2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28

2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and
2.6.28, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.27
and 2.6.28, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2009-02-24      154       27          23
  2009-02-15      152       30          26
  2009-02-04      149       33          30
  2009-01-20      144       30          27
  2009-01-11      139       33          30
  2008-12-21      120       19          17
  2008-12-13      111       14          13
  2008-12-07      106       20          17
  2008-12-04      106       29          21
  2008-11-22       93       25          15
  2008-11-16       89       32          18
  2008-11-09       73       40          27
  2008-11-02       55       41          29
  2008-10-25       26       25          20


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12759
Subject		: scsi: aic7xxx hang since v2.6.28-rc1 ...
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-15 11:44 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123469852817058&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12757
Subject		: &gt;2.6.27 dies at cardbus init on laptop
Submitter	: David Pflug <dtpflug-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-17 19:28 (7 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123489904218306&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12690
Subject		: DPMS (LCD powersave, poweroff) don't work
Submitter	: Antonin Kolisek <akolisek-T3ps84XAcx36AaHJ4hbVU+3CNBr840j2@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-11 09:40 (13 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12645
Subject		: DMI low-memory-protect quirk causes resume hang on Samsung NC10
Submitter	: Patrick Walton <pcwalton-764C0pRuGfqVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-06 18:35 (18 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0af40a4b1050c050e62eb1dc30b82d5ab22bf221


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12634
Subject		: video distortion and lockup with i830 video chip and 2.6.28.3
Submitter	: Bob Raitz <pappy_mcfae-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-04 21:10 (20 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12619
Subject		: Regression 2.6.28 and last - boot failed
Submitter	: jan sonnek <ha2nny-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-01 19:59 (23 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123351836213969&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
Subject		: Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
Submitter	: kpalberg <kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12500
Subject		: r8169: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit timed out
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-13 21:19 (42 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123188160811322&w=4
Handled-By	: Francois Romieu <romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465
Subject		: KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
Submitter	: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah-biM/RbsGxha6c6uEtOJ/EA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-17 03:37 (38 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
Subject		: GPF on 2.6.28 and 2.6.28-rc9-git3, e1000e and e1000 issues
Submitter	: Doug Bazarnic <doug-nOyj/A09A+/k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-09 21:26 (46 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123153653120204&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12411
Subject		: 2.6.28: BUG in r8169
Submitter	: Andrey Vul <andrey.vul-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-31 18:37 (55 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123074869611409&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12409
Subject		: NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
Submitter	: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-30 12:53 (56 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123064167008695&w=4
Handled-By	: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt-kjvbsxwSFqI@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12408
Subject		: Funny problem with 2.6.28: Kernel stalls
Submitter	: Michael Roth <mroth-+8Z3Oe2AQjqzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-25 15:14 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123021931714282&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12407
Subject		: Kernel 2.6.28 regression: Hang after hibernate
Submitter	: Frank Groeneveld <frankgroeneveld-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-28 20:34 (58 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123049651906081&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12405
Subject		: oops in __bounce_end_io_read under kvm
Submitter	: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-26 17:36 (60 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123031303400676&w=4
Handled-By	: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12404
Subject		: Oops in 2.6.28-rc9 and -rc8 -- mtrr issues / e1000e
Submitter	: Kernel <kernel-nOyj/A09A+/k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-22 9:37 (64 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122993873320150&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12401
Subject		: 2.6.28 regression: xbacklight broken on ThinkPad X61s
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-05 8:39 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=22c13f9d8179f4c9caecfcb60a95214562b9addc
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123114479110314&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
Subject		: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
Submitter	: Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-21 14:23 (65 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122986946614791&w=4
Handled-By	: Andi Kleen <ak-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
Subject		: ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
Submitter	: Alberto Gonzalez <luis6674-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12209
Subject		: oldish top core dumps (in its meminfo() function)
Submitter	: Andreas Mohr <andi-5+Cda9B46AM@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-12 18:49 (74 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122910784006472&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907511319288&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208
Subject		: uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host
Submitter	: Miklos Szeredi <miklos-sUDqSbJrdHQHWmgEVkV9KA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-12 9:35 (74 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907463518593&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12160
Subject		: networking oops after resume from s2ram (2.6.28-rc6)
Submitter	: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-11-28 21:15 (88 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122790701615723&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12061
Subject		: snd_hda_intel: power_save: sound cracks on powerdown
Submitter	: Jens Weibler <bugzilla-kernel-6hJTtV8wudIr9FUcG+3rRQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-11-18 12:07 (98 days old)
Handled-By	: Takashi Iwai <tiwai-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12614
Subject		: WOL with forcedeth broken since f55c21fd9a92a444e55ad1ca4e4732d56661bf2e
Submitter	: Philipp Matthias Hahn <pmhahn-u4khhh1J0LzF41mA0N3lWw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-29 6:31 (26 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123321232825316&w=4
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
		  Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123330459229248&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123411195117835&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12612
Subject		: hard lockup when interrupting cdda2wav
Submitter	: Matthias Reichl <hias-vtPv7MOkFPkAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-28 16:41 (27 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123316111415677&w=4
Handled-By	: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123371501613019&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12406
Subject		: 2.6.28 thinks that my PS/2 mouse is a touchpad
Submitter	: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-27 9:06 (59 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123036893817280&w=4
Handled-By	: Arjan Opmeer <arjan-OssVvNj1wBysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123092147703236&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
Subject		: debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
Submitter	: Michal Suchanek <hramrach-aRb0bU7PRFPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-09 07:28 (46 days old)
Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/445


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28, unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11808

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

[Bug #12061] snd_hda_intel: power_save: sound cracks on powerdown

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12061
Subject		: snd_hda_intel: power_save: sound cracks on powerdown
Submitter	: Jens Weibler <bugzilla-kernel-6hJTtV8wudIr9FUcG+3rRQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-11-18 12:07 (98 days old)
Handled-By	: Takashi Iwai <tiwai-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12160] networking oops after resume from s2ram (2.6.28-rc6)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12160
Subject		: networking oops after resume from s2ram (2.6.28-rc6)
Submitter	: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-11-28 21:15 (88 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122790701615723&w=4

[Bug #12209] oldish top core dumps (in its meminfo() function)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12209
Subject		: oldish top core dumps (in its meminfo() function)
Submitter	: Andreas Mohr <andi-5+Cda9B46AM@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-12 18:49 (74 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122910784006472&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907511319288&w=4

[Bug #12208] uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208
Subject		: uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host
Submitter	: Miklos Szeredi <miklos-sUDqSbJrdHQHWmgEVkV9KA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-12 9:35 (74 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907463518593&w=4

[Bug #12393] debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
Subject		: debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
Submitter	: Michal Suchanek <hramrach-aRb0bU7PRFPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-09 07:28 (46 days old)
Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/445

Re: [Bug #12393] debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
> Subject		: debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
> Submitter	: Michal Suchanek <hramrach-aRb0bU7PRFPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-01-09 07:28 (46 days old)
> Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/445

Commit be716615fe596ee117292dc615e95f707fb67fd1 in Linus tree.

"Cc: stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" is in the commit log, so stable folks should
have it as well.

Thanks,

	tglx

Re: [Bug #12393] debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12393
> > Subject		: debugging in dosemu causes lots of 'scheduling while atomic'
> > Submitter	: Michal Suchanek <hramrach-aRb0bU7PRFPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-01-09 07:28 (46 days old)
> > Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/445
> 
> Commit be716615fe596ee117292dc615e95f707fb67fd1 in Linus tree.
> 
> "Cc: stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" is in the commit log, so stable folks should
> have it as well.

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

[Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
Subject		: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
Submitter	: Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-21 14:23 (65 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122986946614791&w=4
Handled-By	: Andi Kleen <ak-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>

Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression

[Robert Richter]

Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:

780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856

-Robert

On 23.02.09 23:03:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
> Subject		: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
> Submitter	: Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-12-21 14:23 (65 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122986946614791&w=4
> Handled-By	: Andi Kleen <ak-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org

Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> 
> 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856

URL, please?

Rafael

 
> On 23.02.09 23:03:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395
> > Subject		: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
> > Submitter	: Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2008-12-21 14:23 (65 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122986946614791&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Andi Kleen <ak-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>

Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression

[Ingo Molnar]

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> > Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> > 
> > 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
> 
> URL, please?

The fix is not yet in Linus's tree - the commit is below.

	Ingo

------------>
From 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:34:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86: oprofile: don't set counter width from cpuid on Core2

Impact: fix stuck NMIs and non-working oprofile on certain CPUs

Resetting the counter width of the performance counters on Intel's
Core2 CPUs, breaks the delivery of NMIs, when running in x86_64 mode.

This should fix bug #12395:

  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12395

Signed-off-by: Tim Blechmann <tim-xpEK/MU0Hawdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
LKML-Reference: <20090303100412.GC10085-yX1UDyMwZ8xWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
---
 arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
index e9f80c7..10131fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
@@ -78,8 +78,18 @@ static void ppro_setup_ctrs(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
 	if (cpu_has_arch_perfmon) {
 		union cpuid10_eax eax;
 		eax.full = cpuid_eax(0xa);
-		if (counter_width < eax.split.bit_width)
-			counter_width = eax.split.bit_width;
+
+		/*
+		 * For Core2 (family 6, model 15), don't reset the
+		 * counter width:
+		 */
+		if (!(eax.split.version_id == 0 &&
+			current_cpu_data.x86 == 6 &&
+				current_cpu_data.x86_model == 15)) {
+
+			if (counter_width < eax.split.bit_width)
+				counter_width = eax.split.bit_width;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* clear all counters */

Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> > > 
> > > 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
> > 
> > URL, please?
> 
> The fix is not yet in Linus's tree - the commit is below.

Thanks a lot!

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> 
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> > > 
> > > 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
> > 
> > URL, please?
> 
> The fix is not yet in Linus's tree - the commit is below.

The fix is upstream now, included in .29-rc7.

	Ingo

Re: [Bug #12395] 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > > Fix upstream in tip/x86/urgent:
> > > > 
> > > > 780eef9492b16a1543a3b2ae9f9526a735fc9856
> > > 
> > > URL, please?
> > 
> > The fix is not yet in Linus's tree - the commit is below.
> 
> The fix is upstream now, included in .29-rc7.

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

[Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
Subject		: ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
Submitter	: Alberto Gonzalez <luis6674-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)

Re: [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop

[Alberto Gonzalez]

--- On Mon, 2/23/09, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> The following bug entry is on the current list of known
> regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it
> still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
> Subject		: ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
> Submitter	: Alberto Gonzalez <luis6674-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)

Still present, yes.


      

Re: [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop

[Nick Piggin]

On Tuesday 24 February 2009 21:53:44 Alberto Gonzalez wrote:
> --- On Mon, 2/23/09, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known
> > regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it
> > still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry	:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
> > Subject		: ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop
> > Submitter	: Alberto Gonzalez <luis6674@yahoo.com>
> > Date		: 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)
>
> Still present, yes.

Any chance you could bisect it?

Re: [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop

[Alberto Gonzalez]

--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin-/E1597aS9LT0CCvOHzKKcA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> > > Bug-Entry	:
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
> > > Subject		: ~100 extra wakeups reported by
> powertop
> > > Submitter	: Alberto Gonzalez
> <luis6674-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date		: 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)
> >
> > Still present, yes.
> 
> Any chance you could bisect it?

Well, if you look at the report you'd notice that:

- I'm using a released, stable, distro (Arch Linux, basically vanilla) kernel. I hardly know how to compile one, let alone bisect it.
- I first had the problem on my 5+ year old Pentium 4 with equally old Intel graphics (845G chipset). I thought it would be hardware specific. But now I got a new Core 2 Duo with new Intel graphics (G45 chipset), moved to 64bit, and still have the exact same problem and exact same workaround. So I really don't believe anymore it's something hardware specific and should be quite general to anyone using Intel graphics. I hoped someone with much better knowledge could reproduce it and investigate it better.

On the report, Eric Anholt mentioned a likely cause and said that Jesse Barnes had looked into a similar issue before. I cc'd him (jbarnes) on last week reminder, but got no reply.

I really wish I could do more, but learning to compile a custom kernel for my hardware and do a git bisect is something I just can't afford now. If relevant people try to reproduce it but can't, and say only possible solution would be for me to bisect it I guess I could try to give it a go when I get some spare time.

Thanks,
Alberto.


      

Re: [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop

[Nick Piggin]

On Tuesday 24 February 2009 23:25:11 Alberto Gonzalez wrote:
> --- On Tue, 2/24/09, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin-/E1597aS9LT0CCvOHzKKcA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > Bug-Entry	:
> > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12337
> > > > Subject		: ~100 extra wakeups reported by
> >
> > powertop
> >
> > > > Submitter	: Alberto Gonzalez
> >
> > <luis6674-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > > > Date		: 2008-12-31 12:25 (55 days old)
> > >
> > > Still present, yes.
> >
> > Any chance you could bisect it?
>
> Well, if you look at the report you'd notice that:

I read at the report, but it wasn't obvious that you wouldn't be
able to bisect it.


> - I'm using a released, stable, distro (Arch Linux, basically vanilla)
> kernel. I hardly know how to compile one, let alone bisect it. - I first
> had the problem on my 5+ year old Pentium 4 with equally old Intel graphics
> (845G chipset). I thought it would be hardware specific. But now I got a
> new Core 2 Duo with new Intel graphics (G45 chipset), moved to 64bit, and
> still have the exact same problem and exact same workaround. So I really
> don't believe anymore it's something hardware specific and should be quite
> general to anyone using Intel graphics. I hoped someone with much better
> knowledge could reproduce it and investigate it better.
>
> On the report, Eric Anholt mentioned a likely cause and said that Jesse
> Barnes had looked into a similar issue before. I cc'd him (jbarnes) on last
> week reminder, but got no reply.
>
> I really wish I could do more, but learning to compile a custom kernel for
> my hardware and do a git bisect is something I just can't afford now. If
> relevant people try to reproduce it but can't, and say only possible
> solution would be for me to bisect it I guess I could try to give it a go
> when I get some spare time.

Fair enough. Reporting a problem is always very appreciated.

Pinging Eric and Jesse ;)

Re: [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop

[Alberto Gonzalez]

--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin-/E1597aS9LT0CCvOHzKKcA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> > I really wish I could do more, but learning to compile
> a custom kernel for
> > my hardware and do a git bisect is something I just
> can't afford now. If
> > relevant people try to reproduce it but can't, and
> say only possible
> > solution would be for me to bisect it I guess I could
> try to give it a go
> > when I get some spare time.
> 
> Fair enough. Reporting a problem is always very
> appreciated.
> 
> Pinging Eric and Jesse ;)

Thank you Nick.

Since Arch Linux is not popular among kernel developers I just tested Fedora 10 Live-CD (KDE) and I can reproduce the exact same problem, even if Fedora 10 has kernel 2.6.27 and for me the problem appeared in .28 (but I guess Fedora adds many patches, so probably the "guilty" commit was backported to 2.6.27.5-117-FC10-i686).

Steps:
- Boot into Fedora 10 Live CD (obviously, into the default graphical mode)
- Install Powertop (yum install powertop) and run it
- I get about 60 wakeups per second from i915@pci.... leaving the system idle
- Switch to console and back to X. The wakeups are gone.

I hope that helps.


      

Re: [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]

I added the "how to reproduce" info to the bug-report, otherwise it would
get lost...

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

Re: [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop

[Jesse Barnes]

On Tuesday, February 24, 2009 5:50:34 am Alberto Gonzalez wrote:
> --- On Tue, 2/24/09, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > > I really wish I could do more, but learning to compile
> >
> > a custom kernel for
> >
> > > my hardware and do a git bisect is something I just
> >
> > can't afford now. If
> >
> > > relevant people try to reproduce it but can't, and
> >
> > say only possible
> >
> > > solution would be for me to bisect it I guess I could
> >
> > try to give it a go
> >
> > > when I get some spare time.
> >
> > Fair enough. Reporting a problem is always very
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Pinging Eric and Jesse ;)
>
> Thank you Nick.
>
> Since Arch Linux is not popular among kernel developers I just tested
> Fedora 10 Live-CD (KDE) and I can reproduce the exact same problem, even if
> Fedora 10 has kernel 2.6.27 and for me the problem appeared in .28 (but I
> guess Fedora adds many patches, so probably the "guilty" commit was
> backported to 2.6.27.5-117-FC10-i686).
>
> Steps:
> - Boot into Fedora 10 Live CD (obviously, into the default graphical mode)
> - Install Powertop (yum install powertop) and run it
> - I get about 60 wakeups per second from i915@pci.... leaving the system
> idle - Switch to console and back to X. The wakeups are gone.

Ah ok, it sounds like you're getting vblank interrupts at startup time, but 
once you VT switch the kernel figures out that you don't need them, so it 
disables them.  I think this is a bug in the 2D driver; it has an ioctl it 
uses when doing modesetting which doubles as a "disabling the irq is ok" 
signal, but we call it at a time when the corresponding pipe is off, so the 
kernel ignores the call.

Can you file a bug for this at bugs.freedesktop.org?  Is it easy for you to 
rebuild & test xf86-video-intel driver patches?

Thanks,
-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [Bug #12337] ~100 extra wakeups reported by powertop

[Alberto Gonzalez]

--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:

> > Steps:
> > - Boot into Fedora 10 Live CD (obviously, into the
> default graphical mode)
> > - Install Powertop (yum install powertop) and run it
> > - I get about 60 wakeups per second from i915@pci....
> leaving the system
> > idle - Switch to console and back to X. The wakeups
> are gone.
> 
> Ah ok, it sounds like you're getting vblank interrupts
> at startup time, but 
> once you VT switch the kernel figures out that you
> don't need them, so it 
> disables them.  I think this is a bug in the 2D driver; it
> has an ioctl it 
> uses when doing modesetting which doubles as a
> "disabling the irq is ok" 
> signal, but we call it at a time when the corresponding
> pipe is off, so the 
> kernel ignores the call.

Yes, that's what E. Anholt supposed too.

> 
> Can you file a bug for this at bugs.freedesktop.org? Is it
> easy for you to 
> rebuild & test xf86-video-intel driver patches?

I filed the report:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20296

Sure, I guess I can manage to patch the Intel driver and test it. I'm using 2.4.3 now, so maybe one thing I could do first is to try 2.5.x.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Thanks,
Alberto.


      

[Bug #12407] Kernel 2.6.28 regression: Hang after hibernate

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12407
Subject		: Kernel 2.6.28 regression: Hang after hibernate
Submitter	: Frank Groeneveld <frankgroeneveld-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-28 20:34 (58 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123049651906081&w=4

[Bug #12405] oops in __bounce_end_io_read under kvm

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12405
Subject		: oops in __bounce_end_io_read under kvm
Submitter	: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-26 17:36 (60 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123031303400676&w=4
Handled-By	: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12404] Oops in 2.6.28-rc9 and -rc8 -- mtrr issues / e1000e

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12404
Subject		: Oops in 2.6.28-rc9 and -rc8 -- mtrr issues / e1000e
Submitter	: Kernel <kernel-nOyj/A09A+/k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-22 9:37 (64 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122993873320150&w=4

[Bug #12401] 2.6.28 regression: xbacklight broken on ThinkPad X61s

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12401
Subject		: 2.6.28 regression: xbacklight broken on ThinkPad X61s
Submitter	: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-05 8:39 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=22c13f9d8179f4c9caecfcb60a95214562b9addc
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123114479110314&w=4

[Bug #12406] 2.6.28 thinks that my PS/2 mouse is a touchpad

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12406
Subject		: 2.6.28 thinks that my PS/2 mouse is a touchpad
Submitter	: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-27 9:06 (59 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123036893817280&w=4
Handled-By	: Arjan Opmeer <arjan-OssVvNj1wBysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123092147703236&w=4

[Bug #12408] Funny problem with 2.6.28: Kernel stalls

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12408
Subject		: Funny problem with 2.6.28: Kernel stalls
Submitter	: Michael Roth <mroth-+8Z3Oe2AQjqzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-25 15:14 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123021931714282&w=4

[Bug #12421] GPF on 2.6.28 and 2.6.28-rc9-git3, e1000e and e1000 issues

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12421
Subject		: GPF on 2.6.28 and 2.6.28-rc9-git3, e1000e and e1000 issues
Submitter	: Doug Bazarnic <doug-nOyj/A09A+/k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-09 21:26 (46 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123153653120204&w=4

[Bug #12409] NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12409
Subject		: NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
Submitter	: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-30 12:53 (56 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123064167008695&w=4
Handled-By	: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt-kjvbsxwSFqI@public.gmane.org>

Re: [Bug #12409] NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()

[Tetsuo Handa]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12409
> Subject		: NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
> Submitter	: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-12-30 12:53 (56 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123064167008695&w=4
> Handled-By	: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt-kjvbsxwSFqI@public.gmane.org>
> 
I couldn't reproduce this problem in native and KVM environments.
This problem seems to be VMware specific and priority is low.
Alok Kataria queued this problem.
Thus, this problem has not yet solved but mainline kernels don't need to wait
for this problem.

Re: [Bug #12409] NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12409
> > Subject		: NULL pointer dereference at get_stats()
> > Submitter	: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2008-12-30 12:53 (56 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123064167008695&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt-kjvbsxwSFqI@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> I couldn't reproduce this problem in native and KVM environments.
> This problem seems to be VMware specific and priority is low.
> Alok Kataria queued this problem.
> Thus, this problem has not yet solved but mainline kernels don't need to wait
> for this problem.

Thanks, I've dropped it from my list.

Rafael

[Bug #12411] 2.6.28: BUG in r8169

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12411
Subject		: 2.6.28: BUG in r8169
Submitter	: Andrey Vul <andrey.vul-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-12-31 18:37 (55 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123074869611409&w=4

[Bug #12500] r8169: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit timed out

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12500
Subject		: r8169: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit timed out
Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-13 21:19 (42 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123188160811322&w=4
Handled-By	: Francois Romieu <romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465
Subject		: KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
Submitter	: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah-biM/RbsGxha6c6uEtOJ/EA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-17 03:37 (38 days old)

Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)

[Kevin Shanahan]

On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).

Yes, the problem should still be listed.
The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.

Regards,
Kevin.

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465
> Subject		: KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
> Submitter	: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah-biM/RbsGxha6c6uEtOJ/EA@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-01-17 03:37 (38 days old)

Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> 
> Yes, the problem should still be listed.
> The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)

[Avi Kivity]

Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>   
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let me know (either way).
>>     
>
> Yes, the problem should still be listed.
> The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.
>   

Did tracing turn anything up?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)

[Kevin Shanahan]

On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 14:09 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >   
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
> >> be listed and let me know (either way).
> >>     
> >
> > Yes, the problem should still be listed.
> > The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef.
> >   
> 
> Did tracing turn anything up?

I provided some more traces using Ingo's "tip" branch, but I don't think
anyone has looked at them yet.

  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465#c11

I can provide more traces if e.g. a different set of functions is
required, but I'm not going to be able to analyse them properly myself.

I should have a bit more time for testing next week and I plan to try
setting up the guest with the different virtual network adapters models
to see if that helps.

Cheers,
Kevin.

[Bug #12559] Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
Subject		: Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
Submitter	: kpalberg <kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)

[Bug #12634] video distortion and lockup with i830 video chip and 2.6.28.3

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12634
Subject		: video distortion and lockup with i830 video chip and 2.6.28.3
Submitter	: Bob Raitz <pappy_mcfae-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-04 21:10 (20 days old)

[Bug #12612] hard lockup when interrupting cdda2wav

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12612
Subject		: hard lockup when interrupting cdda2wav
Submitter	: Matthias Reichl <hias-vtPv7MOkFPkAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-28 16:41 (27 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123316111415677&w=4
Handled-By	: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori-Zyj7fXuS5i5L9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123371501613019&w=2

[Bug #12614] WOL with forcedeth broken since f55c21fd9a92a444e55ad1ca4e4732d56661bf2e

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12614
Subject		: WOL with forcedeth broken since f55c21fd9a92a444e55ad1ca4e4732d56661bf2e
Submitter	: Philipp Matthias Hahn <pmhahn-u4khhh1J0LzF41mA0N3lWw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-01-29 6:31 (26 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123321232825316&w=4
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
		  Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123330459229248&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123411195117835&w=4

[Bug #12619] Regression 2.6.28 and last - boot failed

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12619
Subject		: Regression 2.6.28 and last - boot failed
Submitter	: jan sonnek <ha2nny-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-01 19:59 (23 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123351836213969&w=4

[Bug #12759] scsi: aic7xxx hang since v2.6.28-rc1 ...

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12759
Subject		: scsi: aic7xxx hang since v2.6.28-rc1 ...
Submitter	: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-15 11:44 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123469852817058&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #12690] DPMS (LCD powersave, poweroff) don't work

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12690
Subject		: DPMS (LCD powersave, poweroff) don't work
Submitter	: Antonin Kolisek <akolisek-T3ps84XAcx36AaHJ4hbVU+3CNBr840j2@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-11 09:40 (13 days old)

[Bug #12757] >2.6.27 dies at cardbus init on laptop

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12757
Subject		: >2.6.27 dies at cardbus init on laptop
Submitter	: David Pflug <dtpflug-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-17 19:28 (7 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123489904218306&w=4

[Bug #12645] DMI low-memory-protect quirk causes resume hang on Samsung NC10

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12645
Subject		: DMI low-memory-protect quirk causes resume hang on Samsung NC10
Submitter	: Patrick Walton <pcwalton-764C0pRuGfqVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2009-02-06 18:35 (18 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0af40a4b1050c050e62eb1dc30b82d5ab22bf221

Re: [stable] 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:00:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
> Subject		: Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
> Submitter	: kpalberg <kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)

I'm pretty sure this has been tracked down to a buggy firmware in the
device itself, and the company (Huawei) is working on updating it to
solve the issue.

This is backed up by the fact that Huawei submitted the patch that is
said to have broken this device :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [stable] 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:00:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
> > Subject		: Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
> > Submitter	: kpalberg <kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)
> 
> I'm pretty sure this has been tracked down to a buggy firmware in the
> device itself, and the company (Huawei) is working on updating it to
> solve the issue.
> 
> This is backed up by the fact that Huawei submitted the patch that is
> said to have broken this device :)

OK, the bug is now closed as invalid.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28

[Alan Stern]

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
> Subject		: Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
> Submitter	: kpalberg <kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)

This bug has been marked Invalid and Closed.

Alan Stern

Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12559
> > Subject		: Huawei E169 doesn't work as mass storage anymore
> > Submitter	: kpalberg <kpalberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2009-01-28 02:34 (27 days old)
> 
> This bug has been marked Invalid and Closed.

Thanks a lot for handling it!

Best,
Rafael