From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dave Airlie" Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:18:16 +1000 Message-ID: <21d7e9970809241318s2717e121ic53f1357898a2cd0@mail.gmail.com> References: <21d7e9970809232245x6a91c6e2l552ff039d07e2017@mail.gmail.com> <20080924.003638.71148740.davem@davemloft.net> <21d7e9970809240159u6db747eex51892061846b2251@mail.gmail.com> <20080924.020116.193720569.davem@davemloft.net> <21d7e9970809240216m4a93a339sb51a5928fcb5f6fb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=3GRbxByupVDUOJSec7f2m9GPPYl5DxvXI76GfO1b+O8=; b=aVRo2E8FGW5U505beOrjksH7xUvUR2oquRqz+jEJ1tHEhvsm6aLJ8/Dp4/hJ55bAFd ypKdHvtOUgN2UM6LM/i4fTYpt89rBT9opDLmCUzhL9xjOkeSDPUMqHD83HXaLLnrfvDM gWACGAzkWFOBWVOsG6lvjy5Cuwm0SI2MV8/yM= In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jiri Kosina Cc: David Miller , jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote: > >> Dave (Airlie, too many Daves on CC here really), do you by any chance >> see any recent change in kernel intel graphic parts of DRM be causing >> this breakage? > > BTW, why is the PAT fix implented in commit 242e3df80 needed only for > radeons? > Good question, mainly because only radeons showed the illegal mapping crash, which was mapping via sysfs _wc files and then doing a UC mapping in the kernel over the same address space would fail. However this was VRAM related and these things don't have VRAM. Dave. > -- > Jiri Kosina > SUSE Labs >