From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: 2.6.37-rc2-git4: Reported regressions 2.6.35 -> 2.6.36 Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:16:19 -0500 Message-ID: <4CE70543.2000206@teksavvy.com> References: <4CE5C919.7090504@teksavvy.com> <4CE7006E.4040102@teksavvy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Alex Deucher Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux SCSI List , Linux ACPI , Network Development , Linux Wireless List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DRI , Florian Mickler , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Linus Torvalds , Linux PM List , Maciej Rutecki On 10-11-19 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Mark Lord wrote: > >> It now comes back at resume time. > > So that patch helped? I think so. It didn't used to resume from suspend with 2.6.36, and now it does. >> But suffers long delays (also sometimes with 2.6.35) doing this: >> >> [drm:atom_op_jump] *ERROR* atombios stuck in loop for more than 5secs >> aborting >> [drm:atom_execute_table_locked] *ERROR* atombios stuck executing E576 (len >> 105, WS 12, PS 8) @ 0xE5C4 >> [drm:atom_op_jump] *ERROR* atombios stuck in loop for more than 5secs >> aborting >> [drm:atom_execute_table_locked] *ERROR* atombios stuck executing ECD2 (len >> 86, WS 4, PS 0) @ 0xED05 >> [drm:atom_op_jump] *ERROR* atombios stuck in loop for more than 5secs >> aborting >> [drm:atom_execute_table_locked] *ERROR* atombios stuck executing E576 (len >> 105, WS 12, PS 8) @ 0xE5C4 >> PM: resume of devices complete after 15718.253 msecs >> > > It's be nice if you could bisect to track down when those started. It'd be even nicer if they hadn't started. :) What kernel release first had that atom/ops table in it? I'll try that.