From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rene Herman Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:05:52 +0200 Message-ID: <48714FD0.4090300@keyaccess.nl> References: <200807062356.47908.rjw@sisk.pl> <487142BA.1080508@keyaccess.nl> <200807070057.51663.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200807070057.51663.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Natalie Protasevich , Kernel Testers List , Maximilian Engelhardt , Randy Dunlap , "Paul E. McKenney" , James Bottomley , Domenico Andreoli On 07-07-08 00:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> Being more explicit about liking a reporter to report "yes, nothing >> changed" would probably be good if that IS what's wanted. > > Well, I can change it to > > "Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know." > > if that's better. Or even "please verify that it should still be listed, and let me know either way". Simple "yes" replies feel a little silly, to non-frequent posters at least, without that kind of explicit encouragement so it might make for a few more replies. Rene.