From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [Bug #12609] v2.6.29-rc2 libata sff 32bit PIO regression Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:48:12 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <499797FD.5070701@lwfinger.net> <4997CDDC.1020103@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4997CDDC.1020103-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Larry Finger , Sergei Shtylyov , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Alan Cox , Mikael Pettersson On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Larry Finger wrote: > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12609 > > > Subject : v2.6.29-rc2 libata sff 32bit PIO regression > > > Submitter : Larry Finger > > > Date : 2009-01-23 23:52 (23 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123275478111406&w=4 > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123254501314058&w=4 > > > Handled-By : Mikael Pettersson > > > Hugh Dickins > > > Sergei Shtylyov > > > Patch : > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123412278730735&w=4 > > > > This problem is not fixed as of 2.6.29-rc5. > > Sergei, what is the latest version of your patch? According to my notes, you > and Hugh were going back and forth trading patches, and I never saw a final > version... I was happy with the patch Sergei posted a week ago, and said so - except for the question of whether to say "unlikely(slop)": and that's a very silly little issue which should never have delayed fixing a significant regression, I'm sorry I ever raised it. But I was expecting Alan to gather the fixes together and send them to you: on 26 Jan he posted two other patches, one perhaps just a cleanup, but the other he said required for correct behaviour on AMD devices: I thought all three patches would be in by now. Hugh