From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:58:57 -0400
Message-ID: <20100621135857.GA21159@elliptictech.com>
References: <lc60d4toGTL.A.QzD._LpHMB@chimera>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <lc60d4toGTL.A.QzD._LpHMB@chimera>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kernel-testers.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>, Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, DRI <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

On 00:11 Mon 21 Jun     , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.34, please let us
> know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
> if any of the entries below are invalid.

Didn't see this one in the list:

  Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/996907

-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)