From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 17:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI On Tue, 4 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Unresolved regressions > ---------------------- > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880 > Subject : Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def > Submitter : Alex Elsayed > Date : 2010-04-29 2:28 (6 days old) > Message-ID : > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127250825306178&w=2 This looks like it wasn't a regression, but some other compile/install issue. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127274294422719&w=2 where he reports that his self-compiled 2.6.33 doesn't boot either. There's some confusion about .config, but it might well be an install problem too (in fact, that sounds more likely - the original bug-report seems to reboot before the kernel has really even booted - it apparently hasn't done the graphics mode switch by the early bootloader) Linus