOMPLETE is not set # CONFIG_HISAX_NO_LLC is not set # CONFIG_HISAX_NO_KEYPAD is not set CONFIG_HISAX_1TR6=y CONFIG_HISAX_NI1=y CONFIG_HISAX_MAX_CARDS=8 # # HiSax supported cards # CONFIG_HISAX_16_0=y CONFIG_HISAX_16_3=y CONFIG_HISAX_TELESPCI=y CONFIG_HISAX_S0BOX=y CONFIG_HISAX_AVM_A1=y CONFIG_HISAX_FRITZPCI=y CONFIG_HISAX_AVM_A1_PCMCIA=y CONFIG_HISAX_ELSA=y CONFIG_HISAX_IX1MICROR2=y CONFIG_HISAX_DIEHLDIVA=y CONFIG_HISAX_ASUSCOM=y CONFIG_HISAX_TELEINT=y CONFIG_HISAX_HFCS=y CONFIG_HISAX_SEDLBAUER=y CONFIG_HISAX_SPORTSTER=y CONFIG_HISAX_MIC=y CONFIG_HISAX_NETJET=y CONFIG_HISAX_NETJET_U=y CONFIG_HISAX_NICCY=y CONFIG_HISAX_ISURF=y CONFIG_HISAX_HSTSAPHIR=y CONFIG_HISAX_BKM_A4T=y CONFIG_HISAX_SCT_QUADRO=y CONFIG_HISAX_GAZEL=y CONFIG_HISAX_HFC_PCI=y CONFIG_HISAX_W6692=y CONFIG_HISAX_HFC_SX=y CONFIG_HISAX_ENTERNOW_PCI=y # CONFIG_HISAX_DEBUG is not set # # HiSax PCMCIA card service modules # CONFIG_HISAX_SEDLBAUER_CS=m CONFIG_HISAX_ELSA_CS=m CONFIG_HISAX_AVM_A1_CS=m CONFIG_HISAX_TELES_CS=m # # HiSax sub driver modules # CONFIG_HISAX_ST5481=m CONFIG_HISAX_HFCUSB=m CONFIG_HISAX_HFC4S8S=m CONFIG_HISAX_FRITZ_PCIPNP=m CONFIG_HISAX_HDLC=y # # Active cards # CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_ICN=m CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_PCBIT=m CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_SC=m CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_ACT2000=m CONFIG_HYSDN=m CONFIG_HYSDN_CAPI=y CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_GIGASET=m CONFIG_GIGASET_BASE=m CONFIG_GIGASET_M105=m CONFIG_GIGASET_M101=m # CONFIG_GIGASET_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_GIGASET_UNDOCREQ is not set CONFIG_ISDN_CAPI=m CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_AVMB1_VERBOSE_REASON=y CONFIG_CAPI_TRACE=y CONFIG_ISDN_CAPI_MIDDLEWARE=y CONFIG_ISDN_CAPI_CAPI20=m CONFIG_ISDN_CAPI_CAPIFS_BOOL=y CONFIG_ISDN_CAPI_CAPIFS=m CONFIG_ISDN_CAPI_CAPIDRV=m # # CAPI hardware drivers # CONFIG_CAPI_AVM=y CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_AVMB1_B1ISA=m CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_AVMB1_B1PCI=m CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_AVMB1_B1PCIV4=y CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_AVMB1_T1ISA=m CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_AVMB1_B1PCMCIA=m CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_AVMB1_AVM_CS=m CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_AVMB1_T1PCI=m CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_AVMB1_C4=m CONFIG_CAPI_EICON=y CONFIG_ISDN_DIVAS=m CONFIG_ISDN_DIVAS_BRIPCI=y CONFIG_ISDN_DIVAS_PRIPCI=y CONFIG_ISDN_DIVAS_DIVACAPI=m CONFIG_ISDN_DIVAS_USERIDI=m CONFIG_ISDN_DIVAS_MAINT=m CONFIG_PHONE=m CONFIG_PHONE_IXJ=m CONFIG_PHONE_IXJ_PCMCIA=m # # Input device support # CONFIG_INPUT=y CONFIG_INPUT_FF_MEMLESS=m CONFIG_INPUT_POLLDEV=m # # Userland interfaces # CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=y CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_PSAUX=y CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_X=1024 CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_Y=768 CONFIG_INPUT_JOYDEV=m CONFIG_INPUT_EVDEV=m CONFIG_INPUT_EVBUG=m # # Input Device Drivers # CONFIG_INPUT_KEYBOARD=y CONFIG_KEYBOARD_ATKBD=y CONFIG_KEYBOARD_SUNKBD=m CONFIG_KEYBOARD_LKKBD=m CONFIG_KEYBOARD_XTKBD=m CONFIG_KEYBOARD_NEWTON=m CONFIG_KEYBOARD_STOWAWAY=m CONFIG_KEYBOARD_GPIO=m CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSE=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2=m CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_ALPS=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_LOGIPS2PP=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_SYNAPTICS=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_LIFEBOOK=y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_TRACKPOINT=y # CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_TOUCHKIT is not set CONFIG_MOUSE_SERIAL=m CONFIG_MOUSE_APPLETOUCH=m CONFIG_MOUSE_BCM5974=m CONFIG_MOUSE_INPORT=m # CONFIG_MOUSE_ATIXL is not set CONFIG_MOUSE_LOGIBM=m CONFIG_MOUSE_PC110PAD=m CONFIG_MOUSE_VSXXXAA=m CONFIG_MOUSE_GPIO=m CONFIG_INPUT_JOYSTICK=y CONFIG_JOYSTICK_ANALOG=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_A3D=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_ADI=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_COBRA=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_GF2K=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_GRIP=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_GRIP_MP=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_GUILLEMOT=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_INTERACT=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_SIDEWINDER=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_TMDC=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_IFORCE=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_IFORCE_USB=y CONFIG_JOYSTICK_IFORCE_232=y CONFIG_JOYSTICK_WARRIOR=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_MAGELLAN=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_SPACEORB=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_SPACEBALL=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_STINGER=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_TWIDJOY=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_ZHENHUA=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_DB9=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_GAMECON=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_TURBOGRAFX=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_JOYDUMP=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_XPAD=m CONFIG_JOYSTICK_XPAD_FF=y CONFIG_JOYSTICK_XPAD_LEDS=y CONFIG_INPUT_TABLET=y CONFIG_TABLET_USB_ACECAD=m CONFIG_TABLET_USB_AIPTEK=m CONFIG_TABLET_USB_GTCO=m CONFIG_TABLET_USB_KBTAB=m CONFIG_TABLET_USB_WACOM=m CONFIG_INPUT_TOUCHSCREEN=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_ADS7846=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_FUJITSU=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_GUNZE=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_ELO=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_MTOUCH=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_INEXIO=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_MK712=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_HTCPEN=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_PENMOUNT=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_TOUCHRIGHT=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_TOUCHWIN=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_UCB1400=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_WM97XX=m # CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_WM9705 is not set # CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_WM9712 is not set # CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_WM9713 is not set CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_COMPOSITE=m CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_EGALAX=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_PANJIT=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_3M=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_ITM=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_ETURBO=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_GUNZE=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_DMC_TSC10=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_IRTOUCH=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_IDEALTEK=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_GENERAL_TOUCH=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_GOTOP=y CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_TOUCHIT213=m CONFIG_INPUT_MISC=y # CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR is not set # CONFIG_INPUT_APANEL is not set CONFIG_INPUT_WISTRON_BTNS=m CONFIG_INPUT_ATLAS_BTNS=m CONFIG_INPUT_ATI_REMOTE=m CONFIG_INPUT_ATI_REMOTE2=m CONFIG_INPUT_KEYSPAN_REMOTE=m CONFIG_INPUT_POWERMATE=m CONFIG_INPUT_YEALINK=m CONFIG_INPUT_UINPUT=m # # Hardware I/O ports # CONFIG_SERIO=y CONFIG_SERIO_I8042=y CONFIG_SERIO_SERPORT=m CONFIG_SERIO_CT82C710=m CONFIG_SERIO_PARKBD=m CONFIG_SERIO_PCIPS2=m CONFIG_SERIO_LIBPS2=y CONFIG_SERIO_RAW=m CONFIG_GAMEPORT=m CONFIG_GAMEPORT_NS558=m CONFIG_GAMEPORT_L4=m CONFIG_GAMEPORT_EMU10K1=m CONFIG_GAMEPORT_FM801=m # # Character devices # CONFIG_VT=y CONFIG_CONSOLE_TRANSLATIONS=y CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y CONFIG_HW_CONSOLE=y CONFIG_VT_HW_CONSOLE_BINDING=y CONFIG_DEVKMEM=y CONFIG_SERIAL_NONSTANDARD=y CONFIG_COMPUTONE=m CONFIG_ROCKETPORT=m CONFIG_CYCLADES=m # CONFIG_CYZ_INTR is not set CONFIG_DIGIEPCA=m CONFIG_ESPSERIAL=m CONFIG_MOXA_INTELLIO=m CONFIG_MOXA_SMARTIO=m # CONFIG_ISI is not set CONFIG_SYNCLINK=m CONFIG_SYNCLINKMP=m CONFIG_SYNCLINK_GT=m CONFIG_N_HDLC=m CONFIG_RISCOM8=m CONFIG_SPECIALIX=m CONFIG_SX=m CONFIG_RIO=m # CONFIG_RIO_OLDPCI is not set CONFIG_STALDRV=y CONFIG_NOZOMI=m # # Serial drivers # CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y CONFIG_FIX_EARLYCON_MEM=y CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI=y CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PNP=y CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CS=m CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_NR_UARTS=48 CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RUNTIME_UARTS=4 CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_EXTENDED=y CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_MANY_PORTS=y CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FOURPORT=m CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_ACCENT=m CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_BOCA=m CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_EXAR_ST16C554=m CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_HUB6=m CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_SHARE_IRQ=y # CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DETECT_IRQ is not set CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RSA=y CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_MCA=m # # Non-8250 serial port support # CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE=y CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE=y CONFIG_CONSOLE_POLL=y CONFIG_SERIAL_JSM=m CONFIG_UNIX98_PTYS=y CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS=y CONFIG_LEGACY_PTY_COUNT=256 CONFIG_PRINTER=m # CONFIG_LP_CONSOLE is not set CONFIG_PPDEV=m CONFIG_HVC_DRIVER=y CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=m CONFIG_IPMI_HANDLER=m # CONFIG_IPMI_PANIC_EVENT is not set CONFIG_IPMI_DEVICE_INTERFACE=m CONFIG_IPMI_SI=m CONFIG_IPMI_WATCHDOG=m CONFIG_IPMI_POWEROFF=m CONFIG_HW_RANDOM=y CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_INTEL=m CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_AMD=m CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_GEODE=m CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_VIA=m CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_VIRTIO=m CONFIG_NVRAM=m CONFIG_DTLK=m CONFIG_R3964=m CONFIG_APPLICOM=m CONFIG_SONYPI=m # # PCMCIA character devices # CONFIG_SYNCLINK_CS=m CONFIG_CARDMAN_4000=m CONFIG_CARDMAN_4040=m # CONFIG_IPWIRELESS is not set CONFIG_MWAVE=m CONFIG_SCx200_GPIO=m CONFIG_PC8736x_GPIO=m CONFIG_NSC_GPIO=m CONFIG_CS5535_GPIO=m CONFIG_RAW_DRIVER=m CONFIG_MAX_RAW_DEVS=256 CONFIG_HPET=y CONFIG_HPET_MMAP=y CONFIG_HANGCHECK_TIMER=m CONFIG_TCG_TPM=m CONFIG_TCG_TIS=m CONFIG_TCG_NSC=m CONFIG_TCG_ATMEL=m CONFIG_TCG_INFINEON=m CONFIG_TELCLOCK=m CONFIG_DEVPORT=y CONFIG_I2C=m CONFIG_I2C_BOARDINFO=y CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV=m # CONFIG_I2C_HELPER_AUTO is not set # # I2C Algorithms # CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT=m CONFIG_I2C_ALGOPCF=m CONFIG_I2C_ALGOPCA=m # # I2C Hardware Bus support # # # PC SMBus host controller drivers # CONFIG_I2C_ALI1535=m CONFIG_I2C_ALI1563=m CONFIG_I2C_ALI15X3=m CONFIG_I2C_AMD756=m CONFIG_I2C_AMD756_S4882=m CONFIG_I2C_AMD8111=m CONFIG_I2C_I801=m CONFIG_I2C_ISCH=m CONFIG_I2C_PIIX4=m CONFIG_I2C_NFORCE2=m CONFIG_I2C_NFORCE2_S4985=m CONFIG_I2C_SIS5595=m CONFIG_I2C_SIS630=m CONFIG_I2C_SIS96X=m CONFIG_I2C_VIA=m CONFIG_I2C_VIAPRO=m # # I2C system bus drivers (mostly embedded / system-on-chip) # CONFIG_I2C_GPIO=m CONFIG_I2C_OCORES=m CONFIG_I2C_SIMTEC=m # # External I2C/SMBus adapter drivers # CONFIG_I2C_PARPORT=m CONFIG_I2C_PARPORT_LIGHT=m CONFIG_I2C_TAOS_EVM=m CONFIG_I2C_TINY_USB=m # # Graphics adapter I2C/DDC channel drivers # CONFIG_I2C_VOODOO3=m # # Other I2C/SMBus bus drivers # CONFIG_I2C_PCA_ISA=m CONFIG_I2C_PCA_PLATFORM=m CONFIG_I2C_STUB=m CONFIG_SCx200_I2C=m CONFIG_SCx200_I2C_SCL=12 CONFIG_SCx200_I2C_SDA=13 CONFIG_SCx200_ACB=m # # Miscellaneous I2C Chip support # CONFIG_DS1682=m CONFIG_AT24=m CONFIG_SENSORS_EEPROM=m CONFIG_SENSORS_PCF8591=m CONFIG_TPS65010=m CONFIG_SENSORS_MAX6875=m CONFIG_SENSORS_TSL2550=m # CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CORE is not set # CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_ALGO is not set # CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_BUS is not set # CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CHIP is not set CONFIG_SPI=y # CONFIG_SPI_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_SPI_MASTER=y # # SPI Master Controller Drivers # CONFIG_SPI_BITBANG=m CONFIG_SPI_BUTTERFLY=m CONFIG_SPI_LM70_LLP=m # # SPI Protocol Masters # CONFIG_SPI_AT25=m CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m CONFIG_SPI_TLE62X0=m CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB=y CONFIG_GPIOLIB=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO is not set CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS=y # # I2C GPIO expanders: # CONFIG_GPIO_MAX732X=m CONFIG_GPIO_PCA953X=m CONFIG_GPIO_PCF857X=m # # PCI GPIO expanders: # # # SPI GPIO expanders: # CONFIG_GPIO_MAX7301=m CONFIG_GPIO_MCP23S08=m CONFIG_W1=m CONFIG_W1_CON=y # # 1-wire Bus Masters # CONFIG_W1_MASTER_MATROX=m CONFIG_W1_MASTER_DS2490=m CONFIG_W1_MASTER_DS2482=m CONFIG_W1_MASTER_GPIO=m # # 1-wire Slaves # CONFIG_W1_SLAVE_THERM=m CONFIG_W1_SLAVE_SMEM=m CONFIG_W1_SLAVE_DS2433=m # CONFIG_W1_SLAVE_DS2433_CRC is not set CONFIG_W1_SLAVE_DS2760=m CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY=y # CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_PDA_POWER=m CONFIG_BATTERY_DS2760=m CONFIG_BATTERY_OLPC=m CONFIG_HWMON=y CONFIG_HWMON_VID=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ABITUGURU=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ABITUGURU3=m CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7414=m CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7418=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ADCXX=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1021=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1025=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1026=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1029=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1031=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM9240=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ADT7470=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ADT7473=m CONFIG_SENSORS_K8TEMP=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ASB100=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ATXP1=m CONFIG_SENSORS_DS1621=m CONFIG_SENSORS_I5K_AMB=m CONFIG_SENSORS_F71805F=m CONFIG_SENSORS_F71882FG=m CONFIG_SENSORS_F75375S=m CONFIG_SENSORS_FSCHER=m CONFIG_SENSORS_FSCPOS=m CONFIG_SENSORS_FSCHMD=m CONFIG_SENSORS_GL518SM=m CONFIG_SENSORS_GL520SM=m CONFIG_SENSORS_CORETEMP=m CONFIG_SENSORS_IBMAEM=m CONFIG_SENSORS_IBMPEX=m CONFIG_SENSORS_IT87=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM63=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM70=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM75=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM77=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM78=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM80=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM83=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM85=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM87=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM90=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM92=m CONFIG_SENSORS_LM93=m CONFIG_SENSORS_MAX1619=m CONFIG_SENSORS_MAX6650=m CONFIG_SENSORS_PC87360=m CONFIG_SENSORS_PC87427=m CONFIG_SENSORS_SIS5595=m CONFIG_SENSORS_DME1737=m CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47M1=m CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47M192=m CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47B397=m CONFIG_SENSORS_ADS7828=m CONFIG_SENSORS_THMC50=m CONFIG_SENSORS_VIA686A=m CONFIG_SENSORS_VT1211=m CONFIG_SENSORS_VT8231=m CONFIG_SENSORS_W83781D=m CONFIG_SENSORS_W83791D=m CONFIG_SENSORS_W83792D=m CONFIG_SENSORS_W83793=m CONFIG_SENSORS_W83L785TS=m CONFIG_SENSORS_W83L786NG=m CONFIG_SENSORS_W83627HF=m CONFIG_SENSORS_W83627EHF=m CONFIG_SENSORS_HDAPS=m CONFIG_SENSORS_APPLESMC=m # CONFIG_HWMON_DEBUG_CHIP is not set CONFIG_THERMAL=y CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON=y CONFIG_WATCHDOG=y # CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT is not set # # Watchdog Device Drivers # CONFIG_SOFT_WATCHDOG=m CONFIG_ACQUIRE_WDT=m CONFIG_ADVANTECH_WDT=m CONFIG_ALIM1535_WDT=m CONFIG_ALIM7101_WDT=m CONFIG_SC520_WDT=m CONFIG_EUROTECH_WDT=m CONFIG_IB700_WDT=m CONFIG_IBMASR=m CONFIG_WAFER_WDT=m CONFIG_I6300ESB_WDT=m CONFIG_ITCO_WDT=m CONFIG_ITCO_VENDOR_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_IT8712F_WDT=m # CONFIG_HP_WATCHDOG is not set CONFIG_SC1200_WDT=m CONFIG_SCx200_WDT=m CONFIG_PC87413_WDT=m CONFIG_60XX_WDT=m CONFIG_SBC8360_WDT=m CONFIG_SBC7240_WDT=m CONFIG_CPU5_WDT=m CONFIG_SMSC37B787_WDT=m CONFIG_W83627HF_WDT=m CONFIG_W83697HF_WDT=m CONFIG_W83877F_WDT=m CONFIG_W83977F_WDT=m CONFIG_MACHZ_WDT=m CONFIG_SBC_EPX_C3_WATCHDOG=m # # ISA-based Watchdog Cards # CONFIG_PCWATCHDOG=m CONFIG_MIXCOMWD=m CONFIG_WDT=m CONFIG_WDT_501=y # # PCI-based Watchdog Cards # CONFIG_PCIPCWATCHDOG=m CONFIG_WDTPCI=m CONFIG_WDT_501_PCI=y # # USB-based Watchdog Cards # CONFIG_USBPCWATCHDOG=m # # Sonics Silicon Backplane # CONFIG_SSB_POSSIBLE=y CONFIG_SSB=m CONFIG_SSB_SPROM=y CONFIG_SSB_PCIHOST_POSSIBLE=y CONFIG_SSB_PCIHOST=y CONFIG_SSB_B43_PCI_BRIDGE=y CONFIG_SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE=y # CONFIG_SSB_PCMCIAHOST is not set # CONFIG_SSB_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_PCICORE_POSSIBLE=y CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_PCICORE=y # # Multifunction device drivers # # CONFIG_MFD_CORE is not set CONFIG_MFD_SM501=m CONFIG_HTC_PASIC3=m # CONFIG_MFD_TMIO is not set # # Multimedia devices # # # Multimedia core support # CONFIG_VIDEO_DEV=m CONFIG_VIDEO_V4L2_COMMON=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ALLOW_V4L1=y CONFIG_VIDEO_V4L1_COMPAT=y CONFIG_DVB_CORE=m CONFIG_VIDEO_MEDIA=m # # Multimedia drivers # CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA7146=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA7146_VV=m CONFIG_MEDIA_ATTACH=y CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER=m # CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_CUSTOMIZE is not set CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_SIMPLE=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_TDA8290=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_TDA827X=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_TDA18271=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_TDA9887=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_TEA5761=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_TEA5767=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_MT20XX=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_MT2060=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_MT2266=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_MT2131=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_QT1010=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_XC2028=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_XC5000=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_MXL5005S=m CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER_MXL5007T=m CONFIG_VIDEO_V4L2=m CONFIG_VIDEO_V4L1=m CONFIG_VIDEOBUF_GEN=m CONFIG_VIDEOBUF_DMA_SG=m CONFIG_VIDEOBUF_VMALLOC=m CONFIG_VIDEOBUF_DMA_CONTIG=m CONFIG_VIDEOBUF_DVB=m CONFIG_VIDEO_BTCX=m CONFIG_VIDEO_IR=m CONFIG_VIDEO_TVEEPROM=m CONFIG_VIDEO_TUNER=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CAPTURE_DRIVERS=y # CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_VIDEO_HELPER_CHIPS_AUTO=y CONFIG_VIDEO_IR_I2C=m CONFIG_VIDEO_TVAUDIO=m CONFIG_VIDEO_TDA7432=m CONFIG_VIDEO_TDA9840=m CONFIG_VIDEO_TDA9875=m CONFIG_VIDEO_TEA6415C=m CONFIG_VIDEO_TEA6420=m CONFIG_VIDEO_MSP3400=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CS5345=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CS53L32A=m CONFIG_VIDEO_M52790=m CONFIG_VIDEO_WM8775=m CONFIG_VIDEO_WM8739=m CONFIG_VIDEO_VP27SMPX=m CONFIG_VIDEO_BT819=m CONFIG_VIDEO_BT856=m CONFIG_VIDEO_KS0127=m CONFIG_VIDEO_OV7670=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA7110=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA7111=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA7114=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA711X=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA717X=m CONFIG_VIDEO_TVP5150=m CONFIG_VIDEO_VPX3220=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CX25840=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CX2341X=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA7127=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA7185=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7170=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7175=m CONFIG_VIDEO_UPD64031A=m CONFIG_VIDEO_UPD64083=m CONFIG_VIDEO_VIVI=m CONFIG_VIDEO_BT848=m CONFIG_VIDEO_BT848_DVB=y CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA6588=m CONFIG_VIDEO_PMS=m CONFIG_VIDEO_BWQCAM=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CQCAM=m CONFIG_VIDEO_W9966=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CPIA=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CPIA_PP=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CPIA_USB=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CPIA2=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA5246A=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA5249=m CONFIG_TUNER_3036=m CONFIG_VIDEO_STRADIS=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ZORAN=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ZORAN_DC30=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ZORAN_ZR36060=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ZORAN_BUZ=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ZORAN_DC10=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ZORAN_LML33=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ZORAN_LML33R10=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ZORAN_AVS6EYES=m CONFIG_VIDEO_MEYE=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA7134=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA7134_ALSA=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SAA7134_DVB=m CONFIG_VIDEO_MXB=m CONFIG_VIDEO_DPC=m CONFIG_VIDEO_HEXIUM_ORION=m CONFIG_VIDEO_HEXIUM_GEMINI=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CX88=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CX88_ALSA=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CX88_BLACKBIRD=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CX88_DVB=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CX88_VP3054=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CX23885=m CONFIG_VIDEO_AU0828=m CONFIG_VIDEO_IVTV=m CONFIG_VIDEO_FB_IVTV=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CX18=m CONFIG_VIDEO_CAFE_CCIC=m CONFIG_V4L_USB_DRIVERS=y CONFIG_USB_VIDEO_CLASS=m CONFIG_USB_VIDEO_CLASS_INPUT_EVDEV=y CONFIG_USB_GSPCA=m CONFIG_VIDEO_PVRUSB2=m CONFIG_VIDEO_PVRUSB2_SYSFS=y CONFIG_VIDEO_PVRUSB2_DVB=y # CONFIG_VIDEO_PVRUSB2_DEBUGIFC is not set CONFIG_VIDEO_EM28XX=m CONFIG_VIDEO_EM28XX_ALSA=m CONFIG_VIDEO_EM28XX_DVB=m CONFIG_VIDEO_USBVISION=m CONFIG_VIDEO_USBVIDEO=m CONFIG_USB_VICAM=m CONFIG_USB_IBMCAM=m CONFIG_USB_KONICAWC=m CONFIG_USB_QUICKCAM_MESSENGER=m CONFIG_USB_ET61X251=m CONFIG_VIDEO_OVCAMCHIP=m CONFIG_USB_W9968CF=m # CONFIG_USB_OV511 is not set CONFIG_USB_SE401=m CONFIG_USB_SN9C102=m CONFIG_USB_STV680=m CONFIG_USB_ZC0301=m CONFIG_USB_PWC=m # CONFIG_USB_PWC_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_USB_ZR364XX=m CONFIG_USB_STKWEBCAM=m CONFIG_USB_S2255=m CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA=m CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_MT9M001=m CONFIG_MT9M001_PCA9536_SWITCH=y CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_MT9V022=m CONFIG_MT9V022_PCA9536_SWITCH=y CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_PLATFORM=m CONFIG_VIDEO_SH_MOBILE_CEU=m CONFIG_RADIO_ADAPTERS=y CONFIG_RADIO_CADET=m CONFIG_RADIO_RTRACK=m CONFIG_RADIO_RTRACK2=m CONFIG_RADIO_AZTECH=m CONFIG_RADIO_GEMTEK=m CONFIG_RADIO_GEMTEK_PCI=m CONFIG_RADIO_MAXIRADIO=m CONFIG_RADIO_MAESTRO=m CONFIG_RADIO_SF16FMI=m CONFIG_RADIO_SF16FMR2=m CONFIG_RADIO_TERRATEC=m CONFIG_RADIO_TRUST=m CONFIG_RADIO_TYPHOON=m CONFIG_RADIO_TYPHOON_PROC_FS=y CONFIG_RADIO_ZOLTRIX=m CONFIG_USB_DSBR=m CONFIG_USB_SI470X=m CONFIG_DVB_CAPTURE_DRIVERS=y # # Supported SAA7146 based PCI Adapters # CONFIG_TTPCI_EEPROM=m CONFIG_DVB_AV7110=m # CONFIG_DVB_AV7110_FIRMWARE is not set CONFIG_DVB_AV7110_OSD=y CONFIG_DVB_BUDGET_CORE=m CONFIG_DVB_BUDGET=m CONFIG_DVB_BUDGET_CI=m CONFIG_DVB_BUDGET_AV=m CONFIG_DVB_BUDGET_PATCH=m # # Supported USB Adapters # CONFIG_DVB_USB=m # CONFIG_DVB_USB_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_DVB_USB_A800=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_DIBUSB_MB=m # CONFIG_DVB_USB_DIBUSB_MB_FAULTY is not set CONFIG_DVB_USB_DIBUSB_MC=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_DIB0700=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_UMT_010=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_CXUSB=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_M920X=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_GL861=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_AU6610=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_DIGITV=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_VP7045=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_VP702X=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_GP8PSK=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_NOVA_T_USB2=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_TTUSB2=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_DTT200U=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_OPERA1=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_AF9005=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_AF9005_REMOTE=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_DW2102=m CONFIG_DVB_USB_ANYSEE=m CONFIG_DVB_TTUSB_BUDGET=m CONFIG_DVB_TTUSB_DEC=m CONFIG_DVB_CINERGYT2=m # CONFIG_DVB_CINERGYT2_TUNING is not set CONFIG_DVB_SIANO_SMS1XXX=m CONFIG_DVB_SIANO_SMS1XXX_SMS_IDS=y # # Supported FlexCopII (B2C2) Adapters # CONFIG_DVB_B2C2_FLEXCOP=m CONFIG_DVB_B2C2_FLEXCOP_PCI=m CONFIG_DVB_B2C2_FLEXCOP_USB=m # CONFIG_DVB_B2C2_FLEXCOP_DEBUG is not set # # Supported BT878 Adapters # CONFIG_DVB_BT8XX=m # # Supported Pluto2 Adapters # CONFIG_DVB_PLUTO2=m # # Supported DVB Frontends # # # Customise DVB Frontends # # CONFIG_DVB_FE_CUSTOMISE is not set # # DVB-S (satellite) frontends # CONFIG_DVB_CX24110=m CONFIG_DVB_CX24123=m CONFIG_DVB_MT312=m CONFIG_DVB_S5H1420=m CONFIG_DVB_STV0299=m CONFIG_DVB_TDA8083=m CONFIG_DVB_TDA10086=m CONFIG_DVB_VES1X93=m CONFIG_DVB_TUNER_ITD1000=m CONFIG_DVB_TDA826X=m CONFIG_DVB_TUA6100=m # # DVB-T (terrestrial) frontends # CONFIG_DVB_SP8870=m CONFIG_DVB_SP887X=m CONFIG_DVB_CX22700=m CONFIG_DVB_CX22702=m CONFIG_DVB_DRX397XD=m CONFIG_DVB_L64781=m CONFIG_DVB_TDA1004X=m CONFIG_DVB_NXT6000=m CONFIG_DVB_MT352=m CONFIG_DVB_ZL10353=m CONFIG_DVB_DIB3000MB=m CONFIG_DVB_DIB3000MC=m CONFIG_DVB_DIB7000M=m CONFIG_DVB_DIB7000P=m CONFIG_DVB_TDA10048=m # # DVB-C (cable) frontends # CONFIG_DVB_VES1820=m CONFIG_DVB_TDA10021=m CONFIG_DVB_TDA10023=m CONFIG_DVB_STV0297=m # # ATSC (North American/Korean Terrestrial/Cable DTV) frontends # CONFIG_DVB_NXT200X=m CONFIG_DVB_OR51211=m CONFIG_DVB_OR51132=m CONFIG_DVB_BCM3510=m CONFIG_DVB_LGDT330X=m CONFIG_DVB_S5H1409=m CONFIG_DVB_AU8522=m CONFIG_DVB_S5H1411=m # # Digital terrestrial only tuners/PLL # CONFIG_DVB_PLL=m CONFIG_DVB_TUNER_DIB0070=m # # SEC control devices for DVB-S # CONFIG_DVB_LNBP21=m CONFIG_DVB_ISL6405=m CONFIG_DVB_ISL6421=m # CONFIG_DAB is not set # # Graphics support # CONFIG_AGP=m CONFIG_AGP_ALI=m CONFIG_AGP_ATI=m CONFIG_AGP_AMD=m CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=m CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=m CONFIG_AGP_NVIDIA=m CONFIG_AGP_SIS=m CONFIG_AGP_SWORKS=m CONFIG_AGP_VIA=m CONFIG_AGP_EFFICEON=m CONFIG_DRM=m CONFIG_DRM_TDFX=m CONFIG_DRM_R128=m CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=m CONFIG_DRM_I810=m CONFIG_DRM_I830=m CONFIG_DRM_I915=m CONFIG_DRM_MGA=m CONFIG_DRM_SIS=m CONFIG_DRM_VIA=m CONFIG_DRM_SAVAGE=m CONFIG_VGASTATE=m CONFIG_VIDEO_OUTPUT_CONTROL=m CONFIG_FB=y CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID=y CONFIG_FB_DDC=m CONFIG_FB_CFB_FILLRECT=y CONFIG_FB_CFB_COPYAREA=y CONFIG_FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT=y # CONFIG_FB_CFB_REV_PIXELS_IN_BYTE is not set CONFIG_FB_SYS_FILLRECT=m CONFIG_FB_SYS_COPYAREA=m CONFIG_FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT=m # CONFIG_FB_FOREIGN_ENDIAN is not set CONFIG_FB_SYS_FOPS=m CONFIG_FB_DEFERRED_IO=y CONFIG_FB_HECUBA=m CONFIG_FB_SVGALIB=m # CONFIG_FB_MACMODES is not set CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING=y # # Frame buffer hardware drivers # CONFIG_FB_CIRRUS=m CONFIG_FB_PM2=m CONFIG_FB_PM2_FIFO_DISCONNECT=y CONFIG_FB_CYBER2000=m CONFIG_FB_ARC=m CONFIG_FB_ASILIANT=y CONFIG_FB_IMSTT=y CONFIG_FB_VGA16=m CONFIG_FB_UVESA=m # CONFIG_FB_VESA is not set CONFIG_FB_EFI=y CONFIG_FB_IMAC=y CONFIG_FB_N411=m CONFIG_FB_HGA=m # CONFIG_FB_HGA_ACCEL is not set CONFIG_FB_S1D13XXX=m CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA=m CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA_I2C=y # CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA_BACKLIGHT=y CONFIG_FB_RIVA=m CONFIG_FB_RIVA_I2C=y # CONFIG_FB_RIVA_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_FB_RIVA_BACKLIGHT=y CONFIG_FB_I810=m # CONFIG_FB_I810_GTF is not set CONFIG_FB_LE80578=m CONFIG_FB_CARILLO_RANCH=m CONFIG_FB_INTEL=m # CONFIG_FB_INTEL_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_FB_INTEL_I2C=y CONFIG_FB_MATROX=m CONFIG_FB_MATROX_MILLENIUM=y CONFIG_FB_MATROX_MYSTIQUE=y CONFIG_FB_MATROX_G=y CONFIG_FB_MATROX_I2C=m CONFIG_FB_MATROX_MAVEN=m CONFIG_FB_MATROX_MULTIHEAD=y CONFIG_FB_RADEON=m CONFIG_FB_RADEON_I2C=y CONFIG_FB_RADEON_BACKLIGHT=y # CONFIG_FB_RADEON_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_FB_ATY128=m CONFIG_FB_ATY128_BACKLIGHT=y CONFIG_FB_ATY=m CONFIG_FB_ATY_CT=y CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD=y CONFIG_FB_ATY_GX=y CONFIG_FB_ATY_BACKLIGHT=y CONFIG_FB_S3=m CONFIG_FB_SAVAGE=m CONFIG_FB_SAVAGE_I2C=y CONFIG_FB_SAVAGE_ACCEL=y CONFIG_FB_SIS=m CONFIG_FB_SIS_300=y CONFIG_FB_SIS_315=y CONFIG_FB_NEOMAGIC=m CONFIG_FB_KYRO=m CONFIG_FB_3DFX=m # CONFIG_FB_3DFX_ACCEL is not set CONFIG_FB_VOODOO1=m CONFIG_FB_VT8623=m CONFIG_FB_CYBLA=m CONFIG_FB_TRIDENT=m # CONFIG_FB_TRIDENT_ACCEL is not set CONFIG_FB_ARK=m CONFIG_FB_PM3=m CONFIG_FB_CARMINE=m CONFIG_FB_CARMINE_DRAM_EVAL=y # CONFIG_CARMINE_DRAM_CUSTOM is not set CONFIG_FB_GEODE=y CONFIG_FB_GEODE_LX=m CONFIG_FB_GEODE_GX=m CONFIG_FB_GEODE_GX1=m CONFIG_FB_SM501=m # CONFIG_FB_VIRTUAL is not set CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_LCD_CLASS_DEVICE=m CONFIG_LCD_LTV350QV=m CONFIG_LCD_ILI9320=m CONFIG_LCD_VGG2432A4=m CONFIG_LCD_PLATFORM=m CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=y CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CORGI=m CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_PROGEAR=m CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CARILLO_RANCH=m CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_MBP_NVIDIA=m # # Display device support # CONFIG_DISPLAY_SUPPORT=m # # Display hardware drivers # # # Console display driver support # CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE=y # CONFIG_VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK is not set CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT=y CONFIG_MDA_CONSOLE=m CONFIG_DUMMY_CONSOLE=y CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=m # CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DETECT_PRIMARY is not set # CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_ROTATION is not set # CONFIG_FONTS is not set CONFIG_FONT_8x8=y CONFIG_FONT_8x16=y # CONFIG_LOGO is not set CONFIG_SOUND=m CONFIG_SND=m CONFIG_SND_TIMER=m CONFIG_SND_PCM=m CONFIG_SND_HWDEP=m CONFIG_SND_RAWMIDI=m CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER=m CONFIG_SND_SEQ_DUMMY=m CONFIG_SND_OSSEMUL=y CONFIG_SND_MIXER_OSS=m CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS=m CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS_PLUGINS=y CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER_OSS=y CONFIG_SND_DYNAMIC_MINORS=y CONFIG_SND_SUPPORT_OLD_API=y CONFIG_SND_VERBOSE_PROCFS=y # CONFIG_SND_VERBOSE_PRINTK is not set # CONFIG_SND_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_SND_VMASTER=y CONFIG_SND_MPU401_UART=m CONFIG_SND_OPL3_LIB=m CONFIG_SND_OPL4_LIB=m CONFIG_SND_VX_LIB=m CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m CONFIG_SND_DRIVERS=y CONFIG_SND_PCSP=m CONFIG_SND_DUMMY=m CONFIG_SND_VIRMIDI=m CONFIG_SND_MTPAV=m CONFIG_SND_MTS64=m CONFIG_SND_SERIAL_U16550=m CONFIG_SND_MPU401=m CONFIG_SND_PORTMAN2X4=m CONFIG_SND_AC97_POWER_SAVE=y CONFIG_SND_AC97_POWER_SAVE_DEFAULT=0 CONFIG_SND_AD1848_LIB=m CONFIG_SND_CS4231_LIB=m CONFIG_SND_SB_COMMON=m CONFIG_SND_SB8_DSP=m CONFIG_SND_SB16_DSP=m CONFIG_SND_ISA=y CONFIG_SND_ADLIB=m CONFIG_SND_AD1816A=m CONFIG_SND_AD1848=m CONFIG_SND_ALS100=m CONFIG_SND_AZT2320=m CONFIG_SND_CMI8330=m CONFIG_SND_CS4231=m CONFIG_SND_CS4232=m CONFIG_SND_CS4236=m CONFIG_SND_DT019X=m CONFIG_SND_ES968=m CONFIG_SND_ES1688=m CONFIG_SND_ES18XX=m CONFIG_SND_SC6000=m CONFIG_SND_GUSCLASSIC=m CONFIG_SND_GUSEXTREME=m CONFIG_SND_GUSMAX=m CONFIG_SND_INTERWAVE=m CONFIG_SND_INTERWAVE_STB=m CONFIG_SND_OPL3SA2=m CONFIG_SND_OPTI92X_AD1848=m CONFIG_SND_OPTI92X_CS4231=m CONFIG_SND_OPTI93X=m CONFIG_SND_MIRO=m CONFIG_SND_SB8=m CONFIG_SND_SB16=m CONFIG_SND_SBAWE=m CONFIG_SND_SB16_CSP=y CONFIG_SND_SGALAXY=m CONFIG_SND_SSCAPE=m CONFIG_SND_WAVEFRONT=m CONFIG_SND_WAVEFRONT_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y CONFIG_SND_PCI=y CONFIG_SND_AD1889=m CONFIG_SND_ALS300=m CONFIG_SND_ALS4000=m CONFIG_SND_ALI5451=m CONFIG_SND_ATIIXP=m CONFIG_SND_ATIIXP_MODEM=m CONFIG_SND_AU8810=m CONFIG_SND_AU8820=m CONFIG_SND_AU8830=m CONFIG_SND_AW2=m CONFIG_SND_AZT3328=m CONFIG_SND_BT87X=m # CONFIG_SND_BT87X_OVERCLOCK is not set CONFIG_SND_CA0106=m CONFIG_SND_CMIPCI=m CONFIG_SND_OXYGEN_LIB=m CONFIG_SND_OXYGEN=m CONFIG_SND_CS4281=m CONFIG_SND_CS46XX=m CONFIG_SND_CS46XX_NEW_DSP=y CONFIG_SND_CS5530=m CONFIG_SND_CS5535AUDIO=m CONFIG_SND_DARLA20=m CONFIG_SND_GINA20=m CONFIG_SND_LAYLA20=m CONFIG_SND_DARLA24=m CONFIG_SND_GINA24=m CONFIG_SND_LAYLA24=m CONFIG_SND_MONA=m CONFIG_SND_MIA=m CONFIG_SND_ECHO3G=m CONFIG_SND_INDIGO=m CONFIG_SND_INDIGOIO=m CONFIG_SND_INDIGODJ=m CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1=m CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1X=m CONFIG_SND_ENS1370=m CONFIG_SND_ENS1371=m CONFIG_SND_ES1938=m CONFIG_SND_ES1968=m CONFIG_SND_FM801=m CONFIG_SND_FM801_TEA575X_BOOL=y CONFIG_SND_FM801_TEA575X=m CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL=m # CONFIG_SND_HDA_HWDEP is not set CONFIG_SND_HDA_CODEC_REALTEK=y CONFIG_SND_HDA_CODEC_ANALOG=y CONFIG_SND_HDA_CODEC_SIGMATEL=y CONFIG_SND_HDA_CODEC_VIA=y CONFIG_SND_HDA_CODEC_ATIHDMI=y CONFIG_SND_HDA_CODEC_CONEXANT=y CONFIG_SND_HDA_CODEC_CMEDIA=y CONFIG_SND_HDA_CODEC_SI3054=y CONFIG_SND_HDA_GENERIC=y CONFIG_SND_HDA_POWER_SAVE=y CONFIG_SND_HDA_POWER_SAVE_DEFAULT=0 CONFIG_SND_HDSP=m CONFIG_SND_HDSPM=m CONFIG_SND_HIFIER=m CONFIG_SND_ICE1712=m CONFIG_SND_ICE1724=m CONFIG_SND_INTEL8X0=m CONFIG_SND_INTEL8X0M=m CONFIG_SND_KORG1212=m CONFIG_SND_MAESTRO3=m CONFIG_SND_MIXART=m CONFIG_SND_NM256=m CONFIG_SND_PCXHR=m CONFIG_SND_RIPTIDE=m CONFIG_SND_RME32=m CONFIG_SND_RME96=m CONFIG_SND_RME9652=m CONFIG_SND_SIS7019=m CONFIG_SND_SONICVIBES=m CONFIG_SND_TRIDENT=m CONFIG_SND_VIA82XX=m CONFIG_SND_VIA82XX_MODEM=m CONFIG_SND_VIRTUOSO=m CONFIG_SND_VX222=m CONFIG_SND_YMFPCI=m CONFIG_SND_SPI=y CONFIG_SND_USB=y CONFIG_SND_USB_AUDIO=m CONFIG_SND_USB_USX2Y=m CONFIG_SND_USB_CAIAQ=m CONFIG_SND_USB_CAIAQ_INPUT=y CONFIG_SND_PCMCIA=y CONFIG_SND_VXPOCKET=m CONFIG_SND_PDAUDIOCF=m CONFIG_SND_SOC=m CONFIG_SOUND_PRIME=m CONFIG_SOUND_MSNDCLAS=m CONFIG_MSNDCLAS_INIT_FILE="/etc/sound/msndinit.bin" CONFIG_MSNDCLAS_PERM_FILE="/etc/sound/msndperm.bin" CONFIG_SOUND_MSNDPIN=m CONFIG_MSNDPIN_INIT_FILE="/etc/sound/pndspini.bin" CONFIG_MSNDPIN_PERM_FILE="/etc/sound/pndsperm.bin" CONFIG_SOUND_OSS=m # CONFIG_SOUND_TRACEINIT is not set CONFIG_SOUND_DMAP=y CONFIG_SOUND_SSCAPE=m CONFIG_SOUND_VMIDI=m CONFIG_SOUND_TRIX=m CONFIG_SOUND_MSS=m CONFIG_SOUND_MPU401=m CONFIG_SOUND_PAS=m CONFIG_SOUND_PSS=m CONFIG_PSS_MIXER=y # CONFIG_PSS_HAVE_BOOT is not set CONFIG_SOUND_SB=m CONFIG_SOUND_YM3812=m CONFIG_SOUND_UART6850=m CONFIG_SOUND_AEDSP16=m CONFIG_SC6600=y CONFIG_SC6600_JOY=y CONFIG_SC6600_CDROM=4 CONFIG_SC6600_CDROMBASE=0 CONFIG_AEDSP16_MSS=y # CONFIG_AEDSP16_SBPRO is not set CONFIG_SOUND_KAHLUA=m CONFIG_AC97_BUS=m CONFIG_HID_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_HID=m # CONFIG_HID_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_HIDRAW=y # # USB Input Devices # CONFIG_USB_HID=m CONFIG_USB_HIDINPUT_POWERBOOK=y # CONFIG_HID_FF is not set CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV=y # # USB HID Boot Protocol drivers # CONFIG_USB_KBD=m CONFIG_USB_MOUSE=m CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD=y CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI=y CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI=y CONFIG_USB=m # CONFIG_USB_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_USB_ANNOUNCE_NEW_DEVICES is not set # # Miscellaneous USB options # CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS=y # CONFIG_USB_DEVICE_CLASS is not set # CONFIG_USB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is not set CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=y # CONFIG_USB_OTG is not set CONFIG_USB_MON=y # # USB Host Controller Drivers # CONFIG_USB_C67X00_HCD=m CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=m CONFIG_USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT=y CONFIG_USB_EHCI_TT_NEWSCHED=y CONFIG_USB_ISP116X_HCD=m CONFIG_USB_ISP1760_HCD=m # CONFIG_USB_ISP1760_PCI is not set CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD=m # CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD_SSB is not set # CONFIG_USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_DESC is not set # CONFIG_USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_MMIO is not set CONFIG_USB_OHCI_LITTLE_ENDIAN=y CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HCD=m CONFIG_USB_U132_HCD=m CONFIG_USB_SL811_HCD=m CONFIG_USB_SL811_CS=m CONFIG_USB_R8A66597_HCD=m # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_MUSB_HDRC is not set # # USB Device Class drivers # CONFIG_USB_ACM=m CONFIG_USB_PRINTER=m CONFIG_USB_WDM=m # # NOTE: USB_STORAGE enables SCSI, and 'SCSI disk support' # # # may also be needed; see USB_STORAGE Help for more information # CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=m # CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DATAFAB=y CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_FREECOM=y CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_ISD200=y CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DPCM=y CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_USBAT=y CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_SDDR09=y CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_SDDR55=y CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_JUMPSHOT=y CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_ALAUDA=y # CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH is not set CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_KARMA=y CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_SIERRA=y # CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_CYPRESS_ATACB is not set CONFIG_USB_LIBUSUAL=y # # USB Imaging devices # CONFIG_USB_MDC800=m CONFIG_USB_MICROTEK=m # # USB port drivers # CONFIG_USB_USS720=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL=m CONFIG_USB_EZUSB=y CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_GENERIC=y CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_AIRCABLE=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_ARK3116=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_BELKIN=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_CH341=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_WHITEHEAT=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_DIGI_ACCELEPORT=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_CP2101=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_CYPRESS_M8=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_EMPEG=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_FTDI_SIO=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_FUNSOFT=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_VISOR=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_IPAQ=m # CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_IR is not set CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_EDGEPORT=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_EDGEPORT_TI=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_GARMIN=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_IPW=m # CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_IUU is not set CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_PDA=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KLSI=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KOBIL_SCT=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_MCT_U232=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_MOS7720=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_MOS7840=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_MOTOROLA=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_NAVMAN=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_PL2303=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_OTI6858=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_SPCP8X5=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_HP4X=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_SAFE=m # CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_SAFE_PADDED is not set CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_SIERRAWIRELESS=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_TI=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_CYBERJACK=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_XIRCOM=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_OPTION=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_OMNINET=m CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_DEBUG=m # # USB Miscellaneous drivers # CONFIG_USB_EMI62=m CONFIG_USB_EMI26=m CONFIG_USB_ADUTUX=m CONFIG_USB_RIO500=m CONFIG_USB_LEGOTOWER=m CONFIG_USB_LCD=m CONFIG_USB_BERRY_CHARGE=m CONFIG_USB_LED=m CONFIG_USB_CYPRESS_CY7C63=m CONFIG_USB_CYTHERM=m CONFIG_USB_PHIDGET=m CONFIG_USB_PHIDGETKIT=m CONFIG_USB_PHIDGETMOTORCONTROL=m CONFIG_USB_PHIDGETSERVO=m CONFIG_USB_IDMOUSE=m CONFIG_USB_FTDI_ELAN=m CONFIG_USB_APPLEDISPLAY=m CONFIG_USB_SISUSBVGA=m # CONFIG_USB_SISUSBVGA_CON is not set CONFIG_USB_LD=m CONFIG_USB_TRANCEVIBRATOR=m CONFIG_USB_IOWARRIOR=m # CONFIG_USB_TEST is not set CONFIG_USB_ISIGHTFW=m CONFIG_USB_ATM=m CONFIG_USB_SPEEDTOUCH=m CONFIG_USB_CXACRU=m CONFIG_USB_UEAGLEATM=m CONFIG_USB_XUSBATM=m CONFIG_USB_GADGET=m # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DEBUG_FILES is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DEBUG_FS is not set CONFIG_USB_GADGET_SELECTED=y # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_AMD5536UDC is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_ATMEL_USBA is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_FSL_USB2 is not set CONFIG_USB_GADGET_NET2280=y CONFIG_USB_NET2280=m # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PXA25X is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_M66592 is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PXA27X is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_GOKU is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_LH7A40X is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_OMAP is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_S3C2410 is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_AT91 is not set # CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DUMMY_HCD is not set CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DUALSPEED=y CONFIG_USB_ZERO=m CONFIG_USB_ETH=m CONFIG_USB_ETH_RNDIS=y CONFIG_USB_GADGETFS=m CONFIG_USB_FILE_STORAGE=m # CONFIG_USB_FILE_STORAGE_TEST is not set CONFIG_USB_G_SERIAL=m # CONFIG_USB_MIDI_GADGET is not set # CONFIG_USB_G_PRINTER is not set CONFIG_USB_CDC_COMPOSITE=m CONFIG_MMC=m # CONFIG_MMC_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME is not set # # MMC/SD Card Drivers # CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK=m CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE=y CONFIG_SDIO_UART=m # CONFIG_MMC_TEST is not set # # MMC/SD Host Controller Drivers # CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI=m CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PCI=m CONFIG_MMC_RICOH_MMC=m CONFIG_MMC_WBSD=m CONFIG_MMC_TIFM_SD=m CONFIG_MMC_SDRICOH_CS=m # CONFIG_MEMSTICK is not set CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=m # # LED drivers # CONFIG_LEDS_NET48XX=m CONFIG_LEDS_WRAP=m CONFIG_LEDS_PCA9532=m CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO=m # CONFIG_LEDS_CLEVO_MAIL is not set CONFIG_LEDS_PCA955X=m # # LED Triggers # CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS=y CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_DEFAULT_ON=m # CONFIG_ACCESSIBILITY is not set CONFIG_INFINIBAND=m CONFIG_INFINIBAND_USER_MAD=m CONFIG_INFINIBAND_USER_ACCESS=m CONFIG_INFINIBAND_USER_MEM=y CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS=y CONFIG_INFINIBAND_MTHCA=m CONFIG_INFINIBAND_MTHCA_DEBUG=y CONFIG_INFINIBAND_AMSO1100=m CONFIG_INFINIBAND_AMSO1100_DEBUG=y CONFIG_INFINIBAND_CXGB3=m # CONFIG_INFINIBAND_CXGB3_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_MLX4_INFINIBAND=m # CONFIG_INFINIBAND_NES is not set CONFIG_INFINIBAND_IPOIB=m CONFIG_INFINIBAND_IPOIB_CM=y CONFIG_INFINIBAND_IPOIB_DEBUG=y # CONFIG_INFINIBAND_IPOIB_DEBUG_DATA is not set CONFIG_INFINIBAND_SRP=m CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ISER=m CONFIG_EDAC=y # # Reporting subsystems # # CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_EDAC_MM_EDAC=m CONFIG_EDAC_AMD76X=m CONFIG_EDAC_E7XXX=m CONFIG_EDAC_E752X=m CONFIG_EDAC_I82875P=m CONFIG_EDAC_I82975X=m CONFIG_EDAC_I3000=m CONFIG_EDAC_I82860=m CONFIG_EDAC_R82600=m CONFIG_EDAC_I5000=m CONFIG_EDAC_I5100=m CONFIG_RTC_LIB=y CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS=y CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE="rtc0" # CONFIG_RTC_DEBUG is not set # # RTC interfaces # CONFIG_RTC_INTF_SYSFS=y CONFIG_RTC_INTF_PROC=y CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV=y CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV_UIE_EMUL=y CONFIG_RTC_DRV_TEST=m # # I2C RTC drivers # CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1374=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1672=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MAX6900=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RS5C372=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_ISL1208=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_X1205=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8563=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8583=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M41T80=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M41T80_WDT=y # CONFIG_RTC_DRV_S35390A is not set CONFIG_RTC_DRV_FM3130=m # # SPI RTC drivers # CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M41T94=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1305=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MAX6902=m # CONFIG_RTC_DRV_R9701 is not set CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RS5C348=m # # Platform RTC drivers # CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS=y # CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1511 is not set CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1553=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1742=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_STK17TA8=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M48T86=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M48T59=m CONFIG_RTC_DRV_V3020=m # # on-CPU RTC drivers # CONFIG_DMADEVICES=y # # DMA Devices # CONFIG_INTEL_IOATDMA=m CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE=y # # DMA Clients # CONFIG_NET_DMA=y # CONFIG_DMATEST is not set CONFIG_DCA=m CONFIG_AUXDISPLAY=y CONFIG_KS0108=m CONFIG_KS0108_PORT=0x378 CONFIG_KS0108_DELAY=2 CONFIG_CFAG12864B=m CONFIG_CFAG12864B_RATE=20 CONFIG_UIO=m CONFIG_UIO_CIF=m CONFIG_UIO_PDRV=m CONFIG_UIO_PDRV_GENIRQ=m CONFIG_UIO_SMX=m # # Ubuntu Supplied Third-Party Device Drivers # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DRBD=m CONFIG_SCSI_ISCSITARGET=m CONFIG_SQUASHFS=m # CONFIG_SQUASHFS_EMBEDDED is not set CONFIG_SQUASHFS_FRAGMENT_CACHE_SIZE=3 CONFIG_AUFS=y CONFIG_AUFS_BRANCH_MAX_127=y # CONFIG_AUFS_BRANCH_MAX_511 is not set # CONFIG_AUFS_BRANCH_MAX_1023 is not set # CONFIG_AUFS_BRANCH_MAX_32767 is not set # CONFIG_AUFS_STAT is not set # CONFIG_AUFS_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_ATL2=m CONFIG_NET_ET131X=m CONFIG_DM_RAID45=m CONFIG_DM_LOOP=m CONFIG_NDISWRAPPER=m # # Compcache options # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_COMPCACHE=m # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_COMPCACHE_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_COMPCACHE_STATS is not set # # Two Level Segregate Fit Allocator # CONFIG_TLSF=m # CONFIG_TLSF_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_TLSF_STATS is not set CONFIG_USB_APPLEIR=m CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM_BBR=m CONFIG_INPUT_ACERHK=m CONFIG_FSAM7400=m CONFIG_LMPCM_USB=m CONFIG_TP_SMAPI=m CONFIG_TP_SMAPI_EC=m # # Media related drivers # CONFIG_SND_BTSCO=m CONFIG_USB_OV511_NEW=m # # Wireless Drivers # CONFIG_WIRELESS_ACX=m CONFIG_P80211=m CONFIG_PRISM2_USB=m CONFIG_WIRELESS_AT76=m CONFIG_HECI=m CONFIG_QC_USB=m # CONFIG_E1000E_NEW is not set # CONFIG_E1000E_ENABLED is not set CONFIG_AVERATEC_5100P=m CONFIG_PACKARDBELL_E5=m CONFIG_DRM_VIA_CHROME9=m CONFIG_FS_UNIONFS=m CONFIG_LIRC_DEV=m CONFIG_LIRC_ATIUSB=m CONFIG_LIRC_BT829=m CONFIG_LIRC_CMDIR=m CONFIG_LIRC_I2C=m CONFIG_LIRC_IGORPLUGUSB=m CONFIG_LIRC_IMON=m CONFIG_LIRC_IT87=m CONFIG_LIRC_MCEUSB=m CONFIG_LIRC_MCEUSB2=m CONFIG_LIRC_PVR150=m # CONFIG_LIRC_PARALLEL is not set CONFIG_LIRC_SASEM=m CONFIG_LIRC_SERIAL=m CONFIG_LIRC_SERIAL_IGOR=m CONFIG_LIRC_SIR=m CONFIG_LIRC_STREAMZAP=m CONFIG_LIRC_TTUSBIR=m # CONFIG_LIRC_GPIO is not set CONFIG_GNBD=m CONFIG_GFS_FS=m CONFIG_TLSUP=m # # Firmware Drivers # CONFIG_EDD=y CONFIG_EDD_OFF=y CONFIG_FIRMWARE_MEMMAP=y CONFIG_EFI_VARS=y CONFIG_DELL_RBU=m CONFIG_DCDBAS=m CONFIG_DMIID=y CONFIG_ISCSI_IBFT_FIND=y CONFIG_ISCSI_IBFT=m # # File systems # CONFIG_EXT2_FS=m CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y # CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP is not set CONFIG_EXT3_FS=m CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y # CONFIG_EXT4DEV_FS is not set CONFIG_JBD=m # CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_FS_MBCACHE=m CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=m # CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK is not set # CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO is not set CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_JFS_FS=m CONFIG_JFS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_JFS_SECURITY=y # CONFIG_JFS_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_JFS_STATISTICS=y CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_XFS_FS=m CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA=y CONFIG_XFS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_XFS_RT=y # CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_GFS2_FS=m CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=m CONFIG_OCFS2_FS=m CONFIG_OCFS2_FS_O2CB=m CONFIG_OCFS2_FS_USERSPACE_CLUSTER=m CONFIG_OCFS2_FS_STATS=y CONFIG_OCFS2_DEBUG_MASKLOG=y # CONFIG_OCFS2_DEBUG_FS is not set CONFIG_DNOTIFY=y CONFIG_INOTIFY=y CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER=y CONFIG_QUOTA=y CONFIG_QUOTA_NETLINK_INTERFACE=y CONFIG_PRINT_QUOTA_WARNING=y CONFIG_QFMT_V1=m CONFIG_QFMT_V2=m CONFIG_QUOTACTL=y CONFIG_AUTOFS_FS=m CONFIG_AUTOFS4_FS=m CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m CONFIG_GENERIC_ACL=y # # CD-ROM/DVD Filesystems # CONFIG_ISO9660_FS=m CONFIG_JOLIET=y CONFIG_ZISOFS=y CONFIG_UDF_FS=m CONFIG_UDF_NLS=y # # DOS/FAT/NT Filesystems # CONFIG_FAT_FS=m CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=m CONFIG_VFAT_FS=m CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_CODEPAGE=437 CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET="iso8859-1" CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m # CONFIG_NTFS_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_NTFS_RW is not set # # Pseudo filesystems # CONFIG_PROC_FS=y CONFIG_PROC_KCORE=y CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE=y CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL=y CONFIG_SYSFS=y CONFIG_TMPFS=y CONFIG_TMPFS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_HUGETLBFS=y CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE=y CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS=m # # Miscellaneous filesystems # CONFIG_ADFS_FS=m # CONFIG_ADFS_FS_RW is not set CONFIG_AFFS_FS=m CONFIG_ECRYPT_FS=m CONFIG_HFS_FS=m CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS=m CONFIG_BEFS_FS=m # CONFIG_BEFS_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_BFS_FS=m CONFIG_EFS_FS=m CONFIG_JFFS2_FS=m CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_DEBUG=0 CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER=y # CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WBUF_VERIFY is not set # CONFIG_JFFS2_SUMMARY is not set # CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_XATTR is not set CONFIG_JFFS2_COMPRESSION_OPTIONS=y CONFIG_JFFS2_ZLIB=y CONFIG_JFFS2_LZO=y CONFIG_JFFS2_RTIME=y # CONFIG_JFFS2_RUBIN is not set # CONFIG_JFFS2_CMODE_NONE is not set # CONFIG_JFFS2_CMODE_PRIORITY is not set # CONFIG_JFFS2_CMODE_SIZE is not set CONFIG_JFFS2_CMODE_FAVOURLZO=y CONFIG_UBIFS_FS=m CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_XATTR=y # CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_ADVANCED_COMPR is not set CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_LZO=y CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_ZLIB=y # CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_CRAMFS=y CONFIG_VXFS_FS=m CONFIG_MINIX_FS=m CONFIG_OMFS_FS=m CONFIG_HPFS_FS=m CONFIG_QNX4FS_FS=m CONFIG_ROMFS_FS=m CONFIG_SYSV_FS=m CONFIG_UFS_FS=m # CONFIG_UFS_FS_WRITE is not set # CONFIG_UFS_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS=y CONFIG_NFS_FS=m CONFIG_NFS_V3=y CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFS_V4=y CONFIG_NFSD=m CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y CONFIG_LOCKD=m CONFIG_LOCKD_V4=y CONFIG_EXPORTFS=m CONFIG_NFS_ACL_SUPPORT=m CONFIG_NFS_COMMON=y CONFIG_SUNRPC=m CONFIG_SUNRPC_GSS=m CONFIG_SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA=m CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5=m CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_SPKM3=m CONFIG_SMB_FS=m # CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT is not set CONFIG_CIFS=m # CONFIG_CIFS_STATS is not set CONFIG_CIFS_WEAK_PW_HASH=y CONFIG_CIFS_UPCALL=y # CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR is not set # CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG2 is not set CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL=y CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL=y CONFIG_NCP_FS=m CONFIG_NCPFS_PACKET_SIGNING=y CONFIG_NCPFS_IOCTL_LOCKING=y CONFIG_NCPFS_STRONG=y CONFIG_NCPFS_NFS_NS=y CONFIG_NCPFS_OS2_NS=y # CONFIG_NCPFS_SMALLDOS is not set CONFIG_NCPFS_NLS=y CONFIG_NCPFS_EXTRAS=y CONFIG_CODA_FS=m CONFIG_AFS_FS=m # CONFIG_AFS_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_9P_FS=m # # Partition Types # CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED=y CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION=y # CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_CUMANA is not set # CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_EESOX is not set CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_ICS=y # CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_ADFS is not set # CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_POWERTEC is not set CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_RISCIX=y CONFIG_OSF_PARTITION=y CONFIG_AMIGA_PARTITION=y CONFIG_ATARI_PARTITION=y CONFIG_MAC_PARTITION=y CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION=y CONFIG_BSD_DISKLABEL=y CONFIG_MINIX_SUBPARTITION=y CONFIG_SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION=y CONFIG_UNIXWARE_DISKLABEL=y CONFIG_LDM_PARTITION=y # CONFIG_LDM_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_SGI_PARTITION=y CONFIG_ULTRIX_PARTITION=y CONFIG_SUN_PARTITION=y CONFIG_KARMA_PARTITION=y CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION=y CONFIG_SYSV68_PARTITION=y CONFIG_NLS=y CONFIG_NLS_DEFAULT="cp437" CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_437=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_737=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_775=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_850=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_852=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_855=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_857=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_860=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_861=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_862=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_863=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_864=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_865=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_866=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_869=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_936=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_950=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_932=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_949=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_874=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_8=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_1250=m CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_1251=m CONFIG_NLS_ASCII=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_1=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_2=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_3=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_4=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_5=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_6=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_7=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_9=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_13=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_14=m CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_15=m CONFIG_NLS_KOI8_R=m CONFIG_NLS_KOI8_U=m CONFIG_NLS_UTF8=m CONFIG_DLM=m # CONFIG_DLM_DEBUG is not set # # Kernel hacking # CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y # CONFIG_ENABLE_WARN_DEPRECATED is not set # CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK is not set CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=1024 CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS=y CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y # CONFIG_HEADERS_CHECK is not set CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ is not set CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP=y # CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC is not set CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC_VALUE=0 CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS=y CONFIG_TIMER_STATS=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS is not set # CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is not set # CONFIG_SLUB_STATS is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES is not set # CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is not set # CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not set # CONFIG_LOCK_STAT is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS is not set CONFIG_STACKTRACE=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM is not set CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_WRITECOUNT is not set CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMORY_INIT=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_SG is not set CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y # CONFIG_BOOT_PRINTK_DELAY is not set # CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set # CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST is not set # CONFIG_BACKTRACE_SELF_TEST is not set # CONFIG_LKDTM is not set # CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION is not set CONFIG_LATENCYTOP=y CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL_CHECK=y CONFIG_HAVE_FTRACE=y CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y CONFIG_TRACING=y CONFIG_FTRACE=y # CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER is not set # CONFIG_SYSPROF_TRACER is not set # CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER is not set CONFIG_CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER=y CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y # CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST is not set # CONFIG_PROVIDE_OHCI1394_DMA_INIT is not set # CONFIG_SAMPLES is not set CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KGDB=y CONFIG_KGDB=y CONFIG_KGDB_SERIAL_CONSOLE=y # CONFIG_KGDB_TESTS is not set CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM=y # CONFIG_X86_VERBOSE_BOOTUP is not set CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is not set # CONFIG_X86_PTDUMP is not set CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA=y # CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA_TEST is not set # CONFIG_DEBUG_NX_TEST is not set # CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not set CONFIG_DOUBLEFAULT=y # CONFIG_MMIOTRACE is not set CONFIG_IO_DELAY_TYPE_0X80=0 CONFIG_IO_DELAY_TYPE_0XED=1 CONFIG_IO_DELAY_TYPE_UDELAY=2 CONFIG_IO_DELAY_TYPE_NONE=3 # CONFIG_IO_DELAY_0X80 is not set CONFIG_IO_DELAY_0XED=y # CONFIG_IO_DELAY_UDELAY is not set # CONFIG_IO_DELAY_NONE is not set CONFIG_DEFAULT_IO_DELAY_TYPE=1 # CONFIG_DEBUG_BOOT_PARAMS is not set # CONFIG_CPA_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y # # Security options # CONFIG_KEYS=y # CONFIG_KEYS_DEBUG_PROC_KEYS is not set CONFIG_SECURITY=y CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK=y # CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM is not set CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=y CONFIG_SECURITY_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR=0 CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE=0 CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DEVELOP=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_AVC_STATS=y CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_CHECKREQPROT_VALUE=1 # CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_ENABLE_SECMARK_DEFAULT is not set # CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_POLICYDB_VERSION_MAX is not set CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK=y CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR=y CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR_BOOTPARAM_VALUE=1 CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR_DISABLE=y CONFIG_XOR_BLOCKS=m CONFIG_ASYNC_CORE=m CONFIG_ASYNC_MEMCPY=m CONFIG_ASYNC_XOR=m CONFIG_CRYPTO=y # # Crypto core or helper # CONFIG_CRYPTO_ALGAPI=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEAD=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_BLKCIPHER=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_GF128MUL=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_NULL=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRYPTD=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_AUTHENC=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEST=m # # Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data # CONFIG_CRYPTO_CCM=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_GCM=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_SEQIV=m # # Block modes # CONFIG_CRYPTO_CBC=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_CTR=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_CTS=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_ECB=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_LRW=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_PCBC=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS=m # # Hash modes # CONFIG_CRYPTO_HMAC=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_XCBC=m # # Digest # CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32C=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD4=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD5=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_MICHAEL_MIC=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD128=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD160=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD256=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD320=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA1=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_TGR192=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_WP512=m # # Ciphers # CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_586=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_ANUBIS=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_ARC4=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_BLOWFISH=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAMELLIA=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAST5=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAST6=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_DES=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_FCRYPT=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_KHAZAD=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_SALSA20=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_SALSA20_586=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_SEED=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_SERPENT=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEA=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH_COMMON=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH_586=m # # Compression # CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEFLATE=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_LZO=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_HW=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK_AES=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK_SHA=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_GEODE=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_HIFN_795X=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_HIFN_795X_RNG=y CONFIG_HAVE_KVM=y CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION=y CONFIG_KVM=m CONFIG_KVM_INTEL=m CONFIG_KVM_AMD=m # CONFIG_KVM_TRACE is not set # CONFIG_LGUEST is not set CONFIG_VIRTIO=m CONFIG_VIRTIO_RING=m CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=m CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=m # # Library routines # CONFIG_BITREVERSE=y CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT=y CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT=y CONFIG_CRC_CCITT=m CONFIG_CRC16=m CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=m CONFIG_CRC_ITU_T=m CONFIG_CRC32=y CONFIG_CRC7=m CONFIG_LIBCRC32C=m CONFIG_AUDIT_GENERIC=y CONFIG_ZLIB_INFLATE=y CONFIG_ZLIB_DEFLATE=m CONFIG_LZO_COMPRESS=m CONFIG_LZO_DECOMPRESS=m CONFIG_GENERIC_ALLOCATOR=y CONFIG_REED_SOLOMON=m CONFIG_REED_SOLOMON_DEC16=y CONFIG_TEXTSEARCH=y CONFIG_TEXTSEARCH_KMP=m CONFIG_TEXTSEARCH_BM=m CONFIG_TEXTSEARCH_FSM=m CONFIG_PLIST=y CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM=y CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT=y CONFIG_HAS_DMA=y CONFIG_CHECK_SIGNATURE=y ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809252234400.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 21:06 ` Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-25 22:57 ` H. Peter Anvin [not found] ` <48DC176E.6020807-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2008-09-25 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Jesse Barnes, Frans Pop, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> However, the "Factory" log at #425480 *does* indicate that a GEM aware >> 2D driver was loaded (the "[drm:i915_getparam] *ERROR* Unknown parameter >> 5" message indicates as much), but the kernel was definitely not GEM >> aware otherwise the call would have succeeded. So that rules out GEM >> proper, but it could still be a bug in one of the non-GEM paths in the >> experimental xf86-video-intel bits the various distros seem to be >> picking up. > > That was exactly the point I was trying to make, that these error paths > will probably also need auditing, once we rule out the possibility of > NVRAM being overwritten from kernelspace. > Okay, I just had a scary and hopefully stupid thought. Especially Intel often has backchannels between the chipset and the Ethernet controller for management functions -- anything from WoL to IPMI -- generally over some kind of low-speed serial bus. We're not in a situation where the EEPROM can be touched from the chipset via the SMBus or some other non-CPU channel? -hpa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <48DC176E.6020807-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <48DC176E.6020807-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-26 18:55 ` Krzysztof Halasa [not found] ` <m38wten3dj.fsf-fiqtE+24Nu0B9AHHLWeGtNQXobZC6xk2@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Halasa @ 2008-09-26 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Jiri Kosina, Jesse Barnes, Frans Pop, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes: > Okay, I just had a scary and hopefully stupid thought. > > Especially Intel often has backchannels between the chipset and the > Ethernet controller for management functions -- anything from WoL to > IPMI -- generally over some kind of low-speed serial bus. > > We're not in a situation where the EEPROM can be touched from the > chipset via the SMBus or some other non-CPU channel? I know next to nothing about SMBus and especially those other backchannels, but the 82566 product brief :-) lists support for: - Intel Active Management Technology (AMT) with "System Defence" (whatever that means) - ASF 2.0 I think ASF (Alert Standard Format) is somehow related to IPMI and uses I^2C or something similar (SMBus). 8254x manual says that the EEPROM is divided into 4 parts: one for E1000 hw initialization, one for ASF (Ethernet in ASF mode?), one for external BMC (TCO) (loaded by external BMC from the SMBus) and one for software only (not used by hardware). Some chips only support #1 (and #4 of course). I understand the driver reads the EEPROM using EERD register (which, according to the manual, requires no additional locking) or drives the EEPROM directly, with a lock/unlock protocol (using EECD register). Now some devices lack the lock/unlock bits, but they lack ASF/BMC as well. I imagine chips other than 8254x may be different here. Do we have some "master" bugzilla entry or something like that for these problems? -- Krzysztof Halasa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <m38wten3dj.fsf-fiqtE+24Nu0B9AHHLWeGtNQXobZC6xk2@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <m38wten3dj.fsf-fiqtE+24Nu0B9AHHLWeGtNQXobZC6xk2@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-26 19:39 ` Alan Cox 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2008-09-26 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krzysztof Halasa Cc: H. Peter Anvin, Jiri Kosina, Jesse Barnes, Frans Pop, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Jeff Garzik, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w > external BMC (TCO) (loaded by external BMC from the SMBus) and one for > software only (not used by hardware). Some chips only support #1 (and > #4 of course). We have had historic problems where a very non standard EEPROM setup on some ancient thinkpads ended up with bad stuff happening due to smbus probing and the like. You would then however expect to see the bug occur without loading the e1000* drivers (unless you needed an interaction between the two) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809251921340.18801-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 18:46 ` H. Peter Anvin 2008-09-25 18:56 ` Jesse Barnes @ 2008-09-25 20:06 ` David Miller 2 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-25 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ Cc: elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, jeff-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:24:57 +0200 (CEST) > If being set to 0 (it's so easy to call memset(0) on a bogus pointer, > there are usually lots of them in the code) or to random garbage, it would > seem to be much more understandable, than 0xff. Setting framebuffer bytes to 0xff is pretty common, for example for color keys and anti-aliasing pixel values. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-25 17:24 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809251921340.18801-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 19:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Halasa @ 2008-09-25 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Frans Pop, airlied, Jeff Garzik, davem, Andrew Morton, jeffrey.t.kirsher, david.vrabel, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, chrisl, Ingo Molnar, jbarnes, jesse.brandeburg Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> writes: > Still, what confuses me a little bit -- the EEPROM of the card is set to > all 0xff, once the corruption happens. Isn't that a quite a coincidence, > that bytes representing "nothing" in this context are used? Perhaps the entire chip has been erased with the "ERAL" (erase all) command. Requires previously issued EWEN (erase/write enable). Each command seems to require several writes to the EEPROM control register. -- Krzysztof Halasa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250310190.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 2:01 ` Frans Pop @ 2008-09-25 2:28 ` Jeff Garzik [not found] ` <48DAF75D.4050908-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jeff Garzik @ 2008-09-25 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Dave Airlie, David Miller, Andrew Morton, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> Well I'm out of the race, my attempts to re-write my eeprom using an >> eeprom from an equivalent laptop have totally failed and my BIOS won't >> boot anymore - so my laptop is == a brick. > > Uh oh. Shouldn't we put something like the patch below in Linus' tree > unless we get this sorted out? Otherwise more and more people who use -rc > kernels will run into this, and will get their hardware [hopefully > temporarily, but not all users are able to re-flash their network card > EEPROMs, right] bricked. > > I know that it is quite aggressive and is going to disable wired > networking on a lot of systems that have been functioning properly, > therefore RFC ... > > > > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> > Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] E1000E: temporarily disable e1000e driver > > E1000E: temporarily disable e1000e driver That seems a bit drastic, particularly when the debugging was beginning to point to another culprit. We have equal case at this point to disable r8169 and i915_drm, no? Jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <48DAF75D.4050908-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <48DAF75D.4050908-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 3:51 ` Dave Airlie [not found] ` <21d7e9970809242051x17785159ya7510d92f705f3cf-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Dave Airlie @ 2008-09-25 3:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Jiri Kosina, David Miller, Andrew Morton, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Jeff Garzik <jeff-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote: > Jiri Kosina wrote: >> >> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >>> Well I'm out of the race, my attempts to re-write my eeprom using an >>> eeprom from an equivalent laptop have totally failed and my BIOS won't boot >>> anymore - so my laptop is == a brick. >> >> Uh oh. Shouldn't we put something like the patch below in Linus' tree >> unless we get this sorted out? Otherwise more and more people who use -rc >> kernels will run into this, and will get their hardware [hopefully >> temporarily, but not all users are able to re-flash their network card >> EEPROMs, right] bricked. >> >> I know that it is quite aggressive and is going to disable wired >> networking on a lot of systems that have been functioning properly, >> therefore RFC ... >> >> >> >> From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> >> Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] E1000E: temporarily disable e1000e driver >> >> E1000E: temporarily disable e1000e driver > > That seems a bit drastic, particularly when the debugging was beginning to > point to another culprit. > > We have equal case at this point to disable r8169 and i915_drm, no? > No we actually are more likely unable to do anything from the kernel, if its happening from userspace firstly we need a reflash utility that is safe, otherwise people who have the issue can't reproduce it, and people who don't have the issue don't want to play with it. I think e1000e may enable a BAR or something that causes the issue to break this hw., I haven't seen it broken on any machine where e1000e wasn't loaded yet. Again the r8169 might be the same issue, but it maybe because the bar was enabled. Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <21d7e9970809242051x17785159ya7510d92f705f3cf-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809242051x17785159ya7510d92f705f3cf-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 4:00 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-09-25 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Cc: jeff-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A, jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ, jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:51:23 +1000 > I think e1000e may enable a BAR or something that causes the issue to > break this hw., I haven't seen it broken on any > machine where e1000e wasn't loaded yet. Again the r8169 might be the > same issue, but it maybe because the bar was enabled. All PCI device drivers in the kernel first do pci_enable_device() which essentially enables all BARs. The flash lives in BAR 1 of the E1000E, for example. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809241722w7c3bb6a5w1af5801b7380169d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 1:27 ` Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 4:25 ` Jesse Brandeburg [not found] ` <48DB12C9.5080104-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jesse Brandeburg @ 2008-09-25 4:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie Cc: Jiri Kosina, David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ Dave Airlie wrote: >>> If the MMIO space regions of the video cards sit right before the >>> E1000E ones on the effected systems, that would pretty much >>> convince me that this is the kind of problem we are having here. >> Unfortunately, looking at the lspci outputs that are in >> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 it seems to me that the >> MMIO regions are quite far away from each other. on my ich9 based system the e1000e BAR1 regions are back to back with both the vga memory map and the audio mem, either of which could be the mangler, but more likely vga device (say X maybe) since it is mapped directly in front of the e1000e BAR1 space. > Yup on my laptop these were far away and I wondered what could mangle > things that badly. > > Well I'm out of the race, my attempts to re-write my eeprom using an > eeprom from an equivalent laptop > have totally failed and my BIOS won't boot anymore - so my laptop is == a brick. I'm really sorry to hear that, I wonder if the laptop has an "emergency bios update" mode like many PCs used to through a jumper. Dave A., let us know if you make any recovery progress. I plan to try some random writes tomorrow to my BAR1 space and see if my flash gets erased. Jesse ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <48DB12C9.5080104-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <48DB12C9.5080104-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 16:26 ` Krzysztof Halasa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Halasa @ 2008-09-25 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Brandeburg Cc: Dave Airlie, Jiri Kosina, David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes: > I'm really sorry to hear that, I wonder if the laptop has an > "emergency bios update" mode like many PCs used to through a jumper. > Dave A., let us know if you make any recovery progress. I guess it's more about the E1000's serial configuration EEPROM, the registers seem to live in BAR0 (EECD and for reading perhaps EERD). Corrupted EEPROM (and thus PCI config registers) can easily result in a dead machine. I will be writing a tool for writing 82541PI EEPROMs on a custom board soon (unless there is one available, for Linux, of course), I only have to fight non-working JTAG first :-) > I plan to try some random writes tomorrow to my BAR1 space and see if > my flash gets erased. I'm not sure it's the flash that is corrupted. Anyway booting the laptop should be quite easy (physically disabling the EEPROM on boot should do the trick), though it would require taking the machine apart. -- Krzysztof Halasa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-24 23:15 ` Jiri Kosina [not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250110070.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 0:26 ` Jesse Barnes [not found] ` <200809241726.58628.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-25 19:43 ` Jesse Barnes 1 sibling, 2 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2008-09-25 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher, airlied, david.vrabel, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, chrisl, Ingo Molnar On Wednesday, September 24, 2008 4:15 pm Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > > I did some snooping around, and while doing so I noticed that the PCI > > mmap code for x86 doesn't do one bit of range checking on the size, or > > any other aspect of the request, wrt. the MMIO regions actually mapped > > in the BARs of the PCI device. > > Ugh, indeed. Added Ingo and Jesse to CC. > > > Yikes! > > > > It just does a reserve_memtype() on the address range, and says "ok". > > > > So if, for example, the X server tries to mmap() more than an MMIO bar > > actually maps, the kernel lets the user do this. > > > > It would be very interesting to add the appropriate checks to > > pci_mmap_page_range() in arch/x86/pci/i386.c, anyone who wants to do > > this can use the code in arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c: > > __pci_mmap_make_offset() as a guide, and see what happens. > > Absolutely. Or we can even do some dirty hackery in userspace, like > LD_PRELOADing X server and checking mmaps() that are close to MMIO regions > of affected devices. > > > If the MMIO space regions of the video cards sit right before the > > E1000E ones on the effected systems, that would pretty much > > convince me that this is the kind of problem we are having here. > > Unfortunately, looking at the lspci outputs that are in > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 it seems to me that the > MMIO regions are quite far away from each other. Moreover, we don't actually do any writing (that I know of) of the ROM image from the X drivers or the kernel. In fact, in many cases X should be accessing the RAM copy of the ROM at 0xc0000 rather than via the ROM BAR. That said, adding a check to the x86 code would be a good thing to do; I'll hack up a patch tomorrow unless someone beats me to it. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200809241726.58628.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <200809241726.58628.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 0:33 ` Jiri Kosina 2008-09-25 16:08 ` Jesse Barnes 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes Cc: David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar, jesse.brandeburg-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, Karsten Keil On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > That said, adding a check to the x86 code would be a good thing to do; > I'll hack up a patch tomorrow unless someone beats me to it. The problem here is that what we desperately need first is a method to restore the original EEPROM contents after it gets corrupted (David Airlie has, sadly, apparently bricked his notebook while trying to do so). Without this, we can put a lot of debugging/protecting patches into the kernel, but we won't be able to succesfully verify anything, because testing wouldn't be possible. Added Jesse and Karsten to CC, as they are working on such a tool right now, as far as I know. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-25 0:33 ` Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 16:08 ` Jesse Barnes 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2008-09-25 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher, airlied, david.vrabel, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, chrisl, Ingo Molnar, jesse.brandeburg, Karsten Keil On Wednesday, September 24, 2008 5:33 pm Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > That said, adding a check to the x86 code would be a good thing to do; > > I'll hack up a patch tomorrow unless someone beats me to it. > > The problem here is that what we desperately need first is a method to > restore the original EEPROM contents after it gets corrupted (David Airlie > has, sadly, apparently bricked his notebook while trying to do so). > Without this, we can put a lot of debugging/protecting patches into the > kernel, but we won't be able to succesfully verify anything, because > testing wouldn't be possible. > > Added Jesse and Karsten to CC, as they are working on such a tool right > now, as far as I know. I should be able to test the mmap fix independently of the e1000 breakage at least... lemme try it out now... -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM 2008-09-25 0:26 ` Jesse Barnes [not found] ` <200809241726.58628.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 19:43 ` Jesse Barnes [not found] ` <200809251243.43441.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jesse Barnes @ 2008-09-25 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Kosina Cc: David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher, airlied, david.vrabel, rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, chrisl, Ingo Molnar On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > I did some snooping around, and while doing so I noticed that the PCI > mmap code for x86 doesn't do one bit of range checking on the size, or > any other aspect of the request, wrt. the MMIO regions actually mapped > in the BARs of the PCI device. Here's a patch that adds range checking to the sysfs mappings at least. This patch should catch the case where X (or some other process) tries to map beyond the specific BAR it's (supposedly) trying to access, making things safer in general. FWIW both my F9 and development versions of X start up fine with this patch applied. DaveM, will this work for you on sparc? It looked like your code was allowing bridge window mappings, but that behavior should be preserved as long as your bridge devices reflect their window sizes correctly in their pdev->resources? If we add similar code to the procfs stuff we wouldn't need to do any checking in the arches. diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c index 9c71858..f4e8b4e 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c @@ -502,6 +502,8 @@ pci_mmap_resource(struct kobject *kobj, struct bin_attribute *attr, struct resource *res = (struct resource *)attr->private; enum pci_mmap_state mmap_type; resource_size_t start, end; + unsigned long map_len = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start; + unsigned long map_offset = vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT; int i; for (i = 0; i < PCI_ROM_RESOURCE; i++) @@ -510,6 +512,13 @@ pci_mmap_resource(struct kobject *kobj, struct bin_attribute *attr, if (i >= PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) return -ENODEV; + /* + * Make sure the range the user is trying to map falls within + * the resource + */ + if (map_offset + map_len > pci_resource_len(pdev, i)) + return -EINVAL; + /* pci_mmap_page_range() expects the same kind of entry as coming * from /proc/bus/pci/ which is a "user visible" value. If this is * different from the resource itself, arch will do necessary fixup. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200809251243.43441.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <200809251243.43441.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 20:45 ` Jiri Kosina 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jesse Barnes Cc: David Miller, jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA, Ingo Molnar On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Here's a patch that adds range checking to the sysfs mappings at least. > This patch should catch the case where X (or some other process) tries > to map beyond the specific BAR it's (supposedly) trying to access, > making things safer in general. FWIW both my F9 and development > versions of X start up fine with this patch applied. Good. We will use this on affected machines after we start some real debugging of this. > + /* > + * Make sure the range the user is trying to map falls within > + * the resource > + */ > + if (map_offset + map_len > pci_resource_len(pdev, i)) > + return -EINVAL; > + At least for debugging purposes I'd propose to put a printk() there with process name, and the range it tries to map. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM [not found] ` <21d7e9970809231409r3fdd640h53a72a808266d220-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2008-09-23 22:07 ` David Miller @ 2008-09-25 12:24 ` Jiri Kosina 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Jiri Kosina @ 2008-09-25 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Airlie Cc: David Miller, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: > > My current suspicion in all of this is either the GEM kernel patches > > or recent X server. > I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. Actually there is no way of not shipping GEM when shipping xorg 7.4, isn't it? So definitely GEM could be potential cause here, I think. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (16 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Rafael J. Wysocki ` (25 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek, Pekka Enberg, Rafael J. Wysocki, Vegard Nossum This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org> Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (17 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established Rafael J. Wysocki ` (24 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Oliver Neukum, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (28 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4 Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver-GvhC2dPhHPQdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (18 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Rafael J. Wysocki ` (23 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Kuznetsov This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11459 Subject : kernel crash after wifi connection established Submitter : Alexey Kuznetsov <ak-b7SOpcJQXxU@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-30 03:08 (23 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (19 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Rafael J. Wysocki ` (22 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Greg KH, Rufus & Azrael This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11439 Subject : [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Submitter : Rufus & Azrael <rufus-azrael-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-26 9:37 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121974353815440&w=4 Handled-By : Greg KH <gregkh-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121976424221858&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (20 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki ` (21 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Gene Heskett This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11465 Subject : Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-H+0wwilmMs3R7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-30 18:52 (23 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122012238925775&w=4 Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (21 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Rafael J. Wysocki ` (20 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dan Williams, Jouni Malinen, Michael S. Tsirkin, Zhu Yi This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476 Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (21 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4 Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Dan Williams <dcbw-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (22 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Rafael J. Wysocki ` (19 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11501 Subject : Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Submitter : Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 18:34 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055342419068&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (23 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Rafael J. Wysocki ` (18 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512 Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (17 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (24 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (17 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gregory Haskins, Ingo Molnar, Lin Ming, Peter Zijlstra This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505 Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4 http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins-Et1tbQHTxzrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (25 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-23 9:49 ` Jason Vas Dias 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Rafael J. Wysocki ` (16 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jason Vas Dias This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516 Subject : severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27= -rc5 Submitter : Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-07 13:59 (15 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-23 9:49 ` Jason Vas Dias [not found] ` <200809230549.28544.jason.vas.dias-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Jason Vas Dias @ 2008-09-23 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Andrew Morton Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10019 bytes --] Hi - Yes, this bug is still a problem with both the latest 2.6.27-rc6 kernel (from Linus' tree 2008-09-21) and with the latest fedora 10 kernel . CPU Frequency switching is completely disabled both when powernow-k8 (the correct cpufreq module for my x86_64 AMD TL-64x2 2.2GHz CPU) is installed as a module or is built-in , and the CPU frequency remains at its lowest setting; attempts to modify /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq and /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_setspeed are not honored, even though /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/governor is "userspace" and scaling_min_freq < scaling_setspeed > scaling_max_freq . I see no messages from powernow-k8 indicating that it is aware it was unable to set the speed, though I do see a message if I attempt to set an invalid speed (eg 600000) . With 2.6.26-rc9, I get a default CPU clock frequency of 2200000 ; with 2.6.27-rc6, it becomes 800000 and is not switchable. For some reason, powernow-k8 does not autoload with UDEV; but I don't really need it if the speed is already set to its highest level. On 2.6.27-rc6. after it manages to boot, any low-latency drivers time out (eg. USB, Terminal, Keyboard, Network) and the machine does not get through the boot-up sequence without becoming overloaded by the kernel's debugging log messages - neither the network , the terminal or the keyboard work usably. Building a kernel with USB completely disabled and turning off debug log messages allows the machine to boot (after @ 15 minutes) but the speed is still at its lowest setting and cannot be changed. Also, 2.6.27-rc6 is unable to reboot the machine: it can put the machine into the "HALT" state, with nothing displayed on the screen, but the machine does not power-off until manual reset with the power-button. Then, after the machine has powered-down, it cannot be powered up until the power-on button is depressed for at least two sections an released TWICE in a row. Neither booting with 'acpi=0' or compilation without USB support has any effect; it happens the same with a totally standard Fedora 10 install with the latest 2.6.27 kernel as with my own heavily customized distro , and occurs when either udev-{124,126,128} are installed, and regardless of compiling the kernel with gcc-4.2.4 , gcc-3.4.6, or gcc-4.3.2 . Any help / suggestions would be greatly appreciated ! I've attached the Config, System.map and boot.log (compressed) . Regards, Jason On Sunday 21 September 2008 14:54:18 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516 > Subject : severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27= -rc5 > Submitter : Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> > Date : 2008-09-07 13:59 (15 days old) > > > On Sunday 07 September 2008 18:03:06 Andrew Morton wrote: > Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11516] New: severe performance degradation on x86_64 > going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 From: > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > To: > linux-usb@vger.kernel.org > CC: > bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, jason.vas.dias@gmail.com > Date: > 2008-09-07 18:03 > > Spam Status: Spamassassin 0% probability of being spam. > > Full report: > No, hits=-3.349 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,OSDL_HEADER_SUBJECT_BRACKETED > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the > bugzilla web interface). > > On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:59:04 -0700 (PDT) bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516 > > > > Summary: severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from > > 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 > > Product: Other > > Version: 2.5 > > KernelVersion: 2.6.27-rc9 > > Platform: All > > OS/Version: Linux > > Tree: Mainline > > Status: NEW > > Severity: normal > > Priority: P1 > > Component: Other > > AssignedTo: other_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org > > ReportedBy: jason.vas.dias@gmail.com > > > > > > Latest working kernel version: > > 2.6.26-rc9 > > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git > > @2008-07-10) > > > > Earliest failing kernel version: > > 2.6.27-rc9 > > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git > > @2008-09-07) > > > > Distribution: > > Gentoo / my Own + Fedora 10 > > > > Hardware Environment: > > x86_64 AMD Turion TL-64 64-bit dual core > > > > Software Environment: > > gcc-4.2.4 , glibc-2.8.90, both latest from savannah CVS @ 2008-07-10 > > > > Problem Description: > > > > After my monthly kernel update ( git-pull from Linus' tree + build ) > > the whole machine started crawling instead of sprinting - this was > > on my "own distro" (originally Gentoo based). > > > > Updating Fedora 10 from 2.6.26-0.115.rc9.git2.fc10 to > > 2.6.27-0.305.rc5.git6.fc10 had the same effect > > on a bog-standard Fedora 10 installation. > > > > Before I get out the toolbox and start investigating in-depth > > (which I don't really have time to do at the moment), I thought > > I'd check here first if anyone has seen this issue and if there > > is any quick configuration / boot arg fix ? > > > > To quantify, normally boot-up takes less than 1 minute with the 2.6.26 > > kernel; with the 2.6.27 kernel, it takes over 10 minutes, and the screen > > is flooded with these "hub event change" messages - and the terminal > > scrolls visibly slowly, and seems to be unable to keep up with even > > my extremely slow typing rate. > > > > I'm attaching the config-2.6.26-rc9.jvd and config-2.6.27-rc5.jvd files, > > and klogd logs from a bootup of each kernel. > > > > Any advice suggestions as to how to fix would be gratefully received. > > > > > > Steps to reproduce: > > > > build and install latest kernel from Linus' tree. > > I've tentatively categorised this post-2.6.26 regression under USB. > > Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 21.190720] device: 'vcsa11': > device_unregister Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 21.190721] PM: > Removing info for No Bus:vcsa11 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ > 21.190788] device: 'vcsa11': device_create_release Sep 7 15:56:33 > localhost kernel: [ 21.205252] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt > 0000 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 21.205305] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 > ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 21.460430] > hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost > kernel: [ 21.460454] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep > 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 21.704357] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 > chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 21.704366] hub > 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost > kernel: [ 21.954352] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep > 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 21.954374] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 > chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 22.204433] hub > 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost > kernel: [ 22.204441] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep > 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 22.454376] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 > chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 22.454384] hub > 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost > kernel: [ 22.704406] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep > 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 22.704414] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 > chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost kernel: [ 22.960311] hub > 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:33 localhost > kernel: [ 22.960335] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep > 7 15:56:34 localhost kernel: [ 23.204362] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 > chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:34 localhost kernel: [ 23.204384] hub > 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:34 localhost > kernel: [ 23.454386] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep > 7 15:56:34 localhost kernel: [ 23.454394] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 > chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:34 localhost kernel: [ 23.704357] hub > 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:34 localhost > kernel: [ 23.704366] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep > 7 15:56:34 localhost kernel: [ 23.954377] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 > chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:34 localhost kernel: [ 23.954696] hub > 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:35 localhost > kernel: [ 24.204380] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep > 7 15:56:35 localhost kernel: [ 24.204389] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 > chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:35 localhost kernel: [ 24.454398] hub > 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:35 localhost > kernel: [ 24.454406] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep > 7 15:56:35 localhost kernel: [ 24.704379] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 > chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:35 localhost kernel: [ 24.704402] hub > 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 Sep 7 15:56:35 localhost > kernel: [ 24.954381] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 > > but it might be an x86 problem or anything, it's unclear. > > Jason, perhaps you could test a CONFIG_USB=n kernel? [-- Attachment #2: kernel-2.6.27-rc6.jvd.logs.bz2 --] [-- Type: application/x-bzip2, Size: 383061 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200809230549.28544.jason.vas.dias-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 [not found] ` <200809230549.28544.jason.vas.dias-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-27 9:23 ` Thomas Gleixner [not found] ` <200809280138.57672.jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2008-09-27 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Vas Dias Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Andrew Morton, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Len Brown On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jason Vas Dias wrote: > CPU Frequency switching is completely disabled both when > powernow-k8 (the correct cpufreq module for my x86_64 AMD TL-64x2 > 2.2GHz CPU) is installed as a module or is built-in , and the CPU > frequency remains at its lowest setting; attempts to modify > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq and > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_setspeed are not > honored, even though /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/governor > is "userspace" and scaling_min_freq < scaling_setspeed > > scaling_max_freq . > > I see no messages from powernow-k8 indicating that it is aware it > was unable to set the speed, though I do see a message if I attempt > to set an invalid speed (eg 600000) . > > With 2.6.26-rc9, I get a default CPU clock frequency of 2200000 ; > with 2.6.27-rc6, it becomes 800000 and is not switchable. For some > reason, powernow-k8 does not autoload with UDEV; but I don't really > need it if the speed is already set to its highest level. > > On 2.6.27-rc6. after it manages to boot, any low-latency drivers > time out (eg. USB, Terminal, Keyboard, Network) and the machine does > not get through the boot-up sequence without becoming overloaded by > the kernel's debugging log messages - neither the network , the > terminal or the keyboard work usably. > > Building a kernel with USB completely disabled and turning off > debug log messages allows the machine to boot (after @ 15 minutes) > but the speed is still at its lowest setting and cannot be changed. I have to admit that I'm confused. The dmesg output [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.27-rc6.jvd ... .... [ 26.204477] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 says 26 seconds up to the point where user space should start. Also USB is active in that log and I dont see timeout messages at all. I have a hard time to connect this to your problem description (timeouts, USB off, 15 minutes) Can you please shed some light on this ? > Also, 2.6.27-rc6 is unable to reboot the machine: it can put the > machine into the "HALT" state, with nothing displayed on the screen, > but the machine does not power-off until manual reset with the > power-button. Then, after the machine has powered-down, it cannot be > powered up until the power-on button is depressed for at least two > sections an released TWICE in a row. Len, any opinon on this: [ 0.000000] ACPI Error (tbfadt-0453): 32/64X address mismatch in "Pm2ControlBlock": [00008800] [0000000000008100], using 64X [20080609] Thanks, tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200809280138.57672.jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <200809280138.57672.jason.vas.dias-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 [not found] ` <200809280138.57672.jason.vas.dias-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-28 10:58 ` Thomas Gleixner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2008-09-28 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Vas Dias Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Andrew Morton, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Len Brown On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Jason Vas Dias wrote: > The problem is not "slow booting" - indeed, as noted in the bug, boot time up to the point > where user space should start is very similar to the non-problematic 2.6.26 kernels. > > The USB problem is that @ 10 messages per second are emitted to the log: > Sep 28 00:41:51 localhost kernel: [ 11.985257] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0002 > Sep 28 00:41:51 localhost kernel: [ 12.789240] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0004 > Sep 28 00:41:51 localhost kernel: [ 12.937169] hub 4-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 > Sep 28 00:41:51 localhost kernel: [ 12.937188] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0002 > Sep 28 00:41:51 localhost kernel: [ 13.041167] hub 5-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 > Sep 28 00:41:51 localhost kernel: [ 13.041186] hub 6-0:1.0: state 7 ports 10 chg 0000 evt 0000 > Sep 28 00:41:51 localhost kernel: [ 13.453734] hub 6-0:1.0: state 7 ports 10 chg 0000 evt 0020 > Sep 28 00:41:51 localhost kernel: [ 13.453748] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0004 > Sep 28 00:41:51 localhost kernel: [ 13.846512] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0002 > Sep 28 00:41:51 localhost kernel: [ 14.220994] hub 3-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0002 > > Why should USB be emitting state change messages when no state has changed ? That's a separate question. > I think this is because the core PM-timer (clocksource is acpi-pm) is kaput , > and every driver that depends on high-resolution timers gets confused . No, if the pmtimer would be defect your machine would not even reach user space. I analysed the proc/acpi data of .25 and .27 and the machine is set to throttling state T7 (12%) which would explain that behaviour halfways. Can you please verify if that state is always T7 on your machine with .27 ? Also please add "acpi.debug_level=0x11" to the kernel command line so we can get some more information out of the ACPI code. > Displaying text on the terminal is @ 140 times slower under 2.6.27 > kernels than under 2.6.26 kernels . Downloads over the network take > @ 1000 times longer under 2.6.27 than under 2.6.26. Disk I/O is @ > 100 times slower. That's indeed insane. > There are numerous log messages about "interrupt during system call" > (EINTR) from user-space processes. Separate problem as well. Please let us concentrate on the throttling aspect and not mix USB/EINTR stuff into it for now. Thanks, tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (26 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Rafael J. Wysocki ` (15 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Marcin Slusarz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506 Subject : oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-04 19:14 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055573123449&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (27 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki ` (14 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Frans Pop This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11507 Subject : usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-08-26 21:03 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121977815018224&w=2 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg09735.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (28 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-22 6:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov 2008-09-23 10:50 ` Thomas Gleixner 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Rafael J. Wysocki ` (13 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 2 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org> Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-22 6:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov 2008-09-23 10:50 ` Thomas Gleixner 1 sibling, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-09-22 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 08:54:19PM +0200] | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report | of recent regressions. | | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions | from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know | (either way). | | | Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 | Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? | Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> | Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (11 days old) | References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 | Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org> | Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> | Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> | | There are really multiple issues touched in report. nmi_watchdog hangs, rtc device creation, NULL deref... I've asked Joshua for more information. Since he must to use netdev tree for a while maybe we could wait 'till next merge window will be closed and check if nmi_watchdog does work. So the work in progress. - Cyrill - ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-22 6:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-09-23 10:50 ` Thomas Gleixner [not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809231244190.3247-dbfLifZv8x0yMciVaGeJ0d53zsg1cpMQ@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2008-09-23 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 > Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug alive to chase the other issues. Thanks, tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809231244190.3247-dbfLifZv8x0yMciVaGeJ0d53zsg1cpMQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? [not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809231244190.3247-dbfLifZv8x0yMciVaGeJ0d53zsg1cpMQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-23 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-23 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt On Tuesday, 23 of September 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 > > Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? > > The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with > nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug > alive to chase the other issues. Well, for the sake of documentation I'd prefer to close this bug and create a new non-regression one for the other issues if that's not a problem. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (29 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-24 1:18 ` Chris Mason 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki ` (12 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Chris Mason This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11548 Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Submitter : Chris Mason <chris.mason-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-08 14:26 (14 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122088566310440&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-24 1:18 ` Chris Mason 2008-09-24 18:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Chris Mason @ 2008-09-24 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 20:54 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > I'm unable to reproduce this on 2.6.27-rc7. I don't think it has been fixed, but I'm having a hard time finding a reliable way to trigger it on newer kernels. -chris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! 2008-09-24 1:18 ` Chris Mason @ 2008-09-24 18:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-24 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Mason; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Wednesday, 24 of September 2008, Chris Mason wrote: > On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 20:54 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > I'm unable to reproduce this on 2.6.27-rc7. I don't think it has been > fixed, but I'm having a hard time finding a reliable way to trigger it > on newer kernels. Thanks for the update. For now, I'll close it as 'unreproducible'. Please reopen if it happens again. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (30 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (11 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Frans Pop, Rene Herman, Rene Herman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman-cENuUygGYd//D1n+0JDH9g@public.gmane.org> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098498125536&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (31 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 23:16 ` Justin Mattock 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11549] 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Rafael J. Wysocki ` (10 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, David Brownell, Justin Mattock This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11552 Subject : Disabling IRQ #23 Submitter : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-09 19:08 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098735230906&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107367715361&w=4 Handled-By : David Brownell <david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122187222705195&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 23:16 ` Justin Mattock [not found] ` <dd18b0c30809211616g658b50c8k2ea9f9953f1de96f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Justin Mattock @ 2008-09-21 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, David Brownell On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11552 > Subject : Disabling IRQ #23 > Submitter : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-09-09 19:08 (13 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098735230906&w=4 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107367715361&w=4 > Handled-By : David Brownell <david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> > Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122187222705195&w=4 > > > not sure if it should be; From over here, I did a bad install of isight-firmware-tools, causing hal and udev to clash. After making sure the package was either using hal or udev, there is no message of disable irq #23. If its not too much trouble is there a way to verify that this was the case, i.g. if udev creates a dev, then hal creates the same device will this cause ehci_hcd to have messages of this kind? If so then thats what happened, if not then theres something else causing this. -- Justin P. Mattock ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <dd18b0c30809211616g658b50c8k2ea9f9953f1de96f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 [not found] ` <dd18b0c30809211616g658b50c8k2ea9f9953f1de96f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-22 10:53 ` Alan Stern [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0809220651080.13379-100000-pYrvlCTfrz9XsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Alan Stern @ 2008-09-22 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Justin Mattock Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Brownell On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Justin Mattock wrote: > From over here, I did a bad install > of isight-firmware-tools, causing hal and udev > to clash. After making sure the package was either > using hal or udev, there is no message of disable irq #23. > If its not too much trouble is there a way to verify that this was > the case, i.g. if udev creates a dev, then hal creates the same device > will this cause ehci_hcd to have messages of this kind? If so > then thats what happened, if not then theres something else causing this. You didn't read what I wrote earlier, did you? The "HC died" message should NEVER occur! It doesn't matter what games you play with hal and udev -- it should NEVER occur. Not ever. And since the "HC died" is what causes IRQ #23 to be disabled, that shouldn't happen either. Alan Stern ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0809220651080.13379-100000-pYrvlCTfrz9XsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0809220651080.13379-100000-pYrvlCTfrz9XsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-22 16:20 ` Justin Mattock 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Justin Mattock @ 2008-09-22 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Stern Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Brownell On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Justin Mattock wrote: > >> From over here, I did a bad install >> of isight-firmware-tools, causing hal and udev >> to clash. After making sure the package was either >> using hal or udev, there is no message of disable irq #23. >> If its not too much trouble is there a way to verify that this was >> the case, i.g. if udev creates a dev, then hal creates the same device >> will this cause ehci_hcd to have messages of this kind? If so >> then thats what happened, if not then theres something else causing this. > > You didn't read what I wrote earlier, did you? The "HC died" message > should NEVER occur! It doesn't matter what games you play with hal and > udev -- it should NEVER occur. Not ever. > > And since the "HC died" is what causes IRQ #23 to be disabled, that > shouldn't happen either. > > Alan Stern > > appologize for not fully understanidng, I'm just getting confused with why and what is causing this to occur. The only reason for playing with hal and udev is to have this message appear, if I leave them out of the picture the system runs fine. Anyways, I'm up to trying anything at this point, and again appologize for causing any heat. -- Justin P. Mattock ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11549] 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (32 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 21:07 ` jmerkey 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11551] Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (9 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Starikovskiy, jmerkey-6KXTs3wnGaZTqo3+vT/QGPegYHeGw8Jk This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549 Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Submitter : <jmerkey-6KXTs3wnGaZTqo3+vT/QGPegYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (20 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4 Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098180019264&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11549] 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11549] 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 21:07 ` jmerkey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: jmerkey @ 2008-09-21 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alexey Starikovskiy, jmerkey > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549 > Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup > Submitter : <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com> > Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (20 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4 > Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098180019264&w=4 > > > This bug is corrected by Alexey's patch and has passed all regression tests. Jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11551] Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (33 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11549] 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 20:39 ` Steven Noonan 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (8 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Steven Noonan This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11551 Subject : Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 Submitter : Steven Noonan <steven-Cunn4gMjHvbm+q05EWxUEA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-10 18:07 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107007407994&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11551] Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11551] Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 20:39 ` Steven Noonan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Steven Noonan @ 2008-09-21 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11551 > Subject : Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 > Submitter : Steven Noonan <steven-Cunn4gMjHvbm+q05EWxUEA@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-09-10 18:07 (12 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122107007407994&w=4 > > The machine with these symptoms was sent in for service on Friday. I suspect there may have been dodgy hardware involved on this one. I think this bug should be closed for the time being. Once I get the machine back, I'll reopen the bug if I can still reproduce it. - Steven ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (34 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11551] Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-23 2:13 ` Andy Wettstein 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11590] Nokia 5310 Xpress usb-storage not mounting Rafael J. Wysocki ` (7 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andy Wettstein This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568 Subject : spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Submitter : Andy Wettstein <ajw1980-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-14 20:00 (8 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-23 2:13 ` Andy Wettstein 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Andy Wettstein @ 2008-09-23 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 08:54:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568 > Subject : spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 > Submitter : Andy Wettstein <ajw1980-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-09-14 20:00 (8 days old) Just verified it is still a problem with 2.6.27-rc7. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11590] Nokia 5310 Xpress usb-storage not mounting 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (35 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11569] Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced Rafael J. Wysocki ` (6 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Almaroad This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11590 Subject : Nokia 5310 Xpress usb-storage not mounting Submitter : David Almaroad <dalmaroad-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-18 21:35 (4 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11569] Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (36 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11590] Nokia 5310 Xpress usb-storage not mounting Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki ` (5 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569 Subject : Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (20 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (37 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11569] Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-25 0:46 ` Chuck Ebbert 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11609] oops in find_get_page Rafael J. Wysocki ` (4 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, John Daiker This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-25 0:46 ` Chuck Ebbert [not found] ` <20080924204655.481478c6-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Chuck Ebbert @ 2008-09-25 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, John Daiker, Nick Piggin On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:54:23 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608 > Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request > Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (6 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4 > > As I said in the bugzilla entry: Oops: 000b Bit 3 is set -- the processor detected 1's in reserved bits of the page directory. That can't be good... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080924204655.481478c6-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request [not found] ` <20080924204655.481478c6-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-09-25 3:03 ` Nick Piggin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Nick Piggin @ 2008-09-25 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chuck Ebbert Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, John Daiker, Linus Torvalds On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:46:55PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:54:23 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608 > > Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request > > Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (6 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4 > > > > > > As I said in the bugzilla entry: > > Oops: 000b > > Bit 3 is set -- the processor detected 1's in reserved bits of the page directory. > > That can't be good... 54384.988151] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff8800601dd000 [54384.992095] IP: [<ffffffff80375457>] clear_page_c+0x7/0x10 [54384.992095] PGD 202063 PUD 8067 PMD 65d54163 PTE 80002020601dd163 [54384.992095] Oops: 000b [1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC I initially suspect PAT (maybe via DEBUG_PAGEALLOC)... but let's see if the 3rd line here is useful. xRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR|40b|<--MAXPHYS PHYS-->|...RR.actuwp PGD: 001000000010000001100011 xRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR|40b|<--MAXPHYS PHYS-->|...RR.actuwp PUD: 1000000001100111 xRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR|40b|<--MAXPHYS PHYS-->|...Rs.actuwp PMD: 01100101110101010100000101100011 xRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR|40b|<--MAXPHYS PHYS-->|...gP.actuwp PTE: 1000000000000000001000000010000001100000000111011101000101100011 3210987654321098765432109876543210987654321098765432109876543210 Is this a 36-bit physical address CPU? In which case you have 2 bits in the pte that are outside "maxphys". Or if it is a 40-bit CPU, then you have just 1 bit outside maxphys, in which case I'd say it is memory corruption (maybe a hardware bug, maybe a scribble from elsewhere). So I'm wrong about PAT. Interestingly, the PMD also has a 1 set in a reserved bit (page global), but according to the Intel docs, the CPU doesn't check that bit, so it is not faulting there. Does the machine survive memtest? Is the bug reproduceable? If the answer is no to either of these, I think we can take it off the regression list. Otherwise, is it possible to track down to a specific commit? Thanks, Nick ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11609] oops in find_get_page 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (38 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11610] Problem with kernel commit 664d080c41463570b95717b5ad86e79dc1be0877 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (3 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Marcin Slusarz This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11609 Subject : oops in find_get_page Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-20 14:53 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122192251101892&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11610] Problem with kernel commit 664d080c41463570b95717b5ad86e79dc1be0877 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (39 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11609] oops in find_get_page Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-21 23:10 ` Michal 'vorner' Vaner 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11611] Commit 2344abbcbdb82140050e8be29d3d55e4f6fe860b breaks resume on nx6325 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (2 subsequent siblings) 43 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Holger Macht, Jeff Garzik, Michal 'vorner' Vaner This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11610 Subject : Problem with kernel commit 664d080c41463570b95717b5ad86e79dc1be0877 Submitter : Michal 'vorner' Vaner <vorner-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-21 17:35 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=122201853409501&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11610] Problem with kernel commit 664d080c41463570b95717b5ad86e79dc1be0877 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11610] Problem with kernel commit 664d080c41463570b95717b5ad86e79dc1be0877 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 23:10 ` Michal 'vorner' Vaner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Michal 'vorner' Vaner @ 2008-09-21 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Holger Macht, Jeff Garzik, Michal 'vorner' Vaner Hello On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 08:54:23PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). Yes, it still does this with newest kernel (9824b8f11373b0df806c135a342da9319ef1d893). At last for me. With regards -- Please enter password: Michal 'vorner' Vaner ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11611] Commit 2344abbcbdb82140050e8be29d3d55e4f6fe860b breaks resume on nx6325 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (40 preceding siblings ...) 2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11610] Problem with kernel commit 664d080c41463570b95717b5ad86e79dc1be0877 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [not found] ` <7lIhZC4hCxE.A.0gG.R0q1IB@albercik> 2008-09-21 21:57 ` 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Alexey Starikovskiy 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11611 Subject : Commit 2344abbcbdb82140050e8be29d3d55e4f6fe860b breaks resume on nx6325 Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-20 23:24 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122195277606974&w=4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <7lIhZC4hCxE.A.0gG.R0q1IB@albercik>]
* Re: [Bug #11555] rmmod ide-cd_mod: tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong. [not found] ` <7lIhZC4hCxE.A.0gG.R0q1IB@albercik> @ 2008-09-21 20:43 ` Mariusz Kozlowski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Mariusz Kozlowski @ 2008-09-21 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, FUJITA Tomonori, Jens Axboe Hi, > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). It was present in 2.6.27-rc6. A day or two later I checked mainline and it was gone. I will recheck this and notify if needed. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11555 > Subject : rmmod ide-cd_mod: tried to init an initialized =C2=A0object, something is s= eriously wrong. > Submitter : Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski-NWF1p15JEu3VItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2008-07-16 2:22 (68 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=122061839713526&w=4 > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095622602315&w=4 Thanks, Mariusz ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki ` (42 preceding siblings ...) [not found] ` <7lIhZC4hCxE.A.0gG.R0q1IB@albercik> @ 2008-09-21 21:57 ` Alexey Starikovskiy 43 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Alexey Starikovskiy @ 2008-09-21 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List Hi Rafael, Correct patch is the one attached to bugzilla entry, not the one you mention. Regards, Alex. Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549 > Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup > Submitter : <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com> > Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (20 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4 > Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122098180019264&w=4 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* 2.6.27-rc7-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 @ 2008-09-27 15:54 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-09-27 15:56 ` [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-27 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.26, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.26, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2008-09-27 173 35 28 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11643 Subject : ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1947: BUG? (err >= 0) Submitter : sangu <sangu.gnome@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-24 16:51 (4 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11634 Subject : Sometime my laptop is dead on resume from ram Submitter : Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-24 01:12 (4 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11615 Subject : sata_nv EH problems Submitter : Pär Andersson <paran@lysator.liu.se> Date : 2008-09-21 18:09 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11607 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 Bug in tty_chars_in_buffer Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-15 2:26 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122144565514490&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569 Subject : Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (26 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568 Subject : spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Submitter : Andy Wettstein <ajw1980@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-14 20:00 (14 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com> Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (17 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516 Subject : severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-07 13:59 (21 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512 Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (23 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11506 Subject : oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Submitter : Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-04 19:14 (24 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055573123449&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504 Subject : reiserfs BUG in 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (25 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476 Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (27 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4 Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (38 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (38 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4 Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382 Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com> Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (51 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4 Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380 Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (39 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (46 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (48 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (54 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (54 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (52 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (57 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224 Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (58 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Subject : Screen stays black after resume Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org> Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Subject : libata badness Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4 Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207 Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11654 Subject : Devices enabled in /proc/acpi/wakeup do not wake up any more Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de> Date : 2008-09-22 20:29 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122211535021493&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122224359222164&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122238185304167&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122237497811138&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629 Subject : quad G5 fails to shut down Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2008-09-23 14:20 (5 days old) Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629#c8 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (19 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549 Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Submitter : <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com> Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (26 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4 Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18047&action=view Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505 Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (24 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4 http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (34 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4 Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442#c1 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Subject : corrupt PMD after resume Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date : 2008-08-02 9:51 (57 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121767073424952&w=4 Handled-By : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122001615314700&w=2 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.26, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 2008-09-27 15:54 2.6.27-rc7-git5: " Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-27 15:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-27 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andy Wettstein This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568 Subject : spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Submitter : Andy Wettstein <ajw1980-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-14 20:00 (14 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 @ 2008-10-04 17:28 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-10-04 17:32 ` [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-04 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.26, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.26, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2008-10-04 181 41 33 2008-09-27 173 35 28 2008-09-21 169 45 36 2008-09-15 163 46 32 2008-09-12 163 51 38 2008-09-07 150 43 33 2008-08-30 135 48 36 2008-08-23 122 48 40 2008-08-16 103 47 37 2008-08-10 80 52 31 2008-08-02 47 31 20 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11700 Subject : ACPI instabilities and IRQs being disabled Submitter : Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> Date : 2008-09-27 22:40 (8 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122255527412178&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11699 Subject : 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0 Submitter : Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de> Date : 2008-09-28 17:45 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122262403415629&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11698 Subject : 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de> Date : 2008-09-29 11:29 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122268780926859&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11697 Subject : CD tray closes spontaneously after opening it Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-30 10:47 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122277167125264&w=4 Handled-By : Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11695 Subject : USB disconnects every 30 seconds Submitter : Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Date : 2008-10-03 17:45 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122305738430115&w=4 Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11676 Subject : 2.6.27-rc2 to rc8, apgart fails, iommu=soft works, regression Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Date : 2008-09-30 10:24 (5 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11664 Subject : acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr Submitter : Giovanni Pellerano <giovanni.pellerano@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-28 03:48 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11643 Subject : ALSA sound/core/pcm_native.c:1947: BUG? (err >= 0) Submitter : sangu <sangu.gnome@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-24 16:51 (11 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11634 Subject : Sometime my laptop is dead on resume from ram Submitter : Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-24 01:12 (11 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (19 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11607 Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 Bug in tty_chars_in_buffer Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-15 2:26 (20 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122144565514490&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569 Subject : Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568 Subject : spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Submitter : Andy Wettstein <ajw1980@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-14 20:00 (21 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com> Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (24 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11516 Subject : severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-07 13:59 (28 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512 Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (30 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504 Subject : reiserfs BUG in 2.6.27-rc5 Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (32 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476 Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com> Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (34 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4 Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407 Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (45 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4 Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380 Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (46 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (53 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (55 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272 Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (61 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271 Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (61 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98 Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264 Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com> Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (59 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11230 Subject : Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Submitter : Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2008-08-02 16:03 (64 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121769306319391&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224 Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (65 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Subject : Screen stays black after resume Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org> Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215 Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Subject : libata badness Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4 Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209 Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz> Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/30/199 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207 Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (66 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4 Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11701 Subject : sky2 wol regression Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de> Date : 2008-09-24 8:05 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122224359222164&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122298334522551&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11696 Subject : 2.6.27-rc8 doubled times Submitter : Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Date : 2008-10-03 10:21 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122302939313636&w=4 Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122307260621434&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629 Subject : quad G5 fails to shut down Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date : 2008-09-23 14:20 (12 days old) Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11629#c8 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11615 Subject : sata_nv EH problems Submitter : Pär Andersson <paran@lysator.liu.se> Date : 2008-09-21 18:09 (14 days old) Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18078&action=view Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550 Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (26 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4 Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl> Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549 Subject : 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Submitter : <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com> Date : 2008-09-02 21:27 (33 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122039255517586&w=4 Handled-By : Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18047&action=view Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505 Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (31 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4 http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (41 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4 Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442#c1 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.26, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167 Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 2008-10-04 17:28 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-04 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-04 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andy Wettstein This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11568 Subject : spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Submitter : Andy Wettstein <ajw1980-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2008-09-14 20:00 (21 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-04 17:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:52 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11210] libata badness Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-30 22:25 ` Pavel Machek
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11230] Kconfig no longer outputs a .config with freshly updated defconfigs Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11224] Only three cores found on quad-core machine Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11237] corrupt PMD after resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11335] 2.6.27-rc2-git5 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 23:49 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11357] Can not boot up with zd1211rw USB-Wlan Stick Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 23:51 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080921.165159.67476441.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-22 6:59 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <21d7e9970809212359y6876c405ub57dca3e9ee737e4-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-22 7:01 ` David Miller
2008-09-22 22:15 ` Jiri Kosina
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809230010460.27884-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-22 22:28 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080922.152815.22060684.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-23 1:26 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <21d7e9970809221826i76081719pdd749237580fc68e-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-23 1:59 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080922.185902.80812984.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-23 14:29 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-23 16:38 ` Renato S. Yamane
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809231229460.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-23 21:03 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <21d7e9970809231403wf766660u39908aca70548ca7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-23 22:05 ` David Miller
2008-09-24 6:02 ` David Newall
2008-09-23 21:05 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080923.140519.268233735.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-23 21:09 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <21d7e9970809231409r3fdd640h53a72a808266d220-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-23 22:07 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080923.150722.141587696.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-23 22:12 ` Jeff Kirsher
[not found] ` <9929d2390809231512w160d221axa2923a6b293a041-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-23 22:19 ` Jiri Kosina
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809240014390.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-24 4:12 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080923.211215.193696086.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-24 5:45 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <21d7e9970809232245x6a91c6e2l552ff039d07e2017-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-24 7:36 ` David Miller
2008-09-24 8:59 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <21d7e9970809240159u6db747eex51892061846b2251-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-24 9:01 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20080924.020116.193720569.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-24 9:16 ` Dave Airlie
2008-09-24 16:33 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-24 20:07 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809241829500.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-24 16:37 ` Jiri Kosina
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809241836180.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-24 18:10 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-24 20:18 ` Dave Airlie
2008-09-24 22:54 ` Parag Warudkar
[not found] ` <20080924.003638.71148740.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-24 16:27 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-09-24 20:47 ` Theodore Tso
[not found] ` <20080924102730.31ee305a-vw3g6Xz/EtPk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-24 16:56 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-25 19:01 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-24 19:10 ` Kyle McMartin
[not found] ` <20080924191022.GC2591-EK4dZfYtfFRW/gs8oUvUg/d9D2ou9A/h@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-24 19:22 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2008-09-24 19:52 ` David Miller
2008-09-24 22:37 ` Jiri Kosina
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250036090.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 18:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-25 20:45 ` Kok, Auke
2008-09-24 23:15 ` Jiri Kosina
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250110070.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 0:22 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <21d7e9970809241722w7c3bb6a5w1af5801b7380169d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 1:27 ` Jiri Kosina
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809250310190.4671-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 2:01 ` Frans Pop
[not found] ` <200809250401.54818.elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 17:24 ` Jiri Kosina
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809251921340.18801-1ReQVI26iDCaZKY3DrU6dA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 18:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-25 18:56 ` Jesse Barnes
[not found] ` <200809251156.10648.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 20:22 ` Jiri Kosina
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809252218470.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 19:36 ` Jesse Barnes
[not found] ` <200809251236.12287.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 20:35 ` Jiri Kosina
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809252234400.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 21:06 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <21d7e9970809251406gb2bdacbuf9ff1bde3d118cdb-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 21:42 ` Jesse Brandeburg
[not found] ` <4807377b0809251442x67e4e9eia706b70ae1c177ca-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 21:45 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <21d7e9970809251445s216efcc3kaba639d5e29c51aa-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 22:45 ` Jiri Kosina
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809260042380.3389-JCEl3tv+2Z8CVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-26 7:06 ` Alexey Rempel
2008-09-25 22:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <48DC176E.6020807-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-26 18:55 ` Krzysztof Halasa
[not found] ` <m38wten3dj.fsf-fiqtE+24Nu0B9AHHLWeGtNQXobZC6xk2@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-26 19:39 ` Alan Cox
2008-09-25 20:06 ` David Miller
2008-09-25 19:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-09-25 2:28 ` Jeff Garzik
[not found] ` <48DAF75D.4050908-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 3:51 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <21d7e9970809242051x17785159ya7510d92f705f3cf-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 4:00 ` David Miller
2008-09-25 4:25 ` Jesse Brandeburg
[not found] ` <48DB12C9.5080104-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 16:26 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-09-25 0:26 ` Jesse Barnes
[not found] ` <200809241726.58628.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 0:33 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-25 16:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-09-25 19:43 ` Jesse Barnes
[not found] ` <200809251243.43441.jbarnes-Y1mF5jBUw70BENJcbMCuUQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 20:45 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-25 12:24 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11442] btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11459] kernel crash after wifi connection established Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11439] [2.6.27-rc4-git4] compilation warnings Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11465] Linux-2.6.27-rc5, drm errors in log Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11501] Failed to open destination file: Permission deniedihex2fw Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11516] severe performance degradation on x86_64 going from 2.6.26-rc9 -> 2.6.27-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-23 9:49 ` Jason Vas Dias
[not found] ` <200809230549.28544.jason.vas.dias-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-27 9:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <200809280138.57672.jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <200809280138.57672.jason.vas.dias-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-28 10:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11506] oops during unmount - ext3? (2.6.27-rc5) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11507] usb: sometimes dead keyboard after boot Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-22 6:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-23 10:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809231244190.3247-dbfLifZv8x0yMciVaGeJ0d53zsg1cpMQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-23 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-24 1:18 ` Chris Mason
2008-09-24 18:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11552] Disabling IRQ #23 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 23:16 ` Justin Mattock
[not found] ` <dd18b0c30809211616g658b50c8k2ea9f9953f1de96f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-22 10:53 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0809220651080.13379-100000-pYrvlCTfrz9XsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-22 16:20 ` Justin Mattock
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11549] 2.6.27-rc5 acpi: EC Storm error message on bootup Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 21:07 ` jmerkey
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11551] Semi-repeatable hard lockup on 2.6.27-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 20:39 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-23 2:13 ` Andy Wettstein
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11590] Nokia 5310 Xpress usb-storage not mounting Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11569] Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-25 0:46 ` Chuck Ebbert
[not found] ` <20080924204655.481478c6-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-25 3:03 ` Nick Piggin
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11609] oops in find_get_page Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11610] Problem with kernel commit 664d080c41463570b95717b5ad86e79dc1be0877 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 23:10 ` Michal 'vorner' Vaner
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11611] Commit 2344abbcbdb82140050e8be29d3d55e4f6fe860b breaks resume on nx6325 Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <7lIhZC4hCxE.A.0gG.R0q1IB@albercik>
2008-09-21 20:43 ` [Bug #11555] rmmod ide-cd_mod: tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong Mariusz Kozlowski
2008-09-21 21:57 ` 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Alexey Starikovskiy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-27 15:54 2.6.27-rc7-git5: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-27 15:56 ` [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-04 17:28 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-04 17:32 ` [Bug #11568] spontaneous reboot on resume with 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).