[Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
Subject		: ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
Submitter	: Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-16 6:17 (52 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Justin Mattock]

On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (52 days old)
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
> Patch           : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
>                  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>
>
>

yes;
From what I can see so far,  the reason for the gpe storm detector going off
is due to too many interrupts with the battery. As an example there was
a bug filed for the same issue with the macbook's:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301365#c10
using acpi_osi=Darwin does prevent the gpe storm detector from
going off, but you loose any info on the battery. If anybody has any ideas on
modifying any of the battery modules, or adjusting the DSDT it sure
would be appreciated.
regards;

-- 
Justin P. Mattock

2.6.26-rc9-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.25, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of.  If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.25, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.  Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2008-07-13      170       30          20
  2008-07-09      167       30          21
  2008-07-06      166       38          26
  2008-06-29      158       43          31
  2008-06-22      148       39          28
  2008-06-14      130       37          28
  2008-06-07      125       48          33
  2008-05-31      115       52          31
  2008-05-24       94       47          28
  2008-05-18       80       51          37
  2008-05-11       53       46          34


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11069
Subject		: ACPI Error under 2.6.26-rc*
Submitter	: Andre Prendel <andre_prendel-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-10 20:55 (4 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121572339107954&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11065
Subject		: WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1321 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x8f/0x661()
Submitter	: Greg Fitzgerald <netzdamon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-09 19:36 (5 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11064
Subject		: resume failure on thinkpad x61s
Submitter	: maximilian attems <max-U9r9yeDMy7A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-09 13:24 (5 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121584459809675&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11055
Subject		: iwl4965 - connection doesn't work more than 10 seconds
Submitter	: François Valenduc <francois.valenduc-bmtTS95sd5BUM80lpFwj4w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-08 13:29 (6 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11045
Subject		: Bug in MPT Fusion 2.6.26-rc7 unbootable
Submitter	: Kurk <kurk-9AbUPqfR1/2XDw4h08c5KA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-06 11:22 (8 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11040
Subject		: 2.6.26-rc: host can not shutdown: ata problem
Submitter	: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-03 21:43 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121512197225068&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11039
Subject		: 2.6.28-rc8-git3 forcedeth WARNING (kills the interface)
Submitter	: Brad Campbell <brad-UPaTOFvTz1K6c6uEtOJ/EA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-03 10:07 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121508714430752&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11023
Subject		: 2.6.26-rc8-git2 - kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:585
Submitter	: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-02 11:55 (12 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/2/32
Handled-By	: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11009
Subject		: No console on Riva TNT since 2.6.26-0.rc4
Submitter	: Quel Qun <kelk1-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-26 20:04 (18 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121451344229718&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10989
Subject		: kernel oopses when wiggling the mouse to make it known to hidd
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-26 10:32 (18 days old)
Handled-By	: Marcel Holtmann <marcel-kz+m5ild9QBg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10960
Subject		: 2.6.26-rc: SPARC: Sun Ultra 10 can not boot
Submitter	: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-19 14:07 (25 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121388456519637&w=4
Handled-By	: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10955
Subject		: v2.6.26-rc7: BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-21 19:24 (23 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121407641925121&w=4
Handled-By	: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10954
Subject		: hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x011f000c
Submitter	: Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-21 2:05 (23 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121401399622190&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?t=121416231700010&r=1&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10919
Subject		: [regression] display dimming is slow and laggy - Acer Travelmate 661lci
Submitter	: Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi-OwNUvPV92VfddJNmlsFzeA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-14 22:31 (30 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121348428828320&w=4
Handled-By	: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10906
Subject		: repeatable slab corruption with LTP msgctl08
Submitter	: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-12 5:13 (32 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121324775927704&w=4
Handled-By	: Pekka J Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org>
		  Christoph Lameter <clameter-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
		  Manfred Spraul <manfred-nhLOkwUX5cPe2c5cEj3t2g@public.gmane.org>
		  Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10865
Subject		: Oops trying to mount an ntfs partition on thinkpad
Submitter	: Alex Romosan <romosan-z2gvhuI27Wv/eO6KEJJvLQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-05 14:47 (39 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121267834421414&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10843
Subject		: Display artifacts on XOrg logout with PAT kernel and VESA framebuffer
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-31 14:04 (44 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/7/206
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/15/119
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/23/160


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10821
Subject		: rt25xx: lock dependency warning, association failure, and kmalloc corruption
Submitter	: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-29 14:30 (46 days old)
Handled-By	: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10741
Subject		: bug in `tty: BKL pushdown'?
Submitter	: Johannes Weiner <hannes-BfM5BwqdGSkPyMaTEpOvjQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-18 2:16 (57 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121107706506181&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/16/104
Handled-By	: Alan Cox <alan-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10714
Subject		: powerpc: Badness seen on 2.6.26-rc2 with lockdep enabled
Submitter	: Balbir Singh <balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-14 12:57 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121076917429133&w=4
Handled-By	: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072
Subject		: scsi-layer crash after usb storage device unplug
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-12 01:50 (2 days old)
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072#c3


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11057
Subject		: vbetest fails on 2.6.26-rc9
Submitter	: PaX Team <pageexec-Y8qEzhMunLyT9ig0jae3mg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-08 19:46 (6 days old)
Handled-By	: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16792&action=view


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11042
Subject		: build issue #477 for v2.6.26-rc8-290-gb8a0b6c : input_event" [drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/dvb-ttpci.ko] undefined!
Submitter	: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-05 15:25 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121527158632563&w=4
Handled-By	: Oliver Endriss <o.endriss-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121529790229531&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11024
Subject		: 2.6.25 to 2.6.26-rc8 regression (related to ahci and acpi _GTF)
Submitter	: Mathieu Bérard <Mathieu.Berard-S9djqSf+cojYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-01 9:39 (13 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?t=121490593600001&r=1&w=4
Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <htejun-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121514631317343&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10957
Subject		: pata_pcmcia with Sandisk Extreme III 8GB
Submitter	: Komuro <komurojun-mbn-dTzOdQ2U+/YAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-07 13:37 (37 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121284627119861&w=4
Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <htejun-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
		  Dominik Brodowski <linux-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7OTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org>
		  Komuro <komurojun-mbn-dTzOdQ2U+/YAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121530861605673&w=4


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10862
Subject		: forcedeth: lockdep warning on ethtool -s
Submitter	: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-01 8:37 (43 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121230964032247&w=4
Handled-By	: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/15/120


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10725
Subject		: USB Mass storage mount fails: Write protect on
Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-16 14:55 (59 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121095168003572&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=121433068314568&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
Subject		: ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
Submitter	: Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10493
Subject		: mips BCM47XX compile error
Submitter	: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk-WgUW+8SLYMv1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-04-20 17:07 (85 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/20/34
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/12/30
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/131
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/31/202
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/7/154
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120876451216558&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9791
Subject		: Clock is running too fast^Wslow using acpi_pm clocksource
Submitter	: tosn00j02-O/bDAPVd7B0N+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
Date		: 2008-05-03 05:09 (72 days old)
Handled-By	: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16180


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.25,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10492

Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.

Thanks,
Rafael

[Bug #10493] mips BCM47XX compile error

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10493
Subject		: mips BCM47XX compile error
Submitter	: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk-WgUW+8SLYMv1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-04-20 17:07 (85 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/20/34
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/12/30
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/131
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/31/202
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/7/154
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120876451216558&w=2

[Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
Subject		: ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
Submitter	: Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view

[Bug #10714] powerpc: Badness seen on 2.6.26-rc2 with lockdep enabled

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10714
Subject		: powerpc: Badness seen on 2.6.26-rc2 with lockdep enabled
Submitter	: Balbir Singh <balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-14 12:57 (61 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121076917429133&w=4
Handled-By	: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #10741] bug in `tty: BKL pushdown'?

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10741
Subject		: bug in `tty: BKL pushdown'?
Submitter	: Johannes Weiner <hannes-BfM5BwqdGSkPyMaTEpOvjQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-18 2:16 (57 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121107706506181&w=4
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/16/104
Handled-By	: Alan Cox <alan-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #10957] pata_pcmcia with Sandisk Extreme III 8GB

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10957
Subject		: pata_pcmcia with Sandisk Extreme III 8GB
Submitter	: Komuro <komurojun-mbn-dTzOdQ2U+/YAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-07 13:37 (37 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121284627119861&w=4
Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <htejun-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
		  Dominik Brodowski <linux-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7OTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org>
		  Komuro <komurojun-mbn-dTzOdQ2U+/YAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121530861605673&w=4

[Bug #10821] rt25xx: lock dependency warning, association failure, and kmalloc corruption

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10821
Subject		: rt25xx: lock dependency warning, association failure, and kmalloc corruption
Submitter	: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-29 14:30 (46 days old)
Handled-By	: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #10954] hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x011f000c

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10954
Subject		: hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x011f000c
Submitter	: Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-21 2:05 (23 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121401399622190&w=4
		  http://marc.info/?t=121416231700010&r=1&w=4

[Bug #10865] Oops trying to mount an ntfs partition on thinkpad

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10865
Subject		: Oops trying to mount an ntfs partition on thinkpad
Submitter	: Alex Romosan <romosan-z2gvhuI27Wv/eO6KEJJvLQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-05 14:47 (39 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121267834421414&w=4

[Bug #10989] kernel oopses when wiggling the mouse to make it known to hidd

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10989
Subject		: kernel oopses when wiggling the mouse to make it known to hidd
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-26 10:32 (18 days old)
Handled-By	: Marcel Holtmann <marcel-kz+m5ild9QBg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #10919] [regression] display dimming is slow and laggy - Acer Travelmate 661lci

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10919
Subject		: [regression] display dimming is slow and laggy - Acer Travelmate 661lci
Submitter	: Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi-OwNUvPV92VfddJNmlsFzeA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-14 22:31 (30 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121348428828320&w=4
Handled-By	: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #11009] No console on Riva TNT since 2.6.26-0.rc4

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11009
Subject		: No console on Riva TNT since 2.6.26-0.rc4
Submitter	: Quel Qun <kelk1-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-26 20:04 (18 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121451344229718&w=4

[Bug #11023] 2.6.26-rc8-git2 - kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:585

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11023
Subject		: 2.6.26-rc8-git2 - kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:585
Submitter	: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-02 11:55 (12 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/2/32
Handled-By	: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #11039] 2.6.28-rc8-git3 forcedeth WARNING (kills the interface)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11039
Subject		: 2.6.28-rc8-git3 forcedeth WARNING (kills the interface)
Submitter	: Brad Campbell <brad-UPaTOFvTz1K6c6uEtOJ/EA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-03 10:07 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121508714430752&w=4

[Bug #11045] Bug in MPT Fusion 2.6.26-rc7 unbootable

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11045
Subject		: Bug in MPT Fusion 2.6.26-rc7 unbootable
Submitter	: Kurk <kurk-9AbUPqfR1/2XDw4h08c5KA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-06 11:22 (8 days old)

[Bug #11040] 2.6.26-rc: host can not shutdown: ata problem

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11040
Subject		: 2.6.26-rc: host can not shutdown: ata problem
Submitter	: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-03 21:43 (11 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121512197225068&w=4

[Bug #10955] v2.6.26-rc7: BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10955
Subject		: v2.6.26-rc7: BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten
Submitter	: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-21 19:24 (23 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121407641925121&w=4
Handled-By	: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #10960] 2.6.26-rc: SPARC: Sun Ultra 10 can not boot

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10960
Subject		: 2.6.26-rc: SPARC: Sun Ultra 10 can not boot
Submitter	: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-19 14:07 (25 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121388456519637&w=4
Handled-By	: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #10725] USB Mass storage mount fails: Write protect on

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10725
Subject		: USB Mass storage mount fails: Write protect on
Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-16 14:55 (59 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121095168003572&w=4
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=121433068314568&w=2

[Bug #10843] Display artifacts on XOrg logout with PAT kernel and VESA framebuffer

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10843
Subject		: Display artifacts on XOrg logout with PAT kernel and VESA framebuffer
Submitter	: Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-05-31 14:04 (44 days old)
References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/7/206
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/15/119
		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/23/160

[Bug #11024] 2.6.25 to 2.6.26-rc8 regression (related to ahci and acpi _GTF)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11024
Subject		: 2.6.25 to 2.6.26-rc8 regression (related to ahci and acpi _GTF)
Submitter	: Mathieu Bérard <Mathieu.Berard-S9djqSf+cojYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-01 9:39 (13 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?t=121490593600001&r=1&w=4
Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <htejun-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121514631317343&w=4

[Bug #11042] build issue #477 for v2.6.26-rc8-290-gb8a0b6c : input_event" [drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/dvb-ttpci.ko] undefined!

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11042
Subject		: build issue #477 for v2.6.26-rc8-290-gb8a0b6c : input_event" [drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/dvb-ttpci.ko] undefined!
Submitter	: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-05 15:25 (9 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121527158632563&w=4
Handled-By	: Oliver Endriss <o.endriss-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121529790229531&w=4

[Bug #10862] forcedeth: lockdep warning on ethtool -s

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10862
Subject		: forcedeth: lockdep warning on ethtool -s
Submitter	: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-01 8:37 (43 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121230964032247&w=4
Handled-By	: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/15/120

[Bug #10906] repeatable slab corruption with LTP msgctl08

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10906
Subject		: repeatable slab corruption with LTP msgctl08
Submitter	: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-06-12 5:13 (32 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121324775927704&w=4
Handled-By	: Pekka J Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org>
		  Christoph Lameter <clameter-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
		  Manfred Spraul <manfred-nhLOkwUX5cPe2c5cEj3t2g@public.gmane.org>
		  Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #11072] scsi-layer crash after usb storage device unplug

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072
Subject		: scsi-layer crash after usb storage device unplug
Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-12 01:50 (2 days old)
Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072#c3

[Bug #11057] vbetest fails on 2.6.26-rc9

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11057
Subject		: vbetest fails on 2.6.26-rc9
Submitter	: PaX Team <pageexec-Y8qEzhMunLyT9ig0jae3mg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-08 19:46 (6 days old)
Handled-By	: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16792&action=view

[Bug #11069] ACPI Error under 2.6.26-rc*

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11069
Subject		: ACPI Error under 2.6.26-rc*
Submitter	: Andre Prendel <andre_prendel-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-10 20:55 (4 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121572339107954&w=4
Handled-By	: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #11065] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1321 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x8f/0x661()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11065
Subject		: WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1321 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x8f/0x661()
Submitter	: Greg Fitzgerald <netzdamon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-09 19:36 (5 days old)

[Bug #11064] resume failure on thinkpad x61s

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11064
Subject		: resume failure on thinkpad x61s
Submitter	: maximilian attems <max-U9r9yeDMy7A@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-09 13:24 (5 days old)
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121584459809675&w=4
Handled-By	: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>

[Bug #9791] Clock is running too fast^Wslow using acpi_pm clocksource

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9791
Subject		: Clock is running too fast^Wslow using acpi_pm clocksource
Submitter	: tosn00j02-O/bDAPVd7B0N+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
Date		: 2008-05-03 05:09 (72 days old)
Handled-By	: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16180

[Bug #11055] iwl4965 - connection doesn't work more than 10 seconds

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11055
Subject		: iwl4965 - connection doesn't work more than 10 seconds
Submitter	: François Valenduc <francois.valenduc-bmtTS95sd5BUM80lpFwj4w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2008-07-08 13:29 (6 days old)

Re: [Bug #10493] mips BCM47XX compile error

[Adrian Bunk]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 07:59:46PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.

yes

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10493
> Subject		: mips BCM47XX compile error
> Submitter	: Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk-WgUW+8SLYMv1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-04-20 17:07 (85 days old)
> References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/20/34
> 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/12/30
> 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/131
> 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/31/202
> 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/7/154
> Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120876451216558&w=2

cu
Adrian

Re: [Bug #10725] USB Mass storage mount fails: Write protect on

[Alan Stern]

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10725
> Subject		: USB Mass storage mount fails: Write protect on
> Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-05-16 14:55 (59 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121095168003572&w=4
> Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=121433068314568&w=2

This can be removed.  It was fixed by commit 
bdb2b8cab4392ce41ddfbd6773a3da3334daf836.

Alan Stern

Re: [Bug #10955] v2.6.26-rc7: BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten

[Vegard Nossum]

Hi,

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10955
> Subject         : v2.6.26-rc7: BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten
> Submitter       : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2008-06-21 19:24 (23 days old)
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121407641925121&w=4
> Handled-By      : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>

We've seen a rather lot of fixes for cpu hotplug and the scheduler
over the last few weeks. I'm suspecting that this one might also have
been fixed unknowingly by one of the other commits (this is backed by
the fact that I haven't been able to reproduce _any_
cpu-hotplug-related failure as of the latest mainline kernel), on the
other hand I don't know exactly why.

I guess I should run a longer test to see if this comes up again.

(Oh, maybe it was an RCU-type thing? Nick Piggin recently had a patch
that fixed some RCU error. Peter?)


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Justin Mattock]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
> Patch           : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
>                  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>
>
>

Yeah I think it would be a good idea to still have this as a bug.

-- 
Justin P. Mattock

Re: [Bug #10725] USB Mass storage mount fails: Write protect on

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, 13 of July 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10725
> > Subject		: USB Mass storage mount fails: Write protect on
> > Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2008-05-16 14:55 (59 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121095168003572&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=121433068314568&w=2
> 
> This can be removed.  It was fixed by commit 
> bdb2b8cab4392ce41ddfbd6773a3da3334daf836.

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

Re: [Bug #10955] v2.6.26-rc7: BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten

[Vegard Nossum]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10955
> Subject         : v2.6.26-rc7: BUG task_struct: Poison overwritten
> Submitter       : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2008-06-21 19:24 (23 days old)
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121407641925121&w=4
> Handled-By      : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>

Oh, wait, this probably wasn't a regression in the first place. It's
probably just obscure and rare enough that it was never discovered
earlier.

I'm in favour of closing this and reopening if it reappears. Or if you
simply just want to take it out of the regression list, that's also
fine with me.


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036

Re: [Bug #10954] hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x011f000c

[Justin Mattock]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10954
> Subject         : hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x011f000c
> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2008-06-21 2:05 (23 days old)
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121401399622190&w=4
>                  http://marc.info/?t=121416231700010&r=1&w=4
>
>
>

yes;
after running a small test of removing options snd-hda-intel position_fix=1
out of /etc/modprobe.d I was still receiving this message, but instead
of twice in a row
like it was doing, I am only seeing this happen occasionally once.

-- 
Justin P. Mattock

Re: 2.6.26-rc9-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

[Linus Torvalds]

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Regressions with patches
> ------------------------
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072
> Subject		: scsi-layer crash after usb storage device unplug
> Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-07-12 01:50 (2 days old)
> Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072#c3

Alan, Greg?

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11057
> Subject		: vbetest fails on 2.6.26-rc9
> Submitter	: PaX Team <pageexec-Y8qEzhMunLyT9ig0jae3mg@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-07-08 19:46 (6 days old)
> Handled-By	: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16792&action=view

Merged as commit a361ee5cb8011763ece7b4add393e206439db8b3.

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11024
> Subject		: 2.6.25 to 2.6.26-rc8 regression (related to ahci and acpi _GTF)
> Submitter	: Mathieu Bérard <Mathieu.Berard-S9djqSf+cojYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-07-01 9:39 (13 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?t=121490593600001&r=1&w=4
> Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <htejun-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121514631317343&w=4

Merged as commit b344991ace21896a83694c86d132b8494a29f3be.

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10957
> Subject		: pata_pcmcia with Sandisk Extreme III 8GB
> Submitter	: Komuro <komurojun-mbn-dTzOdQ2U+/YAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-06-07 13:37 (37 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121284627119861&w=4
> Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <htejun-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> 		  Dominik Brodowski <linux-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7OTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org>
> 		  Komuro <komurojun-mbn-dTzOdQ2U+/YAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121530861605673&w=4

This patch is disputed. See the rest of the thread. Maybe some subtle 
timing detail?

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10862
> Subject		: forcedeth: lockdep warning on ethtool -s
> Submitter	: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-06-01 8:37 (43 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121230964032247&w=4
> Handled-By	: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/15/120

Commit 97bff0953dd45a633fa69e1a650d612f5610a60b.

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10725
> Subject		: USB Mass storage mount fails: Write protect on
> Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-05-16 14:55 (59 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121095168003572&w=4
> Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=121433068314568&w=2

Commit bdb2b8cab4392ce41ddfbd6773a3da3334daf836.

			Linus

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Vegard Nossum]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
>> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
>> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
>> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
>>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
>>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
>> Patch           : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
>>                  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view

I didn't follow the discussion, but I may contribute the following information:

This message first appears in my logs on May 16. That was with kernel
version 2.6.24.5-85.fc8. The kernel I used before that was
2.6.24.4-64.fc8 (May 3). My logs go back to November 8
(2.6.23.1-42.fc8). So we can hardly consider this a regression since
2.6.25, but rather one since 2.6.24?

(I'll also note that this message appears quite infrequently here.
Only 42 times in 219 boot-ups. So it would be hard to bisect, but I'm
guessing the error was introduced somewhere between 2.6.24.4 and
2.6.24.5.)


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036

Re: [Bug #11039] 2.6.28-rc8-git3 forcedeth WARNING (kills the interface)

[Brad Campbell]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11039
> Subject		: 2.6.28-rc8-git3 forcedeth WARNING (kills the interface)
> Submitter	: Brad Campbell <brad-UPaTOFvTz1K6c6uEtOJ/EA@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-07-03 10:07 (11 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121508714430752&w=4

I tested a 2.6.26-rc kernel with forcedeth.c from 2.6.25 and it failed in the same way, so I don't 
think its a regression as such. In any case, with the -rc9 it still fails regularly.

Regards,
Brad
-- 
Dolphins are so intelligent that within a few weeks they can
train Americans to stand at the edge of the pool and throw them
fish.

Re: 2.6.26-rc9-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday, 13 of July 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Regressions with patches
> > ------------------------
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072
> > Subject		: scsi-layer crash after usb storage device unplug
> > Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2008-07-12 01:50 (2 days old)
> > Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072#c3
> 
> Alan, Greg?
> 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11057
> > Subject		: vbetest fails on 2.6.26-rc9
> > Submitter	: PaX Team <pageexec-Y8qEzhMunLyT9ig0jae3mg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2008-07-08 19:46 (6 days old)
> > Handled-By	: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16792&action=view
> 
> Merged as commit a361ee5cb8011763ece7b4add393e206439db8b3.

Closed.

> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11024
> > Subject		: 2.6.25 to 2.6.26-rc8 regression (related to ahci and acpi _GTF)
> > Submitter	: Mathieu Bérard <Mathieu.Berard-S9djqSf+cojYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2008-07-01 9:39 (13 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?t=121490593600001&r=1&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <htejun-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121514631317343&w=4
> 
> Merged as commit b344991ace21896a83694c86d132b8494a29f3be.

Closed.
 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10957
> > Subject		: pata_pcmcia with Sandisk Extreme III 8GB
> > Submitter	: Komuro <komurojun-mbn-dTzOdQ2U+/YAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2008-06-07 13:37 (37 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121284627119861&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Tejun Heo <htejun-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > 		  Dominik Brodowski <linux-X3ehHDuj6sIIGcDfoQAp7OTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org>
> > 		  Komuro <komurojun-mbn-dTzOdQ2U+/YAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121530861605673&w=4
> 
> This patch is disputed. See the rest of the thread. Maybe some subtle 
> timing detail?

The patch won't be listed in future.

> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10862
> > Subject		: forcedeth: lockdep warning on ethtool -s
> > Submitter	: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2008-06-01 8:37 (43 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121230964032247&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel-YxUgxmcw2FPQD6PfKP4TzA@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/15/120
> 
> Commit 97bff0953dd45a633fa69e1a650d612f5610a60b.

Closed.

> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10725
> > Subject		: USB Mass storage mount fails: Write protect on
> > Submitter	: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2008-05-16 14:55 (59 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121095168003572&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=121433068314568&w=2
> 
> Commit bdb2b8cab4392ce41ddfbd6773a3da3334daf836.

Closed.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Hugh Dickins]

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> of recent regressions.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
> >>
> >>
> >> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
> >> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
> >> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
> >> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
> >>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
> >>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
> >> Patch           : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
> >>                  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
> 
> I didn't follow the discussion, but I may contribute the following information:
> 
> This message first appears in my logs on May 16. That was with kernel
> version 2.6.24.5-85.fc8. The kernel I used before that was
> 2.6.24.4-64.fc8 (May 3). My logs go back to November 8
> (2.6.23.1-42.fc8). So we can hardly consider this a regression since
> 2.6.25, but rather one since 2.6.24?
> 
> (I'll also note that this message appears quite infrequently here.
> Only 42 times in 219 boot-ups. So it would be hard to bisect, but I'm
> guessing the error was introduced somewhere between 2.6.24.4 and
> 2.6.24.5.)

You're comparing against Fedora kernels, which often contain
patches which haven't got into mainline yet.  As in this case.
Unless it used to be assembled from separate pieces, there was
no "GPE storm detected" message in 2.6.24.N or 2.6.25.N: it was
added in 2.6.26-rc1.

I sometimes see it too, on a Fujitsu-Siemens laptop.

Hugh

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Vegard Nossum]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> I didn't follow the discussion, but I may contribute the following information:
>>
>> This message first appears in my logs on May 16. That was with kernel
>> version 2.6.24.5-85.fc8. The kernel I used before that was
>> 2.6.24.4-64.fc8 (May 3). My logs go back to November 8
>> (2.6.23.1-42.fc8). So we can hardly consider this a regression since
>> 2.6.25, but rather one since 2.6.24?
>>
>> (I'll also note that this message appears quite infrequently here.
>> Only 42 times in 219 boot-ups. So it would be hard to bisect, but I'm
>> guessing the error was introduced somewhere between 2.6.24.4 and
>> 2.6.24.5.)
>
> You're comparing against Fedora kernels, which often contain
> patches which haven't got into mainline yet.  As in this case.
> Unless it used to be assembled from separate pieces, there was
> no "GPE storm detected" message in 2.6.24.N or 2.6.25.N: it was
> added in 2.6.26-rc1.
>
> I sometimes see it too, on a Fujitsu-Siemens laptop.

Oh, right. So what exactly is the bug here? That the message appears
at all? Or is there another specific change that would cause the
warning to trigger once added? Or why do we have bugzilla entries for
broken hardware? Is there anything I can do to help the situation as
the owner of a machine which exhibits the problem?

Thanks for the info :-)


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Justin Mattock]

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> >> of recent regressions.
>> >>
>> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> >> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
>> >> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
>> >> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> >> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
>> >> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
>> >>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
>> >>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
>> >> Patch           : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
>> >>                  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>
>> I didn't follow the discussion, but I may contribute the following information:
>>
>> This message first appears in my logs on May 16. That was with kernel
>> version 2.6.24.5-85.fc8. The kernel I used before that was
>> 2.6.24.4-64.fc8 (May 3). My logs go back to November 8
>> (2.6.23.1-42.fc8). So we can hardly consider this a regression since
>> 2.6.25, but rather one since 2.6.24?
>>
>> (I'll also note that this message appears quite infrequently here.
>> Only 42 times in 219 boot-ups. So it would be hard to bisect, but I'm
>> guessing the error was introduced somewhere between 2.6.24.4 and
>> 2.6.24.5.)
>
> You're comparing against Fedora kernels, which often contain
> patches which haven't got into mainline yet.  As in this case.
> Unless it used to be assembled from separate pieces, there was
> no "GPE storm detected" message in 2.6.24.N or 2.6.25.N: it was
> added in 2.6.26-rc1.
>
> I sometimes see it too, on a Fujitsu-Siemens laptop.
>
> Hugh
>

Hello;
What I've been using is acpi_osi=Darwin so I don't have to take the
gpe storm detector mechanism out of ec.c
The two areas of interest are when not setting a boot option this
message is triggered by too many
interrupts with BAT0 i.g. /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts "gpe17 on a
macbook2,2",
Now when using the Darwin option, the interrupts are very little, but
at the cost of loosing any battery info
but I am receiving a reaction with pommed i.g. unplugging the A/C
adapter does dim the screen.
Also I'm not sure if the smart battery was designed for the macbook,
but when using Darwin option, my system will
freeze upon booting(as a note alexy gave me some patches to test on
monday, but still was unable to load the module)
overall from my perspective; trying to tweak the BAT0 mechanism with
it's interrupts could fix this, and/or
port the sbs module to be used with the Darwin option with interrupts
under control, could also be another option,
or have all two working this way the user can decide what they prefferer.
 Personally tweaking the interrupts with BAT0 seems to be more of an
easier solution,
but then again could cause other problems elsewhere.

-- 
Justin P. Mattock

Re: [Bug #10865] Oops trying to mount an ntfs partition on thinkpad

[Alex Romosan]

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10865
> Subject		: Oops trying to mount an ntfs partition on thinkpad
> Submitter	: Alex Romosan <romosan-z2gvhuI27Wv/eO6KEJJvLQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-06-05 14:47 (39 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121267834421414&w=4
>

just tried it with rc9-git12 and now it seems to work but i get a
warning:

  NTFS volume version 3.1.
  NTFS-fs warning (device sda1): load_system_files(): Unsupported volume flags 0x4000 encountered.
  NTFS-fs error (device sda1): load_system_files(): Volume has unsupported flags set.  Mounting read-only.  Run chkdsk and mount in Windows.

i'll try to boot into windows and run chkdsk to see if it makes the
warning go away.

--alex--

-- 
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
|  advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with  |
|  automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion  |
|  and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |

Re: [Bug #11045] Bug in MPT Fusion 2.6.26-rc7 unbootable

[Oliver Pinter]

I think, fixed by 27898988174bb211fd962ea73b9c6dc09f888705

On 7/13/08, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11045
> Subject		: Bug in MPT Fusion 2.6.26-rc7 unbootable
> Submitter	: Kurk <kurk-9AbUPqfR1/2XDw4h08c5KA@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-07-06 11:22 (8 days old)
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

Re: [Bug #11045] Bug in MPT Fusion 2.6.26-rc7 unbootable

[Oliver Pinter]

add James to CC

On 7/14/08, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I think, fixed by 27898988174bb211fd962ea73b9c6dc09f888705
>
> On 7/13/08, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11045
>> Subject		: Bug in MPT Fusion 2.6.26-rc7 unbootable
>> Submitter	: Kurk <kurk-9AbUPqfR1/2XDw4h08c5KA@public.gmane.org>
>> Date		: 2008-07-06 11:22 (8 days old)
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Oliver
>


-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

Re: [Bug #10954] hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x011f000c

[Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1509 bytes --]

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:00:46 +0200, "Rafael J. Wysocki" said:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10954
> Subject		: hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x011f000c
> Submitter	: Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2008-06-21 2:05 (23 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121401399622190&w=4
> 		  http://marc.info/?t=121416231700010&r=1&w=4

Not sure if it's the same bug or not, this one's been there since before
2.6.25 but I haven't bothered chasing it down before. It's still in 26-rc9-mmotd.

Jul 13 05:53:47 turing-police kernel: [ 1459.168266] ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c:588: hda_intel: No response from codec, disabling MSI: last cmd=0x012f1c00
Jul 13 05:53:48 turing-police kernel: [ 1460.169265] ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c:601: hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x012f1c00

Dell Latitude D820, x86_64 kernel.  Audio device is:

00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 01)

dmidecode says it's a "Sigmatel 9200".

I've been lazy chasing this one, because all that happens is that MSI gets
turned off, and it keeps going without it...

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]

Re: [Bug #10954] hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x011f000c

[Justin Mattock]

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:50 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:00:46 +0200, "Rafael J. Wysocki" said:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry     : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10954
>> Subject               : hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x011f000c
>> Submitter     : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Date          : 2008-06-21 2:05 (23 days old)
>> References    : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121401399622190&w=4
>>                 http://marc.info/?t=121416231700010&r=1&w=4
>
> Not sure if it's the same bug or not, this one's been there since before
> 2.6.25 but I haven't bothered chasing it down before. It's still in 26-rc9-mmotd.
>
> Jul 13 05:53:47 turing-police kernel: [ 1459.168266] ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c:588: hda_intel: No response from codec, disabling MSI: last cmd=0x012f1c00
> Jul 13 05:53:48 turing-police kernel: [ 1460.169265] ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c:601: hda_intel: azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x012f1c00
>
> Dell Latitude D820, x86_64 kernel.  Audio device is:
>
> 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 01)
>
> dmidecode says it's a "Sigmatel 9200".
>
> I've been lazy chasing this one, because all that happens is that MSI gets
> turned off, and it keeps going without it...
>

Could be.
Yeah I must admit too about being lazy with this one;
(spent a few days updating my system with SID);
With Googling a little bit, isn't msi disabled by default?
if not then maybe setting the boot param is something to look into,
as well as tweaking the .config.

-- 
Justin P. Mattock

Re: 2.6.26-rc9-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

[Alan Stern]

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Regressions with patches
> > ------------------------
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072
> > Subject		: scsi-layer crash after usb storage device unplug
> > Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2008-07-12 01:50 (2 days old)
> > Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072#c3
> 
> Alan, Greg?

We haven't heard back yet from Johannes to confirm that the fix really
works.  If it does, IMO the patch should go into 2.6.26.1.

(In fact it might not be so easy to tell, since the failure is caused 
be a race.  Perhaps it would be best to submit the patch in any case.)

Alan Stern

Re: 2.6.26-rc9-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

[Johannes Berg]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1047 bytes --]


> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072
> > > Subject		: scsi-layer crash after usb storage device unplug
> > > Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date		: 2008-07-12 01:50 (2 days old)
> > > Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
> > > Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072#c3
> > 
> > Alan, Greg?
> 
> We haven't heard back yet from Johannes to confirm that the fix really
> works.  If it does, IMO the patch should go into 2.6.26.1.
> 
> (In fact it might not be so easy to tell, since the failure is caused 
> be a race.  Perhaps it would be best to submit the patch in any case.)

I haven't had a chance to apply the patch, but given that to cause the
oops to happen I had to unplug/replug the device at random intervals for
probably 10 minutes (yes, it took me that long to figure out I had put
an SDHC card into an SD reader) I suppose it really won't be easy to
tell.

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: 2.6.26-rc9-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

[Alan Stern]

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Johannes Berg wrote:

> > > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072
> > > > Subject		: scsi-layer crash after usb storage device unplug
> > > > Submitter	: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
> > > > Date		: 2008-07-12 01:50 (2 days old)
> > > > Handled-By	: Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
> > > > Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11072#c3
> > > 
> > > Alan, Greg?
> > 
> > We haven't heard back yet from Johannes to confirm that the fix really
> > works.  If it does, IMO the patch should go into 2.6.26.1.
> > 
> > (In fact it might not be so easy to tell, since the failure is caused 
> > be a race.  Perhaps it would be best to submit the patch in any case.)
> 
> I haven't had a chance to apply the patch, but given that to cause the
> oops to happen I had to unplug/replug the device at random intervals for
> probably 10 minutes (yes, it took me that long to figure out I had put
> an SDHC card into an SD reader) I suppose it really won't be easy to
> tell.

Add

	printk(KERN_ALERT "Unplug now!\n");
	ssleep(10);

to the start of slave_configure() in drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c.  
Then it should be very easy to trigger the failure.  :-)

Assuming the failure does occur without the patch, see if it still 
occurs once the patch is in place.

Alan Stern

Re: 2.6.26-rc9-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

[Johannes Berg]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 409 bytes --]


> Add
> 
> 	printk(KERN_ALERT "Unplug now!\n");
> 	ssleep(10);
> 
> to the start of slave_configure() in drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c.  
> Then it should be very easy to trigger the failure.  :-)

Indeed.

> Assuming the failure does occur without the patch, see if it still 
> occurs once the patch is in place.

Yes, it occurs without the patch and not with the patch, thanks!

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: 2.6.26-rc9-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

[Alan Stern]

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Johannes Berg wrote:

> > Add
> > 
> > 	printk(KERN_ALERT "Unplug now!\n");
> > 	ssleep(10);
> > 
> > to the start of slave_configure() in drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c.  
> > Then it should be very easy to trigger the failure.  :-)
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> > Assuming the failure does occur without the patch, see if it still 
> > occurs once the patch is in place.
> 
> Yes, it occurs without the patch and not with the patch, thanks!

Okay, thanks for testing.  I will submit the patch for 2.6.26.1.

Alan Stern

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Fabio Comolli]

Hi.
I also have this problem with 2.6.26 and when it happens I can notice
that sometimes gnome-power-manager is slow to respond when I switch to
AC from battery and viceversa. Also, sometimes the g-p-m icon
disappears and I have to restart the process.

I tried two days ago the patch

   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view

and everything seems to work ok since then. Before that, the message
showed up sometimes at boot time, sometimes minutes later, very
reliably.

This is with a two years old fairly standard HP laptop.

Regards,
Fabio



On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
> Patch           : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
>                  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Alexey Starikovskiy]

Fabio,
Please try http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16862 instead.
Same bug entry, last patch. 

Regards,
Alex.
Fabio Comolli wrote:
> Hi.
> I also have this problem with 2.6.26 and when it happens I can notice
> that sometimes gnome-power-manager is slow to respond when I switch to
> AC from battery and viceversa. Also, sometimes the g-p-m icon
> disappears and I have to restart the process.
> 
> I tried two days ago the patch
> 
>    http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
> 
> and everything seems to work ok since then. Before that, the message
> showed up sometimes at boot time, sometimes minutes later, very
> reliably.
> 
> This is with a two years old fairly standard HP laptop.
> 
> Regards,
> Fabio

> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
>> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
>> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
>> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
>>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
>>                  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
>> Patch           : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
>>                  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Justin Mattock]

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
<astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Fabio,
> Please try http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16862 instead.
> Same bug entry, last patch.
> Regards,
> Alex.
> Fabio Comolli wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>> I also have this problem with 2.6.26 and when it happens I can notice
>> that sometimes gnome-power-manager is slow to respond when I switch to
>> AC from battery and viceversa. Also, sometimes the g-p-m icon
>> disappears and I have to restart the process.
>>
>> I tried two days ago the patch
>>
>>   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>
>> and everything seems to work ok since then. Before that, the message
>> showed up sometimes at boot time, sometimes minutes later, very
>> reliably.
>>
>> This is with a two years old fairly standard HP laptop.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Fabio
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>>> of recent regressions.
>>>
>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
>>> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
>>> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
>>> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
>>>                 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
>>>                 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
>>> Patch           :
>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
>>>
>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
>>> in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>
>

I tried this patch; and for some reason
I'm still seeing this message(that is when using
acpi_osi=Linux). The problem I see is we've got different brands
of laptops, and the causes are all different.
In my case I'm wondering if there is a way to tweak the interrupts
with the battery. just to see if this works

-- 
Justin P. Mattock

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Fabio Comolli]

Hi Alex. No good news, I'm afraid.

Actually my previous report wasn't correct because with the patch I
mentioned the message appeared yesterday night during the hibernate
process, so I couldn't notice it.

 The interesting thing is that it showed up the day after I booted my
laptop: usually it took a period between 1 and 13 minutes after boot
to trigger and in this case it took more than 2 hours of uptime with 2
suspend and 2 hibernate cycles.

With the patch you told me to apply and the previous reverted the
message triggered in 12 minutes.

Regards,
Fabio




On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
<astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Fabio,
> Please try http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16862 instead.
> Same bug entry, last patch.
> Regards,
> Alex.
> Fabio Comolli wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>> I also have this problem with 2.6.26 and when it happens I can notice
>> that sometimes gnome-power-manager is slow to respond when I switch to
>> AC from battery and viceversa. Also, sometimes the g-p-m icon
>> disappears and I have to restart the process.
>>
>> I tried two days ago the patch
>>
>>   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>
>> and everything seems to work ok since then. Before that, the message
>> showed up sometimes at boot time, sometimes minutes later, very
>> reliably.
>>
>> This is with a two years old fairly standard HP laptop.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Fabio
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>>> of recent regressions.
>>>
>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
>>> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
>>> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
>>> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
>>>                 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
>>>                 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
>>> Patch           :
>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
>>>
>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
>>> in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>
>

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Alexey Starikovskiy]

Hi Fabio,

There are no bad news in seeing the message, as I tried to say several
times in bug report already. We can't fix the hardware.
We only could detect hardware flaw, report it (the message), and try to
workaround it.
So the bad news would be that our workaround causes some unwanted behavior to
other features of notebook -- keyboard, special keys, battery & AC status reports, etc.
If no such problems were noticed -- there is no bug, and there is no problem.

Regards,
Alex.

Fabio Comolli wrote:
> Hi Alex. No good news, I'm afraid.
> 
> Actually my previous report wasn't correct because with the patch I
> mentioned the message appeared yesterday night during the hibernate
> process, so I couldn't notice it.
> 
>  The interesting thing is that it showed up the day after I booted my
> laptop: usually it took a period between 1 and 13 minutes after boot
> to trigger and in this case it took more than 2 hours of uptime with 2
> suspend and 2 hibernate cycles.
> 
> With the patch you told me to apply and the previous reverted the
> message triggered in 12 minutes.
> 
> Regards,
> Fabio
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
> <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Fabio,
>> Please try http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16862 instead.
>> Same bug entry, last patch.
>> Regards,
>> Alex.
>> Fabio Comolli wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>> I also have this problem with 2.6.26 and when it happens I can notice
>>> that sometimes gnome-power-manager is slow to respond when I switch to
>>> AC from battery and viceversa. Also, sometimes the g-p-m icon
>>> disappears and I have to restart the process.
>>>
>>> I tried two days ago the patch
>>>
>>>   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>>
>>> and everything seems to work ok since then. Before that, the message
>>> showed up sometimes at boot time, sometimes minutes later, very
>>> reliably.
>>>
>>> This is with a two years old fairly standard HP laptop.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Fabio
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>>>> of recent regressions.
>>>>
>>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>>> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
>>>> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
>>>> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>>> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
>>>> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
>>>>                 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
>>>>                 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
>>>> Patch           :
>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
>>>>
>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
>>>> in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>>
>>

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Fabio Comolli]

Hi Alex.
Well, I read the bug report but still can't understand why in any
kernels < 2.6.26 I don't have any problems with battery reports and in
2.6.26 as soon as the message appears g-p-m starts to behave
incorrectly.

Anyway, I got back to 25.11 for now, if you have any other workarounds
for me to test please let me know.

Cheers,
Fabio



On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
<astarikovskiy@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> There are no bad news in seeing the message, as I tried to say several
> times in bug report already. We can't fix the hardware.
> We only could detect hardware flaw, report it (the message), and try to
> workaround it.
> So the bad news would be that our workaround causes some unwanted behavior
> to
> other features of notebook -- keyboard, special keys, battery & AC status
> reports, etc.
> If no such problems were noticed -- there is no bug, and there is no
> problem.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
> Fabio Comolli wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex. No good news, I'm afraid.
>>
>> Actually my previous report wasn't correct because with the patch I
>> mentioned the message appeared yesterday night during the hibernate
>> process, so I couldn't notice it.
>>
>>  The interesting thing is that it showed up the day after I booted my
>> laptop: usually it took a period between 1 and 13 minutes after boot
>> to trigger and in this case it took more than 2 hours of uptime with 2
>> suspend and 2 hibernate cycles.
>>
>> With the patch you told me to apply and the previous reverted the
>> message triggered in 12 minutes.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Fabio
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
>> <astarikovskiy@suse.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Fabio,
>>> Please try http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16862 instead.
>>> Same bug entry, last patch.
>>> Regards,
>>> Alex.
>>> Fabio Comolli wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>> I also have this problem with 2.6.26 and when it happens I can notice
>>>> that sometimes gnome-power-manager is slow to respond when I switch to
>>>> AC from battery and viceversa. Also, sometimes the g-p-m icon
>>>> disappears and I have to restart the process.
>>>>
>>>> I tried two days ago the patch
>>>>
>>>>  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>>>
>>>> and everything seems to work ok since then. Before that, the message
>>>> showed up sometimes at boot time, sometimes minutes later, very
>>>> reliably.
>>>>
>>>> This is with a two years old fairly standard HP laptop.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Fabio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>>>>> of recent regressions.
>>>>>
>>>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>>>> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
>>>>> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
>>>>> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
>>>>> References      :
>>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
>>>>>                http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
>>>>>                http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
>>>>> Patch           :
>>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
>>>>>
>>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
>>>>> in
>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>>>
>>>
>
>

Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE

[Justin Mattock]

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hi Alex.
> Well, I read the bug report but still can't understand why in any
> kernels < 2.6.26 I don't have any problems with battery reports and in
> 2.6.26 as soon as the message appears g-p-m starts to behave
> incorrectly.
>
> Anyway, I got back to 25.11 for now, if you have any other workarounds
> for me to test please let me know.
>
> Cheers,
> Fabio
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
> <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Hi Fabio,
>>
>> There are no bad news in seeing the message, as I tried to say several
>> times in bug report already. We can't fix the hardware.
>> We only could detect hardware flaw, report it (the message), and try to
>> workaround it.
>> So the bad news would be that our workaround causes some unwanted behavior
>> to
>> other features of notebook -- keyboard, special keys, battery & AC status
>> reports, etc.
>> If no such problems were noticed -- there is no bug, and there is no
>> problem.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alex.
>>
>> Fabio Comolli wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex. No good news, I'm afraid.
>>>
>>> Actually my previous report wasn't correct because with the patch I
>>> mentioned the message appeared yesterday night during the hibernate
>>> process, so I couldn't notice it.
>>>
>>>  The interesting thing is that it showed up the day after I booted my
>>> laptop: usually it took a period between 1 and 13 minutes after boot
>>> to trigger and in this case it took more than 2 hours of uptime with 2
>>> suspend and 2 hibernate cycles.
>>>
>>> With the patch you told me to apply and the previous reverted the
>>> message triggered in 12 minutes.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Fabio
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
>>> <astarikovskiy-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Fabio,
>>>> Please try http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16862 instead.
>>>> Same bug entry, last patch.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alex.
>>>> Fabio Comolli wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi.
>>>>> I also have this problem with 2.6.26 and when it happens I can notice
>>>>> that sometimes gnome-power-manager is slow to respond when I switch to
>>>>> AC from battery and viceversa. Also, sometimes the g-p-m icon
>>>>> disappears and I have to restart the process.
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried two days ago the patch
>>>>>
>>>>>  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>>>>
>>>>> and everything seems to work ok since then. Before that, the message
>>>>> showed up sometimes at boot time, sometimes minutes later, very
>>>>> reliably.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is with a two years old fairly standard HP laptop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Fabio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>>>>>> of recent regressions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>>>>> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
>>>>>> Subject         : ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
>>>>>> Submitter       : Justin Mattock <justinmattock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>>>>> Date            : 2008-05-16 6:17 (59 days old)
>>>>>> References      :
>>>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121091875711824&w=4
>>>>>>                http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/18/168
>>>>>>                http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/195
>>>>>> Patch           :
>>>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16364&action=view
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16365&action=view
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>

I'm up to try any patches, but I need to wait
until I find a fix for my linux box i.g.
pci is all messed up.

-- 
Justin P. Mattock