From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dheeraj Reddy Subject: Re: [Bug #39342] [3.0.0-rc6-git7] possible recursive locking atcache_alloc_refill Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:42:47 -0700 Message-ID: <87hb58inew.fsf@franklin.jf.intel.com> References: <201108150736.FFC69227.MQSJVFHFFOOOtL@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <1314003262.24275.2.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Peter Zijlstra writes: > On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 08:46 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Tetsuo Handa >> wrote: >> > Pekka Enberg wrote: >> >> Tetsuio, did Peter's commit 30765b9 ("slab, lockdep: Annotate the locks >> >> before using them") and commit 83835b3 ("slab, lockdep: Annotate slab -> >> >> rcu -> debug_object -> slab") in Linus' git fix this for you? >> > >> > Yes. Applying these two commits fixes this problem. >> > >> > Thank you. >> >> The commits weren't tagged for -stable, I'm afraid. Peter? > > I must have forgotten people were actually triggering this on 3.0. Feel > free to tell gregkh to include those two patches in his next 3.0-stable > lineup. I have added some more info to the bug report. I can see a similar lockdep issue in 3.1 rc3. dheeraj --