Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb

Larry Finger
2009-05-17T23:16:21Z

Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Well.. order-1 GFP_ATOMIC allocations are unreliable. The networking
> code should hanlde the situation and recover. I assume that is
> happening in this case?

Yes, the driver has recovered in all cases so far.

> Perhaps we did something in that code after 2.6.29 which increased the
> frequency of the order-1 allocation attempts? Maybe earlier kernels
> used order-0 all the time? Those are much more reliable.

I think something happened to change the allocation as I never saw these O(1)
failures before with these particular drivers. I put in a few test printk's and
the buffers were 700-800 bytes long, and I would not expect them to require more
than an O(0) allocation.

I pushed 2.6.30-rc6 hard for ~12 hours without any recurrence of the problem.
Given the relative infrequency of the error, this certainly does not indicate a
fix in recent code. I will be trying to force it again.

Larry

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html