From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Carlos R. Mafra" Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc3-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.36 -> 2.6.37 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:23:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20110203112316.GA3718@linux-yscl.site> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=nvbYgCs3A0qJkoqYWRc3r6qoPG6jYlqn8yK4nimQi28=; b=PS1NOv398Shf422bhc6i+LO4oDlHc9BN3SlmJsE7pSKWCtgNokYnY88akkwrvVAGoU N3jtI9Podigah2E5nRwyTLibf25IObRfOySSbcbc4sZNm06wfcfJo0ZbpdvhwVtB9Far LFk21reXiL9weJdYz4kqBxRVhkGguB4n7gKbs= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI On Thu 3.Feb'11 at 1:03:41 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.36 regressions, please let us know > either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any > of the entries below are invalid. I'm sorry if I'm overlooking something, but as far as I can see the regression reported here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/24/457 is not in the list (update on that report: reverting that commit on top of 2.6.37 fixes the issue). After some time, I also ended up finding an earlier report in the kernel bugzilla which I think is the same regression (it was bisected to the same commit): https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24982 but I do not see it in the list either, even though it's marked as a regression in the bugzilla. The issue was also present in 2.6.38-rc2 last time I tested.