From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [Bug #13522] BUG: scheduling while atomic Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:15:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20090629221509.1d307184@infradead.org> References: <6JJ2m5kyucK.A.D2D.VJASKB@chimera> <20090629154119.2c61f234@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090629162853.GB3461@localdomain.by> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090629162853.GB3461-AfQBxy1nhrTup4dJKg45FQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Alan Cox , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:28:53 +0300 Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (06/29/09 15:41), Alan Cox wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a > > > report of recent regressions. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known > > > regressions from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be > > > listed and let me know (either way). > > > > Yes although getting people seeing to test with might_sleep() > > checks in the tty layer demonstrate the tty layer isn't calling > > into ppp with irqs disabled when it shouldn't so I'm at a loss as > > to whether this is a network bug, a scheduler bug or something else. > > > > The schedule error in __tasklet_schedule() is itself rather > > peicular. > > > > Hello Alan, Rafael, > > BUG is still here... can you enable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO, and then run this through scripts/markup_oops.pl ? With a bit of luck it'll point to the exact code that's going wrong... -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org