From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: [Bug #14474] restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inotify regression? Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:48:21 -0600 Message-ID: <51f3faa70910261648h242a9a2dp42cdf554a9eb1342@mail.gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dY4ttYv0RNmOgCOdGC7BBmDtbn8yO2efLwlsS5g6GwQ=; b=cavu0MgniJjT3BbH9gOI1dZqxOyvo3XLAGQxaJ39PpXdv6zE1AE4l+3VX13XIwxIMp o5nRf/UFVPDYnrnClfwmuWtpQ4gpz4YVJ1f7mRt0lJw4YaSgF3bT66lPXl4knAmSz8Bu lLpfRNO0/+B0qG1fPwn4sLEaNFu2OBploTnbs= In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. =A0Please verify if it still sh= ould > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry =A0 =A0 =A0 : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D= 14474 > Subject =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : restorecond going crazy on 2.6.31.4 - inoti= fy regression? > Submitter =A0 =A0 =A0 : Robert Hancock > Date =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: 2009-10-16 0:03 (11 days old) > References =A0 =A0 =A0: http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125565= 159520489&w=3D4 This is definitely reproducible on 2.6.31.4 on CentOS 5.4, I'll likely try 2.6.31.5 shortly, but it doesn't seem like any of the 2.6.31.5 patches touch inotify..