From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 04:04:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20100709020440.GJ6405@nowhere> References: <-IGZ64uxA6G.A.P0H.bLmNMB@chimera> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=FlgZ1hPTTKSvU5vW3ETb7LigxDIH2rFRU31EwUVaadk=; b=FC7z0e3Kv6+1vL0dtzvLHTW4GoBAndnj62Qfeazgd684A00jnbiB2x+cFCOdGutkS9 Mhq9BeMUDxNUv6nRotPnl1LOWEtrs7FqDovHLNwh77h++Jlnujcm/Itrcnwsr2kWFdkA 3iolu66dsc/WvGzWRhC2V6xQ3GqTEJ9uwaP78= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI , Al Viro , Shawn Starr , Jesse Barnes , Dave Airlie , "David S. Miller" , Patrick McHardy , Jens Axboe On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote= : > > Bug-Entry =A0 =A0 =A0 : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D= 16284 > > Subject =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code > > Submitter =A0 =A0 =A0 : Paul Mackerras > > Date =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: 2010-06-23 12:57 (16 days old) > > Message-ID =A0 =A0 =A0: <20100623125740.GA3368-oklZEfemRj05kJ7NmlRacFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org= > > > References =A0 =A0 =A0: http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D1277= 29789113432&w=3D2 >=20 > This has "I have a fix, will post it very soon." in the thread from > Frederic, but I'm not seeing anything else. Frederic? Right. In fact it wasn't a regression. The per task breakpoint reservat= ion design was broken from the beginning and this warning has revealed the problem. This only touched perf, and it did since perf support breakpoi= nts. =46ortunately ptrace wasn't concerned by this problem, even not by side= effects of this. The fix is invasive as it's a rewrite of a (little) part of the breakpo= int reservation. And since the symptom is only a warning and also breakpoin= ts never released from the constraint table (just a counter, no memory lea= k), the fix is headed for 2.6.36. It is ready in tip:/perf/core: http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=3Dc= ommitdiff;h=3D45a73372efe4a63f44aa2e1125d4a777c2fdc8d8 I think this ticket can be safely closed. Thanks.