From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [Bug #14015] pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <19099.52899.620345.326521@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> <19100.31254.666066.755541@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> <200909012042.59856.rjw@sisk.pl> <19105.5352.28380.230615@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> <19106.16773.461397.654704@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19106.16773.461397.654704-tgku4HJDRZih8lFjZTKsyTAV6s6igYVG@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Alan Cox , Greg KH , Andrew Morton , OGAWA Hirofumi On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > Thanks, I'm testing this and the pty_write() fix on i686 and ppc64 now. > > Sometimes the bug is difficult to trigger, so I may need to do loads of > testing with different gcc versions before I dare to say that it's fixed. Ok, I'm going to commit the two patches, because even if there is some other bug hiding too (and it doesn't fix your thing - although I think it will), this is definitely a real fix regardless. And I want to do a -rc9 and let it get a couple of days of testing, since I got way more pull requests than I hoped for while I was off diving. Linus