From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wu Fengguang Subject: Re: [Bug #12809] iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:09:20 +0800 Message-ID: <20090305010920.GB11575@localhost> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Andrew Morton , "Lin, Ming M" , Linus Torvalds , Nick Piggin , Peter Zijlstra On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12809 > Subject : iozone regression with 2.6.29-rc6 > Submitter : Lin Ming > Date : 2009-02-27 9:13 (5 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1cf6e7d83bf334cc5916137862c920a97aabc018 > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123572630504360&w=4 > Handled-By : Wu Fengguang Following Peter's idea of relaxing writeback throttling, Lin Ming and I tried the idea of totally disabling writeback throttling by doing benchmarks with the following parameters: echo 60 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio echo 50 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio The result is encouraging: the iozone performance is restored to the level of 2.6.29-rc5! We'll continue to evaluate the dirty/throttling numbers with Nick's patch. Thanks, Fengguang