From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:15:43 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20080912152443.c4e59f42.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080912152443.c4e59f42.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrew Morton Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11500 > > > Subject : /proc/net bug related to selinux > > > Submitter : Andrew Morton > > > Date : 2008-09-04 17:45 (9 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122055041313270&w=4 > > > > I think this might be a regression caused by namespace changes which we By which I mean, this was caused by a non-SELinux change to the upstream kernel many, many eons ago. > > addressed in SELinux policy. Which distro version & policy version is > > this seen with? > > > > FC5 on x86_32 and FC6 on x86_64. As mentioned in the bugzilla, any related avc messages would be useful. -- James Morris