From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [Bug #14630] sched_rt_periodic_timer vs cpu hotplug Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:18:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20091230081800.GA4304@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <1262104619.7135.161.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1262104619.7135.161.camel@laptop> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:36:59PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 16:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14630 > > Subject : sched_rt_periodic_timer vs cpu hotplug > > Submitter : Heiko Carstens > > Date : 2009-11-11 10:18 (49 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125793470309588&w=4 > > Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/60250/ > > git branch -a --contains 047106ad > > seems to suggest that this made it to Linus' tree. Any chance to get this into -stable? Since it seems it got only merged after 2.6.32.