* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-05-16 19:14 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-05-16 19:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-16 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-21 13:21 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 2 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-05-16 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-05-16 19:20 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-05-16 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20090516163610.8a012268.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-21 13:21 ` Larry Finger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-05-16 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Larry Finger, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:20:45 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (18 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>
>
Well.. order-1 GFP_ATOMIC allocations are unreliable. The networking
code should hanlde the situation and recover. I assume that is
happening in this case?
Perhaps we did something in that code after 2.6.29 which increased the
frequency of the order-1 allocation attempts? Maybe earlier kernels
used order-0 all the time? Those are much more reliable.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <20090516163610.8a012268.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-05-17 23:16 ` Larry Finger
2009-05-18 6:31 ` Pekka Enberg
1 sibling, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-05-17 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Johannes Berg, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Well.. order-1 GFP_ATOMIC allocations are unreliable. The networking
> code should hanlde the situation and recover. I assume that is
> happening in this case?
Yes, the driver has recovered in all cases so far.
> Perhaps we did something in that code after 2.6.29 which increased the
> frequency of the order-1 allocation attempts? Maybe earlier kernels
> used order-0 all the time? Those are much more reliable.
I think something happened to change the allocation as I never saw these O(1)
failures before with these particular drivers. I put in a few test printk's and
the buffers were 700-800 bytes long, and I would not expect them to require more
than an O(0) allocation.
I pushed 2.6.30-rc6 hard for ~12 hours without any recurrence of the problem.
Given the relative infrequency of the error, this certainly does not indicate a
fix in recent code. I will be trying to force it again.
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <20090516163610.8a012268.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-17 23:16 ` Larry Finger
@ 2009-05-18 6:31 ` Pekka Enberg
1 sibling, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-05-18 6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Johannes Berg, Larry Finger,
linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
adrian-TSF8l6Tg6afpT6hvJLqO3U8SxdOydiOw
Hi Andrew,
On Sat, 16 May 2009 21:20:45 +0200 (CEST) "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
>> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
>> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
>> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (18 days old)
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
>> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Well.. order-1 GFP_ATOMIC allocations are unreliable. The networking
> code should hanlde the situation and recover. I assume that is
> happening in this case?
>
> Perhaps we did something in that code after 2.6.29 which increased the
> frequency of the order-1 allocation attempts? Maybe earlier kernels
> used order-0 all the time? Those are much more reliable.
I wonder if this is related:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13069
Both point to post 2.6.29... Hmm.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-05-16 19:20 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-16 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2009-05-21 13:21 ` Larry Finger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-05-21 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (18 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
I have been unable to repeat the problem with recent kernels - I am now running
2.6.30-rc6. This regression should probably be dropped even though it may show
up when 2.6.30 is released.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-05-24 19:06 2.6.30-rc7: Reported regressions from 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-05-24 19:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-05-24 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (26 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-05-30 19:29 2.6.30-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-05-30 19:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-05-30 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (32 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-07 9:47 2.6.30-rc8-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-06-07 9:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-07 13:10 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-06-07 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (40 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-07 9:52 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-06-07 13:10 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4A2BBC30.2030300-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-06-07 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (40 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
This bug is extremely difficult to pin down. I cannot reproduce it at
will. The system has to be up for a long time, which is difficult with
testing the late RC's of 2.6.30 and the code in wireless-testing so
that new bugs don't end up in 2.6.31-RCX. That said, it still was in
2.6.30-RC6 and I'm not aware of any changes since that would fix it.
My operating kernel is patched with additional diagnostics to help me
understand why a kmalloc request for a buffer of 1390 bytes suddenly
ends up as an O(1) request. Unfortunately, I don't have any answers.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <4A2BBC30.2030300-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-07 13:40 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020906070640rf5ab14nbf66d3ca7c97675f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-07 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Johannes Berg, Andrew Morton, Rik van Riel, KOSAKI Motohiro,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ
Hi Larry,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
>> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
>> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
>> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (40 days old)
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
>> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>
> This bug is extremely difficult to pin down. I cannot reproduce it at
> will. The system has to be up for a long time, which is difficult with
> testing the late RC's of 2.6.30 and the code in wireless-testing so
> that new bugs don't end up in 2.6.31-RCX. That said, it still was in
> 2.6.30-RC6 and I'm not aware of any changes since that would fix it.
>
> My operating kernel is patched with additional diagnostics to help me
> understand why a kmalloc request for a buffer of 1390 bytes suddenly
> ends up as an O(1) request. Unfortunately, I don't have any answers.
Looking at the out-of-memory trace, there's still memory available but
the pskb_expand_head() allocation is GFP_ATOMIC so there's not much
the page allocator can do here. The amount of memory consumed by
inactive_file is pretty high so maybe the problem is related to the
recent mm/vmscan.c changes. Lets copy some more mm developers and see
if they can help out.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <84144f020906070640rf5ab14nbf66d3ca7c97675f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-07 14:19 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <4A2BCC6F.8090004-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2009-06-07 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Andrew Morton,
KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>>> of recent regressions.
>>>
>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>>> (either way).
>>>
>>>
>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
>>> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
>>> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
>>> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (40 days old)
>>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
>>> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>> This bug is extremely difficult to pin down. I cannot reproduce it at
>> will. The system has to be up for a long time, which is difficult with
>> testing the late RC's of 2.6.30 and the code in wireless-testing so
>> that new bugs don't end up in 2.6.31-RCX. That said, it still was in
>> 2.6.30-RC6 and I'm not aware of any changes since that would fix it.
>>
>> My operating kernel is patched with additional diagnostics to help me
>> understand why a kmalloc request for a buffer of 1390 bytes suddenly
>> ends up as an O(1) request. Unfortunately, I don't have any answers.
>
> Looking at the out-of-memory trace, there's still memory available but
> the pskb_expand_head() allocation is GFP_ATOMIC so there's not much
> the page allocator can do here. The amount of memory consumed by
> inactive_file is pretty high so maybe the problem is related to the
> recent mm/vmscan.c changes. Lets copy some more mm developers and see
> if they can help out.
That is a very strange trace. The Mem-Info indicates
that the system has more than enough memory free, and
also enough memory in higher-order free blocks.
This would indicate a bug somewhere in the page
allocator - this memory should have been given to this
allocation request.
--
All rights reversed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <4A2BCC6F.8090004-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-07 14:32 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020906070732l31786156r5d9753a0cabfde79-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-07 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rik van Riel
Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Andrew Morton,
KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, Mel Gorman
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>
>> Hi Larry,
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>>>> of recent regressions.
>>>>
>>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>>> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>>>> (either way).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
>>>> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
>>>> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
>>>> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (40 days old)
>>>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
>>>> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>>>
>>> This bug is extremely difficult to pin down. I cannot reproduce it at
>>> will. The system has to be up for a long time, which is difficult with
>>> testing the late RC's of 2.6.30 and the code in wireless-testing so
>>> that new bugs don't end up in 2.6.31-RCX. That said, it still was in
>>> 2.6.30-RC6 and I'm not aware of any changes since that would fix it.
>>>
>>> My operating kernel is patched with additional diagnostics to help me
>>> understand why a kmalloc request for a buffer of 1390 bytes suddenly
>>> ends up as an O(1) request. Unfortunately, I don't have any answers.
>>
>> Looking at the out-of-memory trace, there's still memory available but
>> the pskb_expand_head() allocation is GFP_ATOMIC so there's not much
>> the page allocator can do here. The amount of memory consumed by
>> inactive_file is pretty high so maybe the problem is related to the
>> recent mm/vmscan.c changes. Lets copy some more mm developers and see
>> if they can help out.
>
> That is a very strange trace. The Mem-Info indicates
> that the system has more than enough memory free, and
> also enough memory in higher-order free blocks.
>
> This would indicate a bug somewhere in the page
> allocator - this memory should have been given to this
> allocation request.
Aha, I always have difficulties deciphering the traces. But lets
invite Mel to the party then!
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <84144f020906070732l31786156r5d9753a0cabfde79-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-07 16:35 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4A2BEC4F.6020908-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 10:17 ` Mel Gorman
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-06-07 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Rik van Riel, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Andrew Morton,
KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, Mel Gorman
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> That is a very strange trace. The Mem-Info indicates
>> that the system has more than enough memory free, and
>> also enough memory in higher-order free blocks.
>>
>> This would indicate a bug somewhere in the page
>> allocator - this memory should have been given to this
>> allocation request.
>
> Aha, I always have difficulties deciphering the traces. But lets
> invite Mel to the party then!
I'm happy to see some action on this problem. As usual, I'm happy to
test patches and/or provide diagnostic output.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <4A2BEC4F.6020908-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-08 8:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <20090608173219.0588af26.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2009-06-08 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Rik van Riel, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, Mel Gorman
On Sun, 07 Jun 2009 11:35:27 -0500
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> That is a very strange trace. The Mem-Info indicates
> >> that the system has more than enough memory free, and
> >> also enough memory in higher-order free blocks.
> >>
> >> This would indicate a bug somewhere in the page
> >> allocator - this memory should have been given to this
> >> allocation request.
> >
> > Aha, I always have difficulties deciphering the traces. But lets
> > invite Mel to the party then!
>
> I'm happy to see some action on this problem. As usual, I'm happy to
> test patches and/or provide diagnostic output.
>
One question.
Did your system fragmented in same way as to this
(see DMA32, 10052 of order-0 pages) in older kernel ? I think you can check
fragmentation status via /proc/buddyinfo.
=
kernel: Node 0 DMA: 3*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2100kB
kernel: Node 0 DMA32: 10062*4kB 1*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 0*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 40976kB
==
Thanks,
-Kame
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <84144f020906070732l31786156r5d9753a0cabfde79-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-07 16:35 ` Larry Finger
@ 2009-06-08 10:17 ` Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20090608101739.GA15377-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 13:34 ` Larry Finger
1 sibling, 2 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2009-06-08 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 05:32:52PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Larry,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >>>> of recent regressions.
> >>>>
> >>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >>>> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >>>> (either way).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> >>>> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> >>>> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> >>>> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (40 days old)
> >>>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> >>>> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
> >>>
> >>> This bug is extremely difficult to pin down. I cannot reproduce it at
> >>> will. The system has to be up for a long time, which is difficult with
> >>> testing the late RC's of 2.6.30 and the code in wireless-testing so
> >>> that new bugs don't end up in 2.6.31-RCX. That said, it still was in
> >>> 2.6.30-RC6 and I'm not aware of any changes since that would fix it.
> >>>
> >>> My operating kernel is patched with additional diagnostics to help me
> >>> understand why a kmalloc request for a buffer of 1390 bytes suddenly
> >>> ends up as an O(1) request. Unfortunately, I don't have any answers.
> >>
> >> Looking at the out-of-memory trace, there's still memory available but
> >> the pskb_expand_head() allocation is GFP_ATOMIC so there's not much
> >> the page allocator can do here. The amount of memory consumed by
> >> inactive_file is pretty high so maybe the problem is related to the
> >> recent mm/vmscan.c changes. Lets copy some more mm developers and see
> >> if they can help out.
> >
> > That is a very strange trace. The Mem-Info indicates
> > that the system has more than enough memory free, and
> > also enough memory in higher-order free blocks.
> >
> > This would indicate a bug somewhere in the page
> > allocator - this memory should have been given to this
> > allocation request.
>
> Aha, I always have difficulties deciphering the traces. But lets
> invite Mel to the party then!
>
Nothing like a party on Monday morning to get the week started!
What we appear to have is
o Allocation failure is high-order, high-priority, compound and atomic.
o swap is mostly unused, but we cannot enter direct reclaim.
o ZONE_DMA32 can be used
o The allocation path is in the slub allocator
o Are way above the order-0 watermarks so kswapd is probably not awake
o The minimum watermark for an order-0 page was about 647 pages in ZONE_DMA32
o The minimum watermark for an order-1 page was about 323 pages in ZONE_DMA32
o There are 10244 pages free at the time of the failure
o With the order-0 pages taken out for watermark calculation, there are
182 free pages which is below the watermark of 323 pages for an
order-1 allocation
While there is enough free memory overall, the zone watermark calculation
takes into account the order of the request. As this is an order-1 allocation,
the free order-0 pages are taken out of consideration and so the allocation
fails.
We've encountered this before and the conclusion was that the current
adjustments for watermark calculations of high-order allocations is right,
or at least there is no better alternative. In other words, the page
allocator in this instance is behaving as expected. Do we want to
revisit that discussion as to whether the watermark calculations for
high-order allocation should change? I think we'll reach the same
conclusion or at least decide that allowing the order-1 atomic
allocation to succeed here would just postpone the problem.
So the question is why are we doing a high-order atomic allocation in
this path? According to an earlier discussion on this problemn
> I think something happened to change the allocation as I never saw these
> O(1) failures before with these particular drivers. I put in a few test
> printk's and the buffers were 700-800 bytes long, and I would not expect
> them to require more than an O(0) allocation.
So, SLUB is deciding to use order-1 pages for the slab allocation.
Ordinarily, it'll get away with that because order-1 pages will be
allocated from a path that can direct reclaim. However, if a slab is
being used for atomic allocations, there is a chance that it's the
atomic request that allocates a new page for the slab.
Larry, can you post the contents of /proc/slabinfo so we can see
what size pages are being used for the kmalloc() buckets please?
Larry, you say the buffer is 700-800 bytes. Can you confirm that 800 bytes
is roughly the request size being made by ieee80211_skb_resize()?
Pekka, assuming the request size is 800 bytes, and SLUB is using order-1
pages for allocations of that size, what happened order-1 allocations
falling back to order-0 allocations as necessary. That logic exists,
right? If so, could it be broken?
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <20090608101739.GA15377-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-08 10:52 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020906080352k57f12ff9pbd696da5f332ac1a-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 13:20 ` Rik van Riel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-08 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman
Cc: Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Mel Gorman<mel-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Pekka, assuming the request size is 800 bytes, and SLUB is using order-1
> pages for allocations of that size, what happened order-1 allocations
> falling back to order-0 allocations as necessary. That logic exists,
> right? If so, could it be broken?
That logic is in allocate_slab() and if the higher order allocation
fails, we fall-back to struct kmem_cache ->min order. That in turn is
set up in calculate_sizes() to get_order(size) so it seems pretty
unlikely to me the allocation is 800 bytes. Of course, I could be
missing something here and there's a bug in oo_make() or oo_order().
Hmm.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <84144f020906080352k57f12ff9pbd696da5f332ac1a-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-08 11:03 ` Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20090608110303.GD15377-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2009-06-08 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 01:52:05PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Mel Gorman<mel-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Pekka, assuming the request size is 800 bytes, and SLUB is using order-1
> > pages for allocations of that size, what happened order-1 allocations
> > falling back to order-0 allocations as necessary. That logic exists,
> > right? If so, could it be broken?
>
> That logic is in allocate_slab() and if the higher order allocation
> fails, we fall-back to struct kmem_cache ->min order. That in turn is
> set up in calculate_sizes() to get_order(size) so it seems pretty
> unlikely to me the allocation is 800 bytes. Of course, I could be
> missing something here and there's a bug in oo_make() or oo_order().
> Hmm.
Is there any chance you could hatchet together a patch
slab-allocation-failure that reports on slab allocation failures similar
to what the page allocator does? Minimally, it should tell us what
the size of the allocation was but any other information such as the
same of the slab, the size of pages it normally uses are, etc. would
also be useful.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <20090608101739.GA15377-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 10:52 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-08 13:20 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <4A2D1017.6010308-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2009-06-08 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Mel Gorman wrote:
> We've encountered this before and the conclusion was that the current
> adjustments for watermark calculations of high-order allocations is right,
> or at least there is no better alternative. In other words, the page
> allocator in this instance is behaving as expected. Do we want to
> revisit that discussion as to whether the watermark calculations for
> high-order allocation should change? I think we'll reach the same
> conclusion or at least decide that allowing the order-1 atomic
> allocation to succeed here would just postpone the problem.
It would not just postpone the problem, it would also
bring the system closer to a state where kswapd does
something about the order-1 free areas.
This might postpone the problem indefinately.
Currently the system fails early, without kswapd
kicking in and freeing new order-1 areas.
--
All rights reversed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-08 10:17 ` Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20090608101739.GA15377-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-08 13:34 ` Larry Finger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-06-08 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Rik van Riel, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> Larry, can you post the contents of /proc/slabinfo so we can see
> what size pages are being used for the kmalloc() buckets please?
The system is not generating the failures at the moment, but here is
the current state:
finger@larrylap:~/wireless-testing> cat /proc/slabinfo
slabinfo - version: 2.1
# name <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab>
<pagesperslab> : tunables <limit> <batchcount> <sharedfactor> :
slabdata <active_slabs> <num_slabs> <sharedavail>
nfs_direct_cache 0 0 288 14 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
nfs_write_data 42 42 768 21 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
nfs_read_data 42 42 768 21 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
nfs_inode_cache 20 20 1568 20 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1 1 0
nfs_page 0 0 192 21 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
rpc_buffers 30 30 2176 15 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
rpc_tasks 42 42 384 21 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
rpc_inode_cache 23 23 1408 23 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1 1 0
fuse_request 351 352 720 22 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 16 16 0
fuse_inode 325 325 1216 13 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 25 25 0
ext4_inode_cache 17180 17180 1568 20 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 859 859 0
ext4_xattr 0 0 160 25 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
ext4_free_block_extents 0 0 128 32 1 : tunables 0
0 0 : slabdata 0 0 0
ext4_alloc_context 0 0 216 18 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
ext4_prealloc_space 0 0 216 18 1 : tunables 0
0 0 : slabdata 0 0 0
jbd2_journal_handle 68 68 120 34 1 : tunables 0
0 0 : slabdata 2 2 0
jbd2_journal_head 3734 3784 184 22 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 172 172 0
jbd2_revoke_table 46 46 88 46 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1 1 0
jbd2_revoke_record 0 0 128 32 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
kcopyd_job 0 0 528 15 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
dm_rq_clone_bio_info 0 0 88 46 1 : tunables 0
0 0 : slabdata 0 0 0
dm_rq_target_io 0 0 480 17 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
dm_target_io 0 0 96 42 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
dm_io 0 0 104 39 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
uhci_urb_priv 0 0 128 32 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
ext3_inode_cache 69341 69345 1408 23 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 3015 3015 0
ext3_xattr 325 325 160 25 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 13 13 0
journal_handle 68 68 120 34 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
journal_head 2473 4642 184 22 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 211 211 0
revoke_table 46 46 88 46 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1 1 0
revoke_record 64 64 128 32 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
scsi_sense_cache 46 63 192 21 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 3 3 0
scsi_cmd_cache 28 36 320 12 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 3 3 0
sgpool-128 16 21 4224 7 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 3 3 0
sgpool-64 30 30 2176 15 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
sgpool-32 28 28 1152 14 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
sgpool-16 24 24 640 12 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
sgpool-8 44 63 384 21 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 3 3 0
scsi_data_buffer 0 0 96 42 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
flow_cache 0 0 168 24 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
cfq_io_context 93 102 240 17 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 6 6 0
cfq_queue 97 102 240 17 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 6 6 0
mqueue_inode_cache 23 23 1408 23 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1 1 0
isofs_inode_cache 0 0 1088 15 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
kioctx 0 0 640 12 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
kiocb 0 0 320 12 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
inotify_event_cache 72 72 112 36 1 : tunables 0
0 0 : slabdata 2 2 0
inotify_watch_cache 224 224 144 28 1 : tunables 0
0 0 : slabdata 8 8 0
fasync_cache 42 42 96 42 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1 1 0
shmem_inode_cache 1485 1488 1344 12 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 124 124 0
nsproxy 0 0 120 34 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
posix_timers_cache 26 26 304 13 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
uid_cache 24 24 320 12 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
UNIX 354 360 1344 12 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 30 30 0
ip_mrt_cache 0 0 192 21 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
UDP-Lite 0 0 1216 13 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
tcp_bind_bucket 64 64 128 32 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
inet_peer_cache 21 21 192 21 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1 1 0
secpath_cache 0 0 128 32 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
xfrm_dst_cache 0 0 448 18 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
ip_fib_alias 0 0 104 39 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
ip_fib_hash 56 56 144 28 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
ip_dst_cache 36 36 448 18 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
arp_cache 36 36 448 18 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
RAW 14 14 1152 14 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1 1 0
UDP 26 26 1216 13 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
tw_sock_TCP 32 32 256 16 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
request_sock_TCP 21 21 192 21 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1 1 0
TCP 34 45 2176 15 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 3 3 0
eventpoll_pwq 110 112 144 28 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 4 4 0
eventpoll_epi 94 96 256 16 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 6 6 0
blkdev_queue 22 22 2736 11 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
blkdev_requests 40 54 440 18 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 3 3 0
blkdev_ioc 101 105 192 21 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 5 5 0
bio-0 32 32 256 16 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
biovec-256 7 7 4224 7 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1 1 0
biovec-128 30 30 2176 15 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
biovec-64 28 28 1152 14 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
biovec-16 42 42 384 21 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
sock_inode_cache 397 406 1152 14 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 29 29 0
skbuff_fclone_cache 32 32 512 16 2 : tunables 0
0 0 : slabdata 2 2 0
skbuff_head_cache 593 600 320 12 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 50 50 0
file_lock_cache 39 42 288 14 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 3 3 0
Acpi-Operand 1301 1316 144 28 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 47 47 0
Acpi-ParseExt 56 56 144 28 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
Acpi-Parse 68 68 120 34 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
Acpi-State 52 52 152 26 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
Acpi-Namespace 897 897 104 39 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 23 23 0
task_delay_info 247 255 232 17 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 15 15 0
taskstats 40 40 400 20 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
proc_inode_cache 1709 1725 1088 15 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 115 115 0
sigqueue 34 34 232 17 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
radix_tree_node 22109 22126 624 13 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1702 1702 0
bdev_cache 42 42 1536 21 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
sysfs_dir_cache 12246 12246 152 26 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 471 471 0
mnt_cache 47 48 320 12 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 4 4 0
filp 2971 3150 384 21 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 150 150 0
inode_cache 3185 3195 1040 15 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 213 213 0
dentry 274295 274300 312 13 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 21100 21100 0
names_cache 14 14 4224 7 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 2 2 0
key_jar 0 0 320 12 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
buffer_head 120232 120244 176 23 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 5228 5228 0
vm_area_struct 10385 10768 248 16 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 673 673 0
mm_struct 111 140 1152 14 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 10 10 0
fs_cache 125 147 192 21 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 7 7 0
files_cache 122 144 896 18 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 8 8 0
signal_cache 164 192 1024 16 4 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 12 12 0
sighand_cache 161 182 2240 14 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 13 13 0
task_xstate 66 72 640 12 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 6 6 0
task_struct 241 256 3872 8 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 32 32 0
cred_jar 366 560 256 16 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 35 35 0
anon_vma 2206 2310 136 30 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 77 77 0
pid 257 273 192 21 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 13 13 0
shared_policy_node 0 0 120 34 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
numa_policy 42 42 96 42 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 1 1 0
idr_layer_cache 403 403 616 13 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 31 31 0
kmalloc-8192 28 30 8264 3 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 10 10 0
kmalloc-4096 661 665 4168 7 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 95 95 0
kmalloc-2048 335 360 2120 15 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 24 24 0
kmalloc-1024 479 609 1096 29 8 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 21 21 0
kmalloc-512 783 784 584 14 2 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 56 56 0
kmalloc-256 535 552 328 12 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 46 46 0
kmalloc-128 309 360 200 20 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 18 18 0
kmalloc-64 2430 2520 136 30 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 84 84 0
kmalloc-32 656 663 104 39 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 17 17 0
kmalloc-16 2250 2254 88 46 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 49 49 0
kmalloc-8 3619 3621 80 51 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 71 71 0
kmalloc-192 1449 1455 264 15 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 97 97 0
kmalloc-96 726 816 168 24 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 34 34 0
kmem_cache_node 0 0 176 23 1 : tunables 0 0
0 : slabdata 0 0 0
>
> Larry, you say the buffer is 700-800 bytes. Can you confirm that 800
bytes
> is roughly the request size being made by ieee80211_skb_resize()?
For some of the failures, the size was in the 700-800 range, but the
ones I found in my logs called pskb_expand_head() with skb->data_len
of 1962. For those calls, head_need and tail_need were both 0.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <4A2D1017.6010308-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-08 13:35 ` Mel Gorman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2009-06-08 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rik van Riel
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 09:20:23AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Mel Gorman wrote:
>
>> We've encountered this before and the conclusion was that the current
>> adjustments for watermark calculations of high-order allocations is right,
>> or at least there is no better alternative. In other words, the page
>> allocator in this instance is behaving as expected. Do we want to
>> revisit that discussion as to whether the watermark calculations for
>> high-order allocation should change? I think we'll reach the same
>> conclusion or at least decide that allowing the order-1 atomic
>> allocation to succeed here would just postpone the problem.
>
> It would not just postpone the problem, it would also
> bring the system closer to a state where kswapd does
> something about the order-1 free areas.
>
> This might postpone the problem indefinately.
>
How do you figure it does not just postpone the problem? If there are a batch
of order-1 allocations that come in like this, it will eventually deplete
the higher-order pages and then fail because kswapd is not getting woken up.
Minimally, if we were to ignore the watermarks, there would need to be logic
that says
"If a high-order allocation would fail due to high-order watermarks
not being met, but the watermarks are ok from an order-0 perspective
and the high-order page is available, then grant the allocation but
wake up kswapd as if the order-1 allocation had failed to get the
high-order watermarks back in shape"
> Currently the system fails early, without kswapd
> kicking in and freeing new order-1 areas.
>
If the allocation was granted, then kswapd will still not kick in.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <20090608110303.GD15377-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-08 13:58 ` Pekka J Enberg
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906081657001.7036-nkv1RstziBCWKadcF5yKzn5wuOn9r4cE@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka J Enberg @ 2009-06-08 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman
Cc: Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter
Hi Mel,
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Is there any chance you could hatchet together a patch
> slab-allocation-failure that reports on slab allocation failures similar
> to what the page allocator does? Minimally, it should tell us what
> the size of the allocation was but any other information such as the
> same of the slab, the size of pages it normally uses are, etc. would
> also be useful.
Would something like this be sufficient? Figuring out the actual _size_
passed to kmalloc() is pretty difficult as then we would need to do the
NULL test in fastpath code or pass the argument deeper in the call-chain.
Pekka
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 65ffda5..b5acf18 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1565,6 +1565,8 @@ new_slab:
c->page = new;
goto load_freelist;
}
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "SLUB: unable to satisfy allocation for cache %s (size=%d, node=%d, gfp=%x)\n",
+ s->name, s->size, node, gfpflags);
return NULL;
debug:
if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, c->page, object, addr))
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906081657001.7036-nkv1RstziBCWKadcF5yKzn5wuOn9r4cE@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-08 14:12 ` Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20090608141212.GE15070-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2009-06-08 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka J Enberg
Cc: Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 04:58:10PM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Is there any chance you could hatchet together a patch
> > slab-allocation-failure that reports on slab allocation failures similar
> > to what the page allocator does? Minimally, it should tell us what
> > the size of the allocation was but any other information such as the
> > same of the slab, the size of pages it normally uses are, etc. would
> > also be useful.
>
> Would something like this be sufficient? Figuring out the actual _size_
> passed to kmalloc() is pretty difficult as then we would need to do the
> NULL test in fastpath code or pass the argument deeper in the call-chain.
>
It's much better than nothing. In the event of an allocation failure, we'll
know which kmalloc bucket it's coming out of so we'll have a limited range
of possible buffer sizes.
I have some suggestions on what we're outputting though.
> Pekka
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 65ffda5..b5acf18 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1565,6 +1565,8 @@ new_slab:
> c->page = new;
> goto load_freelist;
> }
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "SLUB: unable to satisfy allocation for cache %s (size=%d, node=%d, gfp=%x)\n",
> + s->name, s->size, node, gfpflags);
size could be almost anything here for a casual reader. You are
outputting the size of the object plus its metadata so the name should
reflect that. I think it would be better to output objsize= and the
object size without the metadata overhead. What do you think?
In addition, include how many objects there are per-slab and include what
the order is being passed to the page allocator when allocating new slabs.
Would that be enough to determine if fallback-to-smaller orders occured?
> return NULL;
> debug:
> if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, c->page, object, addr))
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <20090608141212.GE15070-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-08 14:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-09 7:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-09 7:50 ` Pekka Enberg
2 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-06-08 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman
Cc: Pekka J Enberg, Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
> In addition, include how many objects there are per-slab and include what
> the order is being passed to the page allocator when allocating new slabs.
> Would that be enough to determine if fallback-to-smaller orders occured?
There is a per slab counter ORDER_FALLBACK that is increased for
allocations that required fallback.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <20090608173219.0588af26.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-08 17:20 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-06-08 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Rik van Riel, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, Mel Gorman
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Jun 2009 11:35:27 -0500
> Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>> That is a very strange trace. The Mem-Info indicates
>>>> that the system has more than enough memory free, and
>>>> also enough memory in higher-order free blocks.
>>>>
>>>> This would indicate a bug somewhere in the page
>>>> allocator - this memory should have been given to this
>>>> allocation request.
>>> Aha, I always have difficulties deciphering the traces. But lets
>>> invite Mel to the party then!
>> I'm happy to see some action on this problem. As usual, I'm happy to
>> test patches and/or provide diagnostic output.
>>
> One question.
>
> Did your system fragmented in same way as to this
> (see DMA32, 10052 of order-0 pages) in older kernel ? I think you can check
> fragmentation status via /proc/buddyinfo.
> =
> kernel: Node 0 DMA: 3*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
> 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2100kB
> kernel: Node 0 DMA32: 10062*4kB 1*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 0*256kB
> 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 40976kB
> ==
The current system has not been up very long and does not show the
fragmentation:
finger@larrylap:~/wireless-testing> cat /proc/buddyinfo
Node 0, zone DMA 4 5 4 2 4 1 2
0 1 0 0
Node 0, zone DMA32 261 78 46 55 61 54 37
17 14 12 262
After I did a git pull and a kernel build with the sources on an
NFS-mounted volume, the fragmentation increased:
Node 0, zone DMA 4 5 4 2 4 1 2
0 1 0 0
Node 0, zone DMA32 2213 1924 1292 705 285 81 25
8 5 4 141
After a git pull and a kernel build on a second NFS-mounted tree:
Node 0, zone DMA 4 5 4 2 4 1 2
0 1 0 0
Node 0, zone DMA32 3127 3058 1989 756 401 142 56
14 5 3 12
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <20090608141212.GE15070-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 14:42 ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2009-06-09 7:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-09 7:54 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-10 15:56 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-09 7:50 ` Pekka Enberg
2 siblings, 2 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-09 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman
Cc: Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM
Hi Mel,
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 15:12 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index 65ffda5..b5acf18 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -1565,6 +1565,8 @@ new_slab:
> > c->page = new;
> > goto load_freelist;
> > }
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING "SLUB: unable to satisfy allocation for cache %s (size=%d, node=%d, gfp=%x)\n",
> > + s->name, s->size, node, gfpflags);
>
> size could be almost anything here for a casual reader. You are
> outputting the size of the object plus its metadata so the name should
> reflect that. I think it would be better to output objsize= and the
> object size without the metadata overhead. What do you think?
>
> In addition, include how many objects there are per-slab and include what
> the order is being passed to the page allocator when allocating new slabs.
> Would that be enough to determine if fallback-to-smaller orders occured?
So how about something like this then?
Pekka
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 65ffda5..a03dbe8 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1484,6 +1484,58 @@ static inline int node_match(struct kmem_cache_cpu *c, int node)
return 1;
}
+static int count_free(struct page *page)
+{
+ return page->objects - page->inuse;
+}
+
+static unsigned long count_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
+ int (*get_count)(struct page *))
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long x = 0;
+ struct page *page;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry(page, &n->partial, lru)
+ x += get_count(page);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
+ return x;
+}
+
+static noinline void
+slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
+{
+ int node;
+
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+ "SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node %d (gfp=%x)\n",
+ nid, gfpflags);
+ printk(KERN_WARNING " cache: %s, object size: %d, buffer size: %d, "
+ "default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
+ s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
+
+ for_each_online_node(node) {
+ struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
+ unsigned long nr_partials;
+ unsigned long nr_slabs;
+ unsigned long nr_objs;
+ unsigned long nr_free;
+
+ if (!n)
+ continue;
+
+ nr_partials = n->nr_partial;
+ nr_slabs = atomic_long_read(&n->nr_slabs);
+ nr_objs = atomic_long_read(&n->total_objects);
+ nr_free = count_partial(n, count_free);
+
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+ " node %d: partials: %ld, slabs: %ld, objs: %ld, free: %ld\n",
+ node, nr_partials, nr_slabs, nr_objs, nr_free);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Slow path. The lockless freelist is empty or we need to perform
* debugging duties.
@@ -1565,6 +1617,7 @@ new_slab:
c->page = new;
goto load_freelist;
}
+ slab_out_of_memory(s, gfpflags, node);
return NULL;
debug:
if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, c->page, object, addr))
@@ -3318,20 +3371,6 @@ void *__kmalloc_node_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
-static unsigned long count_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
- int (*get_count)(struct page *))
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- unsigned long x = 0;
- struct page *page;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry(page, &n->partial, lru)
- x += get_count(page);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
- return x;
-}
-
static int count_inuse(struct page *page)
{
return page->inuse;
@@ -3342,11 +3381,6 @@ static int count_total(struct page *page)
return page->objects;
}
-static int count_free(struct page *page)
-{
- return page->objects - page->inuse;
-}
-
static int validate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
unsigned long *map)
{
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <20090608141212.GE15070-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 14:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-09 7:06 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-09 7:50 ` Pekka Enberg
2 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-09 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman
Cc: Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Mel Gorman<mel-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> In addition, include how many objects there are per-slab and include what
> the order is being passed to the page allocator when allocating new slabs.
> Would that be enough to determine if fallback-to-smaller orders occured?
Well, if the slab_out_of_memory() is called, we already know the
higher order allocation failed _and_ the fallback allocation failed.
So yes, it would be enough.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-09 7:06 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-09 7:54 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-09 7:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 15:56 ` Mel Gorman
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-06-09 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 15:12 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > > index 65ffda5..b5acf18 100644
> > > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > > @@ -1565,6 +1565,8 @@ new_slab:
> > > c->page = new;
> > > goto load_freelist;
> > > }
> > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "SLUB: unable to satisfy allocation for cache %s (size=%d, node=%d, gfp=%x)\n",
> > > + s->name, s->size, node, gfpflags);
> >
> > size could be almost anything here for a casual reader. You are
> > outputting the size of the object plus its metadata so the name should
> > reflect that. I think it would be better to output objsize= and the
> > object size without the metadata overhead. What do you think?
> >
> > In addition, include how many objects there are per-slab and include what
> > the order is being passed to the page allocator when allocating new slabs.
> > Would that be enough to determine if fallback-to-smaller orders occured?
>
> So how about something like this then?
>
Larry reported this stack trace:
kernel: git: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
kernel: Pid: 3707, comm: git Not tainted 2.6.30-rc1-wl #115
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel: [<ffffffff80292f84>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45d
kernel: [<ffffffff802b2383>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
kernel: [<ffffffff802b66a4>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
That's in the order fallback for new slab allocations; so this cache must
have oo_order(s->min) of 1.
To diagnose whether its object size dictates a >0 slab order, you could
enable CONFIG_SLUB_STATS (it's disabled in his .config) and check which
/sys/kernel/slab/cache/order_fallback increased. Once you have identified
the cache, you can get this information via
/sys/kernel/slab/cache/{objsize,order,size}. I think this is what
Christoph was getting at.
You could even boot with `slub_nomerge' to determine whether cache merging
was the issue where the cache under consideration was unnecessarily merged
with one that requires larger higher order minimums.
I don't quite understand how its necessary to print the partial lists for
each node, they should be exhausted if we're allocating a new slab if the
node doesn't matter (and can't in Larry's case, he only has one).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-09 7:54 ` David Rientjes
@ 2009-06-09 7:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-09 8:14 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-09 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin
Hi David,
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 00:54 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> Larry reported this stack trace:
>
> kernel: git: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
> kernel: Pid: 3707, comm: git Not tainted 2.6.30-rc1-wl #115
> kernel: Call Trace:
> kernel: [<ffffffff80292f84>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45d
> kernel: [<ffffffff802b2383>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
> kernel: [<ffffffff802b66a4>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
>
> That's in the order fallback for new slab allocations; so this cache must
> have oo_order(s->min) of 1.
Yes, agreed which is why I said it's unlikely that the allocated size is
800 bytes or so.
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 00:54 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> To diagnose whether its object size dictates a >0 slab order, you could
> enable CONFIG_SLUB_STATS (it's disabled in his .config) and check which
> /sys/kernel/slab/cache/order_fallback increased. Once you have identified
> the cache, you can get this information via
> /sys/kernel/slab/cache/{objsize,order,size}. I think this is what
> Christoph was getting at.
>
> You could even boot with `slub_nomerge' to determine whether cache merging
> was the issue where the cache under consideration was unnecessarily merged
> with one that requires larger higher order minimums.
Sure. Applying my diagnostic patch will probably shed some light on the
subject too.
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 00:54 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> I don't quite understand how its necessary to print the partial lists for
> each node, they should be exhausted if we're allocating a new slab if the
> node doesn't matter (and can't in Larry's case, he only has one).
It doesn't hurt either, does it? Yes, we expect the partial lists to be
exhausted but it's better to print that out just in case we have a bug
some day somewhere and that condition is not true. This is very
infrequent slow patch code here anyway.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-09 7:58 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-09 8:14 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906090105270.28701-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-06-09 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > To diagnose whether its object size dictates a >0 slab order, you could
> > enable CONFIG_SLUB_STATS (it's disabled in his .config) and check which
> > /sys/kernel/slab/cache/order_fallback increased. Once you have identified
> > the cache, you can get this information via
> > /sys/kernel/slab/cache/{objsize,order,size}. I think this is what
> > Christoph was getting at.
> >
> > You could even boot with `slub_nomerge' to determine whether cache merging
> > was the issue where the cache under consideration was unnecessarily merged
> > with one that requires larger higher order minimums.
>
> Sure. Applying my diagnostic patch will probably shed some light on the
> subject too.
>
I wasn't sure whether you were proposing the patch as an addition to slub
or just to help with this issue. I agree it would help in a hopefully
ratelimited manner for general slab allocation failures and would have
avoided some of the confusion for this issue from lack of diagnostics.
> > I don't quite understand how its necessary to print the partial lists for
> > each node, they should be exhausted if we're allocating a new slab if the
> > node doesn't matter (and can't in Larry's case, he only has one).
>
> It doesn't hurt either, does it? Yes, we expect the partial lists to be
> exhausted but it's better to print that out just in case we have a bug
> some day somewhere and that condition is not true. This is very
> infrequent slow patch code here anyway.
>
It will lead to false postiives since you can get a free to a full slab
which moves it back to an allowed node's partial list before count_free()
is printed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906090105270.28701-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-09 8:28 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 14:41 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-09 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM
Hi David,
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 01:14 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> I wasn't sure whether you were proposing the patch as an addition to slub
> or just to help with this issue. I agree it would help in a hopefully
> ratelimited manner for general slab allocation failures and would have
> avoided some of the confusion for this issue from lack of diagnostics.
I am proposing it as a generic addition to SLUB.
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 01:14 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > It doesn't hurt either, does it? Yes, we expect the partial lists to be
> > exhausted but it's better to print that out just in case we have a bug
> > some day somewhere and that condition is not true. This is very
> > infrequent slow patch code here anyway.
>
> It will lead to false postiives since you can get a free to a full slab
> which moves it back to an allowed node's partial list before count_free()
> is printed.
Fair enough, lets drop it then!
Pekka
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 65ffda5..2bbacfc 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1484,6 +1484,56 @@ static inline int node_match(struct kmem_cache_cpu *c, int node)
return 1;
}
+static int count_free(struct page *page)
+{
+ return page->objects - page->inuse;
+}
+
+static unsigned long count_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
+ int (*get_count)(struct page *))
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long x = 0;
+ struct page *page;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry(page, &n->partial, lru)
+ x += get_count(page);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
+ return x;
+}
+
+static noinline void
+slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
+{
+ int node;
+
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+ "SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node %d (gfp=%x)\n",
+ nid, gfpflags);
+ printk(KERN_WARNING " cache: %s, object size: %d, buffer size: %d, "
+ "default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
+ s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
+
+ for_each_online_node(node) {
+ struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
+ unsigned long nr_slabs;
+ unsigned long nr_objs;
+ unsigned long nr_free;
+
+ if (!n)
+ continue;
+
+ nr_slabs = atomic_long_read(&n->nr_slabs);
+ nr_objs = atomic_long_read(&n->total_objects);
+ nr_free = count_partial(n, count_free);
+
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+ " node %d: slabs: %ld, objs: %ld, free: %ld\n",
+ node, nr_slabs, nr_objs, nr_free);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Slow path. The lockless freelist is empty or we need to perform
* debugging duties.
@@ -1565,6 +1615,7 @@ new_slab:
c->page = new;
goto load_freelist;
}
+ slab_out_of_memory(s, gfpflags, node);
return NULL;
debug:
if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, c->page, object, addr))
@@ -3318,20 +3369,6 @@ void *__kmalloc_node_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
-static unsigned long count_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
- int (*get_count)(struct page *))
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- unsigned long x = 0;
- struct page *page;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry(page, &n->partial, lru)
- x += get_count(page);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
- return x;
-}
-
static int count_inuse(struct page *page)
{
return page->inuse;
@@ -3342,11 +3379,6 @@ static int count_total(struct page *page)
return page->objects;
}
-static int count_free(struct page *page)
-{
- return page->objects - page->inuse;
-}
-
static int validate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
unsigned long *map)
{
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-09 8:28 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-10 14:41 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-10 15:44 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-06-10 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: David Rientjes, Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin
Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 65ffda5..2bbacfc 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1484,6 +1484,56 @@ static inline int node_match(struct kmem_cache_cpu *c, int node)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static int count_free(struct page *page)
> +{
> + return page->objects - page->inuse;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long count_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
> + int (*get_count)(struct page *))
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned long x = 0;
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> + list_for_each_entry(page, &n->partial, lru)
> + x += get_count(page);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> + return x;
> +}
> +
> +static noinline void
> +slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
> +{
> + int node;
> +
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + "SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node %d (gfp=%x)\n",
> + nid, gfpflags);
> + printk(KERN_WARNING " cache: %s, object size: %d, buffer size: %d, "
> + "default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
> + s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
> +
> + for_each_online_node(node) {
> + struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
> + unsigned long nr_slabs;
> + unsigned long nr_objs;
> + unsigned long nr_free;
> +
> + if (!n)
> + continue;
> +
> + nr_slabs = atomic_long_read(&n->nr_slabs);
> + nr_objs = atomic_long_read(&n->total_objects);
> + nr_free = count_partial(n, count_free);
> +
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + " node %d: slabs: %ld, objs: %ld, free: %ld\n",
> + node, nr_slabs, nr_objs, nr_free);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Slow path. The lockless freelist is empty or we need to perform
> * debugging duties.
> @@ -1565,6 +1615,7 @@ new_slab:
> c->page = new;
> goto load_freelist;
> }
> + slab_out_of_memory(s, gfpflags, node);
> return NULL;
> debug:
> if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, c->page, object, addr))
> @@ -3318,20 +3369,6 @@ void *__kmalloc_node_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
> -static unsigned long count_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
> - int (*get_count)(struct page *))
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> - unsigned long x = 0;
> - struct page *page;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> - list_for_each_entry(page, &n->partial, lru)
> - x += get_count(page);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> - return x;
> -}
> -
> static int count_inuse(struct page *page)
> {
> return page->inuse;
> @@ -3342,11 +3379,6 @@ static int count_total(struct page *page)
> return page->objects;
> }
>
> -static int count_free(struct page *page)
> -{
> - return page->objects - page->inuse;
> -}
> -
> static int validate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
> unsigned long *map)
> {
With the above patch installed, I pushed my system hard enough to get
the O(1) allocation failures. This time they were triggered with a
'make -j8' on the kernel. No, I don't have that many CPUs, but I
figured that the extra make jobs might stress memory. My kernel is
2.6.30-rc8 from the wireless-testing tree. Everything matches Linus's
tree except drivers/net/wireless/, which contains what is essentially
2.6.31 code.
The dmesg output starting with the first allocation failure is:
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 6577, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b4d1f>] ? unfreeze_slab+0x4c/0xbd
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff802b7e60>] __kmalloc+0x119/0x194
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffffa02913d6>] ieee80211_skb_resize+0x91/0xc7 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa0291c0f>] ieee80211_master_start_xmit+0x298/0x319 [mac80211]
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffffa0291957>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x54b/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa029162b>] ? ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x21f/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff803e7790>] ? __kfree_skb+0x82/0x86
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b4038>] ? add_partial+0x1a/0x69
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 15
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 65
Active_anon:128724 active_file:123018 inactive_anon:47276
inactive_file:355583 unevictable:8 dirty:18 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:3621 slab:77881 mapped:18629 pagetables:4056 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:12380kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:514896kB inactive_anon:189104kB active_file:492072kB
inactive_file:1422332kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 2821*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 12332kB
479694 total pagecache pages
969 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4523, delete 3554, find 2913/3063
Free swap = 2091884kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
382252 pages shared
441407 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 6577, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b4d1f>] ? unfreeze_slab+0x4c/0xbd
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
<EOI> [<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff8023fc57>] local_bh_enable+0xb5/0xcf
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b4038>] ? add_partial+0x1a/0x69
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 15
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 65
Active_anon:128724 active_file:123018 inactive_anon:47276
inactive_file:355583 unevictable:8 dirty:18 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:3621 slab:77881 mapped:18629 pagetables:4056 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:12380kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:514896kB inactive_anon:189104kB active_file:492072kB
inactive_file:1422332kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 2821*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 12332kB
479694 total pagecache pages
969 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4523, delete 3554, find 2913/3063
Free swap = 2091884kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
382252 pages shared
441407 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 6577, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
<EOI> [<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff8023fc57>] local_bh_enable+0xb5/0xcf
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b4038>] ? add_partial+0x1a/0x69
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 15
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 65
Active_anon:128724 active_file:123018 inactive_anon:47276
inactive_file:355583 unevictable:8 dirty:18 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:3621 slab:77881 mapped:18629 pagetables:4056 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:12380kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:514896kB inactive_anon:189104kB active_file:492072kB
inactive_file:1422332kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 2821*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 12332kB
479694 total pagecache pages
969 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4523, delete 3554, find 2913/3063
Free swap = 2091884kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
382252 pages shared
441407 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 6577, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
<EOI> [<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff8023fc57>] local_bh_enable+0xb5/0xcf
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b4038>] ? add_partial+0x1a/0x69
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 15
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 65
Active_anon:128724 active_file:123018 inactive_anon:47276
inactive_file:355583 unevictable:8 dirty:18 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:3621 slab:77881 mapped:18629 pagetables:4056 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:12380kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:514896kB inactive_anon:189104kB active_file:492072kB
inactive_file:1422332kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 2821*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 12332kB
479694 total pagecache pages
969 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4523, delete 3554, find 2913/3063
Free swap = 2091884kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
382252 pages shared
441407 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 6577, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
<EOI> [<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff8023fc57>] local_bh_enable+0xb5/0xcf
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b4038>] ? add_partial+0x1a/0x69
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 15
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 65
Active_anon:128724 active_file:123018 inactive_anon:47276
inactive_file:355583 unevictable:8 dirty:18 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:3621 slab:77881 mapped:18629 pagetables:4056 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:12380kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:514896kB inactive_anon:189104kB active_file:492072kB
inactive_file:1422332kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 2821*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 12332kB
479694 total pagecache pages
969 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4523, delete 3554, find 2913/3063
Free swap = 2091884kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
382252 pages shared
441407 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 6577, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
<EOI> [<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff8023fc57>] local_bh_enable+0xb5/0xcf
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b4038>] ? add_partial+0x1a/0x69
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 15
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 65
Active_anon:128724 active_file:123018 inactive_anon:47276
inactive_file:355583 unevictable:8 dirty:18 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:3621 slab:77881 mapped:18629 pagetables:4056 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:12380kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:514896kB inactive_anon:189104kB active_file:492072kB
inactive_file:1422332kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 2821*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 12332kB
479694 total pagecache pages
969 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4523, delete 3554, find 2913/3063
Free swap = 2091884kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
382252 pages shared
441407 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 6577, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
<EOI> [<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff8023fc57>] local_bh_enable+0xb5/0xcf
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b4038>] ? add_partial+0x1a/0x69
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 15
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 65
Active_anon:128724 active_file:123018 inactive_anon:47276
inactive_file:355583 unevictable:8 dirty:18 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:3621 slab:77881 mapped:18629 pagetables:4056 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:12380kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:514896kB inactive_anon:189104kB active_file:492072kB
inactive_file:1422332kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 2821*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 12332kB
479694 total pagecache pages
969 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4523, delete 3554, find 2913/3063
Free swap = 2091884kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
382252 pages shared
441407 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 6577, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
<EOI> [<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff8023fc57>] local_bh_enable+0xb5/0xcf
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b4038>] ? add_partial+0x1a/0x69
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 15
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 65
Active_anon:128724 active_file:123018 inactive_anon:47276
inactive_file:355583 unevictable:8 dirty:18 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:3621 slab:77881 mapped:18629 pagetables:4056 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:12380kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:514896kB inactive_anon:189104kB active_file:492072kB
inactive_file:1422332kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 2821*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 12332kB
479694 total pagecache pages
969 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4523, delete 3554, find 2913/3063
Free swap = 2091884kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
382238 pages shared
441414 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 6577, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
<EOI> [<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff8023fc57>] local_bh_enable+0xb5/0xcf
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b4038>] ? add_partial+0x1a/0x69
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 15
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 65
Active_anon:128724 active_file:123018 inactive_anon:47276
inactive_file:355620 unevictable:8 dirty:18 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:3621 slab:77881 mapped:18629 pagetables:4056 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:12380kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:514896kB inactive_anon:189104kB active_file:492072kB
inactive_file:1422480kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 2821*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 12332kB
479694 total pagecache pages
969 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4523, delete 3554, find 2913/3063
Free swap = 2091884kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
382238 pages shared
441414 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 6577, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
<EOI> [<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff8023fc57>] local_bh_enable+0xb5/0xcf
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b4038>] ? add_partial+0x1a/0x69
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 15
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 65
Active_anon:128724 active_file:123018 inactive_anon:47276
inactive_file:355620 unevictable:8 dirty:18 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:3621 slab:77881 mapped:18629 pagetables:4056 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:12380kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:514896kB inactive_anon:189104kB active_file:492072kB
inactive_file:1422480kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 2821*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 12332kB
479694 total pagecache pages
969 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4523, delete 3554, find 2913/3063
Free swap = 2091884kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
382238 pages shared
441414 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
__ratelimit: 23 callbacks suppressed
rpciod/0: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 3085, comm: rpciod/0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b4d1f>] ? unfreeze_slab+0x4c/0xbd
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff802b7e60>] __kmalloc+0x119/0x194
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff80460180>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47
[<ffffffffa02913d6>] ieee80211_skb_resize+0x91/0xc7 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa0291815>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x409/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa029162b>] ? ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x21f/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff803e7790>] ? __kfree_skb+0x82/0x86
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff8023fc6b>] ? local_bh_enable+0xc9/0xcf
[<ffffffff80422e9d>] tcp_push_one+0x2f/0x31
[<ffffffff80417439>] tcp_sendmsg+0x7a1/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] ? sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffff803e39b3>] sock_no_sendpage+0x9b/0xaa
[<ffffffff804176de>] tcp_sendpage+0x48/0x5ec
[<ffffffffa054c525>] xs_sendpages+0x12c/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bf9c3>] ? nfs3_xdr_writeargs+0x0/0x87 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054faa1>] rpc_async_schedule+0x10/0x12 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff8024af33>] worker_thread+0x1fa/0x30a
[<ffffffff8024aedc>] ? worker_thread+0x1a3/0x30a
[<ffffffffa054fa91>] ? rpc_async_schedule+0x0/0x12 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff8024ad39>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x30a
[<ffffffff8024ad39>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x30a
[<ffffffff8024ec21>] kthread+0x56/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb7a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff8020c57c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff8024ebcb>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb70>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 154
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 173
Active_anon:147694 active_file:116688 inactive_anon:47252
inactive_file:344419 unevictable:8 dirty:5 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:2692 slab:76878 mapped:19321 pagetables:4204 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:8664kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:590776kB inactive_anon:189008kB active_file:466752kB
inactive_file:1377660kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:70 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 1898*4kB 12*8kB 8*16kB 1*32kB 0*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 8744kB
462221 total pagecache pages
966 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4555, delete 3589, find 2917/3067
Free swap = 2091764kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
373616 pages shared
454599 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 8867, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b4d1f>] ? unfreeze_slab+0x4c/0xbd
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff802b7e60>] __kmalloc+0x119/0x194
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffffa02913d6>] ieee80211_skb_resize+0x91/0xc7 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa0291c0f>] ieee80211_master_start_xmit+0x298/0x319 [mac80211]
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffffa0291957>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x54b/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa029162b>] ? ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x21f/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff803e7790>] ? __kfree_skb+0x82/0x86
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff803e33a8>] ? release_sock+0xcd/0xd6
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff80422e9d>] tcp_push_one+0x2f/0x31
[<ffffffff80417439>] tcp_sendmsg+0x7a1/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] ? sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffff803e39b3>] sock_no_sendpage+0x9b/0xaa
[<ffffffff804176de>] tcp_sendpage+0x48/0x5ec
[<ffffffffa054c525>] xs_sendpages+0x12c/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bf9c3>] ? nfs3_xdr_writeargs+0x0/0x87 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
kswapd0: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 229, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bb774>] nfs_write_rpcsetup+0x215/0x237 [nfs]
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa05bd257>] nfs_flush_one+0xa2/0xd9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b82d9>] nfs_pageio_doio+0x32/0x5b [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b83ec>] nfs_pageio_complete+0x9/0xb [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bbeae>] nfs_writepages+0x101/0x13a [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd1b5>] ? nfs_flush_one+0x0/0xd9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd043>] nfs_write_mapping+0x63/0x9e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd0a7>] nfs_wb_all+0x12/0x14 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b0145>] nfs_file_flush+0x8a/0xb1 [nfs]
[<ffffffff802bb18d>] filp_close+0x40/0x63
[<ffffffff802bb255>] sys_close+0xa5/0xe4
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
<IRQ> Node 0 [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 89
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 85
Active_anon:151538 active_file:114269 inactive_anon:47211
inactive_file:340887 unevictable:8 dirty:36 writeback:0 unstable:2
free:5246 slab:76536 mapped:19364 pagetables:4251 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:18880kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:606152kB inactive_anon:188844kB active_file:457076kB
inactive_file:1363548kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:69 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB [<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB
0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 4459*4kB 1*8kB [<ffffffff802b4d1f>] ?
unfreeze_slab+0x4c/0xbd
3*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB
0*4096kB = 18852kB
456290 total pagecache pages
966 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4587, delete 3621, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091636kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa01aaee5>] ? ssb_pci_read32+0x46/0x54 [ssb]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff8023f988>] irq_exit+0x4e/0x88
[<ffffffff8020de2d>] do_IRQ+0xac/0xc3
[<ffffffff8020c4d3>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf
<EOI> [<ffffffff8046013e>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x30
[<ffffffff80296a35>] ? __remove_mapping+0xac/0xc6
[<ffffffff802971b3>] ? shrink_page_list+0x558/0x69f
[<ffffffff80296262>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x179/0x219
[<ffffffff8046013c>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x30
[<ffffffff8025ce77>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10b/0x12f
[<ffffffff80297937>] ? shrink_list+0x2a1/0x5b6
[<ffffffff80460180>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47
[<ffffffff80297ed7>] ? shrink_zone+0x28b/0x335
[<ffffffff8033a0d4>] ? __up_read+0x92/0x9a
[<ffffffff802980c3>] ? shrink_slab+0x142/0x154
[<ffffffff80298837>] ? kswapd+0x4b1/0x692
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff802960e9>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x219
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff80298386>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x692
[<ffffffff80298386>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x692
[<ffffffff8024ec21>] ? kthread+0x56/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb7a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff8020c57c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff8024ebcb>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb70>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 89
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 85
Active_anon:151538 active_file:114269 inactive_anon:47211
inactive_file:340887 unevictable:8 dirty:36 writeback:0 unstable:2
free:5246 slab:76536 mapped:19364 pagetables:4251 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:18880kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:606152kB inactive_anon:188844kB active_file:457076kB
inactive_file:1363548kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:69 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 4459*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 18852kB
456290 total pagecache pages
966 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4587, delete 3621, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091636kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
371529 pages shared
456955 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
21377 pages reserved
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
371529 pages shared
456955 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
kswapd0: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 229, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff8025ce5d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf1/0x12f
[<ffffffffa01aaee5>] ? ssb_pci_read32+0x46/0x54 [ssb]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff80243f1f>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x259/0x268
[<ffffffff80243dfc>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x268
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff8023f988>] irq_exit+0x4e/0x88
[<ffffffff8020de2d>] do_IRQ+0xac/0xc3
[<ffffffff8020c4d3>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf
<EOI> [<ffffffff8046013e>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x30
[<ffffffff80296a35>] ? __remove_mapping+0xac/0xc6
[<ffffffff802971b3>] ? shrink_page_list+0x558/0x69f
[<ffffffff80296262>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x179/0x219
[<ffffffff8046013c>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x30
[<ffffffff8025ce77>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10b/0x12f
[<ffffffff80297937>] ? shrink_list+0x2a1/0x5b6
[<ffffffff80460180>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47
[<ffffffff80297ed7>] ? shrink_zone+0x28b/0x335
[<ffffffff8033a0d4>] ? __up_read+0x92/0x9a
[<ffffffff802980c3>] ? shrink_slab+0x142/0x154
[<ffffffff80298837>] ? kswapd+0x4b1/0x692
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff802960e9>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x219
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff80298386>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x692
[<ffffffff80298386>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x692
[<ffffffff8024ec21>] ? kthread+0x56/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb7a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff8020c57c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff8024ebcb>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb70>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 89
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 84
Active_anon:151538 active_file:114269 inactive_anon:47211
inactive_file:340887 unevictable:8 dirty:36 writeback:0 unstable:2
free:5246 slab:76536 mapped:19364 pagetables:4251 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:18880kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:606152kB inactive_anon:188844kB active_file:457076kB
inactive_file:1363548kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:69 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 4459*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 18852kB
456290 total pagecache pages
966 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4587, delete 3621, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091636kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 8867, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b4d1f>] ? unfreeze_slab+0x4c/0xbd
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff802b7e60>] __kmalloc+0x119/0x194
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffffa02913d6>] ieee80211_skb_resize+0x91/0xc7 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa0291c0f>] ieee80211_master_start_xmit+0x298/0x319 [mac80211]
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffffa0291957>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x54b/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa029162b>] ? ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x21f/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff803e7790>] ? __kfree_skb+0x82/0x86
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff80422e9d>] tcp_push_one+0x2f/0x31
[<ffffffff80417439>] tcp_sendmsg+0x7a1/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] ? sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffff803e39b3>] sock_no_sendpage+0x9b/0xaa
[<ffffffff804176de>] tcp_sendpage+0x48/0x5ec
[<ffffffffa054c525>] xs_sendpages+0x12c/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bf9c3>] ? nfs3_xdr_writeargs+0x0/0x87 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bb774>] nfs_write_rpcsetup+0x215/0x237 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd257>] nfs_flush_one+0xa2/0xd9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b82d9>] nfs_pageio_doio+0x32/0x5b [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b83ec>] nfs_pageio_complete+0x9/0xb [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bbeae>] nfs_writepages+0x101/0x13a [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd1b5>] ? nfs_flush_one+0x0/0xd9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd043>] nfs_write_mapping+0x63/0x9e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd0a7>] nfs_wb_all+0x12/0x14 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b0145>] nfs_file_flush+0x8a/0xb1 [nfs]
[<ffffffff802bb18d>] filp_close+0x40/0x63
[<ffffffff802bb255>] sys_close+0xa5/0xe4
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 89
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 51
Active_anon:151575 active_file:114269 inactive_anon:47211
inactive_file:340887 unevictable:8 dirty:36 writeback:0 unstable:2
free:5246 slab:76536 mapped:19364 pagetables:4251 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:18880kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:606300kB inactive_anon:188844kB active_file:457076kB
inactive_file:1363548kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:69 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 4459*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 18852kB
456290 total pagecache pages
966 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4587, delete 3621, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091636kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
371534 pages shared
456983 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
kswapd0: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 229, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa01aaee5>] ? ssb_pci_read32+0x46/0x54 [ssb]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff80243f1f>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x259/0x268
[<ffffffff80243dfc>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x268
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff8023f988>] irq_exit+0x4e/0x88
[<ffffffff8020de2d>] do_IRQ+0xac/0xc3
[<ffffffff8020c4d3>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf
<EOI> [<ffffffff8046013e>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x30
[<ffffffff80296a35>] ? __remove_mapping+0xac/0xc6
[<ffffffff802971b3>] ? shrink_page_list+0x558/0x69f
[<ffffffff80296262>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x179/0x219
[<ffffffff8046013c>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x30
[<ffffffff8025ce77>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10b/0x12f
[<ffffffff80297937>] ? shrink_list+0x2a1/0x5b6
[<ffffffff80460180>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47
[<ffffffff80297ed7>] ? shrink_zone+0x28b/0x335
[<ffffffff8033a0d4>] ? __up_read+0x92/0x9a
[<ffffffff802980c3>] ? shrink_slab+0x142/0x154
[<ffffffff80298837>] ? kswapd+0x4b1/0x692
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff802960e9>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x219
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff80298386>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x692
[<ffffffff80298386>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x692
[<ffffffff8024ec21>] ? kthread+0x56/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb7a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff8020c57c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff8024ebcb>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb70>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 89
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 51
Active_anon:151575 active_file:114269 inactive_anon:47211
inactive_file:340887 unevictable:8 dirty:36 writeback:0 unstable:2
free:5246 slab:76536 mapped:19364 pagetables:4251 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:18880kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:606300kB inactive_anon:188844kB active_file:457076kB
inactive_file:1363548kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:69 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 4459*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 18852kB
456290 total pagecache pages
966 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4587, delete 3621, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091636kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
371535 pages shared
456983 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 8867, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b4d1f>] ? unfreeze_slab+0x4c/0xbd
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff802b7e60>] __kmalloc+0x119/0x194
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff80460180>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47
[<ffffffffa02913d6>] ieee80211_skb_resize+0x91/0xc7 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa0291815>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x409/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa029162b>] ? ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x21f/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff803e7790>] ? __kfree_skb+0x82/0x86
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b40a2>] ? get_partial_node+0x1b/0x8a
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff803e33a8>] ? release_sock+0xcd/0xd6
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff803e3497>] ? lock_sock_nested+0xe6/0xf5
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] ? kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c583>] xs_sendpages+0x18a/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bf9c3>] ? nfs3_xdr_writeargs+0x0/0x87 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bb774>] nfs_write_rpcsetup+0x215/0x237 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd257>] nfs_flush_one+0xa2/0xd9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b82d9>] nfs_pageio_doio+0x32/0x5b [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b83ec>] nfs_pageio_complete+0x9/0xb [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bbeae>] nfs_writepages+0x101/0x13a [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd1b5>] ? nfs_flush_one+0x0/0xd9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd043>] nfs_write_mapping+0x63/0x9e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd0a7>] nfs_wb_all+0x12/0x14 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b0145>] nfs_file_flush+0x8a/0xb1 [nfs]
[<ffffffff802bb18d>] filp_close+0x40/0x63
[<ffffffff802bb255>] sys_close+0xa5/0xe4
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 89
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 51
Active_anon:151575 active_file:114269 inactive_anon:47211
inactive_file:340887 unevictable:8 dirty:36 writeback:0 unstable:2
free:5246 slab:76536 mapped:19364 pagetables:4251 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:18880kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:606300kB inactive_anon:188844kB active_file:457076kB
inactive_file:1363548kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:69 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 4459*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 18852kB
456290 total pagecache pages
966 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4587, delete 3621, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091636kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
371535 pages shared
456983 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
kswapd0: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 229, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa01aaee5>] ? ssb_pci_read32+0x46/0x54 [ssb]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff80243f1f>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x259/0x268
[<ffffffff80243dfc>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x268
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff8023f988>] irq_exit+0x4e/0x88
[<ffffffff8020de2d>] do_IRQ+0xac/0xc3
[<ffffffff8020c4d3>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf
<EOI> [<ffffffff8046013e>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x30
[<ffffffff80296a35>] ? __remove_mapping+0xac/0xc6
[<ffffffff802971b3>] ? shrink_page_list+0x558/0x69f
[<ffffffff80296262>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x179/0x219
[<ffffffff8046013c>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x30
[<ffffffff8025ce77>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10b/0x12f
[<ffffffff80297937>] ? shrink_list+0x2a1/0x5b6
[<ffffffff80460180>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47
[<ffffffff80297ed7>] ? shrink_zone+0x28b/0x335
[<ffffffff8033a0d4>] ? __up_read+0x92/0x9a
[<ffffffff802980c3>] ? shrink_slab+0x142/0x154
[<ffffffff80298837>] ? kswapd+0x4b1/0x692
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff802960e9>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x219
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff80298386>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x692
[<ffffffff80298386>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x692
[<ffffffff8024ec21>] ? kthread+0x56/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb7a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff8020c57c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff8024ebcb>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb70>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 89
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 51
Active_anon:151575 active_file:114269 inactive_anon:47211
inactive_file:340887 unevictable:8 dirty:36 writeback:0 unstable:2
free:5246 slab:76536 mapped:19364 pagetables:4251 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:18880kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:606300kB inactive_anon:188844kB active_file:457076kB
inactive_file:1363548kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:69 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 4459*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 18852kB
456290 total pagecache pages
966 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4587, delete 3621, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091636kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
371535 pages shared
456983 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 8867, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff802b7e60>] __kmalloc+0x119/0x194
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff80460180>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47
[<ffffffffa02913d6>] ieee80211_skb_resize+0x91/0xc7 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa0291815>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x409/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa029162b>] ? ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x21f/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff803e7790>] ? __kfree_skb+0x82/0x86
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803ed179>] net_tx_action+0xd9/0x156
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
<EOI> [<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff8023fc57>] local_bh_enable+0xb5/0xcf
[<ffffffff803efc0e>] dev_queue_xmit+0x352/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff802b40a2>] ? get_partial_node+0x1b/0x8a
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff803e33a8>] ? release_sock+0xcd/0xd6
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff803e3497>] ? lock_sock_nested+0xe6/0xf5
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] ? kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c583>] xs_sendpages+0x18a/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bf9c3>] ? nfs3_xdr_writeargs+0x0/0x87 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bb774>] nfs_write_rpcsetup+0x215/0x237 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd257>] nfs_flush_one+0xa2/0xd9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b82d9>] nfs_pageio_doio+0x32/0x5b [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b83ec>] nfs_pageio_complete+0x9/0xb [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bbeae>] nfs_writepages+0x101/0x13a [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd1b5>] ? nfs_flush_one+0x0/0xd9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd043>] nfs_write_mapping+0x63/0x9e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd0a7>] nfs_wb_all+0x12/0x14 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b0145>] nfs_file_flush+0x8a/0xb1 [nfs]
[<ffffffff802bb18d>] filp_close+0x40/0x63
[<ffffffff802bb255>] sys_close+0xa5/0xe4
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 89
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 51
Active_anon:151575 active_file:114269 inactive_anon:47211
inactive_file:340887 unevictable:8 dirty:36 writeback:0 unstable:2
free:5246 slab:76536 mapped:19364 pagetables:4251 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:18880kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:606300kB inactive_anon:188844kB active_file:457076kB
inactive_file:1363548kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:69 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 4459*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 18852kB
456290 total pagecache pages
966 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4587, delete 3621, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091636kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
371535 pages shared
456983 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
kswapd0: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 229, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff802b78f5>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xbd/0x144
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] ? setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffff803e872d>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffffa02d131d>] setup_rx_descbuffer+0x4b/0x2d7 [b43]
[<ffffffffa01aaee5>] ? ssb_pci_read32+0x46/0x54 [ssb]
[<ffffffffa02d192e>] b43_dma_rx+0x319/0x4ff [b43]
[<ffffffffa02c55d3>] b43_interrupt_tasklet+0x699/0x7fe [b43]
[<ffffffff80243f1f>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x259/0x268
[<ffffffff80243dfc>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x268
[<ffffffff8023f684>] ? tasklet_action+0x44/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023f6c0>] tasklet_action+0x80/0xdb
[<ffffffff8023fdc7>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x186
[<ffffffff8020cc7c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffffff8020e54d>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a
[<ffffffff8023f988>] irq_exit+0x4e/0x88
[<ffffffff8020de2d>] do_IRQ+0xac/0xc3
[<ffffffff8020c4d3>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf
<EOI> [<ffffffff8046013e>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x30
[<ffffffff80296a35>] ? __remove_mapping+0xac/0xc6
[<ffffffff802971b3>] ? shrink_page_list+0x558/0x69f
[<ffffffff80296262>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x179/0x219
[<ffffffff8046013c>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x30
[<ffffffff8025ce77>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10b/0x12f
[<ffffffff80297937>] ? shrink_list+0x2a1/0x5b6
[<ffffffff80460180>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47
[<ffffffff80297ed7>] ? shrink_zone+0x28b/0x335
[<ffffffff8033a0d4>] ? __up_read+0x92/0x9a
[<ffffffff802980c3>] ? shrink_slab+0x142/0x154
[<ffffffff80298837>] ? kswapd+0x4b1/0x692
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff802960e9>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x219
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff80298386>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x692
[<ffffffff80298386>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x692
[<ffffffff8024ec21>] ? kthread+0x56/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb7a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff8020c57c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff8024ebcb>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
[<ffffffff8020cb70>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 89
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 51
Active_anon:151575 active_file:114269 inactive_anon:47211
inactive_file:340887 unevictable:8 dirty:36 writeback:0 unstable:2
free:5246 slab:76536 mapped:19364 pagetables:4251 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:18880kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:606300kB inactive_anon:188844kB active_file:457076kB
inactive_file:1363548kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:69 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 4459*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 18852kB
456290 total pagecache pages
966 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4587, delete 3621, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091636kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
371535 pages shared
456983 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
protocol 0008 is buggy, dev eth1
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
protocol 0008 is buggy, dev eth1
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
protocol 0008 is buggy, dev eth1
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
protocol 0008 is buggy, dev eth1
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
protocol 0008 is buggy, dev eth1
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
protocol 0008 is buggy, dev eth1
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
protocol 0008 is buggy, dev eth1
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
protocol 0008 is buggy, dev eth1
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
protocol 0008 is buggy, dev eth1
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
protocol 0008 is buggy, dev eth1
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
371535 pages shared
456983 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 96, objs: 672, free: 0
b43-phy0 debug: DMA RX: setup_rx_descbuffer() failed
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
__ratelimit: 73 callbacks suppressed
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 9042, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b4d1f>] ? unfreeze_slab+0x4c/0xbd
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff802b7e60>] __kmalloc+0x119/0x194
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff80460180>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47
[<ffffffffa02913d6>] ieee80211_skb_resize+0x91/0xc7 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa0291815>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x409/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa029162b>] ? ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x21f/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff803e7790>] ? __kfree_skb+0x82/0x86
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff802b40a2>] ? get_partial_node+0x1b/0x8a
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 13
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 173
Active_anon:163559 active_file:111927 inactive_anon:47119
inactive_file:334673 unevictable:8 dirty:23 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:2704 slab:75670 mapped:19336 pagetables:4281 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:8712kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:654236kB inactive_anon:188476kB active_file:447708kB
inactive_file:1338692kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 1910*4kB 6*8kB 6*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 8744kB
447641 total pagecache pages
962 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4651, delete 3689, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091380kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
365043 pages shared
466540 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 97, objs: 679, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 10081, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b4d1f>] ? unfreeze_slab+0x4c/0xbd
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff802b7e60>] __kmalloc+0x119/0x194
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffffa02913d6>] ieee80211_skb_resize+0x91/0xc7 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa0291c0f>] ieee80211_master_start_xmit+0x298/0x319 [mac80211]
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffffa0291957>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x54b/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa029162b>] ? ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x21f/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff803e7790>] ? __kfree_skb+0x82/0x86
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
[<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
[<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
[<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
[<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
[<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
[<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
[<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
[<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
[<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
[<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
[<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
[<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
[<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 60
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 132
Active_anon:162603 active_file:111766 inactive_anon:47119
inactive_file:332454 unevictable:8 dirty:11 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:6493 slab:75317 mapped:19281 pagetables:4242 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:23868kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:650412kB inactive_anon:188476kB active_file:447064kB
inactive_file:1329816kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:154 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 5688*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 23768kB
445272 total pagecache pages
946 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4659, delete 3713, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091348kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
357698 pages shared
466721 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
Pid: 10064, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
[<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
[<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
[<ffffffff802b4d1f>] ? unfreeze_slab+0x4c/0xbd
[<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff802b7e60>] __kmalloc+0x119/0x194
[<ffffffff803e7bee>] pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
[<ffffffff80460180>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47
[<ffffffffa02913d6>] ieee80211_skb_resize+0x91/0xc7 [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa0291815>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x409/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffffa029162b>] ? ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x21f/0x56b [mac80211]
[<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff803e7790>] ? __kfree_skb+0x82/0x86
[<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
[<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
[<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
[<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
[<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
[<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
[<ffffffff803e33a8>] ? release_sock+0xcd/0xd6
[<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
[<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
[<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
[<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
[<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
[<ffffffff80422e9d>] tcp_push_one+0x2f/0x31
[<ffffffff80417439>] tcp_sendmsg+0x7a1/0x9fe
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff803e0f6e>] ? sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
[<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
[<ffffffff803e39b3>] sock_no_sendpage+0x9b/0xaa
[<ffffffff804176de>] tcp_sendpage+0x48/0x5ec
[<ffffffffa054c525>] xs_sendpages+0x12c/0x1af [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bf9c3>] ? nfs3_xdr_writeargs+0x0/0x87 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa05bb774>] nfs_write_rpcsetup+0x215/0x237 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd257>] nfs_flush_one+0xa2/0xd9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b82d9>] nfs_pageio_doio+0x32/0x5b [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b83ec>] nfs_pageio_complete+0x9/0xb [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bbeae>] nfs_writepages+0x101/0x13a [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd1b5>] ? nfs_flush_one+0x0/0xd9 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd043>] nfs_write_mapping+0x63/0x9e [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05bd0a7>] nfs_wb_all+0x12/0x14 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa05b0145>] nfs_file_flush+0x8a/0xb1 [nfs]
[<ffffffff802bb18d>] filp_close+0x40/0x63
[<ffffffff802bb255>] sys_close+0xa5/0xe4
[<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Mem-Info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 42
CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 207
Active_anon:165674 active_file:111453 inactive_anon:47087
inactive_file:331621 unevictable:8 dirty:11 writeback:0 unstable:0
free:4632 slab:75221 mapped:19318 pagetables:4242 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
Node 0 DMA32 free:16424kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
active_anon:662696kB inactive_anon:188348kB active_file:445812kB
inactive_file:1326484kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
Node 0 DMA32: 3831*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 16340kB
444199 total pagecache pages
962 pages in swap cache
Swap cache stats: add 4683, delete 3721, find 2934/3084
Free swap = 2091252kB
Total swap = 2104444kB
769872 pages RAM
21377 pages reserved
358924 pages shared
469842 pages non-shared
SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
order: 3, min order: 1
node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 2
phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
If you need the rest of the dmesg output, or anything else, please let
me know.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-10 14:41 ` Larry Finger
@ 2009-06-10 15:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 15:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 14:41 ` Christoph Lameter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-10 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: David Rientjes, Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin, yanmin.zhang, akpm
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 09:41 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> With the above patch installed, I pushed my system hard enough to get
> the O(1) allocation failures. This time they were triggered with a
> 'make -j8' on the kernel. No, I don't have that many CPUs, but I
> figured that the extra make jobs might stress memory. My kernel is
> 2.6.30-rc8 from the wireless-testing tree. Everything matches Linus's
> tree except drivers/net/wireless/, which contains what is essentially
> 2.6.31 code.
>
> The dmesg output starting with the first allocation failure is:
>
> cc1: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
> Pid: 6577, comm: cc1 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc8-wl #164
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff80292a7b>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x43d/0x45e
> [<ffffffff802b1f1f>] alloc_pages_current+0xbe/0xc6
> [<ffffffff802b6362>] new_slab+0xcf/0x28b
> [<ffffffff802b4d1f>] ? unfreeze_slab+0x4c/0xbd
> [<ffffffff802b672e>] __slab_alloc+0x210/0x44c
> [<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
> [<ffffffff803e7bee>] ? pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
> [<ffffffff802b7e60>] __kmalloc+0x119/0x194
> [<ffffffff803e7bee>] pskb_expand_head+0x52/0x166
> [<ffffffffa02913d6>] ieee80211_skb_resize+0x91/0xc7 [mac80211]
> [<ffffffffa0291c0f>] ieee80211_master_start_xmit+0x298/0x319 [mac80211]
> [<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
> [<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
> [<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
> [<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
> [<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
> [<ffffffffa0291957>] ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x54b/0x56b [mac80211]
> [<ffffffffa029162b>] ? ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x21f/0x56b [mac80211]
> [<ffffffff8025cea8>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
> [<ffffffff803e7790>] ? __kfree_skb+0x82/0x86
> [<ffffffff803ef72a>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x229/0x2a8
> [<ffffffff803ef55c>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x5b/0x2a8
> [<ffffffff804005ee>] __qdisc_run+0xed/0x1fe
> [<ffffffff803efb08>] dev_queue_xmit+0x24c/0x384
> [<ffffffff803efa2f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x173/0x384
> [<ffffffff8040fec9>] ip_finish_output+0x217/0x25c
> [<ffffffff802b4038>] ? add_partial+0x1a/0x69
> [<ffffffff8040ffaa>] ip_output+0x9c/0xa1
> [<ffffffff8040f093>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x24
> [<ffffffff8040f900>] ip_queue_xmit+0x2e0/0x337
> [<ffffffff8042087e>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5f7/0x63a
> [<ffffffff802b790b>] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xd3/0x144
> [<ffffffff80422d89>] tcp_write_xmit+0x83f/0x924
> [<ffffffff803e872d>] ? __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x143
> [<ffffffff80422ec9>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2a/0x81
> [<ffffffff80417590>] tcp_sendmsg+0x8f8/0x9fe
> [<ffffffff803e0f6e>] sock_sendmsg+0xdf/0xf8
> [<ffffffff8024efec>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
> [<ffffffff8023695c>] ? finish_task_switch+0x3b/0xdc
> [<ffffffff803e11f7>] kernel_sendmsg+0x34/0x49
> [<ffffffffa054c3f0>] xs_send_kvec+0x7a/0x83 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa054c486>] xs_sendpages+0x8d/0x1af [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa054c6b1>] xs_tcp_send_request+0x52/0x149 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa054b470>] xprt_transmit+0x178/0x234 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa05bfc11>] ? nfs3_xdr_fhandle+0x0/0x2e [nfs]
> [<ffffffffa0548d02>] call_transmit+0x20e/0x250 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa054f8a7>] __rpc_execute+0x86/0x244 [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa054fa8d>] rpc_execute+0x28/0x2c [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa054963c>] rpc_run_task+0x56/0x5e [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa054972f>] rpc_call_sync+0x3f/0x5d [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffffa05bdcd0>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper+0x22/0x5c [nfs]
> [<ffffffffa05be40c>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x5b/0x81 [nfs]
> [<ffffffffa05b1e22>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xbd/0x1c9 [nfs]
> [<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
> [<ffffffffa05d0529>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x79/0x82 [nfs]
> [<ffffffffa05d04b0>] ? nfs_have_delegation+0x0/0x82 [nfs]
> [<ffffffffa05acb60>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x265/0x49c [nfs]
> [<ffffffff802ccfa9>] ? __d_lookup+0xba/0x16a
> [<ffffffff802cd047>] ? __d_lookup+0x158/0x16a
> [<ffffffff802cceef>] ? __d_lookup+0x0/0x16a
> [<ffffffffa0550992>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x77/0x9f [sunrpc]
> [<ffffffff802c49c6>] do_lookup+0x166/0x1bb
> [<ffffffff802c66b7>] __link_path_walk+0x8f8/0xd58
> [<ffffffff802c6d1d>] path_walk+0x69/0xd4
> [<ffffffff802c6fb6>] do_path_lookup+0x187/0x1df
> [<ffffffff802bdf80>] ? get_empty_filp+0xe9/0x14e
> [<ffffffff802c7c4b>] do_filp_open+0x105/0x909
> [<ffffffff802d0bb6>] ? alloc_fd+0x11d/0x12e
> [<ffffffff802bb2ea>] do_sys_open+0x56/0xd6
> [<ffffffff802bb393>] sys_open+0x1b/0x1d
> [<ffffffff8020baab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> Mem-Info:
> Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
> CPU 0: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
> CPU 1: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
> Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
> CPU 0: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 15
> CPU 1: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 65
> Active_anon:128724 active_file:123018 inactive_anon:47276
> inactive_file:355583 unevictable:8 dirty:18 writeback:0 unstable:0
> free:3621 slab:77881 mapped:18629 pagetables:4056 bounce:0
> Node 0 DMA free:2104kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active_anon:0kB
> inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB
> present:15220kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
> lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2927 2927 2927
> Node 0 DMA32 free:12380kB min:6904kB low:8628kB high:10356kB
> active_anon:514896kB inactive_anon:189104kB active_file:492072kB
> inactive_file:1422332kB unevictable:32kB present:2997292kB
> pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
> lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
> Node 0 DMA: 4*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB
> 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2104kB
> Node 0 DMA32: 2821*4kB 1*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB
> 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 12332kB
> 479694 total pagecache pages
> 969 pages in swap cache
> Swap cache stats: add 4523, delete 3554, find 2913/3063
> Free swap = 2091884kB
> Total swap = 2104444kB
> 769872 pages RAM
> 21377 pages reserved
> 382252 pages shared
> 441407 pages non-shared
> SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=20)
> cache: kmalloc-4096, object size: 4096, buffer size: 4168, default
> order: 3, min order: 1
> node 0: slabs: 95, objs: 665, free: 0
> phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
Aha, SLUB thinks the minimum order for 4096 is 1. I guess you have
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG enabled? If yes, something like to following should
help. Christoph, are you okay with this patch?
Pekka
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 65ffda5..2c93c30 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2334,6 +2334,8 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order)
}
+#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
+
static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
const char *name, size_t size,
size_t align, unsigned long flags,
@@ -2346,6 +2348,9 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
s->align = align;
s->flags = kmem_cache_flags(size, flags, name, ctor);
+ if ((size + MAX_DEBUG_SIZE) >= PAGE_SIZE)
+ flags &= ~(SLAB_POISON|SLAB_RED_ZONE|SLAB_STORE_USER);
+
if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1))
goto error;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-10 15:44 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-10 15:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 15:52 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-10 16:10 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-11 14:41 ` Christoph Lameter
1 sibling, 2 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-10 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: David Rientjes, Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM,
yanmin.zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:44 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Aha, SLUB thinks the minimum order for 4096 is 1. I guess you have
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG enabled? If yes, something like to following should
> help. Christoph, are you okay with this patch?
>
> Pekka
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 65ffda5..2c93c30 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2334,6 +2334,8 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order)
>
> }
>
> +#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
> +
> static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
> const char *name, size_t size,
> size_t align, unsigned long flags,
> @@ -2346,6 +2348,9 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
> s->align = align;
> s->flags = kmem_cache_flags(size, flags, name, ctor);
>
> + if ((size + MAX_DEBUG_SIZE) >= PAGE_SIZE)
> + flags &= ~(SLAB_POISON|SLAB_RED_ZONE|SLAB_STORE_USER);
> +
> if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1))
> goto error;
>
>
Argh, that patch has a typo. Please try this one instead.
Pekka
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 65ffda5..cb0473c 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2334,6 +2334,8 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order)
}
+#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
+
static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
const char *name, size_t size,
size_t align, unsigned long flags,
@@ -2346,6 +2348,9 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
s->align = align;
s->flags = kmem_cache_flags(size, flags, name, ctor);
+ if ((size + MAX_DEBUG_SIZE) >= PAGE_SIZE)
+ s->flags &= ~(SLAB_POISON|SLAB_RED_ZONE|SLAB_STORE_USER);
+
if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1))
goto error;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-10 15:49 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-10 15:52 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1244649174.6165.0.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-10 16:10 ` Larry Finger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-06-10 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Larry Finger, David Rientjes, Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM,
yanmin.zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 591 bytes --]
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:49 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:44 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> > Aha, SLUB thinks the minimum order for 4096 is 1. I guess you have
> > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG enabled? If yes, something like to following should
> > help. Christoph, are you okay with this patch?
> + if ((size + MAX_DEBUG_SIZE) >= PAGE_SIZE)
&& size <= PAGE_SIZE
? Or is this a path that only happens for small allocations?
> + s->flags &= ~(SLAB_POISON|SLAB_RED_ZONE|SLAB_STORE_USER);
> +
> if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1))
> goto error;
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-09 7:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-09 7:54 ` David Rientjes
@ 2009-06-10 15:56 ` Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20090610155626.GA7951-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2009-06-10 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 10:06:41AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 15:12 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > > index 65ffda5..b5acf18 100644
> > > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > > @@ -1565,6 +1565,8 @@ new_slab:
> > > c->page = new;
> > > goto load_freelist;
> > > }
> > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "SLUB: unable to satisfy allocation for cache %s (size=%d, node=%d, gfp=%x)\n",
> > > + s->name, s->size, node, gfpflags);
> >
> > size could be almost anything here for a casual reader. You are
> > outputting the size of the object plus its metadata so the name should
> > reflect that. I think it would be better to output objsize= and the
> > object size without the metadata overhead. What do you think?
> >
> > In addition, include how many objects there are per-slab and include what
> > the order is being passed to the page allocator when allocating new slabs.
> > Would that be enough to determine if fallback-to-smaller orders occured?
>
> So how about something like this then?
>
> Pekka
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 65ffda5..a03dbe8 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1484,6 +1484,58 @@ static inline int node_match(struct kmem_cache_cpu *c, int node)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static int count_free(struct page *page)
> +{
> + return page->objects - page->inuse;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long count_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
> + int (*get_count)(struct page *))
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned long x = 0;
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> + list_for_each_entry(page, &n->partial, lru)
> + x += get_count(page);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> + return x;
> +}
> +
> +static noinline void
> +slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
> +{
> + int node;
> +
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + "SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node %d (gfp=%x)\n",
> + nid, gfpflags);
> + printk(KERN_WARNING " cache: %s, object size: %d, buffer size: %d, "
> + "default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
> + s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
> +
Much nicer. There is a clear division between the object size and the
size including the metadata. There is also now a good idea of what sort
of request it was, we know what cache it was so we can guess the size
passed to kmalloc() with reasonable accuracy.
> + for_each_online_node(node) {
> + struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
> + unsigned long nr_partials;
> + unsigned long nr_slabs;
> + unsigned long nr_objs;
> + unsigned long nr_free;
> +
> + if (!n)
> + continue;
> +
> + nr_partials = n->nr_partial;
> + nr_slabs = atomic_long_read(&n->nr_slabs);
> + nr_objs = atomic_long_read(&n->total_objects);
> + nr_free = count_partial(n, count_free);
> +
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + " node %d: partials: %ld, slabs: %ld, objs: %ld, free: %ld\n",
> + node, nr_partials, nr_slabs, nr_objs, nr_free);
> + }
> +}
That looks like it would generate easier-to-debug-with messages and to
not-expert-at-slub eye, it looks correct. Slap a changelog on it with an
example message and go with it. It should make page allocation failures
messages that go through SLUB a lot easier to figure out.
Thanks
> +
> /*
> * Slow path. The lockless freelist is empty or we need to perform
> * debugging duties.
> @@ -1565,6 +1617,7 @@ new_slab:
> c->page = new;
> goto load_freelist;
> }
> + slab_out_of_memory(s, gfpflags, node);
> return NULL;
> debug:
> if (!alloc_debug_processing(s, c->page, object, addr))
> @@ -3318,20 +3371,6 @@ void *__kmalloc_node_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
> -static unsigned long count_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
> - int (*get_count)(struct page *))
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> - unsigned long x = 0;
> - struct page *page;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> - list_for_each_entry(page, &n->partial, lru)
> - x += get_count(page);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> - return x;
> -}
> -
> static int count_inuse(struct page *page)
> {
> return page->inuse;
> @@ -3342,11 +3381,6 @@ static int count_total(struct page *page)
> return page->objects;
> }
>
> -static int count_free(struct page *page)
> -{
> - return page->objects - page->inuse;
> -}
> -
> static int validate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
> unsigned long *map)
> {
>
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <1244649174.6165.0.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-10 16:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 16:16 ` Pekka Enberg
1 sibling, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-10 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Berg
Cc: Larry Finger, David Rientjes, Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM,
yanmin.zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 17:52 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:49 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:44 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >
> > > Aha, SLUB thinks the minimum order for 4096 is 1. I guess you have
> > > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG enabled? If yes, something like to following should
> > > help. Christoph, are you okay with this patch?
>
>
> > + if ((size + MAX_DEBUG_SIZE) >= PAGE_SIZE)
>
> && size <= PAGE_SIZE
>
> ? Or is this a path that only happens for small allocations?
Anything that's beyond PAGE_SIZE * 2 is passed straight to the page
allocator and the intent of this patch is to disable debugging for all
big caches like SLAB does.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-10 15:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 15:52 ` Johannes Berg
@ 2009-06-10 16:10 ` Larry Finger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-06-10 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: David Rientjes, Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM,
yanmin.zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Argh, that patch has a typo. Please try this one instead.
>
> Pekka
I installed this patch on top of the other one and have started
testing. It usually takes almost a day for it to occur.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <1244649174.6165.0.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-10 16:06 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-10 16:16 ` Pekka Enberg
1 sibling, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-10 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Berg
Cc: Larry Finger, David Rientjes, Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM,
yanmin.zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:49 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:44 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >
> > > Aha, SLUB thinks the minimum order for 4096 is 1. I guess you have
> > > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG enabled? If yes, something like to following should
> > > help. Christoph, are you okay with this patch?
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 17:52 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > + if ((size + MAX_DEBUG_SIZE) >= PAGE_SIZE)
>
> && size <= PAGE_SIZE
>
> ? Or is this a path that only happens for small allocations?
>
> > + s->flags &= ~(SLAB_POISON|SLAB_RED_ZONE|SLAB_STORE_USER);
> > +
> > if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1))
> > goto error;
Although something like this would probably be even nicer.
Pekka
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 65ffda5..a4206ef 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2334,6 +2334,16 @@ static int calculate_sizes(struct kmem_cache *s, int forced_order)
}
+#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
+
+static bool must_disable_debug(size_t size)
+{
+ /*
+ * Disable debugging if it increases the minimum page order.
+ */
+ return get_order(size + MAX_DEBUG_SIZE) > get_order(size);
+}
+
static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
const char *name, size_t size,
size_t align, unsigned long flags,
@@ -2346,6 +2356,9 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags,
s->align = align;
s->flags = kmem_cache_flags(size, flags, name, ctor);
+ if (must_disable_debug(size))
+ s->flags &= ~(SLAB_POISON|SLAB_RED_ZONE|SLAB_STORE_USER);
+
if (!calculate_sizes(s, -1))
goto error;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <20090610155626.GA7951-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-10 18:03 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-10 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman
Cc: Rik van Riel, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
Christoph Lameter, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Mel Gorman<mel-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> That looks like it would generate easier-to-debug-with messages and to
> not-expert-at-slub eye, it looks correct. Slap a changelog on it with an
> example message and go with it. It should make page allocation failures
> messages that go through SLUB a lot easier to figure out.
Thanks Mel! The patch is here and will be part of next slab pull
request to Linus:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=4bc6e7858da5ea4ecc3e47538f7fabed331cc21b
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-10 15:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 15:49 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-11 14:41 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906111040440.29827-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-06-11 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Larry Finger, David Rientjes, Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Johannes Berg, Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM, yanmin.zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA,
Andrew Morton
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Aha, SLUB thinks the minimum order for 4096 is 1. I guess you have
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG enabled? If yes, something like to following should
> help. Christoph, are you okay with this patch?
He likely has CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON set which enables debugging and thus
needs more than the payload for metadata.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906111040440.29827-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-11 15:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 18:41 ` Johannes Berg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-11 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Larry Finger, David Rientjes, Mel Gorman, Rik van Riel,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Johannes Berg, Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM, yanmin.zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Aha, SLUB thinks the minimum order for 4096 is 1. I guess you have
> > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG enabled? If yes, something like to following should
> > help. Christoph, are you okay with this patch?
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 10:41 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> He likely has CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON set which enables debugging and thus
> needs more than the payload for metadata.
Yup. I suspect a lot of people who are doing _testing_ enable that. If
you're unhappy with my patch (the get_order one which shouldn't affect
that many caches anyway), any suggestions how to fix this up? It seems
that the wireless stack at least does quite a few kmalloc(4096)
allocations.
We can probably switch back to page allocator pass-through in the near
future (when Mel's patches are in) but we need a fix for -stable.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-11 15:09 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-11 18:41 ` Johannes Berg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-06-11 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Christoph Lameter, Larry Finger, David Rientjes, Mel Gorman,
Rik van Riel, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM,
yanmin.zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 892 bytes --]
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 18:09 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > Aha, SLUB thinks the minimum order for 4096 is 1. I guess you have
> > > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG enabled? If yes, something like to following should
> > > help. Christoph, are you okay with this patch?
>
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 10:41 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > He likely has CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON set which enables debugging and thus
> > needs more than the payload for metadata.
>
> Yup. I suspect a lot of people who are doing _testing_ enable that. If
> you're unhappy with my patch (the get_order one which shouldn't affect
> that many caches anyway), any suggestions how to fix this up? It seems
> that the wireless stack at least does quite a few kmalloc(4096)
> allocations.
I think networking rounds up allocations, but it's not wireless per se.
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-29 0:26 2.6.31-rc1-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-06-29 0:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-29 16:51 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-06-29 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-29 0:30 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-06-29 16:51 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4A48F114.1010702-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-06-29 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
be corrected if I missed it.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <4A48F114.1010702-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-29 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-29 23:47 ` David Rientjes
1 sibling, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-06-29 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Monday 29 June 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>
> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
>
> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
> be corrected if I missed it.
Thanks for the update.
Hmm, isn't it suboptimal to use a slab allocator for allocations taking up an
entire page? That's the case on some architectures and seems to be the root
cause of the issue at hand.
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <4A48F114.1010702-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-29 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-06-29 23:47 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906291642520.17663-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-06-29 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Johannes Berg, Pekka Enberg, Christoph Lameter
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>
> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
>
> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
> be corrected if I missed it.
>
I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it. This particular
page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
the system has 4K pages. Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906291642520.17663-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-30 2:06 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-30 5:47 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-30 6:55 ` Pekka Enberg
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-06-30 2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Johannes Berg, Pekka Enberg, Christoph Lameter
David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
>
>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
>>> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
>>> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
>>> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
>>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
>>> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
>> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
>> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
>> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
>>
>> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
>> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
>> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
>> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
>> be corrected if I missed it.
>>
>
> I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
> oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it. This particular
> page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
> the system has 4K pages. Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
> its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
If the current behavior is not changed, I will be forced to disable
SLUB debugging, which will explicitly lead to errors that are
undiagnosed. It seems better to me to debug when you can, but turn off
debugging in cases like this.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-30 2:06 ` Larry Finger
@ 2009-06-30 5:47 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-06-30 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Johannes Berg, Pekka Enberg, Christoph Lameter
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> > I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
> > oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it. This particular
> > page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
> > the system has 4K pages. Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
> > its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
>
> If the current behavior is not changed, I will be forced to disable
> SLUB debugging, which will explicitly lead to errors that are
> undiagnosed.
You're buying debugging support at the cost of increased memory
consumption when you enable CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON and that's causing the
page allocation failures because of fragmentation. To reduce the minimum
order required for caches such as kmalloc-4096, you'd have to disable
debugging for that particular cache. It's my opinion that such a
configuration should not be the default, however.
You could argue adding `slub_debug=-,kmalloc-4096' support from the
command line, but CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON should not change its well-defined
purpose of enabling debugging on all slab caches. Otherwise the rest of
us would be forced to add `slub_debug=,kmalloc-4096' for consistent
behavior with older kernels.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906291642520.17663-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 2:06 ` Larry Finger
@ 2009-06-30 6:55 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020906292355o7cf63f7ch47bd19961cf92da3-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-30 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Christoph Lameter
Hi David,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
>
>> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
>> > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
>> > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
>> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (61 days old)
>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
>> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
>> > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> The cause of these failures has been determined. The wireless
>> subsystem frequently requests buffers of size 4096, but when SLUB
>> debugging is enabled and the debug info is added, the request becomes
>> of order 1 and memory becomes fragmented.
>>
>> A controversial "fix" in which SLUB debugging was disabled for
>> allocations where adding such debugging info would increase the order
>> was discussed and tried. With a quick look at the commit list for
>> Linus's tree, I don't see that such a patch is available, but I will
>> be corrected if I missed it.
>>
>
> I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
> oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it. This particular
> page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
> the system has 4K pages. Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
> its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging
causes problems in the real world. Furthermore, SLUB never supported
debugging for objects that big historically because of page allocator
passthrough. And with Mel Gorman's page allocator optimizations, we
might be going back to that.
So we should fix SLUB debugging as outlined by Mel Gorman and
Christoph Lameter. I simply haven't had the time to do it. Patches are
welcome!
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <84144f020906292355o7cf63f7ch47bd19961cf92da3-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-30 7:47 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906300032310.11018-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 14:32 ` Christoph Lameter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-06-30 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Christoph Lameter
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2316 bytes --]
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
> > oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it. This particular
> > page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
> > the system has 4K pages. Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
> > its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
>
> Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging
> causes problems in the real world.
I don't think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is generally the configuration used in
the real world.
The option has a clear and well-defined purpose and that is to enable
debugging on all slab caches. If you modify its definition, users will
generally ignore the warning about debugging being disabled when "the
minimum possible order at which slab may be allocated is higher than
without." And unless they check the kernel log for such a warning to boot
with `slab_debug=,kmalloc-4096', we lose testing coverage because we
cannot enable redzoning or tracing after boot.
> Furthermore, SLUB never supported
> debugging for objects that big historically because of page allocator
> passthrough. And with Mel Gorman's page allocator optimizations, we
> might be going back to that.
>
Even when page allocation is fast enough, it would still be helpful to
configure slub to not do passthrough purely for the lightweight debugging
opportunities.
> So we should fix SLUB debugging as outlined by Mel Gorman and
> Christoph Lameter. I simply haven't had the time to do it. Patches are
> welcome!
>
You're referring to `slub_debug=A'? I think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON should
continue to enable debugging on all slab caches and in instances where it
causes page allocation failures such in Larry's case because
oo_order(s->min) with debugging on is greater than oo_order(s->min) with
debugging off, you can emit a friendly warning in your recently added
slab_out_of_memory() about using `slab_debug=-,<cache>'.
We have a disagreement about which is the default behavior, but I would
opt on the side of adding exemptions to a debug configuration option as
opposed to requiring additional command line parameters to be fully
enabled.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906300032310.11018-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-30 8:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-30 14:38 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <84144f020906300124n24e206b5tc85dd5cc4661bde7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-30 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Christoph Lameter
Hi David,
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> > I'd disagree with disabling slub debugging by default for caches where
>> > oo_order(s->min) increases as the result of using it. This particular
>> > page allocation failure is happening for, presumably, kmalloc-4096, and
>> > the system has 4K pages. Disabling debugging for that cache (and any of
>> > its aliases) implicitly will lead to errors going undiagnosed as a result.
>>
>> Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging
>> causes problems in the real world.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I don't think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is generally the configuration used in
> the real world.
It is, hence the epic bug report that's eaten too many man hours
already! Look, we encourage _testers_ to turn all as much as debugging
options as possible so we catch bugs early. That why the only sane
defaults are the ones that don't cause other problems!
I don't know why you want to argue this. It's simply not an option to
say "stupid user, fix your config" in core code like the slab
allocator. Enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is a very reasonable thing to
do when you are a tester looking for bugs.
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> So we should fix SLUB debugging as outlined by Mel Gorman and
>> Christoph Lameter. I simply haven't had the time to do it. Patches are
>> welcome!
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> You're referring to `slub_debug=A'? I think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON should
> continue to enable debugging on all slab caches and in instances where it
> causes page allocation failures such in Larry's case because
> oo_order(s->min) with debugging on is greater than oo_order(s->min) with
> debugging off, you can emit a friendly warning in your recently added
> slab_out_of_memory() about using `slab_debug=-,<cache>'.
>
> We have a disagreement about which is the default behavior, but I would
> opt on the side of adding exemptions to a debug configuration option as
> opposed to requiring additional command line parameters to be fully
> enabled.
Yup, I was referring to slub_debug=A and no, I don't agree with you
that it should be on by default. Only people who know what they're
doing should enable the option and a random tester by definition
doesn't (no offence to Mr. Random Tester).
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <84144f020906292355o7cf63f7ch47bd19961cf92da3-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 7:47 ` David Rientjes
@ 2009-06-30 14:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-30 15:01 ` Pekka Enberg
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-06-30 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: David Rientjes, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Well, I obviously don't agree here because kmalloc-4096 debugging causes
> problems in the real world. Furthermore, SLUB never supported debugging
> for objects that big historically because of page allocator passthrough.
> And with Mel Gorman's page allocator optimizations, we might be going
> back to that.
SLUB for some period of time had passthrough. It did not start out like
that though.
kmalloc-4096 causes problems in the long run and so do other caches that
are of similar size. But it allows debugging to occur. Silently switching
it off is something I am not comfortable with.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-30 8:24 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-30 14:38 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <84144f020906300124n24e206b5tc85dd5cc4661bde7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-06-30 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: David Rientjes, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Christoph Lameter
Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> Yup, I was referring to slub_debug=A and no, I don't agree with you
> that it should be on by default. Only people who know what they're
> doing should enable the option and a random tester by definition
> doesn't (no offence to Mr. Random Tester).
None taken.
For me, the next step is clear. As I'm much more interested in finding
bugs in the wireless system than in the mechanics of SLUB allocation,
I need to disable CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON. BTW, I use SLAB on Linus's
mainline tree and SLUB on the wireless testing tree. I build and boot
the mainline kernels mostly to look for quick failures/regressions,
but run the w-t kernels looking for longer-term effects such as memory
fragmentation or slow memory leaks.
For Rafael's benefit, we do need to decide if this is a bug or merely
an unintended side effect. My sense is the latter and Bug #13319
should have a summary of this discussion added to the record, and then
the bug should be closed.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-30 14:32 ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2009-06-30 15:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-30 15:14 ` Christoph Lameter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-06-30 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: David Rientjes, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:32 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> kmalloc-4096 causes problems in the long run and so do other caches that
> are of similar size. But it allows debugging to occur. Silently switching
> it off is something I am not comfortable with.
I suggested adding a
printk(KERN_INFO ": debugging disabled for %s. Use slub_debug=a to "
"enable it blah blah blah\n");
Does that work for you?
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-30 15:01 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2009-06-30 15:14 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906301114450.3879-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-06-30 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: David Rientjes, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> printk(KERN_INFO ": debugging disabled for %s. Use slub_debug=a to "
> "enable it blah blah blah\n");
>
> Does that work for you?
Its definitely better.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906301114450.3879-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-30 20:04 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906301248000.16312-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-06-30 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > printk(KERN_INFO ": debugging disabled for %s. Use slub_debug=a to "
> > "enable it blah blah blah\n");
> >
> > Does that work for you?
>
> Its definitely better.
>
I don't see how that's different from enabling debugging on all caches
like CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG_ON currently does and then warning at the time of
slab allocation failure that it may be the result of the debugging
metadata so the user can subsequently prevent it. In other words, if we
use MAX_DEBUG_SIZE as Pekka originally implemented as
(3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track)), do this:
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -142,6 +142,11 @@
SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
/*
+ * The maximum amount of metadata added to a slab when debugging is enabled.
+ */
+#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
+
+/*
* Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
*/
#define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
@@ -1561,6 +1566,21 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
"default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
+ if (s->flags & (SLAB_POISON | SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER)) {
+ int min_order;
+
+ /*
+ * Debugging is enabled, which may increase oo_order(s->min), so
+ * warn the user that allocation failures may be avoided if
+ * debugging is enabled for this cache.
+ */
+ min_order = get_order(s->size - MAX_DEBUG_SIZE);
+ if (min_order < oo_order(s->min))
+ printk(KERN_WARNING " %s debugging increased min order "
+ "from %d to %d, use slab_debug=-,%s to disable.",
+ s->name, min_order, oo_order(s->min), s->name);
+ }
+
for_each_online_node(node) {
struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
unsigned long nr_slabs;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <84144f020906300124n24e206b5tc85dd5cc4661bde7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-30 20:25 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-06-30 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Christoph Lameter
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > I don't think CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is generally the configuration used in
> > the real world.
>
> It is, hence the epic bug report that's eaten too many man hours
> already! Look, we encourage _testers_ to turn all as much as debugging
> options as possible so we catch bugs early. That why the only sane
> defaults are the ones that don't cause other problems!
>
I feel that asking a user to add a command line parameter such as
`slub_debug=A' in addition to CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON will likely lead to
less testing coverage and bugs going unreported. CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is
not something that a distro is going to enable or would be used in a
production environment, it's something that's used to debug slub and/or
slab allocations either during the development of new kernel code or when
an underlying problem is realized.
> I don't know why you want to argue this. It's simply not an option to
> say "stupid user, fix your config" in core code like the slab
> allocator. Enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is a very reasonable thing to
> do when you are a tester looking for bugs.
>
Quite the contrary, I agree completely with the above, and that's why I'm
arguing for full debugging to be enabled when a well-defined configuration
option is enabled. I simply don't believe that such debugging should be
coupled with a command line option to be fully activated for all caches.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906301248000.16312-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-30 21:05 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906301632570.22158-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-06-30 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> I don't see how that's different from enabling debugging on all caches
> like CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG_ON currently does and then warning at the time of
> slab allocation failure that it may be the result of the debugging
> metadata so the user can subsequently prevent it. In other words, if we
> use MAX_DEBUG_SIZE as Pekka originally implemented as
> (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track)), do this:
I like it.
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,11 @@
> SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
>
> /*
> + * The maximum amount of metadata added to a slab when debugging is enabled.
> + */
> +#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
> +
> +/*
> * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
> */
> #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
> @@ -1561,6 +1566,21 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
> "default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
> s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
>
> + if (s->flags & (SLAB_POISON | SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER)) {
> + int min_order;
> +
> + /*
> + * Debugging is enabled, which may increase oo_order(s->min), so
> + * warn the user that allocation failures may be avoided if
> + * debugging is enabled for this cache.
> + */
> + min_order = get_order(s->size - MAX_DEBUG_SIZE);
> + if (min_order < oo_order(s->min))
> + printk(KERN_WARNING " %s debugging increased min order "
> + "from %d to %d, use slab_debug=-,%s to disable.",
> + s->name, min_order, oo_order(s->min), s->name);
It may be easier to check the order of the initial size vs. the order of
the size with all metadata
if (get_order(s->size) > get_order(s->objsize)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906301632570.22158-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-30 21:15 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906301413460.24397-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-06-30 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,11 @@
> > SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
> >
> > /*
> > + * The maximum amount of metadata added to a slab when debugging is enabled.
> > + */
> > +#define MAX_DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
> > +
> > +/*
> > * Set of flags that will prevent slab merging
> > */
> > #define SLUB_NEVER_MERGE (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER | \
> > @@ -1561,6 +1566,21 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
> > "default order: %d, min order: %d\n", s->name, s->objsize,
> > s->size, oo_order(s->oo), oo_order(s->min));
> >
> > + if (s->flags & (SLAB_POISON | SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER)) {
> > + int min_order;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Debugging is enabled, which may increase oo_order(s->min), so
> > + * warn the user that allocation failures may be avoided if
> > + * debugging is enabled for this cache.
> > + */
> > + min_order = get_order(s->size - MAX_DEBUG_SIZE);
> > + if (min_order < oo_order(s->min))
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING " %s debugging increased min order "
> > + "from %d to %d, use slab_debug=-,%s to disable.",
> > + s->name, min_order, oo_order(s->min), s->name);
>
> It may be easier to check the order of the initial size vs. the order of
> the size with all metadata
>
> if (get_order(s->size) > get_order(s->objsize)
>
Ah, right. Then we could simply eliminate the check on s->flags to begin
with.
This patch is supposing that `slab_debug=-,<cache>' actually disables all
debugging for <cache> which would need to be implemented first, but I
think this is a better alternative than requiring slab_debug=A for full
debugging after enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906301413460.24397-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-30 21:23 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906301722280.17682-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-06-30 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> This patch is supposing that `slab_debug=-,<cache>' actually disables all
> debugging for <cache> which would need to be implemented first, but I
> think this is a better alternative than requiring slab_debug=A for full
> debugging after enabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.
We could add an option that disables debugging for troublesome page
size slabs
slab_debug=p
or so
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906301722280.17682-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-30 21:52 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906301445070.26290-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-01 5:53 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 2 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-06-30 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> We could add an option that disables debugging for troublesome page
> size slabs
>
>
> slab_debug=p
>
> or so
>
I definitely like that more than slab_debug=A, where we're requiring an
added parameter for full debugging to be activated.
I'm curious whether there would ever be any use for disabling debugging on
specific caches for reasons other than higher minimum orders for metadata,
though, given that we already support things like slub_debug=FZ,cache,
which should only enable free debugging and redzoning even with
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON enabled for cache.
I think the solution to this is really based on good software engineering
and test practices, though, so hopefully there'll be a consensus on which
direction to take before any time is spent in implementing and pushing it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906301445070.26290-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-06-30 22:18 ` Christoph Lameter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-06-30 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> I'm curious whether there would ever be any use for disabling debugging on
> specific caches for reasons other than higher minimum orders for metadata,
> though, given that we already support things like slub_debug=FZ,cache,
> which should only enable free debugging and redzoning even with
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON enabled for cache.
One of the reasons for disabling debugging is to speed up the kernel. Race
conditions may vanish due to the additional latency added by the debugging
code. Ideally you know which slab cache has the race and you only would
enable it on that one.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-06-30 21:52 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906301445070.26290-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-01 5:53 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020906302253n2424d4a5k3aaf124838a041df-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-07-01 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Christoph Lameter, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
Hi David,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:52 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> I think the solution to this is really based on good software engineering
> and test practices, though, so hopefully there'll be a consensus on which
> direction to take before any time is spent in implementing and pushing it.
Lets go with the slab_out_of_memory() patch you outlined in a previous
post and implement the slub_debug=p thing Christoph suggested. I think
it's the best compromise at this point. When you guys finally see the
light, we can always change it to a reasonable default. ;)
So can you send a patch, please?
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <84144f020906302253n2424d4a5k3aaf124838a041df-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-02 17:18 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907021016380.30890-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-02 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Christoph Lameter, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Lets go with the slab_out_of_memory() patch you outlined in a previous
> post and implement the slub_debug=p thing Christoph suggested. I think
> it's the best compromise at this point. When you guys finally see the
> light, we can always change it to a reasonable default. ;)
>
> So can you send a patch, please?
>
Sure, let me know if you think this is -rc material; otherwise, the bug
will have to be deferred until 2.6.32 with the temporary workaround of
disabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907021016380.30890-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-03 7:23 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-07-03 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Christoph Lameter, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
Hi David,
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> Lets go with the slab_out_of_memory() patch you outlined in a previous
>> post and implement the slub_debug=p thing Christoph suggested. I think
>> it's the best compromise at this point. When you guys finally see the
>> light, we can always change it to a reasonable default. ;)
>>
>> So can you send a patch, please?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:18 PM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Sure, let me know if you think this is -rc material; otherwise, the bug
> will have to be deferred until 2.6.32 with the temporary workaround of
> disabling CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON.
We're at -rc2 so yes, I do think we should fix 2.6.31.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-07-06 23:57 2.6.31-rc2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-07 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 1:05 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (69 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-07 1:05 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4A529F60.7010509-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-07-07 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (69 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
I have not seen the fix yet, but one is being prepared. I think the
bug can be closed.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <4A529F60.7010509-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-07 6:29 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907062302540.10840-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-07 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Johannes Berg, Pekka Enberg
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> I have not seen the fix yet, but one is being prepared. I think the
> bug can be closed.
>
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34385 should fix your issue (try with
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON still enabled and slub_debug=O on the command line).
Pekka indicated he wanted this fixed in 2.6.31, so he'll probably push it
to Linus before the 2.6.31-rc3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907062302540.10840-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-07 6:57 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020907062357m6a75d2eav1589e7f8b4a3d887-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-07-07 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
Hi,
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
>> I have not seen the fix yet, but one is being prepared. I think the
>> bug can be closed.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/34385 should fix your issue (try with
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON still enabled and slub_debug=O on the command line).
>
> Pekka indicated he wanted this fixed in 2.6.31, so he'll probably push it
> to Linus before the 2.6.31-rc3.
Yup, if it's not too much trouble Larry, I'd appreciate if you gave it
a spin before I apply the sucker. Note to regression trackers, I don't
think this should go to -stable because it depends on other patches in
mainline and there's an obvious workaround for the problem (disable
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON). Furthermore, it's very unlikely people will hit
this on production configurations anyway.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <84144f020907062357m6a75d2eav1589e7f8b4a3d887-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-08 13:18 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-07-08 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: David Rientjes, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> Yup, if it's not too much trouble Larry, I'd appreciate if you gave it
> a spin before I apply the sucker. Note to regression trackers, I don't
> think this should go to -stable because it depends on other patches in
> mainline and there's an obvious workaround for the problem (disable
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON). Furthermore, it's very unlikely people will hit
> this on production configurations anyway.
Pekka,
I have been running the patch for ~24 hours with slub_debug=0 as a
boot option. So far, no problems. My workload has not involved as many
network operations as some times, but my memory has not fragmented.
The output of 'cat /proc/buddyinfo' is as follows:
Node 0, zone DMA 8 5 5 4 5 5 5
4 3 0 1
Node 0, zone DMA32 1804 1585 3007 36 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
As might be expected, the high-order fragments are gone, but the O(1)
pieces have not been depleted.
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-07-26 20:41 2.6.31-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-26 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 0:17 ` Larry Finger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-07-26 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-07-27 0:17 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4A6CF220.7080605-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2009-07-27 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
This bug was fixed by commit 781b2ba6eb5f22440afac9c79a89ebd6e3674a60
entitled "SLUB: Out-of-memory diagnostics" by Pekka Enberg
<penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org> and dated Wed Jun 10 18:50:32 2009 +0300.
The fault occurred because when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG was set, many of the
memory allocations for wireless buffers were increased from O(0) to
O(1) causing memory fragmentation, and eventually there were no
remaining O(1) fragments. This problem is unlikely to affect most
users as none of the distos turn on the above debug option.
This bug should be marked "closed with patch".
Larry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <4A6CF220.7080605-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-27 0:24 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907261722140.21259-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-27 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Larry Finger
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Johannes Berg, Pekka Enberg
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>
> This bug was fixed by commit 781b2ba6eb5f22440afac9c79a89ebd6e3674a60
> entitled "SLUB: Out-of-memory diagnostics" by Pekka Enberg
> <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org> and dated Wed Jun 10 18:50:32 2009 +0300.
>
Hmm, I'm remembering differently. I thought the root problem here has
only been fixed in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree with "slub: add option to
disable higher order debugging slabs" and isn't currently in Linus' tree.
> The fault occurred because when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG was set, many of the
> memory allocations for wireless buffers were increased from O(0) to
> O(1) causing memory fragmentation, and eventually there were no
> remaining O(1) fragments. This problem is unlikely to affect most
> users as none of the distos turn on the above debug option.
>
It only happens when CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is enabled for caches with
sizes that increase as the result of the added metadata.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907261722140.21259-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-27 7:08 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020907270008h2a985278of68e70ff1ee9265c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-07-27 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Christoph Lameter
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:24 AM, David Rientjes<rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Larry Finger wrote:
>
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>> >
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
>> > be listed and let me know (either way).
>> >
>> >
>> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
>> > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
>> > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
>> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (89 days old)
>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
>> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
>> > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> This bug was fixed by commit 781b2ba6eb5f22440afac9c79a89ebd6e3674a60
>> entitled "SLUB: Out-of-memory diagnostics" by Pekka Enberg
>> <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org> and dated Wed Jun 10 18:50:32 2009 +0300.
>>
>
> Hmm, I'm remembering differently. I thought the root problem here has
> only been fixed in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree with "slub: add option to
> disable higher order debugging slabs" and isn't currently in Linus' tree.
Yup, the fix is in slab.git and queued for 2.6.32. There was some
complaints from Christoph from the patch that need to be addressed
still.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <84144f020907270008h2a985278of68e70ff1ee9265c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-27 9:37 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907270227420.15760-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-27 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg, Christoph Lameter
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1169 bytes --]
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Hmm, I'm remembering differently. I thought the root problem here has
> > only been fixed in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree with "slub: add option to
> > disable higher order debugging slabs" and isn't currently in Linus' tree.
>
> Yup, the fix is in slab.git and queued for 2.6.32. There was some
> complaints from Christoph from the patch that need to be addressed
> still.
>
From what I recall, he asked that calculate_sizes() be called twice, first
to determine if get_order(s->size) increased as the result of the metadata
and, if so, a second time with the flags disabled.
slab_debug=O only disables debugging options that increase the min order
of slab as defined in DEBUG_FLAGS; it doesn't selectively disable some of
them when get_order(s->size) grows. So it's quite sane, like my patch
does, to disable all DEBUG_FLAGS when
get_order(s->objsize) + DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS > get_order(s->objsize)
without calling calculate_sizes() twice.
We need DEBUG_FLAGS to determine which flags to mask off to reduce the
minimum order, so I don't see DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE as troublesome.
Christoph?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907270227420.15760-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-27 17:20 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0907271320130.13513-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-07-27 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> We need DEBUG_FLAGS to determine which flags to mask off to reduce the
> minimum order, so I don't see DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE as troublesome.
>
> Christoph?
Post a patch? Otherwise just go ahead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0907271320130.13513-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-27 18:16 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907271113460.8408-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-27 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > We need DEBUG_FLAGS to determine which flags to mask off to reduce the
> > minimum order, so I don't see DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE as troublesome.
> >
> > Christoph?
>
> Post a patch? Otherwise just go ahead.
>
>
My patch is already in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree at
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa5ec8a1f66f3c2a3af723abcf8085509c9ee682
You had proposed http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124725166205814, which
moves the mask to kmem_cache_open() and calls calculate_sizes() twice.
That eliminates DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE, but I don't see that define as being
troublesome since we must define DEBUG_FLAGS to specify what options add
metdata anyway.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907271113460.8408-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-07-27 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-27 22:38 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2009-07-27 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, David Rientjes wrote:
> My patch is already in Pekka's slab-2.6.git tree at
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa5ec8a1f66f3c2a3af723abcf8085509c9ee682
>
> You had proposed http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124725166205814, which
> moves the mask to kmem_cache_open() and calls calculate_sizes() twice.
> That eliminates DEBUG_FLAGS_SIZE, but I don't see that define as being
> troublesome since we must define DEBUG_FLAGS to specify what options add
> metdata anyway.
My prosal was to use the size and objsize parameters. You would only have
to call calculate_sizes() twice when the comparison of the order of size
and objsize would be different.
Doing so would simplify additing future flags. If you do your own
calculations (like in the patch) then you have to replicate the size
calculation from calculate_sizes() somehow. Is the duplicate calculation
really accurate regarding alignment and other special casing?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-07-27 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2009-07-27 22:38 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2009-07-27 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Larry Finger, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> My prosal was to use the size and objsize parameters. You would only have
> to call calculate_sizes() twice when the comparison of the order of size
> and objsize would be different.
>
> Doing so would simplify additing future flags. If you do your own
> calculations (like in the patch) then you have to replicate the size
> calculation from calculate_sizes() somehow. Is the duplicate calculation
> really accurate regarding alignment and other special casing?
>
Ok, fair enough. It seems like a matter of taste in implementation but
your proposal is also more extendable than mine, and I'm definitely not
going to argue your taste vs. mine when it comes to slub :)
I'll write an incremental patch on top of Pekka's for-next branch to
implement your idea.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-08-02 19:06 2.6.31-rc5: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-02 19:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-02 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (96 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/213
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37655/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-08-09 21:07 2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 21:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (103 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/213
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37655/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-08-19 20:36 2.6.31-rc6-git5: " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (113 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/213
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37655/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
@ 2009-08-25 20:37 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 20:37 ` [Bug #13180] 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle Rafael J. Wysocki
` (33 more replies)
0 siblings, 34 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and
2.6.30, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.29
and 2.6.30, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-08-26 152 33 30
2009-08-20 150 35 32
2009-08-10 148 39 37
2009-08-02 145 44 39
2009-07-27 143 48 45
2009-07-07 138 50 46
2009-06-29 133 46 43
2009-06-07 110 35 31
2009-05-31 100 32 27
2009-05-24 92 34 27
2009-05-16 81 36 33
2009-04-25 55 36 26
2009-04-17 37 35 28
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14049
Subject : joydev: blacklist digitizers avoids recognition of Saitek X52 joysticks
Submitter : Janos Laube <janos.dev@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-24 14:18 (2 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d07a9cba6be5c0e947afc1014b5a62182a86f1f1
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13958
Subject : ath5k Atheros AR5001 low signal
Submitter : Marco Siviero <darker1985@slacky.it>
Date : 2009-08-10 15:03 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13949
Subject : XFS regression
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date : 2009-08-08 8:39 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124972079229959&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13898
Subject : Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X
Submitter : dienet <dienet@poczta.fm>
Date : 2009-07-31 15:17 (26 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124905346729959&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797
Subject : iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8
Submitter : Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
Date : 2009-07-18 20:18 (39 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795
Subject : abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot)
Submitter : Rafal Kaczynski <fscnoboot@wp.pl>
Date : 2009-07-18 17:19 (39 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780
Subject : NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8
Submitter : Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Date : 2009-07-15 18:00 (42 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13770
Subject : System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-14 10:31 (43 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13739
Subject : 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch
Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date : 2009-07-07 8:44 (50 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124695628924382&w=4
Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694
Subject : i915 phantom TV
Submitter : Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-02 12:26 (55 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682
Subject : The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30
Submitter : Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-06-30 13:34 (57 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2009-06-19 17:05 (68 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583
Subject : pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system
Submitter : Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
Date : 2009-06-19 13:33 (68 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject : ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter : Matteo <rootkit85@yahoo.it>
Date : 2009-06-19 12:04 (68 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564
Subject : random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd.
Submitter : Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-06-18 12:44 (69 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject : Tracelog during resume
Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date : 2009-06-17 11:32 (70 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter : Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua>
Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (75 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject : D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter : Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
Date : 2009-06-11 20:12 (76 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject : GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter : <sveina@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-06-10 20:04 (77 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject : Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-05-30 18:51 (88 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (90 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter : Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
Date : 2009-05-28 18:43 (90 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (96 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject : 2.6.30 - 2.6.31 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter : <unggnu@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-05-20 14:09 (98 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject : Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter : <patrick@ostenberg.de>
Date : 2009-05-19 09:08 (99 days old)
Handled-By : Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject : b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter : Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-05-03 16:22 (115 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (118 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (104 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6
Submitter : David Hill <hilld@binarystorm.net>
Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (117 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13180
Subject : 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-04-21 21:35 (127 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124034980819102&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/27/290
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14059
Subject : DomU crashes during xenfb initialization
Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-08-21 10:40 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125085108431360&w=4
Handled-By : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43107/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (92 days old)
Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (119 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/213
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37655/
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13070
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13180] 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 20:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
` (32 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Niel Lambrechts
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13180
Subject : 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-04-21 21:35 (127 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124034980819102&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/27/290
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 20:37 ` [Bug #13180] 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (30 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Johannes Berg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13306
Subject : hibernate slow on _second_ run
Submitter : Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date : 2009-05-14 09:34 (104 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 0:12 ` David Hill
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Hill
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6
Submitter : David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (117 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 20:37 ` [Bug #13180] 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 6:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run Rafael J. Wysocki
` (31 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes, Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (119 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/213
Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37655/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13328] b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13351] 2.6.30 - 2.6.31 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Rafael J. Wysocki
` (27 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Francis Moreau, netdev
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Subject : b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear.
Submitter : Francis Moreau <francis.moro-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-05-03 16:22 (115 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124136778012280&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13328] b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Airlie, Jerome Glisse, Karsten Mehrhoff,
Michel Dänzer, Shaohua Li
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13318
Subject : AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2
Submitter : Karsten Mehrhoff <kawime@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-04-30 8:51 (118 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=59de2bebabc5027f93df999d59cc65df591c3e6e
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124108156417560&w=4
Handled-By : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13351] 2.6.30 - 2.6.31 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13328] b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar, unggnu-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg,
Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13351
Subject : 2.6.30 - 2.6.31 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk
Submitter : <unggnu-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-05-20 14:09 (98 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki
` (23 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, patrick-nxAOmsU53hB6lmGzAMPh1A,
Rusty Russell
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13341
Subject : Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules
Submitter : <patrick-nxAOmsU53hB6lmGzAMPh1A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-05-19 09:08 (99 days old)
Handled-By : Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13351] 2.6.30 - 2.6.31 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 9:29 ` Frans Pop
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Rafael J. Wysocki
` (25 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Frans Pop
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (92 days old)
Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alejandro Riveira, Chris Wright,
Johannes Berg, John W. Linville
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
Subject : rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap
Submitter : Alejandro Riveira <ariveira@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-05-22 13:32 (96 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption Rafael J. Wysocki
` (21 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe, Laurent Riffard
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13401
Subject : pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected)
Submitter : Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-05-28 18:43 (90 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 22:20 ` Jan Scholz
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jan Scholz,
Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (90 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13408] Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (18 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, sveina-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13502
Subject : GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1
Submitter : <sveina-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-06-10 20:04 (77 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13408] Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13581] ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Morton, Diego Calleja
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13408
Subject : Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7
Submitter : Diego Calleja <diegocg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-05-30 18:51 (88 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/30/146
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Rafael J. Wysocki
` (20 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rus
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption
Submitter : Rus <harbour-K87ZgELTUEPsG83rWm+8vg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (75 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Smolik, Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13512
Subject : D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore
Submitter : Daniel Smolik <marvin@mydatex.cz>
Date : 2009-06-11 20:12 (76 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13564] random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd.
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13581] ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13583] pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pauli
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13564
Subject : random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd.
Submitter : Pauli <suokkos@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-06-18 12:44 (69 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13581] ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13408] Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13564] random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Matteo
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13581
Subject : ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels
Submitter : Matteo <rootkit85-whZMOeQn8C0@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-06-19 12:04 (68 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13583] pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13564] random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Paul Martin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13583
Subject : pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system
Submitter : Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
Date : 2009-06-19 13:33 (68 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13583] pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13558
Subject : Tracelog during resume
Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz>
Date : 2009-06-17 11:32 (70 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 6:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13694] i915 phantom TV Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
Subject : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-06-19 17:05 (68 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13694] i915 phantom TV
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciek Józiewicz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13694
Subject : i915 phantom TV
Submitter : Maciek Józiewicz <mjoziew-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-02 12:26 (55 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13694] i915 phantom TV Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13770] System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Nathanael Schaeffer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13682
Subject : The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30
Submitter : Nathanael Schaeffer <nathanael.schaeffer-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-06-30 13:34 (57 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13795] abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot)
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13770] System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13739] 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch Rafael J. Wysocki
` (8 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Arjan van de Ven, Rafal Kaczynski
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13795
Subject : abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot)
Submitter : Rafal Kaczynski <fscnoboot-5tc4TXWwyLM@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-18 17:19 (39 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13797] iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13898] Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13780] NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (5 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jörg Sommer, Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13797
Subject : iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8
Submitter : Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
Date : 2009-07-18 20:18 (39 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13898] Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13739] 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13797] iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (6 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, dienet
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13898
Subject : Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X
Submitter : dienet <dienet@poczta.fm>
Date : 2009-07-31 15:17 (26 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124905346729959&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13770] System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13795] abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot) Rafael J. Wysocki
` (9 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jean-Luc Coulon
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13770
Subject : System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-14 10:31 (43 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13780] NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13797] iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13949] XFS regression Rafael J. Wysocki
` (4 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Kurt Roeckx
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780
Subject : NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8
Submitter : Kurt Roeckx <kurt-burXGKnpAKGzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-15 18:00 (42 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13739] 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13795] abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot) Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13898] Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen, Jiri Kosina
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13739
Subject : 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch
Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-07 8:44 (50 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124695628924382&w=4
Handled-By : Jiri Kosina <jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13949] XFS regression
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13780] NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #14059] DomU crashes during xenfb initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Felix Blyakher, Justin Piszcz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13949
Subject : XFS regression
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 8:39 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124972079229959&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13958] ath5k Atheros AR5001 low signal
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #14049] joydev: blacklist digitizers avoids recognition of Saitek X52 joysticks Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 8:47 ` 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafał Miłecki
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Marco Siviero
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13958
Subject : ath5k Atheros AR5001 low signal
Submitter : Marco Siviero <darker1985-LhojQA2xIZ1eoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-10 15:03 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14059] DomU crashes during xenfb initialization
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13949] XFS regression Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 14:18 ` Michal Schmidt
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #14049] joydev: blacklist digitizers avoids recognition of Saitek X52 joysticks Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 subsequent siblings)
33 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michal Schmidt
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14059
Subject : DomU crashes during xenfb initialization
Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-08-21 10:40 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125085108431360&w=4
Handled-By : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43107/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14049] joydev: blacklist digitizers avoids recognition of Saitek X52 joysticks
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #14059] DomU crashes during xenfb initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13958] ath5k Atheros AR5001 low signal Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 8:47 ` 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafał Miłecki
33 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Janos Laube
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14049
Subject : joydev: blacklist digitizers avoids recognition of Saitek X52 joysticks
Submitter : Janos Laube <janos.dev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-24 14:18 (2 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d07a9cba6be5c0e947afc1014b5a62182a86f1f1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-26 0:12 ` David Hill
[not found] ` <CA50EE78-9582-4F7B-84EA-40CACBDC5D0E-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: David Hill @ 2009-08-26 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
It seems to be fixed in 2.6.31-rc7
David Hill
On 2009-08-25, at 17:05, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still
> should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
> Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers
> hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6
> Submitter : David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (117 days old)
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-26 6:14 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020908252314l364588bfi16e2d426cece2c5a-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-08-26 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek,
Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
> Subject : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-06-19 17:05 (68 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187
Pavel, is this still an open issue? Plenty tty fixes went into 2.6.31
so maybe we need to backport some of them to -stable?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-26 6:25 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020908252325p88178f2yb0a76e033352b78d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2009-08-26 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes,
Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
Hi Rafael,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (119 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/213
> Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
> David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKldhl2p70BpVqQ@public.gmane.orgm>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37655/
FYI, the fix (a new slub debugging option) is queued for 2.6.32 and we
don't have plans to backport it to -stable because it depends on SLUB
out-of-memory diagnostic patches and the problem doesn't affect
production configs.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13958] ath5k Atheros AR5001 low signal Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-26 8:47 ` Rafał Miłecki
2009-08-26 14:53 ` Andrew Morton
2009-08-26 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
33 siblings, 2 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2009-08-26 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, DRI, Linux SCSI List,
Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Natalie Protasevich,
Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds,
Linux PM List
2009/8/25 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
> Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption
> Submitter : Rus <harbour-K87ZgELTUEPsG83rWm+8vg@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (75 days old)
It has patch, just Len doesn't seem to... don't know, read the topic?
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/29082/
Can we ping Len somehow to push this patch directly to Linus's tree?
--
Rafał Miłecki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-26 9:29 ` Frans Pop
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Frans Pop @ 2009-08-26 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Len Brown
On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389
> Subject : Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed
> when it should not be
> Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-05-26 15:24 (92 days old)
> Handled-By : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21671
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=21672
Still waiting for Len (or somebody) to pick them up.
Slightly improved versions of the patches (as also sent to the mailing
list recently) are at:
- http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=22857
- http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=22858
Cheers,
FJP
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14059] DomU crashes during xenfb initialization
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #14059] DomU crashes during xenfb initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-26 14:18 ` Michal Schmidt
2009-08-26 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Michal Schmidt @ 2009-08-26 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Dne Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:05:07 +0200 (CEST) Rafael J. Wysocki napsal:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still
> should be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14059
> Subject : DomU crashes during xenfb initialization
> Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-08-21 10:40 (5 days old)
> References :
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125085108431360&w=4
> Handled-By : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43107/
The patch is not in mainline yet, it's only in Jeremy's git tree.
Michal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
2009-08-26 8:47 ` 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafał Miłecki
@ 2009-08-26 14:53 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20090826075337.4230d82c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-26 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-08-26 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafał Miłecki
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, DRI,
Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI, Kernel Testers List,
Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:47:13 +0200 Rafa__ Mi__ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/8/25 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> > Bug-Entry __ __ __ : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
> > Subject __ __ __ __ : acer_wmi causes stack corruption
> > Submitter __ __ __ : Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua>
> > Date __ __ __ __ __ __: 2009-06-12 08:13 (75 days old)
>
> It has patch, just Len doesn't seem to... don't know, read the topic?
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/29082/
>
> Can we ping Len somehow to push this patch directly to Linus's tree?
>
I'm not seeing any linux-acpi emails from Len since August 14.
So I merged this patch and shall send it along with
thermal_sys-check-get_temp-return-value.patch
acpi-dont-call-acpi_processor_init-if-acpi-is-disabled.patch
in to Linus today.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
[not found] ` <20090826075337.4230d82c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-08-26 16:33 ` Frans Pop
2009-08-26 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Frans Pop @ 2009-08-26 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
protasnb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b
(Dropped unrelated CCs.)
Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'm not seeing any linux-acpi emails from Len since August 14.
>
> So I merged this patch and shall send it along with
>
> thermal_sys-check-get_temp-return-value.patch
> acpi-dont-call-acpi_processor_init-if-acpi-is-disabled.patch
Thanks for that Andrew. Could you please do the same for my patches in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 (or
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/17/169)?
That BR is on the regression list for 2.6.30. The patches apply cleanly to
current mainline.
Thanks,
FJP
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
2009-08-26 16:33 ` Frans Pop
@ 2009-08-26 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20090826123647.e60d9555.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-08-26 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frans Pop
Cc: zajec5, rjw, linux-kernel, protasnb, linux-acpi, kernel-testers,
torvalds, Zhang Rui, Len Brown, Rusty Russell, Stephen Rothwell
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:33:34 +0200
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:
> (Dropped unrelated CCs.)
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I'm not seeing any linux-acpi emails from Len since August 14.
> >
> > So I merged this patch and shall send it along with
> >
> > thermal_sys-check-get_temp-return-value.patch
> > acpi-dont-call-acpi_processor_init-if-acpi-is-disabled.patch
>
> Thanks for that Andrew. Could you please do the same for my patches in
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389 (or
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/17/169)?
>
> That BR is on the regression list for 2.6.30. The patches apply cleanly to
> current mainline.
>
OK, shall do, thanks.
These patches make rather a big mess in linux-next.
Rusty's strangely-named patch:
commit 6949d7cbb26476cbf1ee7b45ac74faacc9eb7cdf
Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
AuthorDate: Thu Aug 13 10:26:38 2009 +1000
Commit: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
CommitDate: Thu Aug 13 10:26:38 2009 +1000
misc:work_on_cpu-acpi
is now in the acpi tree. It changes the throttling code so that
set/get_throttling is performed via smp_call_function_single() rather
than via cpumask fiddling.
So in my tree I reworked it so that the new `force' arg gets passed
through appropriately. It compiles cleanly but I'd suggest that Len
simply drop "misc:work_on_cpu-acpi" and we send it back to Rusty for
some rechecking (sorry).
Rusty/Len: please work out why the title for that patch went silly.
Rusty, please self-administer smackings for
struct set_throttling_info sti
= { pr, p_throttling, t_state.target_state };
these things always start out simple and end up not-simple, so some poor
schmuck has to clean them up so stuff doesn't break.
struct set_throttling_info sti = {
.pr = pr,
.p_throttling = p_throttling,
.target_state = t_state.target_state,
.force = force
};
is better!
My linux-next repair job:
drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c~linux-next-fixup drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c~linux-next-fixup
+++ a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
@@ -1015,10 +1015,25 @@ static int acpi_processor_set_throttling
return 0;
}
+struct set_throttling_info {
+ struct acpi_processor *pr;
+ struct acpi_processor_throttling *p_throttling;
+ int target_state;
+ bool force;
+ int ret;
+};
+
+static void set_throttling(void *_sti)
+{
+ struct set_throttling_info *s = _sti;
+
+ s->ret = s->p_throttling->acpi_processor_set_throttling(s->pr,
+ s->target_state, s->force);
+}
+
int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
int state, bool force)
{
- cpumask_var_t saved_mask;
int ret = 0;
unsigned int i;
struct acpi_processor *match_pr;
@@ -1059,10 +1074,13 @@ int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct
* it can be called only for the cpu pointed by pr.
*/
if (p_throttling->shared_type == DOMAIN_COORD_TYPE_SW_ANY) {
- /* FIXME: use work_on_cpu() */
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(pr->id));
- ret = p_throttling->acpi_processor_set_throttling(pr,
- t_state.target_state, force);
+ struct set_throttling_info sti = {
+ .pr = pr,
+ .p_throttling = p_throttling,
+ .target_state = t_state.target_state,
+ .force = force };
+ smp_call_function_single(pr->id, set_throttling, &sti, 1);
+ ret = sti.ret;
} else {
/*
* When the T-state coordination is SW_ALL or HW_ALL,
@@ -1093,11 +1111,12 @@ int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct
continue;
}
t_state.cpu = i;
- /* FIXME: use work_on_cpu() */
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(i));
- ret = match_pr->throttling.
- acpi_processor_set_throttling(
- match_pr, t_state.target_state, force);
+ sti.pr = match_pr;
+ sti.p_throttling = &match_pr->throttling;
+ sti.target_state = t_state.target_state;
+ sti.force = force;
+ smp_call_function_single(i, set_throttling, &sti, 1);
+ ret = sti.ret;
}
}
/*
_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
2009-08-26 8:47 ` 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafał Miłecki
2009-08-26 14:53 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2009-08-26 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
1 sibling, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-26 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafał Miłecki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, DRI, Linux SCSI List,
Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Natalie Protasevich,
Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds,
Linux PM List, Len Brown
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2009/8/25 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13514
> > Subject : acer_wmi causes stack corruption
> > Submitter : Rus <harbour@sfinx.od.ua>
> > Date : 2009-06-12 08:13 (75 days old)
>
> It has patch, just Len doesn't seem to... don't know, read the topic?
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/29082/
>
> Can we ping Len somehow to push this patch directly to Linus's tree?
I have updated the bug entry, hopefully Len will notice it now.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6
[not found] ` <CA50EE78-9582-4F7B-84EA-40CACBDC5D0E-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-08-26 20:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-26 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hill; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, David Hill wrote:
> It seems to be fixed in 2.6.31-rc7
Thanks, bug closed.
Rafael
> On 2009-08-25, at 17:05, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still
> > should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13219
> > Subject : Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers
> > hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6
> > Submitter : David Hill <hilld-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-05-01 16:57 (117 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
[not found] ` <84144f020908252325p88178f2yb0a76e033352b78d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-08-26 20:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-26 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, David Rientjes,
Johannes Berg, Larry Finger
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
> > Subject : Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
> > Submitter : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-04-29 21:01 (119 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124103897101088&w=4
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/7/136
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/26/213
> > Handled-By : Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
> > David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37655/
>
> FYI, the fix (a new slub debugging option) is queued for 2.6.32 and we
> don't have plans to backport it to -stable because it depends on SLUB
> out-of-memory diagnostic patches and the problem doesn't affect
> production configs.
Thanks for the info, I've closed the bug as "will fix later".
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14059] DomU crashes during xenfb initialization
2009-08-26 14:18 ` Michal Schmidt
@ 2009-08-26 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-26 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Schmidt
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Dne Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:05:07 +0200 (CEST) Rafael J. Wysocki napsal:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still
> > should be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14059
> > Subject : DomU crashes during xenfb initialization
> > Submitter : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-21 10:40 (5 days old)
> > References :
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125085108431360&w=4
> > Handled-By : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43107/
>
> The patch is not in mainline yet, it's only in Jeremy's git tree.
Yes, that's why the bug hasn't been closed yet.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-26 22:20 ` Jan Scholz
[not found] ` <87hbvurzdg.fsf-X87fCqEI3snt2/fatF9ZgSk+o5UQzIjPIRYYPiSvRdM@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-08-26 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Jan Scholz
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1019 bytes --]
The bug is still present in v2.6.31-rc7.
To make it easier to reproduce, I attached my config to this mail.
Jan
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13407
> Subject : adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
> Submitter : Jan Scholz <scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-05-28 7:59 (90 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2ed8d2b3a81bdbb0418301628ccdb008ac9f40b7
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124349762314976&w=4
> Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
>
[-- Attachment #2: config --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 53873 bytes --]
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux kernel version: 2.6.31-rc7
# Wed Aug 26 22:34:45 2009
#
# CONFIG_PPC64 is not set
#
# Processor support
#
CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_32=y
# CONFIG_PPC_85xx is not set
# CONFIG_PPC_8xx is not set
# CONFIG_40x is not set
# CONFIG_44x is not set
# CONFIG_E200 is not set
CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S=y
CONFIG_6xx=y
CONFIG_PPC_FPU=y
CONFIG_ALTIVEC=y
CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU=y
CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU_32=y
# CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES is not set
CONFIG_PPC_HAVE_PMU_SUPPORT=y
# CONFIG_SMP is not set
CONFIG_PPC32=y
CONFIG_WORD_SIZE=32
# CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is not set
CONFIG_MMU=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ=y
# CONFIG_HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA is not set
CONFIG_IRQ_PER_CPU=y
CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U32=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_HWEIGHT=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT=y
# CONFIG_ARCH_NO_VIRT_TO_BUS is not set
CONFIG_PPC=y
CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_NVRAM=y
CONFIG_SCHED_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER=y
CONFIG_ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC=y
CONFIG_PPC_OF=y
CONFIG_OF=y
CONFIG_PPC_UDBG_16550=y
# CONFIG_GENERIC_TBSYNC is not set
CONFIG_AUDIT_ARCH=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG=y
CONFIG_SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION=y
CONFIG_DTC=y
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_UIMAGE is not set
CONFIG_HIBERNATE_32=y
CONFIG_ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE=y
CONFIG_ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE=y
# CONFIG_PPC_DCR_NATIVE is not set
# CONFIG_PPC_DCR_MMIO is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y
CONFIG_DEFCONFIG_LIST="/lib/modules/$UNAME_RELEASE/.config"
CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS=y
#
# General setup
#
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y
CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP=y
CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_INIT_ENV_ARG_LIMIT=32
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION=""
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO=y
CONFIG_SWAP=y
CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y
CONFIG_SYSVIPC_SYSCTL=y
CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE=y
CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE_SYSCTL=y
CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT=y
# CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3 is not set
# CONFIG_TASKSTATS is not set
# CONFIG_AUDIT is not set
#
# RCU Subsystem
#
CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y
# CONFIG_TREE_RCU is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU is not set
# CONFIG_TREE_RCU_TRACE is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU_TRACE is not set
CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y
CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=y
CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT=14
CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=y
CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y
# CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is not set
CONFIG_USER_SCHED=y
# CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED is not set
# CONFIG_CGROUPS is not set
# CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 is not set
# CONFIG_RELAY is not set
CONFIG_NAMESPACES=y
# CONFIG_UTS_NS is not set
# CONFIG_IPC_NS is not set
# CONFIG_USER_NS is not set
# CONFIG_PID_NS is not set
# CONFIG_NET_NS is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD is not set
# CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is not set
CONFIG_SYSCTL=y
CONFIG_ANON_INODES=y
# CONFIG_EMBEDDED is not set
CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL=y
CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y
# CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS is not set
CONFIG_HOTPLUG=y
CONFIG_PRINTK=y
CONFIG_BUG=y
CONFIG_ELF_CORE=y
CONFIG_PCSPKR_PLATFORM=y
CONFIG_BASE_FULL=y
CONFIG_FUTEX=y
CONFIG_EPOLL=y
CONFIG_SIGNALFD=y
CONFIG_TIMERFD=y
CONFIG_EVENTFD=y
CONFIG_SHMEM=y
CONFIG_AIO=y
CONFIG_HAVE_PERF_COUNTERS=y
#
# Performance Counters
#
# CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS is not set
CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS=y
CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS=y
# CONFIG_STRIP_ASM_SYMS is not set
# CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is not set
CONFIG_SLAB=y
# CONFIG_SLUB is not set
# CONFIG_SLOB is not set
# CONFIG_PROFILING is not set
# CONFIG_MARKERS is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_OPROFILE=y
# CONFIG_KPROBES is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=y
CONFIG_HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT=y
CONFIG_HAVE_KPROBES=y
CONFIG_HAVE_KRETPROBES=y
CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK=y
#
# GCOV-based kernel profiling
#
# CONFIG_SLOW_WORK is not set
# CONFIG_HAVE_GENERIC_DMA_COHERENT is not set
CONFIG_SLABINFO=y
CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=y
CONFIG_BASE_SMALL=0
CONFIG_MODULES=y
# CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_LOAD is not set
CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y
# CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD is not set
# CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is not set
# CONFIG_MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL is not set
CONFIG_BLOCK=y
CONFIG_LBDAF=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY is not set
#
# IO Schedulers
#
CONFIG_IOSCHED_NOOP=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_AS=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ=y
CONFIG_DEFAULT_AS=y
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEADLINE is not set
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ is not set
# CONFIG_DEFAULT_NOOP is not set
CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="anticipatory"
CONFIG_FREEZER=y
#
# Platform support
#
CONFIG_PPC_CHRP=y
# CONFIG_MPC5121_ADS is not set
# CONFIG_MPC5121_GENERIC is not set
# CONFIG_PPC_MPC52xx is not set
CONFIG_PPC_PMAC=y
# CONFIG_PPC_CELL is not set
# CONFIG_PPC_CELL_NATIVE is not set
# CONFIG_PPC_82xx is not set
# CONFIG_PQ2ADS is not set
# CONFIG_PPC_83xx is not set
# CONFIG_PPC_86xx is not set
# CONFIG_EMBEDDED6xx is not set
# CONFIG_AMIGAONE is not set
CONFIG_PPC_NATIVE=y
CONFIG_PPC_OF_BOOT_TRAMPOLINE=y
# CONFIG_UDBG_RTAS_CONSOLE is not set
# CONFIG_IPIC is not set
CONFIG_MPIC=y
# CONFIG_MPIC_WEIRD is not set
CONFIG_PPC_I8259=y
CONFIG_PPC_RTAS=y
# CONFIG_RTAS_ERROR_LOGGING is not set
CONFIG_RTAS_PROC=y
# CONFIG_MMIO_NVRAM is not set
CONFIG_PPC_MPC106=y
# CONFIG_PPC_970_NAP is not set
# CONFIG_PPC_INDIRECT_IO is not set
# CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=y
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=y
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS is not set
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE is not set
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_POWERSAVE is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_USERSPACE=y
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND is not set
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=y
#
# CPU Frequency drivers
#
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_PMAC=y
# CONFIG_PPC601_SYNC_FIX is not set
CONFIG_TAU=y
# CONFIG_TAU_INT is not set
# CONFIG_TAU_AVERAGE is not set
# CONFIG_FSL_ULI1575 is not set
# CONFIG_SIMPLE_GPIO is not set
#
# Kernel options
#
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y
CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
# CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS is not set
CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BUILD=y
# CONFIG_HZ_100 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
CONFIG_HZ_300=y
# CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
CONFIG_HZ=300
# CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y
CONFIG_CORE_DUMP_DEFAULT_ELF_HEADERS=y
# CONFIG_HAVE_AOUT is not set
CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC=m
# CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER is not set
# CONFIG_SWIOTLB is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_WALK_MEMORY=y
CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE=y
# CONFIG_KEXEC is not set
# CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP=y
CONFIG_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y
CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL=y
# CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL is not set
# CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is not set
CONFIG_FLATMEM=y
CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP=y
CONFIG_PAGEFLAGS_EXTENDED=y
CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS=4
CONFIG_MIGRATION=y
# CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is not set
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA_FLAG=1
CONFIG_BOUNCE=y
CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS=y
CONFIG_HAVE_MLOCK=y
CONFIG_HAVE_MLOCKED_PAGE_BIT=y
CONFIG_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR=4096
CONFIG_PPC_4K_PAGES=y
# CONFIG_PPC_16K_PAGES is not set
# CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES is not set
# CONFIG_PPC_256K_PAGES is not set
CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER=11
CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE=y
# CONFIG_CMDLINE_BOOL is not set
CONFIG_EXTRA_TARGETS=""
CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_FREEZER_CONTROL=y
CONFIG_PM=y
# CONFIG_PM_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=y
CONFIG_SUSPEND=y
CONFIG_SUSPEND_FREEZER=y
# CONFIG_HIBERNATION is not set
CONFIG_APM_EMULATION=m
CONFIG_SECCOMP=y
CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API=y
#
# Bus options
#
# CONFIG_ISA is not set
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y
CONFIG_PPC_INDIRECT_PCI=y
CONFIG_PCI=y
CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS=y
CONFIG_PCI_SYSCALL=y
# CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSI=y
# CONFIG_PCI_MSI is not set
CONFIG_PCI_LEGACY=y
# CONFIG_PCI_STUB is not set
# CONFIG_PCI_IOV is not set
# CONFIG_PCCARD is not set
# CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI is not set
# CONFIG_HAS_RAPIDIO is not set
#
# Advanced setup
#
# CONFIG_ADVANCED_OPTIONS is not set
#
# Default settings for advanced configuration options are used
#
CONFIG_LOWMEM_SIZE=0x30000000
CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xc0000000
CONFIG_KERNEL_START=0xc0000000
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x00000000
CONFIG_TASK_SIZE=0xc0000000
CONFIG_NET=y
#
# Networking options
#
CONFIG_PACKET=y
CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP=y
CONFIG_UNIX=y
CONFIG_XFRM=y
CONFIG_XFRM_USER=m
# CONFIG_XFRM_SUB_POLICY is not set
# CONFIG_XFRM_MIGRATE is not set
# CONFIG_XFRM_STATISTICS is not set
CONFIG_XFRM_IPCOMP=m
CONFIG_NET_KEY=m
# CONFIG_NET_KEY_MIGRATE is not set
CONFIG_INET=y
# CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST is not set
CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y
CONFIG_ASK_IP_FIB_HASH=y
# CONFIG_IP_FIB_TRIE is not set
CONFIG_IP_FIB_HASH=y
CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE=y
# CONFIG_IP_PNP is not set
# CONFIG_NET_IPIP is not set
# CONFIG_NET_IPGRE is not set
# CONFIG_ARPD is not set
CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES=y
CONFIG_INET_AH=m
CONFIG_INET_ESP=m
CONFIG_INET_IPCOMP=m
CONFIG_INET_XFRM_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT=m
CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET_XFRM_MODE_BEET=m
# CONFIG_INET_LRO is not set
CONFIG_INET_DIAG=m
CONFIG_INET_TCP_DIAG=m
# CONFIG_TCP_CONG_ADVANCED is not set
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_CUBIC=y
CONFIG_DEFAULT_TCP_CONG="cubic"
CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG=y
CONFIG_IPV6=m
# CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY is not set
# CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF is not set
# CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD is not set
CONFIG_INET6_AH=m
CONFIG_INET6_ESP=m
CONFIG_INET6_IPCOMP=m
CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6=m
CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET6_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT=m
CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_BEET=m
# CONFIG_INET6_XFRM_MODE_ROUTEOPTIMIZATION is not set
CONFIG_IPV6_SIT=m
CONFIG_IPV6_NDISC_NODETYPE=y
# CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL is not set
# CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES is not set
# CONFIG_IPV6_MROUTE is not set
# CONFIG_NETWORK_SECMARK is not set
CONFIG_NETFILTER=y
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_NETFILTER_ADVANCED=y
# CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER is not set
#
# Core Netfilter Configuration
#
CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK=m
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_QUEUE is not set
CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_LOG=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
# CONFIG_NF_CT_ACCT is not set
# CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK is not set
# CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_EVENTS is not set
# CONFIG_NF_CT_PROTO_DCCP is not set
# CONFIG_NF_CT_PROTO_SCTP is not set
# CONFIG_NF_CT_PROTO_UDPLITE is not set
# CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_AMANDA is not set
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_FTP=m
# CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_H323 is not set
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IRC=m
# CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_NETBIOS_NS is not set
# CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PPTP is not set
# CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SANE is not set
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SIP=m
# CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_TFTP is not set
CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_TPROXY=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XTABLES=y
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CLASSIFY is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CONNMARK is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_DSCP is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_HL is not set
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_LED=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_MARK=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_NFLOG=m
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_NFQUEUE is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_RATEEST is not set
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TPROXY=m
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TCPMSS is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TCPOPTSTRIP is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CLUSTER is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_COMMENT is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNBYTES is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNLIMIT is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNMARK is not set
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNTRACK=m
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DCCP is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_DSCP is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_ESP is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HASHLIMIT is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HELPER is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_HL is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_IPRANGE is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LENGTH is not set
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_LIMIT=m
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MAC is not set
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MARK=m
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_MULTIPORT is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OWNER is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_POLICY is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_PKTTYPE is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_QUOTA is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_RATEEST is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_REALM is not set
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_RECENT=m
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_RECENT_PROC_COMPAT is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_SCTP is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_SOCKET is not set
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_STATE=m
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_STATISTIC is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_STRING is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_TCPMSS is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_TIME is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_U32 is not set
# CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OSF is not set
# CONFIG_IP_VS is not set
#
# IP: Netfilter Configuration
#
CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4=m
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROC_COMPAT=y
# CONFIG_IP_NF_QUEUE is not set
CONFIG_IP_NF_IPTABLES=m
# CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_ADDRTYPE is not set
# CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_AH is not set
# CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_ECN is not set
# CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_TTL is not set
CONFIG_IP_NF_FILTER=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REJECT=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_LOG=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_ULOG=m
CONFIG_NF_NAT=m
CONFIG_NF_NAT_NEEDED=y
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_MASQUERADE=m
# CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_NETMAP is not set
# CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REDIRECT is not set
# CONFIG_NF_NAT_SNMP_BASIC is not set
CONFIG_NF_NAT_FTP=m
CONFIG_NF_NAT_IRC=m
# CONFIG_NF_NAT_TFTP is not set
# CONFIG_NF_NAT_AMANDA is not set
# CONFIG_NF_NAT_PPTP is not set
# CONFIG_NF_NAT_H323 is not set
CONFIG_NF_NAT_SIP=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MANGLE=m
# CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_CLUSTERIP is not set
# CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_ECN is not set
# CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_TTL is not set
# CONFIG_IP_NF_RAW is not set
# CONFIG_IP_NF_ARPTABLES is not set
#
# IPv6: Netfilter Configuration
#
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV6=m
# CONFIG_IP6_NF_QUEUE is not set
CONFIG_IP6_NF_IPTABLES=m
# CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_AH is not set
# CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_EUI64 is not set
# CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_FRAG is not set
# CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_OPTS is not set
# CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_HL is not set
# CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_IPV6HEADER is not set
# CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_MH is not set
# CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_RT is not set
# CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_HL is not set
CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_LOG=m
CONFIG_IP6_NF_FILTER=m
CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_REJECT=m
CONFIG_IP6_NF_MANGLE=m
# CONFIG_IP6_NF_RAW is not set
# CONFIG_IP_DCCP is not set
# CONFIG_IP_SCTP is not set
# CONFIG_TIPC is not set
# CONFIG_ATM is not set
CONFIG_STP=m
CONFIG_BRIDGE=m
# CONFIG_NET_DSA is not set
# CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q is not set
# CONFIG_DECNET is not set
CONFIG_LLC=m
# CONFIG_LLC2 is not set
# CONFIG_IPX is not set
# CONFIG_ATALK is not set
# CONFIG_X25 is not set
# CONFIG_LAPB is not set
# CONFIG_ECONET is not set
# CONFIG_WAN_ROUTER is not set
# CONFIG_PHONET is not set
# CONFIG_IEEE802154 is not set
# CONFIG_NET_SCHED is not set
# CONFIG_DCB is not set
#
# Network testing
#
# CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN is not set
# CONFIG_HAMRADIO is not set
# CONFIG_CAN is not set
# CONFIG_IRDA is not set
CONFIG_BT=m
CONFIG_BT_L2CAP=m
CONFIG_BT_SCO=m
CONFIG_BT_RFCOMM=m
CONFIG_BT_RFCOMM_TTY=y
CONFIG_BT_BNEP=m
CONFIG_BT_BNEP_MC_FILTER=y
CONFIG_BT_BNEP_PROTO_FILTER=y
CONFIG_BT_HIDP=m
#
# Bluetooth device drivers
#
CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB=m
# CONFIG_BT_HCIUART is not set
CONFIG_BT_HCIBCM203X=m
# CONFIG_BT_HCIBPA10X is not set
# CONFIG_BT_HCIBFUSB is not set
# CONFIG_BT_HCIVHCI is not set
# CONFIG_AF_RXRPC is not set
CONFIG_FIB_RULES=y
CONFIG_WIRELESS=y
CONFIG_CFG80211=m
# CONFIG_CFG80211_REG_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY=y
CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT=y
CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT_SYSFS=y
# CONFIG_LIB80211 is not set
CONFIG_MAC80211=m
CONFIG_MAC80211_DEFAULT_PS=y
CONFIG_MAC80211_DEFAULT_PS_VALUE=1
#
# Rate control algorithm selection
#
CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_MINSTREL=y
# CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT_PID is not set
CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT_MINSTREL=y
CONFIG_MAC80211_RC_DEFAULT="minstrel"
CONFIG_MAC80211_LEDS=y
# CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUG_MENU is not set
# CONFIG_WIMAX is not set
# CONFIG_RFKILL is not set
# CONFIG_NET_9P is not set
#
# Device Drivers
#
#
# Generic Driver Options
#
CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH="/sbin/hotplug"
CONFIG_STANDALONE=y
CONFIG_PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD=y
CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y
# CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL is not set
CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE=""
# CONFIG_SYS_HYPERVISOR is not set
# CONFIG_CONNECTOR is not set
# CONFIG_MTD is not set
CONFIG_OF_DEVICE=y
CONFIG_OF_I2C=y
# CONFIG_PARPORT is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_FD is not set
# CONFIG_MAC_FLOPPY is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_DA is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_CISS_DA is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DAC960 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UMEM is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_COW_COMMON is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CRYPTOLOOP is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NBD=m
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SX8 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM is not set
CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD=m
CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD_BUFFERS=8
# CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD_WCACHE is not set
# CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HD is not set
# CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_IDE=y
CONFIG_IDE=y
#
# Please see Documentation/ide/ide.txt for help/info on IDE drives
#
CONFIG_IDE_XFER_MODE=y
CONFIG_IDE_TIMINGS=y
CONFIG_IDE_ATAPI=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA is not set
CONFIG_IDE_GD=y
CONFIG_IDE_GD_ATA=y
# CONFIG_IDE_GD_ATAPI is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD_VERBOSE_ERRORS=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDETAPE is not set
CONFIG_IDE_TASK_IOCTL=y
CONFIG_IDE_PROC_FS=y
#
# IDE chipset support/bugfixes
#
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PLATFORM is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_SFF=y
#
# PCI IDE chipsets support
#
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPCI=y
CONFIG_IDEPCI_PCIBUS_ORDER=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_GENERIC is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OPTI621 is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AEC62XX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ALI15X3 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AMD74XX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD64X is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TRIFLEX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CS5520 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CS5530 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HPT366 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_JMICRON is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SC1200 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PIIX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IT8172 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IT8213 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IT821X is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NS87415 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_OLD is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_NEW is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SVWKS is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SIIMAGE is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SL82C105 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SLC90E66 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TRM290 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TC86C001 is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_PMAC=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_PMAC_ATA100FIRST=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y
#
# SCSI device support
#
# CONFIG_RAID_ATTRS is not set
CONFIG_SCSI=m
CONFIG_SCSI_DMA=y
# CONFIG_SCSI_TGT is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_NETLINK is not set
CONFIG_SCSI_PROC_FS=y
#
# SCSI support type (disk, tape, CD-ROM)
#
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD=m
# CONFIG_CHR_DEV_ST is not set
# CONFIG_CHR_DEV_OSST is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR=m
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR_VENDOR is not set
CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG=m
# CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SCH is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN is not set
CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS=y
# CONFIG_SCSI_LOGGING is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC is not set
CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m
#
# SCSI Transports
#
# CONFIG_SCSI_SPI_ATTRS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_FC_ATTRS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_ISCSI_ATTRS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_LIBSAS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_SRP_ATTRS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_LOWLEVEL is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_DH is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_OSD_INITIATOR is not set
# CONFIG_ATA is not set
CONFIG_MD=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM=m
# CONFIG_DM_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_DM_CRYPT is not set
# CONFIG_DM_SNAPSHOT is not set
# CONFIG_DM_MIRROR is not set
# CONFIG_DM_ZERO is not set
# CONFIG_DM_MULTIPATH is not set
# CONFIG_DM_DELAY is not set
# CONFIG_DM_UEVENT is not set
# CONFIG_FUSION is not set
#
# IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support
#
#
# You can enable one or both FireWire driver stacks.
#
#
# See the help texts for more information.
#
# CONFIG_FIREWIRE is not set
CONFIG_IEEE1394=m
CONFIG_IEEE1394_OHCI1394=m
# CONFIG_IEEE1394_PCILYNX is not set
CONFIG_IEEE1394_SBP2=m
# CONFIG_IEEE1394_SBP2_PHYS_DMA is not set
CONFIG_IEEE1394_ETH1394_ROM_ENTRY=y
CONFIG_IEEE1394_ETH1394=m
CONFIG_IEEE1394_RAWIO=m
CONFIG_IEEE1394_VIDEO1394=m
CONFIG_IEEE1394_DV1394=m
# CONFIG_IEEE1394_VERBOSEDEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_I2O is not set
CONFIG_MACINTOSH_DRIVERS=y
CONFIG_ADB=y
# CONFIG_ADB_CUDA is not set
CONFIG_ADB_PMU=y
CONFIG_ADB_PMU_LED=y
CONFIG_ADB_PMU_LED_IDE=y
CONFIG_PMAC_APM_EMU=m
# CONFIG_PMAC_MEDIABAY is not set
CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT=y
CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT_LEGACY=y
# CONFIG_ADB_MACIO is not set
CONFIG_INPUT_ADBHID=y
CONFIG_MAC_EMUMOUSEBTN=y
# CONFIG_THERM_WINDTUNNEL is not set
CONFIG_THERM_ADT746X=m
# CONFIG_WINDFARM is not set
# CONFIG_PMAC_RACKMETER is not set
CONFIG_NETDEVICES=y
CONFIG_DUMMY=m
# CONFIG_BONDING is not set
# CONFIG_MACVLAN is not set
# CONFIG_EQUALIZER is not set
CONFIG_TUN=m
# CONFIG_VETH is not set
# CONFIG_ARCNET is not set
# CONFIG_PHYLIB is not set
CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET=y
CONFIG_MII=m
# CONFIG_MACE is not set
# CONFIG_BMAC is not set
# CONFIG_HAPPYMEAL is not set
CONFIG_SUNGEM=y
# CONFIG_CASSINI is not set
# CONFIG_NET_VENDOR_3COM is not set
# CONFIG_ETHOC is not set
# CONFIG_DNET is not set
# CONFIG_NET_TULIP is not set
# CONFIG_HP100 is not set
# CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_ZMII is not set
# CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_RGMII is not set
# CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_TAH is not set
# CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_EMAC4 is not set
# CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_NO_FLOW_CTRL is not set
# CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_MAL_CLR_ICINTSTAT is not set
# CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC_MAL_COMMON_ERR is not set
# CONFIG_NET_PCI is not set
# CONFIG_B44 is not set
# CONFIG_KS8842 is not set
# CONFIG_ATL2 is not set
# CONFIG_NETDEV_1000 is not set
# CONFIG_NETDEV_10000 is not set
# CONFIG_TR is not set
#
# Wireless LAN
#
# CONFIG_WLAN_PRE80211 is not set
CONFIG_WLAN_80211=y
# CONFIG_LIBERTAS is not set
# CONFIG_LIBERTAS_THINFIRM is not set
# CONFIG_AIRO is not set
# CONFIG_ATMEL is not set
# CONFIG_AT76C50X_USB is not set
# CONFIG_PRISM54 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ZD1201 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_NET_RNDIS_WLAN is not set
# CONFIG_RTL8180 is not set
# CONFIG_RTL8187 is not set
# CONFIG_ADM8211 is not set
# CONFIG_MAC80211_HWSIM is not set
# CONFIG_MWL8K is not set
# CONFIG_P54_COMMON is not set
# CONFIG_ATH5K is not set
# CONFIG_ATH9K is not set
# CONFIG_AR9170_USB is not set
# CONFIG_IPW2100 is not set
# CONFIG_IPW2200 is not set
# CONFIG_IWLWIFI is not set
# CONFIG_HOSTAP is not set
CONFIG_B43=m
CONFIG_B43_PCI_AUTOSELECT=y
CONFIG_B43_PCICORE_AUTOSELECT=y
CONFIG_B43_LEDS=y
CONFIG_B43_HWRNG=y
# CONFIG_B43_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_B43LEGACY is not set
# CONFIG_ZD1211RW is not set
# CONFIG_RT2X00 is not set
# CONFIG_HERMES is not set
#
# Enable WiMAX (Networking options) to see the WiMAX drivers
#
#
# USB Network Adapters
#
CONFIG_USB_CATC=m
CONFIG_USB_KAWETH=m
CONFIG_USB_PEGASUS=m
CONFIG_USB_RTL8150=m
CONFIG_USB_USBNET=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_AX8817X=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_CDCETHER=m
# CONFIG_USB_NET_CDC_EEM is not set
CONFIG_USB_NET_DM9601=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_SMSC95XX=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_GL620A=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_NET1080=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_PLUSB=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_MCS7830=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_RNDIS_HOST=m
CONFIG_USB_NET_CDC_SUBSET=m
CONFIG_USB_ALI_M5632=y
CONFIG_USB_AN2720=y
CONFIG_USB_BELKIN=y
CONFIG_USB_ARMLINUX=y
CONFIG_USB_EPSON2888=y
CONFIG_USB_KC2190=y
CONFIG_USB_NET_ZAURUS=m
# CONFIG_USB_NET_INT51X1 is not set
# CONFIG_WAN is not set
# CONFIG_FDDI is not set
# CONFIG_HIPPI is not set
CONFIG_PPP=m
CONFIG_PPP_MULTILINK=y
CONFIG_PPP_FILTER=y
CONFIG_PPP_ASYNC=m
CONFIG_PPP_SYNC_TTY=m
CONFIG_PPP_DEFLATE=m
CONFIG_PPP_BSDCOMP=m
CONFIG_PPP_MPPE=m
CONFIG_PPPOE=m
CONFIG_PPPOL2TP=m
# CONFIG_SLIP is not set
CONFIG_SLHC=m
# CONFIG_NET_FC is not set
# CONFIG_NETCONSOLE is not set
# CONFIG_NETPOLL is not set
# CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER is not set
# CONFIG_ISDN is not set
# CONFIG_PHONE is not set
#
# Input device support
#
CONFIG_INPUT=y
CONFIG_INPUT_FF_MEMLESS=m
# CONFIG_INPUT_POLLDEV is not set
#
# Userland interfaces
#
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=y
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_PSAUX=y
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_X=1024
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_Y=768
# CONFIG_INPUT_JOYDEV is not set
CONFIG_INPUT_EVDEV=m
# CONFIG_INPUT_EVBUG is not set
#
# Input Device Drivers
#
CONFIG_INPUT_KEYBOARD=y
# CONFIG_KEYBOARD_ATKBD is not set
# CONFIG_KEYBOARD_LKKBD is not set
# CONFIG_KEYBOARD_LM8323 is not set
# CONFIG_KEYBOARD_NEWTON is not set
# CONFIG_KEYBOARD_STOWAWAY is not set
# CONFIG_KEYBOARD_SUNKBD is not set
# CONFIG_KEYBOARD_XTKBD is not set
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSE=y
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2=y
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_ALPS=y
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_LOGIPS2PP=y
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_SYNAPTICS=y
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_TRACKPOINT=y
# CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_ELANTECH is not set
# CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_TOUCHKIT is not set
# CONFIG_MOUSE_SERIAL is not set
# CONFIG_MOUSE_APPLETOUCH is not set
# CONFIG_MOUSE_BCM5974 is not set
# CONFIG_MOUSE_VSXXXAA is not set
# CONFIG_MOUSE_SYNAPTICS_I2C is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_JOYSTICK is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_TABLET is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_TOUCHSCREEN is not set
CONFIG_INPUT_MISC=y
# CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_ATI_REMOTE is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_ATI_REMOTE2 is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_KEYSPAN_REMOTE is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_POWERMATE is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_YEALINK is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_CM109 is not set
CONFIG_INPUT_UINPUT=m
#
# Hardware I/O ports
#
CONFIG_SERIO=y
CONFIG_SERIO_I8042=y
CONFIG_SERIO_SERPORT=y
# CONFIG_SERIO_PCIPS2 is not set
CONFIG_SERIO_LIBPS2=y
# CONFIG_SERIO_RAW is not set
# CONFIG_SERIO_XILINX_XPS_PS2 is not set
# CONFIG_GAMEPORT is not set
#
# Character devices
#
CONFIG_VT=y
CONFIG_CONSOLE_TRANSLATIONS=y
CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_HW_CONSOLE=y
# CONFIG_VT_HW_CONSOLE_BINDING is not set
# CONFIG_DEVKMEM is not set
# CONFIG_SERIAL_NONSTANDARD is not set
# CONFIG_NOZOMI is not set
#
# Serial drivers
#
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=m
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI=m
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_NR_UARTS=4
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RUNTIME_UARTS=4
# CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_EXTENDED is not set
#
# Non-8250 serial port support
#
# CONFIG_SERIAL_UARTLITE is not set
CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE=m
# CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG is not set
# CONFIG_SERIAL_JSM is not set
# CONFIG_SERIAL_OF_PLATFORM is not set
CONFIG_UNIX98_PTYS=y
# CONFIG_DEVPTS_MULTIPLE_INSTANCES is not set
CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS=y
CONFIG_LEGACY_PTY_COUNT=256
# CONFIG_BRIQ_PANEL is not set
# CONFIG_HVC_RTAS is not set
# CONFIG_HVC_UDBG is not set
# CONFIG_IPMI_HANDLER is not set
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM=y
# CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TIMERIOMEM is not set
CONFIG_NVRAM=y
# CONFIG_R3964 is not set
# CONFIG_APPLICOM is not set
# CONFIG_RAW_DRIVER is not set
# CONFIG_TCG_TPM is not set
CONFIG_DEVPORT=y
CONFIG_I2C=y
CONFIG_I2C_BOARDINFO=y
CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV=y
CONFIG_I2C_HELPER_AUTO=y
CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT=y
#
# I2C Hardware Bus support
#
#
# PC SMBus host controller drivers
#
# CONFIG_I2C_ALI1535 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_ALI1563 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_ALI15X3 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_AMD756 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_AMD8111 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_I801 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_ISCH is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_PIIX4 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_NFORCE2 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_SIS5595 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_SIS630 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_SIS96X is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_VIAPRO is not set
#
# Mac SMBus host controller drivers
#
# CONFIG_I2C_HYDRA is not set
CONFIG_I2C_POWERMAC=m
#
# I2C system bus drivers (mostly embedded / system-on-chip)
#
# CONFIG_I2C_MPC is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_OCORES is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_SIMTEC is not set
#
# External I2C/SMBus adapter drivers
#
# CONFIG_I2C_PARPORT_LIGHT is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_TAOS_EVM is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_TINY_USB is not set
#
# Graphics adapter I2C/DDC channel drivers
#
# CONFIG_I2C_VOODOO3 is not set
#
# Other I2C/SMBus bus drivers
#
# CONFIG_I2C_PCA_PLATFORM is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_STUB is not set
#
# Miscellaneous I2C Chip support
#
# CONFIG_DS1682 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_PCF8574 is not set
# CONFIG_PCF8575 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_PCA9539 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_TSL2550 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CORE is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_ALGO is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_BUS is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CHIP is not set
# CONFIG_SPI is not set
#
# PPS support
#
# CONFIG_PPS is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB=y
# CONFIG_GPIOLIB is not set
# CONFIG_W1 is not set
CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY=y
# CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_PDA_POWER is not set
# CONFIG_APM_POWER is not set
# CONFIG_BATTERY_DS2760 is not set
# CONFIG_BATTERY_DS2782 is not set
CONFIG_BATTERY_PMU=y
# CONFIG_BATTERY_BQ27x00 is not set
# CONFIG_BATTERY_MAX17040 is not set
CONFIG_HWMON=y
# CONFIG_HWMON_VID is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7414 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7418 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1021 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1025 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1026 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1029 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1031 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM9240 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADT7462 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADT7470 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADT7473 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADT7475 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_AMS is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ATXP1 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_DS1621 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_I5K_AMB is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_F71805F is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_F71882FG is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_F75375S is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_G760A is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_GL518SM is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_GL520SM is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_IT87 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM63 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM75 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM77 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM78 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM80 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM83 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM85 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM87 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM90 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM92 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM93 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LTC4215 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LTC4245 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM95241 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_MAX1619 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_MAX6650 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_PC87360 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_PC87427 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_PCF8591 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_SIS5595 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_DME1737 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47M1 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47M192 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_SMSC47B397 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADS7828 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_THMC50 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_TMP401 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_VIA686A is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_VT1211 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_VT8231 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_W83781D is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_W83791D is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_W83792D is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_W83793 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_W83L785TS is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_W83L786NG is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_W83627HF is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_W83627EHF is not set
# CONFIG_HWMON_DEBUG_CHIP is not set
CONFIG_THERMAL=y
# CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON is not set
# CONFIG_WATCHDOG is not set
CONFIG_SSB_POSSIBLE=y
#
# Sonics Silicon Backplane
#
CONFIG_SSB=m
CONFIG_SSB_SPROM=y
CONFIG_SSB_PCIHOST_POSSIBLE=y
CONFIG_SSB_PCIHOST=y
CONFIG_SSB_B43_PCI_BRIDGE=y
# CONFIG_SSB_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_PCICORE_POSSIBLE=y
CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_PCICORE=y
#
# Multifunction device drivers
#
# CONFIG_MFD_CORE is not set
# CONFIG_MFD_SM501 is not set
# CONFIG_HTC_PASIC3 is not set
# CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE is not set
# CONFIG_MFD_TMIO is not set
# CONFIG_PMIC_DA903X is not set
# CONFIG_MFD_WM8400 is not set
# CONFIG_MFD_WM8350_I2C is not set
# CONFIG_MFD_PCF50633 is not set
# CONFIG_AB3100_CORE is not set
# CONFIG_REGULATOR is not set
# CONFIG_MEDIA_SUPPORT is not set
#
# Graphics support
#
CONFIG_AGP=y
CONFIG_AGP_UNINORTH=y
CONFIG_DRM=y
# CONFIG_DRM_TDFX is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_R128 is not set
CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=y
# CONFIG_DRM_MGA is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_SAVAGE is not set
# CONFIG_VGASTATE is not set
CONFIG_VIDEO_OUTPUT_CONTROL=m
CONFIG_FB=y
# CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID is not set
CONFIG_FB_DDC=y
# CONFIG_FB_BOOT_VESA_SUPPORT is not set
CONFIG_FB_CFB_FILLRECT=y
CONFIG_FB_CFB_COPYAREA=y
CONFIG_FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT=y
# CONFIG_FB_CFB_REV_PIXELS_IN_BYTE is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SYS_FILLRECT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SYS_COPYAREA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_FOREIGN_ENDIAN is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SYS_FOPS is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SVGALIB is not set
CONFIG_FB_MACMODES=y
CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y
CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y
# CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING is not set
#
# Frame buffer hardware drivers
#
# CONFIG_FB_CIRRUS is not set
# CONFIG_FB_PM2 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_CYBER2000 is not set
CONFIG_FB_OF=y
# CONFIG_FB_CONTROL is not set
# CONFIG_FB_PLATINUM is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VALKYRIE is not set
# CONFIG_FB_CT65550 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ASILIANT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_IMSTT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VGA16 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_S1D13XXX is not set
# CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_RIVA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_MATROX is not set
CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y
CONFIG_FB_RADEON_I2C=y
CONFIG_FB_RADEON_BACKLIGHT=y
# CONFIG_FB_RADEON_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ATY128 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ATY is not set
# CONFIG_FB_S3 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SAVAGE is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_NEOMAGIC is not set
# CONFIG_FB_KYRO is not set
# CONFIG_FB_3DFX is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VOODOO1 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VT8623 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_TRIDENT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ARK is not set
# CONFIG_FB_PM3 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_CARMINE is not set
# CONFIG_FB_IBM_GXT4500 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VIRTUAL is not set
# CONFIG_FB_METRONOME is not set
# CONFIG_FB_MB862XX is not set
# CONFIG_FB_BROADSHEET is not set
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_LCD_CLASS_DEVICE=m
# CONFIG_LCD_ILI9320 is not set
CONFIG_LCD_PLATFORM=m
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=y
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_GENERIC=y
#
# Display device support
#
# CONFIG_DISPLAY_SUPPORT is not set
#
# Console display driver support
#
# CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE is not set
CONFIG_DUMMY_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y
# CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DETECT_PRIMARY is not set
# CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_ROTATION is not set
# CONFIG_FONTS is not set
CONFIG_FONT_8x8=y
CONFIG_FONT_8x16=y
CONFIG_LOGO=y
# CONFIG_LOGO_LINUX_MONO is not set
CONFIG_LOGO_LINUX_VGA16=y
CONFIG_LOGO_LINUX_CLUT224=y
CONFIG_SOUND=m
CONFIG_SOUND_OSS_CORE=y
CONFIG_SND=m
CONFIG_SND_TIMER=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM=m
CONFIG_SND_HWDEP=m
CONFIG_SND_RAWMIDI=m
# CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER is not set
CONFIG_SND_OSSEMUL=y
CONFIG_SND_MIXER_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS_PLUGINS=y
# CONFIG_SND_DYNAMIC_MINORS is not set
# CONFIG_SND_SUPPORT_OLD_API is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VERBOSE_PROCFS is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VERBOSE_PRINTK is not set
# CONFIG_SND_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_SND_VMASTER=y
# CONFIG_SND_RAWMIDI_SEQ is not set
# CONFIG_SND_OPL3_LIB_SEQ is not set
# CONFIG_SND_OPL4_LIB_SEQ is not set
# CONFIG_SND_SBAWE_SEQ is not set
# CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1_SEQ is not set
CONFIG_SND_DRIVERS=y
# CONFIG_SND_DUMMY is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MTPAV is not set
# CONFIG_SND_SERIAL_U16550 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MPU401 is not set
CONFIG_SND_PCI=y
# CONFIG_SND_AD1889 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ALS300 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ALS4000 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ALI5451 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ATIIXP is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ATIIXP_MODEM is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AU8810 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AU8820 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AU8830 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AW2 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AZT3328 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_BT87X is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CA0106 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CMIPCI is not set
# CONFIG_SND_OXYGEN is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CS4281 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CS46XX is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CS5530 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CTXFI is not set
# CONFIG_SND_DARLA20 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_GINA20 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_LAYLA20 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_DARLA24 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_GINA24 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_LAYLA24 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MONA is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MIA is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ECHO3G is not set
# CONFIG_SND_INDIGO is not set
# CONFIG_SND_INDIGOIO is not set
# CONFIG_SND_INDIGODJ is not set
# CONFIG_SND_INDIGOIOX is not set
# CONFIG_SND_INDIGODJX is not set
# CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1X is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ENS1370 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ENS1371 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ES1938 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ES1968 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_FM801 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL is not set
# CONFIG_SND_HDSP is not set
# CONFIG_SND_HDSPM is not set
# CONFIG_SND_HIFIER is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ICE1712 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ICE1724 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_INTEL8X0 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_INTEL8X0M is not set
# CONFIG_SND_KORG1212 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_LX6464ES is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MAESTRO3 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MIXART is not set
# CONFIG_SND_NM256 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_PCXHR is not set
# CONFIG_SND_RIPTIDE is not set
# CONFIG_SND_RME32 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_RME96 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_RME9652 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_SONICVIBES is not set
# CONFIG_SND_TRIDENT is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VIA82XX is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VIA82XX_MODEM is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VIRTUOSO is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VX222 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_YMFPCI is not set
CONFIG_SND_PPC=y
CONFIG_SND_POWERMAC=m
CONFIG_SND_POWERMAC_AUTO_DRC=y
CONFIG_SND_AOA=m
CONFIG_SND_AOA_FABRIC_LAYOUT=m
CONFIG_SND_AOA_ONYX=m
CONFIG_SND_AOA_TAS=m
# CONFIG_SND_AOA_TOONIE is not set
CONFIG_SND_AOA_SOUNDBUS=m
CONFIG_SND_AOA_SOUNDBUS_I2S=m
CONFIG_SND_USB=y
CONFIG_SND_USB_AUDIO=m
# CONFIG_SND_USB_USX2Y is not set
# CONFIG_SND_USB_CAIAQ is not set
# CONFIG_SND_SOC is not set
# CONFIG_SOUND_PRIME is not set
CONFIG_HID_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_HID=m
CONFIG_HID_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_HIDRAW=y
#
# USB Input Devices
#
CONFIG_USB_HID=m
# CONFIG_HID_PID is not set
# CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV is not set
#
# Special HID drivers
#
CONFIG_HID_A4TECH=m
CONFIG_HID_APPLE=m
CONFIG_HID_BELKIN=m
CONFIG_HID_CHERRY=m
CONFIG_HID_CHICONY=m
CONFIG_HID_CYPRESS=m
CONFIG_HID_DRAGONRISE=m
# CONFIG_DRAGONRISE_FF is not set
CONFIG_HID_EZKEY=m
CONFIG_HID_KYE=m
CONFIG_HID_GYRATION=m
CONFIG_HID_KENSINGTON=m
CONFIG_HID_LOGITECH=m
# CONFIG_LOGITECH_FF is not set
# CONFIG_LOGIRUMBLEPAD2_FF is not set
CONFIG_HID_MICROSOFT=m
CONFIG_HID_MONTEREY=m
CONFIG_HID_NTRIG=m
CONFIG_HID_PANTHERLORD=m
# CONFIG_PANTHERLORD_FF is not set
CONFIG_HID_PETALYNX=m
CONFIG_HID_SAMSUNG=m
CONFIG_HID_SONY=m
CONFIG_HID_SUNPLUS=m
CONFIG_HID_GREENASIA=m
# CONFIG_GREENASIA_FF is not set
CONFIG_HID_SMARTJOYPLUS=m
# CONFIG_SMARTJOYPLUS_FF is not set
CONFIG_HID_TOPSEED=m
CONFIG_HID_THRUSTMASTER=m
# CONFIG_THRUSTMASTER_FF is not set
CONFIG_HID_WACOM=m
CONFIG_HID_ZEROPLUS=m
# CONFIG_ZEROPLUS_FF is not set
CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD=y
CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI=y
CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI=y
CONFIG_USB=m
# CONFIG_USB_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_USB_ANNOUNCE_NEW_DEVICES=y
#
# Miscellaneous USB options
#
CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS=y
# CONFIG_USB_DEVICE_CLASS is not set
# CONFIG_USB_DYNAMIC_MINORS is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND is not set
# CONFIG_USB_OTG is not set
# CONFIG_USB_MON is not set
CONFIG_USB_WUSB=m
# CONFIG_USB_WUSB_CBAF is not set
#
# USB Host Controller Drivers
#
# CONFIG_USB_C67X00_HCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD is not set
CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=m
# CONFIG_USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT is not set
# CONFIG_USB_EHCI_TT_NEWSCHED is not set
CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD_PPC_OF=y
# CONFIG_USB_OXU210HP_HCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ISP116X_HCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ISP1760_HCD is not set
CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD=m
CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD_PPC_OF_BE=y
# CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD_PPC_OF_LE is not set
CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD_PPC_OF=y
CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD_PCI=y
# CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD_SSB is not set
CONFIG_USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_DESC=y
CONFIG_USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_MMIO=y
CONFIG_USB_OHCI_LITTLE_ENDIAN=y
# CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SL811_HCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_R8A66597_HCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_WHCI_HCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_HWA_HCD is not set
#
# Enable Host or Gadget support to see Inventra options
#
#
# USB Device Class drivers
#
CONFIG_USB_ACM=m
CONFIG_USB_PRINTER=m
# CONFIG_USB_WDM is not set
# CONFIG_USB_TMC is not set
#
# NOTE: USB_STORAGE depends on SCSI but BLK_DEV_SD may
#
#
# also be needed; see USB_STORAGE Help for more info
#
CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=m
# CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DATAFAB=m
CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_FREECOM=m
CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_ISD200=m
CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_USBAT=m
CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_SDDR09=m
CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_SDDR55=m
CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_JUMPSHOT=m
CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_ALAUDA=m
# CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_ONETOUCH is not set
CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_KARMA=m
# CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_CYPRESS_ATACB is not set
# CONFIG_USB_LIBUSUAL is not set
#
# USB Imaging devices
#
# CONFIG_USB_MDC800 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_MICROTEK is not set
#
# USB port drivers
#
CONFIG_USB_SERIAL=m
CONFIG_USB_EZUSB=y
CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_GENERIC=y
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_AIRCABLE is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_ARK3116 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_BELKIN is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_CH341 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_WHITEHEAT is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_DIGI_ACCELEPORT is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_CP210X is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_CYPRESS_M8 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_EMPEG is not set
CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_FTDI_SIO=m
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_FUNSOFT is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_VISOR is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_IPAQ is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_IR is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_EDGEPORT is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_EDGEPORT_TI is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_GARMIN is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_IPW is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_IUU is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_PDA is not set
CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN=m
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KLSI is not set
CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KOBIL_SCT=m
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_MCT_U232 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_MOS7720 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_MOS7840 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_MOTOROLA is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_NAVMAN is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_PL2303 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_OTI6858 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_QUALCOMM is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_SPCP8X5 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_HP4X is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_SAFE is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_SIEMENS_MPI is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_SIERRAWIRELESS is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_SYMBOL is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_TI is not set
CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_CYBERJACK=m
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_XIRCOM is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_OPTION is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_OMNINET is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_OPTICON is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_DEBUG is not set
#
# USB Miscellaneous drivers
#
# CONFIG_USB_EMI62 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_EMI26 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ADUTUX is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SEVSEG is not set
# CONFIG_USB_RIO500 is not set
CONFIG_USB_LEGOTOWER=m
# CONFIG_USB_LCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_BERRY_CHARGE is not set
# CONFIG_USB_LED is not set
# CONFIG_USB_CYPRESS_CY7C63 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_CYTHERM is not set
# CONFIG_USB_IDMOUSE is not set
# CONFIG_USB_FTDI_ELAN is not set
# CONFIG_USB_APPLEDISPLAY is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SISUSBVGA is not set
# CONFIG_USB_LD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_TRANCEVIBRATOR is not set
# CONFIG_USB_IOWARRIOR is not set
# CONFIG_USB_TEST is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ISIGHTFW is not set
# CONFIG_USB_VST is not set
# CONFIG_USB_GADGET is not set
#
# OTG and related infrastructure
#
# CONFIG_NOP_USB_XCEIV is not set
CONFIG_UWB=m
# CONFIG_UWB_HWA is not set
# CONFIG_UWB_WHCI is not set
# CONFIG_UWB_WLP is not set
# CONFIG_MMC is not set
# CONFIG_MEMSTICK is not set
CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y
CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=y
#
# LED drivers
#
# CONFIG_LEDS_PCA9532 is not set
# CONFIG_LEDS_LP3944 is not set
# CONFIG_LEDS_PCA955X is not set
# CONFIG_LEDS_BD2802 is not set
#
# LED Triggers
#
CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS=y
CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER=y
CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_IDE_DISK=y
CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT=y
CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_BACKLIGHT=y
CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_DEFAULT_ON=y
#
# iptables trigger is under Netfilter config (LED target)
#
# CONFIG_ACCESSIBILITY is not set
# CONFIG_INFINIBAND is not set
# CONFIG_EDAC is not set
CONFIG_RTC_LIB=m
CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=m
#
# RTC interfaces
#
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_PROC=y
CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV=y
# CONFIG_RTC_INTF_DEV_UIE_EMUL is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_TEST is not set
#
# I2C RTC drivers
#
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1374 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1672 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MAX6900 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RS5C372 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_ISL1208 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_X1205 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8563 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PCF8583 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M41T80 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_S35390A is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_FM3130 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RX8581 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RX8025 is not set
#
# SPI RTC drivers
#
#
# Platform RTC drivers
#
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1286 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1511 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1553 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1742 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_STK17TA8 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M48T86 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M48T35 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_M48T59 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_BQ4802 is not set
# CONFIG_RTC_DRV_V3020 is not set
#
# on-CPU RTC drivers
#
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_GENERIC=m
CONFIG_DMADEVICES=y
#
# DMA Devices
#
# CONFIG_AUXDISPLAY is not set
# CONFIG_UIO is not set
#
# TI VLYNQ
#
# CONFIG_STAGING is not set
#
# File systems
#
CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y
# CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR is not set
# CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP is not set
CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y
# CONFIG_EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED is not set
CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y
# CONFIG_EXT3_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set
# CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY is not set
CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m
# CONFIG_EXT4DEV_COMPAT is not set
CONFIG_EXT4_FS_XATTR=y
# CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set
# CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY is not set
CONFIG_JBD=y
CONFIG_JBD2=m
CONFIG_FS_MBCACHE=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=y
# CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK is not set
# CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO is not set
# CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR is not set
CONFIG_JFS_FS=m
# CONFIG_JFS_POSIX_ACL is not set
# CONFIG_JFS_SECURITY is not set
# CONFIG_JFS_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_JFS_STATISTICS is not set
# CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set
# CONFIG_XFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_GFS2_FS is not set
# CONFIG_OCFS2_FS is not set
# CONFIG_BTRFS_FS is not set
CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING=y
CONFIG_FSNOTIFY=y
CONFIG_DNOTIFY=y
CONFIG_INOTIFY=y
CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER=y
# CONFIG_QUOTA is not set
# CONFIG_AUTOFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_AUTOFS4_FS is not set
CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m
# CONFIG_CUSE is not set
#
# Caches
#
# CONFIG_FSCACHE is not set
#
# CD-ROM/DVD Filesystems
#
CONFIG_ISO9660_FS=m
CONFIG_JOLIET=y
CONFIG_ZISOFS=y
CONFIG_UDF_FS=m
CONFIG_UDF_NLS=y
#
# DOS/FAT/NT Filesystems
#
CONFIG_FAT_FS=m
CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=m
CONFIG_VFAT_FS=m
CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_CODEPAGE=437
CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET="iso8859-1"
CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m
# CONFIG_NTFS_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y
#
# Pseudo filesystems
#
CONFIG_PROC_FS=y
CONFIG_PROC_KCORE=y
CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL=y
CONFIG_PROC_PAGE_MONITOR=y
CONFIG_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_TMPFS=y
# CONFIG_TMPFS_POSIX_ACL is not set
# CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set
# CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS is not set
CONFIG_MISC_FILESYSTEMS=y
# CONFIG_ADFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_AFFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_HFS_FS is not set
CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS=m
# CONFIG_BEFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_BFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_EFS_FS is not set
CONFIG_CRAMFS=m
# CONFIG_SQUASHFS is not set
# CONFIG_VXFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_MINIX_FS is not set
# CONFIG_OMFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_HPFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_QNX4FS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_ROMFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_SYSV_FS is not set
# CONFIG_UFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_NILFS2_FS is not set
CONFIG_NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS=y
CONFIG_NFS_FS=m
CONFIG_NFS_V3=y
# CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL is not set
# CONFIG_NFS_V4 is not set
CONFIG_NFSD=m
CONFIG_NFSD_V3=y
# CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL is not set
# CONFIG_NFSD_V4 is not set
CONFIG_LOCKD=m
CONFIG_LOCKD_V4=y
CONFIG_EXPORTFS=m
CONFIG_NFS_COMMON=y
CONFIG_SUNRPC=m
# CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 is not set
# CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_SPKM3 is not set
CONFIG_SMB_FS=m
# CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT is not set
CONFIG_CIFS=m
# CONFIG_CIFS_STATS is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_WEAK_PW_HASH is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG2 is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL is not set
# CONFIG_NCP_FS is not set
# CONFIG_CODA_FS is not set
# CONFIG_AFS_FS is not set
#
# Partition Types
#
CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED=y
# CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_OSF_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_AMIGA_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_ATARI_PARTITION is not set
CONFIG_MAC_PARTITION=y
CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION=y
CONFIG_BSD_DISKLABEL=y
# CONFIG_MINIX_SUBPARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_UNIXWARE_DISKLABEL is not set
# CONFIG_LDM_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_SGI_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_ULTRIX_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_SUN_PARTITION is not set
CONFIG_KARMA_PARTITION=y
# CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION is not set
# CONFIG_SYSV68_PARTITION is not set
CONFIG_NLS=y
CONFIG_NLS_DEFAULT="iso8859-1"
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_437=y
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_737 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_775 is not set
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_850=y
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_852 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_855 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_857 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_860 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_861 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_862 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_863 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_864 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_865 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_866 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_869 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_936 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_950 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_932 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_949 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_874 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_8 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_1250 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_1251 is not set
CONFIG_NLS_ASCII=y
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_1=y
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_2 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_3 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_4 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_5 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_6 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_7 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_9 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_13 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_14 is not set
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_15=y
# CONFIG_NLS_KOI8_R is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_KOI8_U is not set
CONFIG_NLS_UTF8=y
# CONFIG_DLM is not set
# CONFIG_BINARY_PRINTF is not set
#
# Library routines
#
CONFIG_BITREVERSE=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_LAST_BIT=y
CONFIG_CRC_CCITT=y
CONFIG_CRC16=m
CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=m
CONFIG_CRC_ITU_T=m
CONFIG_CRC32=y
# CONFIG_CRC7 is not set
CONFIG_LIBCRC32C=m
CONFIG_ZLIB_INFLATE=m
CONFIG_ZLIB_DEFLATE=m
CONFIG_LZO_COMPRESS=m
CONFIG_LZO_DECOMPRESS=m
CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM=y
CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT=y
CONFIG_HAS_DMA=y
CONFIG_HAVE_LMB=y
CONFIG_NLATTR=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64=y
#
# Kernel hacking
#
# CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME is not set
CONFIG_ENABLE_WARN_DEPRECATED=y
# CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK is not set
CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=1024
# CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ is not set
# CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set
# CONFIG_HEADERS_CHECK is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL is not set
CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMORY_INIT=y
# CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR is not set
# CONFIG_LATENCYTOP is not set
CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL_CHECK=y
CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER=y
CONFIG_HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER=y
CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y
CONFIG_HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD=y
CONFIG_TRACING_SUPPORT=y
# CONFIG_FTRACE is not set
# CONFIG_SAMPLES is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KGDB=y
# CONFIG_PPC_DISABLE_WERROR is not set
CONFIG_PPC_WERROR=y
CONFIG_PRINT_STACK_DEPTH=64
# CONFIG_IRQSTACKS is not set
CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=y
# CONFIG_PPC_EARLY_DEBUG is not set
#
# Security options
#
# CONFIG_KEYS is not set
# CONFIG_SECURITY is not set
# CONFIG_SECURITYFS is not set
# CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES is not set
CONFIG_CRYPTO=y
#
# Crypto core or helper
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_FIPS=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ALGAPI=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ALGAPI2=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEAD=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEAD2=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_BLKCIPHER=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_BLKCIPHER2=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH2=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_RNG=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_RNG2=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_PCOMP=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER2=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_GF128MUL=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_NULL=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_WORKQUEUE=y
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRYPTD is not set
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AUTHENC=m
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEST is not set
#
# Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CCM=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_GCM=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SEQIV=m
#
# Block modes
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CBC=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CTR=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CTS=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ECB=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_LRW=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_PCBC=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS=m
#
# Hash modes
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_HMAC=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_XCBC=m
#
# Digest
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32C=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD4=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD5=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MICHAEL_MIC=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD128=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD160=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD256=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_RMD320=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA1=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TGR192=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_WP512=m
#
# Ciphers
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ANUBIS=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ARC4=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_BLOWFISH=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAMELLIA=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAST5=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAST6=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DES=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_FCRYPT=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_KHAZAD=m
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_SALSA20 is not set
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SEED=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SERPENT=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEA=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH_COMMON=m
#
# Compression
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEFLATE=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ZLIB=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_LZO=m
#
# Random Number Generation
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ANSI_CPRNG=m
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_HW is not set
# CONFIG_PPC_CLOCK is not set
# CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION is not set
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram
[not found] ` <87hbvurzdg.fsf-X87fCqEI3snt2/fatF9ZgSk+o5UQzIjPIRYYPiSvRdM@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-08-26 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-26 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Scholz
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thursday 27 August 2009, Jan Scholz wrote:
>
> The bug is still present in v2.6.31-rc7.
Thanks for the update.
> To make it easier to reproduce, I attached my config to this mail.
Can you also attach it to the bug entry, please?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
[not found] ` <20090826123647.e60d9555.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-08-27 10:53 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <200908272023.21288.rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2009-08-27 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Frans Pop, zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
protasnb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b, Zhang Rui, Len Brown,
Stephen Rothwell
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:06:47 am Andrew Morton wrote:
> So in my tree I reworked it so that the new `force' arg gets passed
> through appropriately. It compiles cleanly but I'd suggest that Len
> simply drop "misc:work_on_cpu-acpi" and we send it back to Rusty for
> some rechecking (sorry).
Sure. My main motivation is to get rid of cpumasks on the stack; while
there, I tried to fix this up properly.
> Rusty/Len: please work out why the title for that patch went silly.
git-quiltimport uses the patch names, and doesn't extract the title. I
assume that's what Stephen uses. I didn't rename the patch when I rewrote
it not to use work_on_cpu.
> Rusty, please self-administer smackings for
>
> struct set_throttling_info sti
> = { pr, p_throttling, t_state.target_state };
>
> these things always start out simple and end up not-simple, so some poor
> schmuck has to clean them up so stuff doesn't break.
>
> struct set_throttling_info sti = {
> .pr = pr,
> .p_throttling = p_throttling,
> .target_state = t_state.target_state,
> .force = force
> };
>
> is better!
Meh... same concept applies to function arguments, and we rely on typechecking
to catch that (though we have little choice in C).
> My linux-next repair job:
OK, I've dropped these from my tree entirely to avoid more problems.
Can you take them? They're not really at home in my tree.
arch-x86-kernel-acpi-cstatec-avoid-using-work_on_cpu.patch
misc:work_on_cpu-acpi.patch
misc:work_on_cpu-acpi-fix.patch
misc:work_on_cpu-dcdbas.patch
You can fetch them from http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/kernel/rr-latest/
(You'll want to rename the last three something sane...)
Thanks,
Rusty.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
[not found] ` <200908272023.21288.rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-08-27 11:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <20090827211351.f9c96bfc.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-27 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-08-27 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell
Cc: Andrew Morton, Frans Pop, zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
protasnb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b, Zhang Rui, Len Brown
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 697 bytes --]
Hi Rusty,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:23:20 +0930 Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > Rusty/Len: please work out why the title for that patch went silly.
>
> git-quiltimport uses the patch names, and doesn't extract the title. I
> assume that's what Stephen uses. I didn't rename the patch when I rewrote
> it not to use work_on_cpu.
git quiltimport assumes "mail-like" patches, so it looks for "From:" and
"Subject:" lines. I guess it could be made to use the first line of the
patch if there is no subject ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
[not found] ` <200908272023.21288.rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-27 11:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-08-27 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20090827143653.52308d6d.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-08-27 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell
Cc: elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw, zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
protasnb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b,
rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A,
sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:23:20 +0930
Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > My linux-next repair job:
>
> OK, I've dropped these from my tree entirely to avoid more problems.
>
> Can you take them? They're not really at home in my tree.
>
> arch-x86-kernel-acpi-cstatec-avoid-using-work_on_cpu.patch
> misc:work_on_cpu-acpi.patch
> misc:work_on_cpu-acpi-fix.patch
> misc:work_on_cpu-dcdbas.patch
>
> You can fetch them from http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/kernel/rr-latest/
>
> (You'll want to rename the last three something sane...)
Those patches are already in today's linux-next so I can't carry them.
Please email them over in the traditional fashion once that situation
has sorted itself out?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
[not found] ` <20090827143653.52308d6d.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-08-27 23:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-08-27 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Rusty Russell, elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw,
zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
protasnb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b,
rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 996 bytes --]
Hi Andrew, Rusty,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:36:53 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:23:20 +0930 Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > Can you take them? They're not really at home in my tree.
> >
> > arch-x86-kernel-acpi-cstatec-avoid-using-work_on_cpu.patch
> > misc:work_on_cpu-acpi.patch
> > misc:work_on_cpu-acpi-fix.patch
> > misc:work_on_cpu-dcdbas.patch
> >
> > You can fetch them from http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/kernel/rr-latest/
> >
> > (You'll want to rename the last three something sane...)
>
> Those patches are already in today's linux-next so I can't carry them.
>
> Please email them over in the traditional fashion once that situation
> has sorted itself out?
Those patches will not be in next-20090828.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
[not found] ` <20090827211351.f9c96bfc.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-08-28 2:02 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <200908281132.19765.rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2009-08-28 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Andrew Morton, Frans Pop, zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
protasnb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b, Zhang Rui, Len Brown
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:43:51 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:23:20 +0930 Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Rusty/Len: please work out why the title for that patch went silly.
> >
> > git-quiltimport uses the patch names, and doesn't extract the title. I
> > assume that's what Stephen uses. I didn't rename the patch when I rewrote
> > it not to use work_on_cpu.
>
> git quiltimport assumes "mail-like" patches, so it looks for "From:" and
> "Subject:" lines. I guess it could be made to use the first line of the
> patch if there is no subject ...
My scripts should all handle Subject: prefixes, I can just start using that.
Thanks,
Rusty.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30
[not found] ` <200908281132.19765.rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-08-28 2:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-08-28 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell
Cc: Andrew Morton, Frans Pop, zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
protasnb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b, Zhang Rui, Len Brown
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 627 bytes --]
Hi Rusty,
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:32:18 +0930 Rusty Russell <rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:43:51 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > git quiltimport assumes "mail-like" patches, so it looks for "From:" and
> > "Subject:" lines. I guess it could be made to use the first line of the
> > patch if there is no subject ...
>
> My scripts should all handle Subject: prefixes, I can just start using that.
Thanks, that would be good.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
[not found] ` <84144f020908252314l364588bfi16e2d426cece2c5a-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-08-29 9:36 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20090829093657.GC1634-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 139+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2009-08-29 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Linus Torvalds
On Wed 2009-08-26 09:14:02, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. ?Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
> > Subject ? ? ? ? : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
> > Submitter ? ? ? : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
> > Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2009-06-19 17:05 (68 days old)
> > References ? ? ?: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187
>
> Pavel, is this still an open issue? Plenty tty fixes went into 2.6.31
> so maybe we need to backport some of them to -stable?
It seems to be interminent, and depends on timing/usage patterns. (Try
to start bluetooth when it is already starting). It
is possible that it was there before. Perhaps it can be just closed as
'bug but not regression'.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
[not found] ` <20090829093657.GC1634-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-08-29 12:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 139+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-29 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Linus Torvalds
On Saturday 29 August 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2009-08-26 09:14:02, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. ?Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13646
> > > Subject ? ? ? ? : warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth
> > > Submitter ? ? ? : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2009-06-19 17:05 (68 days old)
> > > References ? ? ?: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/187
> >
> > Pavel, is this still an open issue? Plenty tty fixes went into 2.6.31
> > so maybe we need to backport some of them to -stable?
>
> It seems to be interminent, and depends on timing/usage patterns. (Try
> to start bluetooth when it is already starting). It
> is possible that it was there before. Perhaps it can be just closed as
> 'bug but not regression'.
Done.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 139+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-29 12:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 139+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-25 20:37 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 20:37 ` [Bug #13180] 2.6.30-rc2: WARNING at i915_gem.c for i915_gem_idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 6:25 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020908252325p88178f2yb0a76e033352b78d-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-26 20:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13306] hibernate slow on _second_ run Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13219] Intel 440GX: Since kernel 2.6.30-rc1, computers hangs randomly but not with kernel <= 2.6.29.6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 0:12 ` David Hill
[not found] ` <CA50EE78-9582-4F7B-84EA-40CACBDC5D0E-HTiBYHdybX7UkGsOFmftXw@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-26 20:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13318] AGP doesn't work anymore on nforce2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13328] b44: eth0: BUG! Timeout waiting for bit 00000002 of register 42c to clear Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13351] 2.6.30 - 2.6.31 corrupts my system after suspend resume with readonly mounted hard disk Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13389] Warning 'Invalid throttling state, reset' gets displayed when it should not be Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 9:29 ` Frans Pop
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13362] rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13341] Random Oops at boot at loading ip6tables rules Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13407] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 22:20 ` Jan Scholz
[not found] ` <87hbvurzdg.fsf-X87fCqEI3snt2/fatF9ZgSk+o5UQzIjPIRYYPiSvRdM@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-26 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13401] pktcdvd writing is really slow with CFQ scheduler (bisected) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13514] acer_wmi causes stack corruption Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13512] D43 on 2.6.30 doesn't suspend anymore Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13502] GPE storm causes polling mode, which causes /proc/acpi/battery read to take 4 seconds - MacBookPro4,1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13408] Performance regression in 2.6.30-rc7 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13581] ath9k doesn't work with newer kernels Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13564] random general protection fault at boot time caused by khubd Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13583] pdflush uses 5% CPU on otherwise idle system Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13558] Tracelog during resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13646] warn_on tty_io.c, broken bluetooth Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 6:14 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020908252314l364588bfi16e2d426cece2c5a-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-29 9:36 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20090829093657.GC1634-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-29 12:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13694] i915 phantom TV Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13682] The webcam stopped working when upgrading from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13770] System freeze on XFS filesystem recovery on an external disk Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13795] abnormal boot and no suspend due to 'async' (fastboot) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13739] 2.6.30 leaking keys on console switch Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13898] Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13797] iBook G4 doesn't suspend since 2ed8d2b3a8 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13780] NULL pointer dereference loading powernowk8 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13949] XFS regression Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #14059] DomU crashes during xenfb initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 14:18 ` Michal Schmidt
2009-08-26 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #14049] joydev: blacklist digitizers avoids recognition of Saitek X52 joysticks Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 21:05 ` [Bug #13958] ath5k Atheros AR5001 low signal Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 8:47 ` 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafał Miłecki
2009-08-26 14:53 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20090826075337.4230d82c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-26 16:33 ` Frans Pop
2009-08-26 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20090826123647.e60d9555.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-27 10:53 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <200908272023.21288.rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-27 11:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <20090827211351.f9c96bfc.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-28 2:02 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <200908281132.19765.rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-28 2:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-27 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20090827143653.52308d6d.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-27 23:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-26 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-19 20:36 2.6.31-rc6-git5: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-19 20:40 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 21:07 2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 21:10 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-02 19:06 2.6.31-rc5: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-02 19:09 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:41 2.6.31-rc4: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-26 20:45 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-27 0:17 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4A6CF220.7080605-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-27 0:24 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907261722140.21259-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-27 7:08 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020907270008h2a985278of68e70ff1ee9265c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-27 9:37 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907270227420.15760-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-27 17:20 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0907271320130.13513-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-27 18:16 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907271113460.8408-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-27 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-27 22:38 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-06 23:57 2.6.31-rc2: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 0:00 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 1:05 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4A529F60.7010509-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-07 6:29 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907062302540.10840-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-07 6:57 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020907062357m6a75d2eav1589e7f8b4a3d887-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-08 13:18 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-29 0:26 2.6.31-rc1-git3: Reported regressions 2.6.29 -> 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-29 0:30 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-29 16:51 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4A48F114.1010702-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-29 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-29 23:47 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906291642520.17663-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 2:06 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-30 5:47 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-30 6:55 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020906292355o7cf63f7ch47bd19961cf92da3-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 7:47 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906300032310.11018-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 8:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-30 14:38 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <84144f020906300124n24e206b5tc85dd5cc4661bde7-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 20:25 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-30 14:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-30 15:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-30 15:14 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906301114450.3879-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 20:04 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906301248000.16312-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 21:05 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906301632570.22158-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 21:15 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906301413460.24397-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 21:23 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906301722280.17682-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 21:52 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906301445070.26290-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-30 22:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-01 5:53 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020906302253n2424d4a5k3aaf124838a041df-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-02 17:18 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907021016380.30890-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-03 7:23 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 9:47 2.6.30-rc8-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-07 9:52 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-06-07 13:10 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4A2BBC30.2030300-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-07 13:40 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020906070640rf5ab14nbf66d3ca7c97675f-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-07 14:19 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <4A2BCC6F.8090004-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-07 14:32 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020906070732l31786156r5d9753a0cabfde79-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-07 16:35 ` Larry Finger
[not found] ` <4A2BEC4F.6020908-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 8:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <20090608173219.0588af26.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 17:20 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-08 10:17 ` Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20090608101739.GA15377-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 10:52 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020906080352k57f12ff9pbd696da5f332ac1a-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 11:03 ` Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20090608110303.GD15377-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 13:58 ` Pekka J Enberg
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906081657001.7036-nkv1RstziBCWKadcF5yKzn5wuOn9r4cE@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 14:12 ` Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20090608141212.GE15070-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 14:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-09 7:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-09 7:54 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-09 7:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-09 8:14 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.0906090105270.28701-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-09 8:28 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 14:41 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-10 15:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 15:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 15:52 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1244649174.6165.0.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-10 16:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 16:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-10 16:10 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-11 14:41 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906111040440.29827-gkYfJU5Cukgdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-11 15:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-11 18:41 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-10 15:56 ` Mel Gorman
[not found] ` <20090610155626.GA7951-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-10 18:03 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-09 7:50 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-08 13:20 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <4A2D1017.6010308-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 13:35 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-08 13:34 ` Larry Finger
2009-05-30 19:29 2.6.30-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-30 19:37 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-24 19:06 2.6.30-rc7: Reported regressions from 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-24 19:11 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-16 19:14 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-16 19:20 ` [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-16 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20090516163610.8a012268.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-17 23:16 ` Larry Finger
2009-05-18 6:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-21 13:21 ` Larry Finger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).