Re: 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>]

[Trimming the CC list.]

On Monday, September 20, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> can you please add the following, Thanks in advance.
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
> > Subject         : Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
> > Submitter       : Richard Mittendorfer <delist-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
> > Date            : 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
> > Message-ID      : <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2
> 
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
> > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
> >
> > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
> > know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
> > if any of the entries below are invalid.
> >
> > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
> > to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
> > the issue.
> >
> >
> > Listed regressions statistics:
> >
> >  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
> >  ----------------------------------------
> >  2010-09-20       38       15          15
> >  2010-09-12       28       14          13
> >  2010-08-30       21       16          15
> >
> >
> > Unresolved regressions
> 
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> can you please add the following Bug, Thanks in advance.
> 
> Bug-Entry       : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140
> Subject         : Suspend To RAM/ Resume broken - Radeon KMS on RV250
> Submitter       : Michael Long <harn-solo-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2010-06-06 09:52
> Message-ID      : ???
> References      : ???
> 
> What is with "Regression:	No" in the BR? Change?

Yes, but according to the comments in there, it is a regression from 2.6.33.
I marked is as such and linked it to the appropriate meta-bug entry, but we're
not going to list it, because we only list post-2.6.34 (and post-2.6.35)
regressions in the current cycle.

Thanks,
Rafael