From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: list-2tUql6aCh3Vfq8cQ1yknNg@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [Bug #13624] usb: wrong autosuspend initialization Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:44:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4A6DBD51.6040103@phuk.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Alan Stern Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Oliver Neukum , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 >> Subject : usb: wrong autosuspend initialization >> Submitter : >> Date : 2009-06-25 18:18 (32 days old) > > There's some question as to whether this should be considered a kernel > bug. The kernel isn't doing anything wrong; the problem is that > various userspace programs enable autosuspend for devices that can't > support it properly. > > Alan Stern > I'm currently working on a patch for laptop_mode. The maintainer tells me there's work going on in the kernel to blacklist USB devices that don't implement autosuspend correctly (like mice turning their light off, etc...). Is that true?