Re: 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35

Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20T19:47:39Z

[Trimming the CC list.]

On Monday, September 20, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> can you please add the following, Thanks in advance.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
> > Subject : Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
> > Submitter : Richard Mittendorfer <delist-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
> > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
> >
> > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
> > know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know
> > if any of the entries below are invalid.
> >
> > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
> > to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
> > the issue.
> >
> >
> > Listed regressions statistics:
> >
> > Date Total Pending Unresolved
> > ----------------------------------------
> > 2010-09-20 38 15 15
> > 2010-09-12 28 14 13
> > 2010-08-30 21 16 15
> >
> >
> > Unresolved regressions
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> can you please add the following Bug, Thanks in advance.
>
> Bug-Entry : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140
> Subject : Suspend To RAM/ Resume broken - Radeon KMS on RV250
> Submitter : Michael Long <harn-solo-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-06-06 09:52
> Message-ID : ???
> References : ???
>
> What is with "Regression: No" in the BR? Change?

Yes, but according to the comments in there, it is a regression from 2.6.33.
I marked is as such and linked it to the appropriate meta-bug entry, but we're
not going to list it, because we only list post-2.6.34 (and post-2.6.35)
regressions in the current cycle.

Thanks,
Rafael