From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:47:25 +0200 Message-ID: <49760E2D.2060109@redhat.com> References: <1232410363.4768.21.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au> <20090120113546.GA26571@elte.hu> <1232455343.4895.4.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au> <20090120125652.GA1457@elte.hu> <20090120130714.GA11048@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar , Kevin Shanahan , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Kevin Shanahan , Mike Galbraith , Peter Zijlstra , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_W?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?eisbecker?= Steven Rostedt wrote: > Note, the wakeup latency only tests realtime threads, since other threads > can have other issues for wakeup. I could change the wakeup tracer as > wakeup_rt, and make a new "wakeup" that tests all threads, but it may > be difficult to get something accurate. > Kevin, can you retest with kvm at realtime priority? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function