From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:42:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <4A2BBC30.2030300@lwfinger.net> <84144f020906070640rf5ab14nbf66d3ca7c97675f@mail.gmail.com> <4A2BCC6F.8090004@redhat.com> <84144f020906070732l31786156r5d9753a0cabfde79@mail.gmail.com> <20090608101739.GA15377@csn.ul.ie> <84144f020906080352k57f12ff9pbd696da5f332ac1a@mail.gmail.com> <20090608110303.GD15377@csn.ul.ie> <20090608141212.GE15070@csn.ul.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090608141212.GE15070-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mel Gorman Cc: Pekka J Enberg , Rik van Riel , Larry Finger , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Johannes Berg , Andrew Morton , KOSAKI Motohiro , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Mel Gorman wrote: > In addition, include how many objects there are per-slab and include what > the order is being passed to the page allocator when allocating new slabs. > Would that be enough to determine if fallback-to-smaller orders occured? There is a per slab counter ORDER_FALLBACK that is increased for allocations that required fallback.