From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Gamari Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4bce5cc3.966bdc0a.2ef7.fffff5de@mx.google.com> References: Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:subject :to:cc:in-reply-to:references; bh=Jl+nBSSiOD0X1xXBgA/0+QRSCY+rzRopmJ6cHJR85hY=; b=ckHf6nqH8cGLGYRX8aGa/NVRDhSLYSp3BU8G7DnoNTbz50BlpqL8iyl6uJhaExmHhB qm+KktvSFfq0gh5Hz1BUF4lG9ekKr56qrNRvWO/MkSE0eWUbg+GbmPrF59DClf9Cs88l vHgUCndFp5A4TQD5NQ+/57odMtEnnOvZ1sles= In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:15:57 +0200 (CEST), "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33, > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us > know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know > if any of the entries below are invalid. > I have recently reported this suspend regression on my Dell laptop hardware. References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/18/20 Bug-report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15820 Thanks, - Ben