From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alexander Beregalov" Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc6: hpet: object is on stack, but not annotated Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:40:15 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20081204111621.GA2466@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=duqdwJ2lcpDRqK9KX486CwsIb+4Ev9fnxjAV0dsp4Rs=; b=oBD9rXcz2xZQlWVwVm4WOk+FWkjCKjTrpxaGjcUDCDDtP+cdRv6y5kpanEg0gFQeC8 A8HC9UvJewK4NjF6yT5uDa9TYPEaA6TxGnbT4yzamHKBfkzRP1iFtLE9WC30UP1BUxWS 30gzYCDDIRqcsMsdsNfy7GYo0LdyroVKi0ou4= In-Reply-To: <20081204111621.GA2466-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Pavel Machek , Kernel Testers List , LKML , mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org, venkatesh.pallipadi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org 2008/12/4 Pavel Machek : > On Mon 2008-11-24 19:17:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote: >> >> > 2008/11/24 Alexander Beregalov : >> > > hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 0 >> > > hpet0: 3 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter >> > > ODEBUG: object is on stack, but not annotated >> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> > > WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:251 __debug_object_init+0x2a4/0x352() >> > >> > Bisected down to 26afe5f2fbf06ea0765aaa316640c4dd472310c0 >> > (x86: HPET_MSI Initialise per-cpu HPET timers) >> > >> > Revert helps >> >> That's just a warning about a missing annotation. The commit is fine. > > You must be using very different metric of what "fine" means than rest > of the world. > > (No, introducing WARN_ON()s is not fine; it spams kerneloops.org at least...) The warning is still here on 2.6.29-rc1. It taints the kernel.