From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lennert Buytenhek Subject: Re: [Bug #13293] Kernel BUG under network load with gianfar Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 03:42:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20090525014253.GA14371@mail.wantstofly.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Andy Fleming , "David S. Miller" , Michael Guntsche On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:11:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13293 > Subject : Kernel BUG under network load with gianfar > Submitter : Michael Guntsche > Date : 2009-05-03 13:36 (22 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0fd56bb5be6455d0d42241e65aed057244665e5e > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124135824600924&w=4 > Handled-By : Lennert Buytenhek > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/25518/ The proposed patch has yet to be ACKed by the maintainer/merged, so yes, this regression should still be listed.