From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jeff Kirsher" Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:12:43 -0700 Message-ID: <9929d2390809231512w160d221axa2923a6b293a041@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080923.140519.268233735.davem@davemloft.net> <21d7e9970809231409r3fdd640h53a72a808266d220@mail.gmail.com> <20080923.150722.141587696.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=cOrhJCYMZ2x9vaOXxx/4Ci7vCUwyzX2UHCGp7vIAF3M=; b=I2yzfp3RezJ4z2xA2cVcVnQ4N/560kdpv6dxpOhTMg9qT82ij6YPdIUeq3KtPsDSVW pR4wyW8RaTHbdXHBOJuZIaxJ5J3LH/m3Vt36+JerIvs5dy1do3LkJ41e0tGJaM8ZUxKZ puroP37S7yhv6wJEitYObjECXaW39N+kOeDMI= In-Reply-To: <20080923.150722.141587696.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: David Miller Cc: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:07 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Dave Airlie" > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:09:09 +1000 > >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:05 AM, David Miller wrote: >> > From: Jiri Kosina >> > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:29:16 +0200 (CEST) >> > >> >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: >> >> >> >> > So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 >> >> > ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were >> >> > definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. >> >> >> >> Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled >> >> into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. >> > >> > My current suspicion in all of this is either the GEM kernel patches >> > or recent X server. >> > >> >> I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. > > Good data point, can someone confirm this? Also, what X server version > is the effected OpenSUSE shipping? > -- OpenSuSE 11 ships x server version 7.3. -- Cheers, Jeff