Re: [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On 11/10, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380
> > Subject		: lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
> > Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2008-08-20 6:44 (82 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4
> 
> had a quick look again: i believe this one still triggers, and it's 
> caused by some interaction between input code and workqueue code. I 
> think it started triggering when Oleg's workqueue annotation patches 
> went upstream:
> 
> 6af8bf3: workqueues: add comments to __create_workqueue_key()
> 8448502: workqueues: do CPU_UP_CANCELED if CPU_UP_PREPARE fails
> 8de6d30: workqueues: schedule_on_each_cpu() can use schedule_work_on()
> ef1ca23: workqueues: queue_work() can use queue_work_on()
> a67da70: workqueues: lockdep annotations for flush_work()
> 3da1c84: workqueues: make get_online_cpus() useable for work->func()
> 8616a89: workqueues: schedule_on_each_cpu: use flush_work()
> db70089: workqueues: implement flush_work()
> 1a4d9b0: workqueues: insert_work: use "list_head *" instead of "int tail"

"make get_online_cpus() useable for work->func()" changed the locking.
destroy_workqueue() was changed to take cpu_maps_update_begin() instead
of get_online_cpus(). Other patches can't make any difference afaics.

Currently I don't understand why lockdep complains, will try to do
more grepping later.

Oleg.