From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [Bug #13186] cpufreq timer teardown problem Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:32:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20090426183205.GA29238@Krystal> References: <20090426162800.GB25774@Krystal> <200904261945.11690.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200904261945.11690.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , stable-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org) wrote: > On Sunday 26 April 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org) wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > > I've had no news that the patches I proposed has been considered for > > -stable. They fix the teardown problem here. So I guess it's better to > > wait for the patches to get into -stable before we close this bug ? > > In fact the bug is closeable as soon as they are in the Linus' tree. Are they > in it right now? > Nope, Andrew pulled the conservative governor fix for 2.6.30-rc in his tree, but that's about it. The fixes for ondemand 2.6.28, 2.6.29 and 2.6.30-rc have not been pulled yet. The fix for conservative 2.6.28, 2.6.29 has not been pulled neither. Mathieu > Thanks, > Rafael -- Mathieu Desnoyers OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68