From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [Bug #12401] 2.6.28 regression: xbacklight broken on ThinkPad X61s Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:42:24 +0000 Message-ID: <20090216124223.GA2999@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20090215134409.GC21670@srcf.ucam.org> <200902151538.29766.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090215221647.GA15392@dose.home.local> <20090216011600.GA28929@srcf.ucam.org> <20090216123740.GB7047@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090216123740.GB7047-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Andi Kleen , Len Brown , Thomas Renninger , Zhang Rui On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 01:37:40PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:16:47PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > > > I think if it works without DRI in 2.6.27 and doesn't work in 2.6.28, > > > it isn't a configuration error, but a real regression. > > > > It only worked by accident without DRM support, since you were using the > > ATI codepath in the firmware rather than the Intel one. That bug's been > > fixed, [...] > > Which precise commit ID is that? 22c13f9d8179f4c9caecfcb60a95214562b9addc -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org