From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14940] cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:18:18 +0100
Message-ID: <20091230091818.GW4489@kernel.dk>
References: <LptzGUUXbTK.A.MSF.ymhOLB@chimera> <NJVdobuNFNK.A.1VG.EnhOLB@chimera>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <NJVdobuNFNK.A.1VG.EnhOLB@chimera>
Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-ID: <kernel-testers.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
> Subject		: cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
> Submitter	: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2009-12-24 0:55 (6 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126161612401994&w=4

I don't think this should be labelled as a regression. It was already
known that we'd have less throughput for the many clients cases, it was
a trade off that was made to improve latencies.

-- 
Jens Axboe