From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Bug #22532] 2.6.37-rc1: BUG: scheduling while atomic (kvm_init) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 22:26:49 +0100 Message-ID: <201012032226.49768.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1OMp3vU_qjP.A.JXG.uxC-MB@chimera> <1291396759.13945.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1291396759.13945.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Thomas Meyer Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler On Friday, December 03, 2010, Thomas Meyer wrote: > Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:41 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The BUG still happens: > > [ 0.502550] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/1/0x00000002 > [ 0.502574] Modules linked in: > [ 0.502577] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.37-rc4-00153-g59e57c6 #104 > [ 0.502579] Call Trace: > [ 0.502581] [] __schedule_bug+0x5a/0x5e > [ 0.502585] [] schedule+0xd4/0x592 > [ 0.502588] [] ? resched_task+0x68/0x6d > [ 0.502591] [] ? test_tsk_need_resched+0x12/0x1c > [ 0.502595] [] schedule_timeout+0x31/0xde > [ 0.502598] [] ? wake_up_process+0x10/0x12 > [ 0.502602] [] ? wake_up_worker+0x1f/0x21 > [ 0.502605] [] ? insert_work+0x57/0x5f > [ 0.502608] [] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x20/0x2b > [ 0.502611] [] wait_for_common+0x98/0x10e > [ 0.502614] [] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0xf > [ 0.502618] [] wait_for_completion+0x18/0x1a > [ 0.502621] [] call_usermodehelper_exec+0x82/0xd1 > [ 0.502624] [] kobject_uevent_env+0x3e6/0x422 > [ 0.502628] [] kobject_uevent+0xb/0xd > [ 0.502632] [] device_add+0x360/0x4f6 > [ 0.502635] [] device_register+0x19/0x1e > [ 0.502639] [] device_create_vargs+0x8c/0xc4 > [ 0.502642] [] device_create+0x2c/0x2e > [ 0.502646] [] misc_register+0xba/0x113 > [ 0.502649] [] kvm_init+0x1d1/0x2dc > [ 0.502652] [] ? pci_iommu_init+0x0/0x41 > [ 0.502655] [] ? svm_init+0x0/0x1e > [ 0.502657] [] svm_init+0x1c/0x1e > [ 0.502660] [] do_one_initcall+0x7a/0x12a > [ 0.502663] [] kernel_init+0x133/0x1bd > [ 0.502667] [] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 > [ 0.502670] [] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1bd > [ 0.502673] [] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10 > [ 0.502754] initcall svm_init+0x0/0x1e returned with preemption imbalance Thanks for the update. Rafael