From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Subject: [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2) Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:08:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20090703000829.735976000@intel.com> Return-path: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dave Jones Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cpufreq-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dave Young , Pekka Enberg , Mathieu Desnoyers , Thomas Renninger , Venkatesh Pallipadi Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there have been multiple reports of lockdep issues in cpufreq. Patch series takes care of these problems. This is the next attempt following the one here, which was not a complete fix. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0906.3/01073.html I am currently running some stress tests to make sure there are no issues with these patches. But, wanted to send them out for review/comments/testing before I head out for the long weekend. If this patchset seems sane, the first patch in the patchset should also get into 30.stable. --